Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Lalmuni Devi @ Bhakoli DeviversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court held that the petitioner had made out a prima facie case for pre‑arrest bail and ordered her release on bail.

Summary

Lalmuni Devi, a 50‑year‑old woman, was implicated in a FIR alleging she, along with co‑accused, abused and assaulted the informant’s family. She contended that the allegations against her were vague, that no specific overt act was ascribed to her, and that she had a clean criminal record. The State opposed her request for pre‑arrest bail. The Court examined the nature of the allegations, noted the absence of specific charges against her, and considered her clean antecedent, concluding that she had made out a prima facie case for bail. Accordingly, the Court ordered that she be released on pre‑arrest bail upon surrender to the District Court within four weeks, subject to a bail bond and sureties, and directed verification of her criminal antecedents.

Issues considered

  • Whether a pre‑arrest bail should be granted when the FIR contains general and omnibus allegations without specific overt acts against the accused.
  • Whether the accused’s clean antecedent and the existence of a case‑counter‑case scenario justify bail under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • pre‑arrest bail
  • general allegation
  • clean antecedent
  • Section 482
  • Bihar criminal procedure
  • bail bond

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11230 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-208 Year-2025 Thana- VISHNUPAD District- Gaya
                 ======================================================
                 Lalmuni Devi @ Bhakoli Devi, Female, Aged about 50 years, W/o
                 Brhamanand Paswan @ Varmanand Paswan, R/o West Ramsagar Tank Chand
                 Chaura, P.S.- Vishnupad, District- Gaya, 823001

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s      :      Mr. Ajit Kumar Ojha, Advocate
                                                  Ms. Pratyaksha, Advocate
                                                  Mr. Mritunjay Kumar, Advocate
                                                  Mr. Kuldeep Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Arun Kumar Singh, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   06-05-2026                          Heard Mr. Ajit Kumar Ojha, learned counsel

                   appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Arun Kumar

                   Singh, learned APP for the State.

                                 2. The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection

                   with Vishnupad P.S. Case No. 208 of 2025, registered for the

                   offence punishable under Sections 191(2), 190, 126(2), 115(2),

                   118(1), 117(2), 118(2), 329(3), 76, 308(2), 303(2) and 109 of the

                   BNS.

                                 3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, petitioner

                   along with other co-accused persons, had abused and assaulted

                   the informant and his family members causing injury.

                                 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11230 of 2026(4) dt.06-05-2026
                                            2/3




          petitioner submitted that petitioner is innocent and she has

          falsely been implicated in the present case. He further submitted

          that general and omnibus allegation has been levelled against

          the petitioner. Allegation against the petitioner is that she had

          abused the wife of the informant. No specific allegation of

          assault or any overt act is alleged against the petitioner. There is

          case and counter case between the parties. Petitioner has clean

          antecedent. On these grounds, petitioner seeks to be released on

          pre-arrest bail.

                       5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the

          prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail.

                       6. Considering the rival submissions made on behalf

          of the parties, as well as, the fact that general and omnibus

          allegation has been levelled against the petitioner. No specific

          allegation of any overt act is alleged against the petitioner. There

          is case and counter case between the parties. Petitioner has clean

          antecedent. I am of the opinion that petitioner has, prima facie,

          made out a case to be released on pre-arrest bail.

                       7. The petitioner, above named, is directed to be

          released on pre-arrest bail, in the event of his/her arrest or

          surrender before the learned District Court within a period of

          four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11230 of 2026(4) dt.06-05-2026
                                                          3/3




                        (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

                        each to the satisfaction of the learned District Court where the

                        case is pending, in connection with Vishnupad P.S. Case No.

                        208 of 2025, subject to the condition as laid down under Section

                        482(2) of the BNSS.

                                     8. The learned District Court is directed to verify

                        the criminal antecedent of the petitioner as stated in

                        paragraph no. 3 of the bail application. If any other case is

                        pending against the petitioner as what has been stated in

                        paragraph no. 3, this order will lose its force automatically.



                                                  (Purnendu Singh, J)
Niraj/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.