Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bihar Negotiable Sale (BNSS) Act

9 judgments · newest first · showing 1–9

Kamlesh Yadav @Kamlesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Kamlesh Yadav and Ramesh Yadav petitioned the Patna High Court for bail after being implicated in a police case (Athmalgola PS Case No.57 of 2026) involving alleged firing during a clash between two groups, which injured an informant. The informant’s statement indicated that two unidentified persons …

Tuntun YadavversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

Petitioners Tuntun Yadav and Rajesh Yadav filed anticipatory bail applications in connection with FIR No. 29 of 2026 alleging offences under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Sale (BNSS) Act and Section 27 of the Arms Act, arising from an irrigation‑related dispute. The petition for Tuntun …

Balmiki Chauhan @ Balmiki NoniyaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Balmiki Chauhan, was named in an FIR for alleged assault and related offences arising from a dispute over a drainage system, with charges under multiple sections of the Bihar Negotiable Sale (BNS) Act. He contended that the incident was a mutual free fight, that the injury he was …

Suran Yadav @ Surendra Yadav @ Bauka @ Suren YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Suran Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 18 litres of liquor from a public bush. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the location did not belong to him, and the …

Md. SubhanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, six residents of Lakshminiya village, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bihar Non‑Statutory (BNS) Act, 2023. They contended that they have clean antecedents and were falsely implicated by the informant, with no …

Vikash Ram @ Vikesh Kumar @ Vikesh Kumar RamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vikash Ram and Dhanesh Ram, members of a Scheduled Caste, were implicated in a case (PS No.262/2025) alleging assault on the informant’s son with an iron rod after a dispute over music volume. The petitioners contend that the informant has repeatedly harassed them and that a counter‑case under the …

Bahadur Ray @ Sujit RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Bahadur Ray and Abhimanyu Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that liquor and raw fermented Jawa Mahua were recovered from the Ganga river bank and that they were implicated solely on the testimony …