Patna High Court
Sonwa DeviversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- PURNENDU SINGH
Holding
The court granted pre‑arrest bail to the petitioner, subject to a bond and conditions, as the alleged assault was not attributable to her.
Summary
The petitioner, Sonwa Devi, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case (Sherghati P.S. Case No. 270 of 2025) involving alleged assault under several sections of the BNS. The FIR alleges that the accused, including the petitioner, assaulted an informant causing a grievous head injury, but the specific allegation of assault is directed at co‑accused Soni Manjhi. The petitioner contended she was falsely implicated and, being a woman, should not be held liable for the injury. The State opposed the bail. After considering the submissions and noting that the assault is not attributable to the petitioner, the court granted pre‑arrest bail on a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C and Section 482(2) BNSS, and directed the District Court to verify any other criminal antecedents.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner is liable for the assault alleged in the FIR and thus eligible for pre‑arrest bail.
- Whether the conditions of Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 482(2) of the BNSS are satisfied for granting bail.
- Whether the petitioner’s gender and alleged false implication affect the bail decision.
Legislation cited
- Bihar Negotiable Securities Act — s. 482(2)
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438(2)
Subjects
- pre‑arrest bail
- assault
- false implication
- Section 438 Cr.P.C
- Section 482 BNSS
- Bihar
- gender considerations
- criminal antecedent
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21243 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-270 Year-2025 Thana- SHERGHATI District- Gaya
======================================================
Sonwa Devi W/O Umesh Manjhi R/O Village- Gopalpur, P.S- Sherghati,
Distt.- Gaya.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Vijay Kumar, Advocate.
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Anant Kumar 1, APP.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH
ORAL ORDER
2 16-04-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection
with Sherghati P.S. Case No. 270 of 2025 registered for the
offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 74, 110, 352
and 3(5) of the BNS.
3. As per the allegation made in the F.I.R., the accused
persons including the petitioner assaulted the informant causing
head injury.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and she has
falsely been implicated in the case. Petitioner is a lady. The
specific allegation of assault is against co-accused Soni Manjhi.
The injury sustained by the victim though is grievous in nature,
but the same is not attributable to the petitioner.
5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21243 of 2026(2) dt.16-04-2026
2/2
the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner.
6. Having heard the rival submissions made on behalf
of the parties, as well as, having perused the allegation made in
the F.I.R., specific allegation of assault is against co-accused
Soni Manjhi and the injury sustained by the victim though is
grievous in nature, but the same is not attributable to the
petitioner, the petitioner, above named, who is a lady, is directed
to be released on pre-arrest bail, in the event of her arrest or
surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks
from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten
thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
satisfaction of learned District Court where the case is pending
in connection with Sherghati P.S. Case No. 270 of 2025, subject
to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C /
482(2) BNSS.
7. The District Court is directed to verify the criminal
antecedent of the petitioner and if it is found that the petitioner
is involved in some other cases as what has been stated in Para-
3 of the bail petition, this order will automatically lose its force.
8. The bail application stands disposed of.
(Purnendu Singh, J)
mantreshwar/-
U T
Checking your session…