Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
6 judgments · newest first · showing 1–6
The petitioner, Ganesh Das, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor after 6.84 litres of country-made liquor were seized from a motorcycle registered in his name. He contended that mere ownership of the vehicle did not establish his conscious possession or …
The petitioner, Ajay Kumar Sahu, was implicated in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, based on the recovery of 13.8 litres of liquor from a motorcycle registered in his name. He contended that the …
The petitioner, Munna Yadav, was named in an FIR under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor, with 807.925 litres seized. He contended that his name was included only because he owned the seized motorcycle and that the …
Chhotu Kumar was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act (Amendment) 2022, based on a farmer’s disclosure and the recovery of 50 litres of liquor. The petitioner contended that he was not arrested on the …
Ajay Kumar and Mithilesh Chaudhary applied for anticipatory bail after learning that they might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, alleging possession of large quantities of liquor recovered from a house and a hut. The petitioners argued that …
The petitioners, Abhay Kumar Yadav and Umesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 15.87 litres of liquor from a collapsed house. They argued that they were not caught in possession, the FIR omitted the …
