Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
5 judgments · newest first · showing 1–5
Nibha Kumari, a teacher with a clean record, was implicated in a FIR alleging offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the IPC, based on an informant’s claim that she secured her appointment using a forged marksheet. She argued that she was not given a show‑cause notice before the FIR …
Arjun Bind was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly transporting 30 litres of liquor in a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, the liquor was not found in his possession, and he was unaware that the vehicle would be used for …
Pammy Devi, the petitioner, was arrested in a complaint case alleging forgery and cheating under Sections 467, 468 and 34 of the IPC related to a land dispute. She contended that she was the bona‑fide purchaser of the land, that the matter was essentially a civil family dispute, and that she had a …
The petitioner, Shashi Kumar Mahto, was arrested in connection with a case alleging rape of a 16‑year‑old girl, charged under IPC sections 376(2) and 376(2)(n), section 6 of the POCSO Act and section 9 of the Child Marriage Restraint Act. He contended that the alleged victim was his wife, the …
The petitioners, four relatives of the husband of the informant, were named in an FIR for offences under Sections 82(1), 85 and 3(5) of the BNS, alleged to have committed cruelty against the informant. They contended that the allegations were vague, omnibus and aimed at harassing the family, noting …
