Sakina Khatoon, the mother‑in‑law of an accused, filed a bail application in the Patna High Court. She sought to withdraw that application and instead surrender before the District Court to obtain regular bail, contending that she had been falsely implicated while the main allegation was against a …
The petitioner, Sunil Kumar Singh, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a criminal case alleging fraud in a land sale, invoking sections 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 318(4) of the BNS. Both the petitioner and the informant (who is also the petitioner’s nephew) agreed that the dispute is essentially civil and …
The petitioners, three brothers, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bihar Negotiable Statutes (BNS) alleging a common intention to kill and assault of an informant's family. The FIR specifically alleged that petitioner No.3 assaulted the informant's son, …
Ladan Khan filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court in a criminal miscellaneous case arising from PS Charpokhari. During the proceedings, the petitioner, through counsel, sought to withdraw the bail application. The court considered the petitioner's request to withdraw. No …
The petitioners Khabir, Ameen and Azhar were arrested in connection with a case alleging kidnapping, rape, and video recording of the victim, the informant's daughter, under Section 70(1) of the BNS. They contended that they were falsely implicated because the victim and co‑accused Musfique were in …
Vinay Kumar and Kundan Kumar were named in FIR No.257/2025 for offences including assault, outraging modesty and theft. They sought pre‑arrest bail, asserting that they were falsely implicated due to a personal enmity. The State opposed the bail. The High Court found specific allegations against …
The petitioner, Arun Mandal, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a complaint alleging cheating under IPC sections 420, 467, 468 and 120(B) arising from a disputed land sale where Rs.2,00,000 was paid in advance. The petitioner claimed innocence, argued that the dispute was essentially civil, and sought …
The petitioners Jitendra Kumar and Santosh Kumar were arrested in connection with FIR No. 259/2025 alleging they abused the informant's mother, called her a witch and snatched a jitiya. They claimed innocence, stating the incident stemmed from a petty neighbour dispute and that they have clean …
The petitioners, five accused persons, sought pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Sections 191(2), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 74, 117(2), 109 and 303 of the BNS for allegedly assaulting an informant and her family with intent to kill. The State opposed bail, pointing out that the injury report of a …
Sudheer Kumar Singh and Jyoti Prakash applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case where the FIR alleges they assaulted an informant over a failed vehicle transaction, charging them under several sections of the BNS. The petitioners contend that the dispute is essentially civil, that no injury was caused, …
The petitioner, Sandeep Mishra, filed a bail application before the Patna High Court in Criminal Miscellaneous No.11199 of 2026. The petitioner’s counsel later sought to withdraw the bail application and requested liberty to surrender before the learned District Court and apply for regular bail. The …
Petitioner Rajesh Kumar Das applied for anticipatory bail in a criminal case. While the bail application was pending, he was arrested. The petitioner, through counsel, sought to withdraw the bail application on the ground of his arrest. The learned judge considered the request to withdraw the …
The petitioners Jitendra Kumar and Santosh Kumar were arrested in connection with FIR No. 259/2025 alleging they abused the informant's mother, called her a witch and snatched a jitiya. They claimed innocence, stating the incident stemmed from a petty neighbour dispute and that they have clean …
The petitioner, Chanchal Kumar, sought pre‑arrest bail in an excise case (S.T. Excise Case No.1088/2025) alleging that illicit liquor was recovered from the house of a co‑accused, Golu Yadav, and that he had no involvement. He claimed innocence, a clean criminal record, and no connection to the …
The petitioner, Raj Kumar, was implicated in a case (Bypass PS Case No.79 of 2026) for alleged possession of 56 litres of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The liquor was recovered from a roadside sack, an open space accessible to anyone, and the petitioner …
The petitioner, Dwarika Prasad Yadav, the owner of a motorcycle, was implicated in an excise case for the recovery of two litres of country‑made liquor from his vehicle, alleged to violate Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. He applied for pre‑arrest bail, …
Vikesh Kumar and Hari Nandan Kumar, both students, were named in an FIR for assaulting an informant and her family with intent to kill, alleged under several sections of the Bihar Penal Code. They applied for pre‑arrest bail, arguing they had no specific overt act attributed to them, were merely …
Kanhaiya Bhagat was implicated in a FIR alleging that he, along with co‑accused, assaulted an informant and his family with the intention to kill, invoking several sections of the Bihar Penal Code. The petitioner applied for pre‑arrest bail, claiming innocence, false implication, a five‑day delay in …
The petitioner, Govind Kumar, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 12 litres of country‑made liquor from a motorcycle. He contended that he was falsely implicated due to personal enmity and that the …
The petitioner, Bittu Kumar, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a kidnapping case (Simri P.S. Case No. 318 of 2025) alleged under Sections 137(2) and 96 of the BNS. The FIR claimed he abducted the minor daughter of an informant, but the victim’s statement under Section 183 BNSS disclosed a consensual …
The petitioner, Umesh Roy, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 60 litres of illicit liquor from an open bush. He claimed false implication, no involvement in liquor trade, and a clean antecedent, …
The petitioner, Gautam Yadav, sought pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 17 litres of country‑made liquor seized during a police raid. The FIR alleged that the liquor was linked to the petitioner based solely on …
The petitioner, Md Parvez, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a forest case alleging that he had lawfully purchased forest land and constructed on it, relying on a registered sale deed. The prosecution contended that he had contravened Sections 30 and 33 of the Indian Forest (Bihar Amendment) Act, 1989 …
The petitioners, who are agnates involved in a land dispute, were charged under multiple sections of the B.N.S. and Section 12 of the POCSO Act for allegedly assaulting an informant and his family with weapons. They contended that the allegations were general and omnibus, that the incident arose …
The petitioners, Ajay Ram and Akshay Ram, applied for pre‑arrest (anticipatory) bail in a case arising from a land‑dispute‑related FIR alleging multiple offences under the Bihar Penal Code. Akshay Ram withdrew his bail application and was directed to surrender before the District Court for regular …
The petitioner, a 19‑year‑old male, was charged under IPC Sections 366, 366A and POCSO Act Section 8 for allegedly kidnapping the minor daughter of an informant. He sought pre‑arrest bail, asserting that the relationship with the girl was consensual and that her statement recorded under Section 164 …
The petitioner, Bablu Sharma, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 69, 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, alleging a physical relationship with the informant, Rehna Khatoon, who was living separately from her husband. The petitioner sought pre‑arrest …
The appellant Hans Lal Rai was convicted under Section 395 IPC for a dacoity that allegedly occurred in 1994, based primarily on the testimony of the informant (PW‑3) who identified him in court but not during investigation. The appellant challenged the conviction, arguing that the two other …
The petitioners, Ravindra Singh and his son Amulya Singh, applied to the Patna High Court seeking a further extension of time to surrender before the learned District Court and to furnish a bail bond, pursuant to an earlier order dated 23 February 2026 in Criminal Appeal (SJ) No. 4460 of 2025. The …
The petitioner, Md. Kalim Khan, filed a contempt petition in the Patna High Court against the Principal Secretary to the Governor of Bihar. The petition alleged that the respondent had committed contempt of court. During the hearing on 5 May 2026, the petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Sanjay Kumar, moved to …
The petitioner, Firoj Alam, was implicated in a theft case (Sathi PS Case No.251/2025) alleging that electronic items were stolen from a school computer lab. The FIR claimed the petitioner possessed the stolen articles, but the items were actually recovered from the informant’s house and no …
The petitioners, five members of the Yadav family, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case arising from a land dispute where an FIR alleged assault, firing and other offences under several sections of the Bihar Non‑Applicable Special (BNS) Act. The FIR was based on a written report by a relative and …
The petitioner, Rajdeo Bhagat, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a complaint alleging offences under IPC Sections 420, 406 and 506, arising from a dispute over a Rs 3.70 lakh loan. The complainant claimed the petitioner failed to return the money and threatened him. Both parties expressed a desire to …
The petitioners, Sarwan Kumar and Pawan Kumar Das, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the BNS, alleging that they injured an informant and his sons during a land‑dispute but without intent to kill. They argued that the …
Roshan Kumar was arrested in connection with a case under Section 69 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, alleged to have engaged in a sexual relationship with the informant on a false promise of marriage and subsequently refusing to marry. The petitioner sought pre‑arrest bail, arguing that both …
The petitioners, Urmila Devi and her son Abhishek Kumar, sought pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Sections 96, 3(5) of the BNS and Sections 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act. They claimed they were falsely implicated and argued that the alleged victim, the informant’s daughter, had voluntarily …
The petitioners sought pre‑arrest bail in a case involving alleged assaults and robbery under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Statutes. The FIR alleged that the accused had assaulted an informant, his mother, and brother, and had stolen a gold chain. The court noted that no specific …
Rahul Kumar, a 20‑year‑old, was charged with kidnapping the minor daughter of an informant for the purpose of marriage, under Sections 137(2), 96, 303(2), 3(5) of the Bihar Negotiable Statutes (BNS) and Section 4 of the POCSO Act. He applied for pre‑arrest bail, claiming the girl consented to leave …
Gorelal Yadav was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 103(1), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the BNS. He filed an application for regular bail before the Patna High Court. The petitioner was represented by Mr. Bipin Kumar, while the State was represented by Mr. Nand Kishore Prasad, …
Birendra Ram, who had obtained pre‑arrest bail in Criminal Miscellaneous No.37514 of 2025, was arrested in a different criminal case before he could surrender as ordered by the District Court. He filed a modification petition seeking relief from the bail order. The High Court, after noting the …
The petitioners, Somendra and Nagendra Kamat, applied for pre‑arrest (anticipatory) bail in a case registered under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code for alleged assault, unlawful assembly, and robbery during a Durga Puja event. Their earlier anticipatory bail application had been rejected …
The petitioner, Md. Jahid @ Afroj, was charged in Bhagwanpur Police Station Case No. 07 of 2024 for offences under Sections 328, 302 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code, relating to attempt to murder, murder and criminal conspiracy. He applied for regular bail before the Patna High Court. The …
The petitioner, Parmanand Yadav, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case arising from a land dispute where he was alleged to have entered an informant's house armed and assaulted family members. The petitioner claimed innocence and that the matter was purely civil, seeking an amicable settlement. The …
Mala Devi applied for pre‑arrest bail in a complaint case (No. 347/2022) alleging that she dishonoured a cheque of Rs 7 lakhs, invoking Sections 406, 420 IPC and Section 138 NI Act. The court observed that the dispute was essentially a civil one concerning a friendly loan and that the complaint …
The petitioners, Ramdev and Dhiraj, sought pre‑arrest (anticipatory) bail in connection with PS‑Maharajganj Case No. 143 of 2020, which alleged offences under Sections 147, 341, 342, 323, 324, 307 and 435 of the IPC for assaulting an informant and setting fire to his hut. They contended that the …
The petitioner, Sudhir Kumar, sought pre‑arrest bail in a theft case (Barh P.S. Case No. 415 of 2024) involving alleged violations of Sections 461, 379 and 414 of the Indian Penal Code. The FIR alleged that rice bags were stolen from a godown and that the petitioner was implicated based on a …
The petitioner, Ravi Kumar Singh, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Sections 137(2) and 96 of the BNS and Section 6 of the POCSO Act. The court examined the seriousness of the allegations, noting the victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the BNSS and a supporting …
The appellants were convicted by the trial court for offences under Sections 307/34 and 323 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly assaulting the informant Chhabilal Ram on a dark night, resulting in a head injury. They appealed, contending that the sole eyewitnesses were interested, the …
The appellants were convicted by the trial court for offences under Sections 307/34 and 323 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly assaulting the informant Chhabilal Ram on a dark night, resulting in a head injury. They appealed, contending that the sole eyewitnesses were interested, the …
The petitioner, Kamindra Kumar, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly assaulting the husband of an informant with an iron rod. The assault, though resulting in a simple injury, was described as being carried out with a clear …
Sonu Kumar was arrested in connection with a case alleging rape of a minor, the informant's granddaughter, under multiple statutes including the Bihar Penal Code, the POCSO Act and the SC/ST Act. The victim’s statement under Section 183 of the Bihar Penal Code identified another accused, Ravindra …
Ajay Bhagat and Rambabu Bhagat applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under multiple sections of the BNS for allegedly assaulting an informant, her mother‑in‑law and outraging the informant's daughter. The FIR alleges that the informant sustained a head injury that could be serious. The …
Santlal Mahto (73) and Munna Mahto (30) were implicated in a FIR alleging assault with intent to kill and related offences under Sections 126(3), 115(2), 109, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bihar Penal Code. The petitioners claimed they were falsely implicated, stating a case‑and‑counter‑case arose …
Indal Yadav sought protection from arrest in a criminal case (PS No.198/2025) alleging assault with intent to kill the informant and his family. Both parties, who are neighbours, expressed a desire to settle the dispute amicably and referred to the Apex Court’s decision in Naushey Ali (2025). The …
The petitioner, Ghutuk Miyan, was accused in an FIR of raping the informant in the presence of her 11‑year‑old son. The petitioner applied for pre‑arrest bail, arguing that the allegation was doubtful, the medical examination showed no recent sexual assault, and the FIR was motivated by a monetary …
The petitioner, Vivek Ranjan, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case where the FIR alleges he induced an informant to invest Rs 50 lakhs in a financial scheme and failed to repay, amounting to alleged cheating. The petitioner contended that he merely acted as a broker for a builder and that the …
The petitioner, Ranjan Kumar, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case (Maner P.S. Case No. 527 of 2024) alleging his involvement in the murder of an informant's husband. The FIR originally named eight accused, but the bail application mistakenly claimed the petitioner was also named; the petitioner …
Anju Devi, the petitioner, had applied for bail in a criminal miscellaneous case. She later sought to withdraw the bail application and surrender before the District Court to obtain regular bail. The High Court considered the submission and allowed the withdrawal, directing the District Court to …
Petitioner Pradeep Kumar Mishra applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case (Bahera PS Case No. 442/2025) alleging attempted sexual assault, assault, and theft under several sections of the Bihar Penal Code and Sections 8 and 12 of the Protection of Children From Sexual Offences Act. The petitioner …
The petitioners, Samir Nath Jha and his wife, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case where an informant alleged that they received Rs 6.20 lakh for a land transaction that was never completed and the amount was not returned. The petitioners contended that the matter is a civil monetary dispute and …
The appellants MD Mausam and the late MD Naushad were convicted under Sections 25(1‑AA) and 26(2) of the Arms Act for allegedly operating a mini‑gun factory at their house, based on a police raid and seizure of pistols and manufacturing equipment. The prosecution’s case relied solely on police …
The appellants were convicted for assaulting the complainant's family and stealing valuables after a quarrel between children, and were sentenced to six months' simple imprisonment under Sections 323 and 34 of the IPC. They appealed, contending that the prosecution failed to prove an attempt to …
Anil Kumar Singh, a director of Horizon Infab Private Limited, sought pre‑arrest bail in a complaint alleging criminal breach of trust, cheating, and conspiracy under IPC sections 406, 420 and 34, relating to the alleged fraudulent transfer of shares and misappropriation of company assets. The …
The petitioners, eight villagers from Karanj, were charged under several sections of the Bihar Non‑Compulsory Statutes for allegedly assaulting an informant, stealing her gold earring and attempting to outrage her modesty. They applied for pre‑arrest bail, claiming innocence and that the FIR …
The petitioner, Santosh Manjhi, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Sections 105, 74, 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the BNS, alleging that he had no mens rea for the death of an informant’s grandfather and that the FIR only shows a generic allegation of a push. The State opposed, …
The petitioners, Rambhajan Yadav and Pugal Yadav, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under several sections of the Bihar Non‑... (BNS) for allegedly assaulting a victim with an iron rod and lathi. They claimed innocence, alleging that the FIR was motivated by local political rivalry …
The petitioners applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case (Ghoghardiha P.S. Case No. 164/2024) involving alleged assault with firearms and other offences under the Indian Penal Code. The FIR alleged that the petitioners, along with others, attacked an Airtel employee, causing head injuries and …
The petitioners, Nidhi Devi, Ajay Kumar and Manisha Devi, filed an anticipatory bail application in the High Court of Patna. They later sought to withdraw that application, requesting liberty to surrender before the District Court and obtain regular bail. The Court considered the request and allowed …
The petitioners, Md. Muktar Sekh and Rocky Sk, feared arrest in connection with a case where 55 cows were seized and they were charged under sections 303(2), 317(5), 317(2), 3(5) of the BNS and sections 11(a), (d), (e), (f) of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960. They argued that they …
The petitioners, Vikash Kumar and Bittu Kumar, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 352 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, alleging they were falsely implicated due to a land dispute. The FIR alleges that Vikash assaulted the informant with an …
The petitioner, Mithlesh Kumar, was arrested in connection with a kidnapping allegation under Sections 137(2), 96 and 3(5) of the Bihar Negotiable Sale Act (BNSS). The informant, the victim's mother, claimed the petitioner abducted her minor daughter for marriage, but the victim’s statement under …
Arvind Sah and Anand Kumar were charged under multiple sections of the Bihar Non‑Cognizable Offences Act for allegedly assaulting an informant and his mother in a land‑dispute. They contended that the incident was a spontaneous fight in self‑defence, resulting only in simple injuries, and asserted …
The petitioner, Veeru Banjara, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act (BNS) relating to assault and homicide. The FIR alleges that the petitioner, along with co‑accused, assaulted the informant and his mother, leading to the …
The petitioners, three brothers, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under several sections of the Indian Penal Code relating to assault, theft and other offences arising from a land dispute. The State opposed the bail. The court examined the allegations, finding that Janardan Yadav was …
The petitioners, Ram Sogarath Bhagat and Ramadhar Bhagat, were implicated in a FIR alleging assault, robbery, and outraging the modesty of a woman arising from a land dispute in Madhuban, East Champaran. They applied for pre‑arrest (anticipatory) bail, claiming innocence, lack of any weapon …
The petitioners, four brothers, applied for pre‑arrest bail in connection with a case alleging assault and attempted murder. Petitioner's No.2 was arrested during the pendency of an anticipatory bail application, leading to the withdrawal of his bail request. The court found that petitioners No.1 …
Ramjee Yadav petitioned the Patna High Court for pre‑arrest (anticipatory) bail in a case arising from a 2005 incident where an informant alleged that Yadav and others, armed with firearms, shot at him and stole his watch. The FIR was lodged on 17‑04‑2005, but the police charge‑sheet of 2006 named …
Petitioner Ashok Kumar Jaipuriar filed a contempt application against the State of Bihar and several officials. The petitioner, through counsel, sought to withdraw the contempt proceedings. The Court considered the request for withdrawal. No substantive discussion on merits was required. The Court …
The petitioner, a Group C employee of the Bureau of Indian Standards, challenged a transfer order from Patna to Madurai through multiple writ petitions, the latest being CWJC No.14325 of 2024, which directed the respondents to communicate the action taken on his representation dated 12 July 2024. …
The petitioner, M/s Priyadarshi Resort and Hotel Ltd, filed a civil review seeking deletion of certain paragraphs in a contempt application. The petitioner’s counsel requested the court’s permission to amend the contempt pleading, arguing procedural impropriety. The High Court granted the request, …
Petitioner Pradeep Paswan applied to the Patna High Court seeking a modification of the order dated 22 March 2025, which required him to surrender and furnish a bail bond before the District Court. The petitioner pleaded for a further extension of time, supporting the request with reasons and an …
Ajit Rai, the petitioner, filed a modification application seeking to withdraw it and obtain liberty to surrender before the District Court and apply for regular bail. The petitioner’s counsel requested the court’s permission to withdraw the modification and to be allowed to surrender. The court …
The petitioner, Vagisha Kumari, filed a contempt petition against the State of Bihar and several officials alleging non‑compliance with a prior order. The petition sought relief for the alleged contempt. On 24‑04‑2026, counsel for the petitioner informed the court that the order under contempt had …
Arvind Kumar filed a petition seeking restoration of Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 15045 of 2021, which had been dismissed for non‑prosecution on 4 July 2025. The petitioner submitted a restoration application supported by an affidavit, arguing that the dismissal was not warranted. The learned …
The petitioner, Krishna Prasad, filed a contempt application against several officials of the North Eastern Railway. The application sought to hold the railway officials in contempt of court. During the hearing on 24-04-2026, the petitioner’s counsel requested to withdraw the contempt application. …
Shyam Sunder Poddar filed a contempt petition in the Patna High Court against several officials of the Education Department and two universities. The petitioner claimed a grievance that he alleged had not been addressed. During the hearing on 24-04-2026, counsel for the petitioner informed the Court …
Gyanti Kumari filed a civil writ petition against the State of Bihar and several education officials seeking relief. The petitioner claimed that the order dated 25 July 2023 in CWJC No. 3814 of 2023 had not been fully complied with. The court examined the record and found that the order had been …
The petitioner, Surya Mani Choudhary, filed a modification application seeking correction of a clerical error in the bail order dated 27-08-2025, where the court name was incorrectly recorded as "Learned Special Judge Excise-02, Samastipur" instead of "Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur". …
The petitioner, Shailendra Kumar, filed an application seeking restoration of Criminal Miscellaneous No. 78102 of 2024, which had been dismissed for failure to comply with a peremptory order dated 29.01.2025. The petitioner argued that the dismissal was procedural and that the case should be …
The petitioners, Arun Kumar and Dinesh Kumar, were arrested after police seized 35 litres of illicit liquor from motorcycles and alleged they were freed by a mob. They claimed they were falsely implicated due to personal enmity and had no involvement with the liquor or motorcycles. The State opposed …
The petitioners, Bali Paswan, Shadhu Paswan and Chhotelal Paswan, were implicated in a 2017 case alleging assault with intent to kill under multiple IPC sections. They claimed innocence, stating the dispute arose from a land conflict resulting in a case and counter‑case, with injuries not to vital …
Reyazul Ansari applied for pre‑arrest (anticipatory) bail in a case registered under Sections 21(b), 23(b) and 24 of the NDPS Act. The High Court examined the nature and gravity of the alleged offences and considered whether the anticipatory bail application was maintainable. The Court held that, …
The petitioner, Rajan Sharma, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition (No.10864 of 2026) before the Patna High Court seeking relief. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel requested to withdraw the petition and to surrender before the district court, seeking regular bail. The Court considered …
The petitioners, Shyam Sundar Kumar and Hardev Mahto, were implicated in FIR No. 230 of 2025 under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, for alleged assault, robbery and threats during a land dispute. They contended that the allegations were false, arising as a counter‑blast to an …
The appellant, Nageshwar Singh, filed an interim application (I.A. No. 1514 of 2012) seeking bail in a criminal trial (Sessions Trial No. 217 of 2009). Earlier, the High Court had rejected his bail plea on 26 August 2011. While hearing the interim application, the Court considered the appellant's …
The petitioners, who are the parents‑in‑law and brother‑in‑law of a deceased woman, sought pre‑arrest bail after being implicated in a dowry‑death case registered under Sections 80, 238 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The FIR alleged dowry‑related torture and murder, but the …
Nitish Kumar was arrested in connection with PS case No.258 of 2025 for alleged offences under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act. He applied for pre‑arrest bail, arguing that the nature of injury reported by the doctor did not warrant continued detention. The court, after hearing …
Dilip Kumar applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case (PS‑380/2025) alleging land fraud involving forged identity documents and threats. The FIR alleges that the accused induced the informant to purchase land, paid most of the consideration in cash, and used forged documents. The petitioner contended …
Nawal Kumar petitioned for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Sections 316(2), 318(4) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023, arising from a disputed land transaction where alleged impersonation of landowners led to a criminal complaint. The petitioner claimed the matter was …
Jagar Nath Rai was accused in Bheldi Police Station Case No. 205 of 2025 for assaulting an informant and her son, causing simple head injuries, under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner claimed innocence and argued that the injuries were minor, seeking pre‑arrest bail. The …
Mamta Devi and Vimla Devi, mother and grandmother of the accused Basist Kumar, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a kidnapping case involving a minor girl under Sections 96 and 3(5) of the BNS and Sections 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act. The FIR alleged that Basist Kumar kidnapped the girl, but the victim’s …
The petitioners, Ugendra Kumar and Babita Kumari, were implicated in a FIR alleging assault on an informant and his son under multiple sections of the BNS. They contended that the incident arose from a mutual free fight and that any injuries inflicted were in self‑defence, without criminal intent, …
Deepak Kumar (Deepak Yadav) was arrested in a kidnapping case alleging he abducted the minor daughter of an informant with intent to marry her. He applied for pre‑arrest bail, claiming innocence, a clean criminal record, and that the victim’s statement under Section 183 BNSS did not support the …
The petitioners, Nidhi Devi, Ajay Kumar and Manisha Devi, filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal case arising from PS. Case No.339 of 2025. They later sought to withdraw this application, requesting liberty to surrender before the District Court and to apply for regular bail. The High …
Mahesh Rai and Vipin Kumar sought protection from arrest in a criminal case (Sonepur P.S. Case No. 828 of 2025) alleging assault on an informant and his brothers under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act. They claimed innocence and expressed a desire to settle the dispute …
The petitioner, Wasim Ahmad, was charged under IPC sections 420, 504 and 506 for allegedly cheating Ranjeet Kumar of Rs 5 lakh in a purported vehicle purchase. The informant claimed he paid Rs 2.5 lakh each, but the vehicle was never delivered and the money was not returned. The petitioner denied …
The petitioner, Krishna Kumar, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a kidnapping case (PS‑750/2025) alleging the kidnapping of a minor under Sections 137(2) and 96 of the BNS. The victim’s statement under Section 183 BNSS did not support the prosecution’s claim and instead indicated she had married the …
The petitioner, Surendra Kumar, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case (Thakraha P.S. Case No. 74 of 2023) involving alleged contravention of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where police seized 16.4 litres of illicit liquor from a motorcycle. He contended that he was merely the …
Lotan Paswan was arrested in connection with Parsa Bazar PS Case No. 478 of 2025 for alleged assault on an informant under several sections of the BNS. The petitioner claimed innocence, arguing that no medical injury report existed to substantiate the alleged assault. The learned District Court had …
The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case (PS Case No. 30 of 2026) alleging violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the recovery of 99 litres of foreign liquor from a tempo. He claimed he was falsely implicated due to police enmity and that …
The petitioner, Chandan Kumar Paswan, filed a bail application in the Patna High Court in connection with a criminal case (PS Case No. 54 of 2026). He later sought to withdraw the bail application, and his counsel requested permission to do so. The Court, after hearing counsel for both parties, …
The petitioners, Markande Singh and Chunnu Singh, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 74, 352, 109 and 3(5) of the BNS, arising from a land‑registration dispute that led to alleged assault on the informant’s family. The FIR alleged that after the death of …
The petitioner, Subhash Chand, the owner of a truck, was charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for transporting a large quantity of foreign liquor. He applied for pre‑arrest bail. The court examined the facts, noting the huge seizure of liquor from the truck and the …
Sarfaraz Alam applied for pre‑arrest bail after being charged under several provisions of the Bihar Nativity and Security Act, 2023, corresponding IPC sections and Section 67 of the Income‑Tax Act for allegedly subjecting his informant, Chandtara Khatoon, to cruelty, refusing cohabitation and …
Vinod Kumar Gupta, the owner of two vehicles, was implicated in a case (PS Case No.166 of 2022) where police seized 628.5 litres of illicit liquor. He was charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018. The petitioner contended that he had no knowledge of the …
The petitioner, Molu Kumar, was charged under Sections 341, 323 and 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code (and corresponding sections of the Bihar Negotiable Statutes) for allegedly assaulting and attempting to kill the son of an informant. The petitioner sought pre‑arrest bail, arguing that only a single …
The petitioner, Janweer, sought pre‑arrest bail in a complaint alleging he tortured his wife, Asro Khatoon, over dowry demands, invoking sections 85, 115(2), 303(2), 352, 351(2)(3) and 3(5) of the Bihar Negotiable (BNS) Act. The petitioner claimed the allegations were false, asserted a clean record, …
The petitioner, Ajay Chaudhary, was implicated in G.O. Case No.558 of 2015 for alleged offences under Section 47(A)(F) of the Excise Act, with police seizing 300 kg of illicit liquor. He applied for pre‑arrest bail, asserting that he is neither a licencee nor involved in the preparation of …
The petitioners, Baban Nut and Jodhan Nut, were implicated in a case (Baniyapur PS Case No. 584/2025) for alleged possession of 116 litres of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. They applied for pre‑arrest bail, claiming innocence, clean antecedents, and that …
The petitioner, Pankaj Kumar Sinha, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 35 litres of illicit liquor recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He claimed he was not present at the time of seizure and had merely lent …
The petitioners, five brothers, were charged under several sections of the Bihar Penal Code for alleged assault, attempted outrage of modesty, and other offences arising from a dispute over a land transaction. They sought pre‑arrest bail, contending that the dispute was purely civil, stemming from …
Chotu @ Nandu Paswan applied for pre‑arrest (anticipatory) bail in a case registered under Sections 8(c) and 21(b) of the NDPS Act. The petitioner argued that bail should be granted pending investigation. The Court examined the nature and gravity of offences under the NDPS Act and considered whether …
Manish Kumar was arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 750 ml of illicit liquor. He applied for pre‑arrest bail, claiming innocence and a clean antecedent. The State opposed the bail, but the High Court, after …
The petitioner, Arvind Yadav, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 135.180 litres of illicit liquor recovered from a forest under a bridge. The petitioner claimed innocence, a clean antecedent, and …
The petitioner, Sanjog Dhangar, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case where 60 litres of illicit liquor was recovered from an open area behind his house, alleged under Sections 30(a) and 41(i) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He claimed innocence, asserting that the open space is accessible …
The petitioners, a group of ten men from Malharia Tola, were charged in FIR No. 213 of 2025 for assault, outraging the modesty of female family members, and theft of gold ornaments, invoking multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code. They applied for pre‑arrest bail, claiming innocence and arguing …
The petitioner, Laxmi Kumari, sought pre‑arrest bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 21.885 litres of illicit liquor recovered from a tempo she owned. She claimed she was not present at the time of seizure and that the vehicle was being …
The petitioner, Chandra Bhushan Kumar, was implicated in a FIR alleging assault with an iron rod resulting in injuries to the informant, under several sections of the BNS. He claimed innocence, asserting that the dispute arose from a land conflict and that the injuries were simple in nature. The …
The petitioner, Haidar Alam, was implicated in FIR No.420 of 2025 for allegedly assaulting police officers with lathi‑danda and rods, causing injuries and setting fire to a National Highways vehicle, invoking numerous sections of the BNS and Section 8(B) of the National Highways Act. He applied for …
Kishore Sahni was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged possession of 420 litres of illicit liquor recovered from an open area called Murahi Diyara. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated and had no connection with the recovered …
The petitioners, Gulab Paswan, Kundan Paswan, Rajani Devi and Ram Bilash Paswan, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a murder case (PS Case No.103 of 2025) alleging they were falsely implicated in the killing of the informant's son. They contended that the informant was not an eye‑witness and that they …
The petitioner, Kaushal Yadav, sought pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 250 litres of illicit liquor from an open pond. He claimed innocence, a clean criminal record, and argued that the liquor was …
Petitioner Rajesh Kumar was arrested in connection with an alleged offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for possession of 10.335 litres of illicit liquor seized from his house. He contended that the seizure was illegal because the authorities did not obtain the …
Asharfi Mahto applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case where 20 litres of country‑made liquor were recovered from an open area and he was charged under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He claimed he was falsely …
Brajesh Rai applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case (PS‑Rajepur Case No. 24 of 2026) under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The police had seized a large quantity of foreign liquor from a truck, a Bolero and a motorcycle, and the petitioner was already involved in four similar …
The petitioner, Tabarak Ansari, was implicated in a complaint (Case No. 1668 of 2004) alleging arson under Section 436 of the IPC, with the alleged incident occurring on 15 June 2004 but the complaint filed only on 25 August 2024. He learned of the case on 28 November 2025 and was served with a …
Petitioner Raj Kumar Ray applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case (Tilkeshwar P.S. Case No. 13 of 2026) alleging that six litres of foreign liquor were recovered from a motorcycle, constituting an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner claimed he was falsely …
The petitioner, Lakhindra Paswan, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case where 15 litres of illicit country‑made liquor were recovered from a banana orchard near his house. The offence alleged is punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner claimed he was …
The petitioner, Lala Yadav, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 35.625 litres of foreign liquor from co‑accused Manish Kumar. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated, had no involvement with …
Pandit Kishku (Manoj Kishku) was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 25 litres of mahua liquor from a gallon. He claimed he was falsely implicated due to personal enmity, had no involvement with the seized liquor, and possessed …
Nitesh Kumar, a 19‑year‑old, was arrested in connection with a kidnapping case involving the minor daughter of an informant, alleged under Sections 137(2) and 96 of the BNS and Section 8 of the POCSO Act. The petitioner claimed the girl, aged about 14‑16, voluntarily accompanied him to Mumbai in a …
Luta Yadav was convicted by the Fast Track Court in Jamui for assaulting an informant and his wife with a garasa, resulting in injuries, and was sentenced to two years' rigorous imprisonment under Section 324 IPC. He appealed under CrPC sections 374(2) and 389(1), contending that the prosecution …
The petitioner, Pappu Turha, sought pre‑arrest bail fearing arrest in connection with FIR No. 401 of 2025 filed under Sections 20(b)(ii)(c), 25 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act. The High Court examined the seriousness of the allegations under the NDPS Act and was …
Birbal Yadav was arrested in 2007 after police seized 1.5 kg of narcotics and a country‑made pistol with ammunition. He was convicted under Sections 20(ii)(B) and 22(A) of the NDPS Act and sentenced to seven years rigorous imprisonment, a fine of Rs.40,000 and, in default of fine payment, an …
The petitioner, Raja Ram Chauhan, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(2), 303(2), 352, 351(2), 351(3) and 3(5) of the BNS, alleging assault, robbery and grievous hurt. The FIR alleged that the petitioner held the husband of the informant while a …
The petitioners, brothers of the informant, were implicated in a FIR alleging assault with a sharp weapon in a family property dispute. They argued that the allegations were vague, unsupported by independent witnesses, and that no injury was recorded, emphasizing their clean criminal record. The …
The petitioner, Pratap Kumar, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case where he is charged under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Sale Act, 2023 and Section 8 of the POCSO Act, 2012 for allegedly catching the hand of the informant’s minor daughter and attempting to abduct her, leading to a …
The petitioners, four members of the Pandey family, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case (Buxar Muffasil P.S. Case No. 367/2025) alleging offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109 and 3(5) of the Bihar Negotiable Sale Act. The FIR alleged that they assaulted an informant and his relatives …
The petitioner, Rahul Kumar Chauhan, sought pre‑arrest bail for offences alleged under several IPC sections, alleging he was falsely implicated due to village politics and enmity. The FIR claimed he and others intercepted an informant’s auto and assaulted him with iron rods and a pistol, causing a …
The appellant Yogendra Sah was convicted under Section 20(b)(ii)(B) of the NDPS Act for possession of 8.5 kg of ganja, based solely on the testimony of S.S.B. officials. The appellant appealed under CrPC Section 374(2), arguing that the prosecution failed to comply with mandatory search‑seizure …
The appellants were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge for offences under Sections 406, 323 and 354 of the IPC arising from a dowry‑related complaint by the victim Anita Devi, who alleged cruelty, assault and miscarriage. On appeal, the appellants contended that the prosecution case rested …
The appellant was convicted in 2011 for rape under Section 376 IPC based on the allegation that he assaulted a 14‑year‑old girl, promised to marry her, and later refused, leading to pregnancy. The prosecution relied on the victim’s testimony, several family witnesses, an eye‑witness, and a medical …
The petitioner, Jahagir @ Md. Jahangeer Alam, was charged under IPC Sections 323, 504, 354 and 376 in PS Abadpur Case No. 65 of 2024. The petitioner and his wife, Sakhina Khatoon, settled their matrimonial dispute through a compromise petition signed before their advocates. The petitioner applied …
Vishal Kumar applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under IPC sections 414, 420, 467, 468, 34 and Arms Act sections 25(i)(b)(a), 26 and 35. The court examined the petitioner’s criminal antecedent, the seriousness of the alleged offences as detailed in the FIR, and the alleged complicity of …
The petitioner, Santosh Chaubey, sought pre‑arrest bail in a criminal miscellaneous case alleging that he had tortured his wife, Priyanka Chaubey, for dowry demands. The charges were under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 85, 82(1), 352 and 3(5) of the Bihar Negotiable Statutes (BNS). The court found no …
Petitioners Kallu Yadav and Jitendra Yadav, who were in custody, filed a bail application before the Patna High Court. They later sought to withdraw that application and instead surrender before the learned District Court to obtain regular bail. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted this …
Petitioner Pankaj Singh sought pre‑arrest bail in a complaint alleging dowry‑related cruelty under Sections 115, 352(2) and 85 of the Bihar Negotiable Statutes (BNS) and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The State and the wife, Nilam Kumari, opposed bail, contending the allegations were …
The petitioner, Md. Bablu Khan, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a complaint under Section 498A IPC alleging dowry‑related cruelty against his wife, Tamana Khanam. He contended that the allegations were false, he had a clean antecedent, and he was willing to treat his wife with dignity. The State and …
The petitioner, Gopal Kumar, was implicated in a dowry‑related complaint (Case No. 1230C of 2024) alleging cruelty and assault under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Statutes (BNS). He applied for pre‑arrest bail, asserting innocence, a clean antecedent and willingness to treat his wife with …
The petitioner, Athar Ali, sought pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Sections 191(2), 126(2), 115(2), 64 of the BNS and Sections 4 and 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, alleging that he had married the informant’s daughter by Nikah and was willing to keep her with …
Shivam Kumar was arrested in a dowry‑related case alleging torture of his wife Nisha Kumari under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Statutes (BNS). He applied for pre‑arrest bail, claiming the allegations were false, he was ready to keep his wife, and he had a clean record. The State and the …
The petitioner, Narayan Das, sought pre‑arrest bail in a case alleging he tortured his wife, Kiran Das, for dowry demands, invoking sections 126(2), 115(2), 85, 352, 351(3) and 3(5) of the BNS. The petitioner claimed the allegations were false and that he was willing to treat his wife with dignity. …
The petitioner, Anubhav Yadav, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Sections 366(A) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code alleging kidnapping of the informant’s daughter. He claimed innocence and argued that he was a juvenile at the time of the alleged offence, filing an interlocutory …
The petitioner, Sita Devi, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a complaint alleging cheating under Section 318(4) of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act for selling a piece of land that later turned out to belong to the Government of Bihar. The petitioner claimed innocence and argued that the dispute is …
The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar Sah, was appointed as a GDS BPM at Lalit Narayan Mahavidyalaya University based on a forged Class‑10 certificate. The Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board later verified that the certificate was counterfeit, leading to his termination from service on 4 February 2026. He was …
The petitioners, Maheshwar Mandal and his wife Amira Devi, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case arising from a land dispute that escalated into an assault, allegedly involving a bhala that caused head injuries to an informant and Shyam Mandal. The FIR charges them under multiple sections of the …
The petitioner, Prasanjit Kumar, was named in an FIR for alleged offences under Sections 118(2), 109 and 3(5) of the BNS after two minor boys were injured by a live electric wire in his father’s orchard. The prosecution argued that the petitioner failed to disconnect the supply despite prior …
The petitioners were accused of forging sale deeds and illegally mutating land records, leading to an FIR under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Sale Act. The petitioner sought pre‑arrest bail, arguing that the dispute was civil in nature and that the co‑accused, not he, executed the forged …
The petitioners, Raju Mukhiya, Malakh Mukhiya and Indu Devi, sought pre‑arrest bail in a case alleging kidnapping of a minor and a child marriage, charged under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Statutes and Section 8 of the POCSO Act. The victim’s statement under Section 183 of the BNS …
The petitioner, Abhay Das, was arrested in connection with a case under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act alleging misappropriation of rice and wheat from his PDS shop. The FIR claimed a large discrepancy between e‑POS records and actual stock, with only a fraction of beneficiaries …
The petitioner, Biran Pasi, filed an application seeking a further extension of the time granted to surrender before the learned District Court, which had been originally ordered on 13 October 2025 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 70093/2025. The High Court examined the reasons presented in the …
The petitioners, a group of ten individuals from Madipur village, were charged in a criminal case (PS Case No.255 Year‑2022) and were required to surrender before the District Court. They filed a petition (Cr. Misc. No.17884 of 2026) seeking modification of an earlier order dated 01‑08‑2025 that had …
Hemnarayan Yadav petitioned the Patna High Court for a modification of an earlier order that had granted him an extension to surrender before the learned District Court. The petitioner argued that further time was needed, supporting his request with an affidavit. The court examined the reasons …
The petitioner, Gopal Singh, a retired associate professor, filed a contempt petition alleging that Magadh University had failed to pay his claimed gratuity, earned leave encashment, arrear pension and other retiral benefits totaling Rs 49,06,601. The university submitted a show‑cause response …
Prem Sahani filed a criminal miscellaneous petition before the Patna High Court. The petitioner, through counsel, sought to withdraw the petition invoking the bar provided under Section 403 of the BNSS. The State of Bihar opposed the withdrawal. The Court examined the statutory provision and allowed …
Rakesh Singh, the owner of a truck from which 425 kg of ganja was seized, has been in custody since March 2021 pending trial under the NDPS Act. He applied for regular bail, arguing that five years of pre‑trial detention, the early stage of trial with only two witnesses examined, and lack of …
Roshan Kumar was named in a FIR (Jamui P.S. Case No. 545 of 2025) under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act and alleged to have assaulted an informant, causing head injury. Both parties, who are co‑villagers, sustained grievous injuries and the petitioner sought to avoid arrest …
The petitioner, Pramod Sah, filed a bail application in a criminal miscellaneous case arising from a 2024 Mahila Police Station matter in Gopalganj. Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Sushil Kumar, appeared before the Hon'ble Justice Purnendu Singh and sought to withdraw the bail application, …
Ganga Sagar Paswan applied for pre‑arrest bail in a 2017 case alleging assault and related offences under Sections 341, 323, 325, 307, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The FIR alleges that Paswan and co‑accused assaulted an informant …
Petitioner Sanjiv Sahani sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS Manjhararh Case No. 74 of 2025) alleging offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The FIR alleged that he, along with others, intercepted an informant, abused and assaulted him with …
The petitioner, Kanti Kumar, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case (Malahi P.S. Case No. 271 of 2025) under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 29 litres of illicit country‑made liquor recovered from his poultry farm. He claimed he was falsely implicated, …
The petitioner, Pankaj Kumar Singh, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case (Kartaha PS Case No. 131/2025) alleging violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for possession of 375 ml of illicit liquor recovered from a motorcycle allegedly owned by him. He …
Anand @ Niranjan Singh, the petitioner, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case (Ramgarh Chowk P.S. Case No. 217/2025) where he is accused of assaulting his daughter‑in‑law and her husband for solemnising a love marriage, resulting in a fractured head. The FIR charges him under Sections 115(2), …
The petitioner, Dilbag Singh, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 6.160 litres of illicit liquor recovered from a cow shed behind a hotel. The petitioner contended that he neither owned the cow shed …
The petitioners – the father‑in‑law, mother‑in‑law and two brothers‑in‑law of a missing woman – applied for anticipatory bail in a dowry‑related case (Section 80, 3(5) of BNS) after the woman disappeared following a dowry demand. The FIR alleged that the petitioners conspired to make the woman …
The petitioner applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case where 54 litres of illicit liquor were seized from a motorcycle lacking a number plate. The FIR alleged offences under Sections 274, 275, 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The …
The petitioner, Bipin Mandal, was implicated in a case alleging recovery of 53.8 litres of illicit liquor from a semi‑constructed house and was charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He pleaded that he had no involvement in the liquor trade, the premises were open and …
The petitioner, Santan Paswan, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Sections 115(1), 117, 126(2), 109 and 3(5) of the Bihar Non‑Compulsory Statutes, alleging that he and co‑accused assaulted the husband of an informant with intent to kill, causing head injuries. The district court …
Nitish Kumar filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal miscellaneous case arising from PS Maner. The petitioner sought relief to avoid arrest pending the main trial. During the hearing, the petitioner requested to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The court considered the …
Petitioner Gautam Kumar was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022, after police seized raw materials, liquor and a motorcycle. He applied for pre‑arrest bail, contending that the district court had passed …
The petitioner, Rajan Kumar, applied for pre‑arrest (anticipatory) bail in a case registered under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of illicit Nepali liquor. The FIR alleged that police, acting on secret information, seized liquor from a car and motorcycle and apprehended …
The petitioner, Anju Devi, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 20 litres of country‑made mahua liquor. The FIR alleged the liquor was recovered from a hut, but the petitioner claimed she was not …
The petitioner, Shivnandan Paswan, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 68.875 litres of illicit liquor were seized from a vehicle he owned. The driver, Golden Kumar, was arrested at the scene and implicated the petitioner as the …
Shankar Singh applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Sections 103(1), 61(2) and 3(5) of the BNS. The petitioner argued that the district court had passed an order granting bail without first examining the post‑mortem report to determine the cause of death. The High Court noted that …
The petitioner, Dilkhush Kumar, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(iii) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly transporting 360 litres of illicit liquor in a Mahindra pick‑up vehicle. He contended that he is innocent, not the owner of the vehicle, and that the …
The petitioner, Chandan Mandal, sought pre‑arrest bail in a case where 8.100 litres of illicit country‑made liquor was seized from a motorcycle registered in his name. He argued that he was not named in the FIR, had no knowledge of the liquor, and was merely the registered owner who had lent the …
The petitioner, Sonwa Devi, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case (Sherghati P.S. Case No. 270 of 2025) involving alleged assault under several sections of the BNS. The FIR alleges that the accused, including the petitioner, assaulted an informant causing a grievous head injury, but the specific …
The petitioner, Anil Rai, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 22 litres of illicit liquor recovered from an open area on Kila Road. The petitioner claimed innocence, arguing that the liquor was found …
The petitioner, Vijay Rai, sought pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Sections 30(a), 41(1) and 32 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022, alleging that he was falsely implicated due to village politics and that the seized four‑wheeler did not belong to him. The State opposed …
The appellants were charged under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and IPC for allegedly assaulting a complainant over a land dispute, with the complaint alleging caste-based abuse. They contended that the allegations were false, stemming from a family land partition dispute, and that a …
We use cookies for analytics to improve your experience. Essential cookies are always on. Privacy Policy.