Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Munna YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioner as the recovery of illicit liquor was not shown to be in his physical possession and he has a clean antecedent.

Summary

The petitioner, Munna Yadav, was named in an FIR under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor, with 807.925 litres seized. He contended that his name was included only because he owned the seized motorcycle and that the seizure list lacked independent witnesses, asserting he was not present at the scene and had no conscious possession of the liquor. The Additional Public Prosecutor opposed his anticipatory bail. The court examined the factual submissions and noted that the liquor recovery did not appear to be from the petitioner's physical possession and that he had a clean antecedent. Consequently, the court directed that the petitioner be released on anticipatory bail upon surrender, subject to a bail bond and sureties, under Section 438(2) of the CrPC and Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner under Section 438 of the CrPC in a case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
  • Whether the seizure of illicit liquor can be linked to the petitioner’s possession for the purpose of arrest.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • illegal liquor
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • Section 438 CrPC
  • clean antecedent

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                             CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42207 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-238 Year-2026 Thana- KHUSRUPUR District- Patna
                 ======================================================
                 Munna Yadav Son of Sudama Singh Resident of Village- Sukar beg chak,
                 Police Station- Khushrupur, District- Patna

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                          ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner     :        Mr.Awadhesh Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party :        Mr.Indu Kumari Srivastava, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   01-07-2026                 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                               2. The accused/petitioner is named in the FIR and

                   apprehending his arrest in connection with Khushrupur P.S.

                   Case No.238 of 2026 registered under Section 30(a) of

                   Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

                               3. Allegation against the petitioner is to engage in

                   illegal trade/manufacturing of illicit liquor, where there is

                   recovery of 807.925 litres of IMFL/country-made liquor.

                               4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for

                   the petitioner that the name of petitioner arrayed solely for

                   the reason that petitioner is the owner of motorcycle bearing
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42207 of 2026(2) dt.01-07-2026
                                            2/3




          Registration No. BR01BD 0856. It is also submitted that the

          seizure list also appears doubtful being not supported by

          independent witnesses rather than by police personnel. It is

          also submitted that petitioner has been falsely implicated in

          this case as the petitioner was not present at the place of

          occurrence. It is also submitted that recovery of illicit liquor

          was not made from conscious possession of this petitioner.

          Petitioner claimed clean antecedent.

                       5. Learned APP opposed the prayer of anticipatory

          bail to the petitioner.

                       6. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by

          taking note of the fact as recovery of illicit liquor prima facie

          not appears to be made from physical possession of this

          petitioner, who is a man of clean antecedent, accordingly,

          the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or

          surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks

          from today, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing

          bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two

          sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the

          learned Exclusive Special Court of Excise, Patna City, in
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42207 of 2026(2) dt.01-07-2026
                                                       3/3




                     connection with Khushrupur P.S. Case No.238 of 2026,

                     subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2)

                     of the CrPC/under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.


                                                      (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.)

Aniket/-
U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.