Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Raj Kumar @ Bichchi LalaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court held that the petitioner had made out a prima facie case for pre‑arrest bail and ordered his release on bail subject to the stipulated conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Raj Kumar, was implicated in a case (Bypass PS Case No.79 of 2026) for alleged possession of 56 litres of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The liquor was recovered from a roadside sack, an open space accessible to anyone, and the petitioner claimed he merely discarded the sack after seeing police. He applied for pre‑arrest bail, arguing innocence and lack of control over the recovered liquor. The State opposed the bail, but the court noted the open‑space recovery and the State’s failure to enforce its liquor policy, finding a prima facie case for bail. Consequently, the court ordered the petitioner’s release on pre‑arrest bail, subject to a Rs.10,000 bond, two sureties, and verification of his criminal antecedents under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to pre‑arrest bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act where the alleged liquor was recovered from an open public space.
  • Whether the circumstances disclosed in the FIR constitute a prima facie case justifying bail.
  • Whether the conditions prescribed under Section 482(2) of the BNSS apply to the bail order.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • pre‑arrest bail
  • illicit liquor
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • Section 30(a)
  • open space recovery
  • Section 482(2)
  • bail conditions

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29482 of 2026
                         Arising Out of PS. Case No.-79 Year-2026 Thana- BYPASS District- Patna
                 ======================================================
                 Raj Kumar @ Bichchi Lala Son of Parma Bind @ Parma Beldar Resident of
                 Mohalla- Sidhe Bazar, Bahri Begampur, Patna City, P.S.- Bypss, District-
                 Patna

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Shyam Kumar Chaudhary, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Md. Iftekhar Mahmood, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   06-05-2026                        Heard Mr. Shyam Kumar Chaudhary, learned

                   counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Md.

                   Iftekhar Mahmood, learned APP for the State.

                                 2. The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection

                   with Bypass P.S. Case No. 79 of 2026 registered for the

                   offence(s) punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar

                   Prohibition and Excise Act.

                                 3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, 56 litres of

                   illicit liquor was recovered from a sack allegedly thrown away

                   by the petitioner after seeing the police party.

                                 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioner submitted that petitioner is innocent and has falsely

                   been implicated in the present case merely on suspicion.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29482 of 2026(2) dt.06-05-2026
                                            2/3




          Learned counsel further submitted that recovery of illicit liquor

          has been made from the roadside, which is an open space and is

          easily accessible by anyone. Petitioner has no concern either

          with the place of recovery or with the alleged recovered liquor.

          On these grounds, petitioner seeks to be released on pre-arrest

          bail.

                        5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the

          prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail.

                        6. Having heard the rival submissions made on

          behalf of the parties, as well as, having perused the allegation

          made in the FIR and the fact that recovery of illicit liquor has

          been made from the roadside, which is an open space and is

          easily accessible by anyone and also the fact that the State has

          failed to implement its liquor policy in its true spirit, I am of the

          opinion that petitioner has, prima facie, made out a case to be

          released on pre-arrest bail.

                       7. The petitioner, above named, is directed to be

          released on pre-arrest bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender

          before the learned District Court within a period of four weeks

          from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten

          Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

          satisfaction of learned          Concerned Court where the case is
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29482 of 2026(2) dt.06-05-2026
                                                       3/3




                     pending in connection with Bypass P.S. Case No. 79 of 2026,

                     subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of

                     the BNSS.

                                  8. The learned District Court is directed to verify the

                     criminal antecedent of the petitioner and if it is found that the

                     petitioner is involved in some other cases, as what has been

                     stated in paragraph no.3 of the bail application, this order will

                     automatically lose its force.



                                               (Purnendu Singh, J)
Sanjay/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.