Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
8 judgments · newest first · showing 1–8
The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, was arrested for allegedly transporting 195 litres of illicit foreign liquor in his car, alleged offences under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he was merely a driver, not the owner of the vehicle, and had no knowledge …
The petitioners, Ranjit Rai and Awdhesh Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 150 litres of liquor near a railway line. They argued that they were not caught in possession, the liquor was recovered from …
The petitioners, Lagan Ray, Subodh Ray and Upendra Ray, feared arrest in connection with a police case (No. 306 of 2025) alleging offences under various sections of the Bihar Negotiable and Security Act and an alleged assault. They contended that they were falsely implicated, had no criminal …
The appellant, Diwakar Kumar, was charged under multiple sections of the Bihar Penal Code and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly demanding money and assaulting an informant. He applied for anticipatory bail, which was rejected by the Additional Sessions Judge. The appellant …
Lalmuni Devi, a 50‑year‑old woman, was implicated in a FIR alleging she, along with co‑accused, abused and assaulted the informant’s family. She contended that the allegations against her were vague, that no specific overt act was ascribed to her, and that she had a clean criminal record. The State …
The petitioner, Shivnandan Paswan, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 68.875 litres of illicit liquor were seized from a vehicle he owned. The driver, Golden Kumar, was arrested at the scene and implicated the petitioner as the …
The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 16 litres of liquor recovered from his joint family house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, that the house is a …
The petitioners, Nanhak Manjhi and Dharmendra Manjhi, were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 40 litres of liquor from a roadside in Mirjapur. They contended that they have no prior criminal record, were not caught in possession, and were …
