Patna High Court
Gorelal YadavversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL REJECTED
- Bench
- PURNENDU SINGH
Holding
The court held that, given the nature of the allegations, regular bail could not be granted.
Summary
Gorelal Yadav was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 103(1), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the BNS. He filed an application for regular bail before the Patna High Court. The petitioner was represented by Mr. Bipin Kumar, while the State was represented by Mr. Nand Kishore Prasad, A.P.P. The court examined the nature of the allegations disclosed in the FIR. Justice Purnendu Singh observed that the seriousness of the accusations did not warrant the grant of bail. Consequently, the bail application was dismissed.
Issues considered
- Whether regular bail should be granted to the petitioner in light of the allegations under Sections 103(1), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the BNS.
Legislation cited
- BNS — s. 103(1), 3(5), 351(2), 352
Subjects
- regular bail
- criminal procedure
- BNS
- sections 103
- section 352
- section 351
- section 3
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4653 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-285 Year-2024 Thana- SIKANDRA District- Jamui
======================================================
Gorelal Yadav S/O Kapil Yadav R/O Village - Mirjanj, P.S- Sikandara,
District - Jamui
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bipin Kumar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nand Kishore Prasad, A.P.P.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH
ORAL ORDER
4 01-05-2026 Heard Mr. Bipin Kumar, learned counsel appearing
on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Nand Kishore Prasad,
learned APP for the State.
2. Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with
Sikandara P.S. Case No. 285 of 2024 registered for offences
punishable under Sections 103(1), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the
BNS.
3. Considering the nature of allegation made in the
FIR, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
4. Accordingly, the present application stands
dismissed.
(Purnendu Singh, J)
Niraj/-
U T
Checking your session…