Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Tuntun YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

Holding

The Court granted anticipatory bail to Rajesh Yadav, directing his release on bail with bond and sureties subject to Section 482(2) conditions.

Summary

Petitioners Tuntun Yadav and Rajesh Yadav filed anticipatory bail applications in connection with FIR No. 29 of 2026 alleging offences under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Sale (BNSS) Act and Section 27 of the Arms Act, arising from an irrigation‑related dispute. The petition for Tuntun Yadav was withdrawn, leaving only Rajesh Yadav’s application. Counsel for Rajesh argued that the specific allegation of assault causing grievous injury was not made against him, only against Tuntun and another co‑accused, and asserted his clean antecedents. The State opposed the bail, citing the seriousness of the offences listed in the FIR. The Court examined the factual submissions and noted the absence of a direct assault charge against Rajesh Yadav, and consequently ordered his release on bail with a bond of Rs.10,000 and two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the BNSS Act. The order effectively dismissed the anticipatory bail petition for Tuntun and granted bail to Rajesh.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to Rajesh Yadav despite the FIR naming him for offences under the BNSS Act and Arms Act.
  • Whether the lack of a specific assault allegation against Rajesh Yadav justifies bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • FIR
  • assault
  • irrigation dispute
  • bail bond
  • sureties
  • Section 482
  • Arms Act

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42026 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-29 Year-2026 Thana- BARAHAT District- Banka
                 ======================================================
           1.     Tuntun Yadav S/o Majar Yadav R/o Village- Mirzapur, P.S.- Barahat,
                  District- Banka
           2.     Rajesh Yadav S/o Majar Yadav R/o Village- Mirzapur, P.S.- Barahat,
                  District- Banka
                                                                      ... ... Petitioner/s
                                              Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                               ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Brij Nandan Prasad
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Anand Kishore Choudhary
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   02-07-2026                    Heard the parties.

                                2. At the outset after arguing for short, learned

                   counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner seeks permission to

                   withdraw the anticipatory bail petition of petitioner no. 1

                   namely, Tuntun Yadav.

                                3. Accordingly, the present anticipatory bail petition

                   of petitioner no. 1 namely, Tuntun Yadav stands dismissed

                   as withdrawn.

                                4. Now this petition survives only against petitioner

                   no. 2 namely, Rajesh Yadav.

                                5. The petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and

                   apprehending his arrest in connection with Barahat P.S. Case
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42026 of 2026(2) dt.02-07-2026
                                            2/3




          No. 29 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under

          Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(2), 109(1), 352, 3/5 of BNS

          and Section 27 of Arms Act.

                       6. As per FIR petitioner alongwith other co-accused

          person alleged to assault informant causing head and bodily

          injuries where assault was alleged to made with an intention

          to cause death of the injured person. Occurrence alleged to

          be arising out of irrigation related issues.

                       7. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on

          behalf of the petitioner that allegation of causing grievous

          injury is available specifically against Tuntun Uadav and

          Kundan Yadav who are not the petitioner for the present.

          Allegation of physical assault is not available against

          petitioner namely, Rajesh Yadav. Petitioner claimed clean

          antecedent.

                       8. Learned APP opposes the prayer of bail.

                       9. In view of aforesaid factual submission and by

          taking note of fact as allegation of assault is not available

          against this petitioner, accordingly petitioner namely Rajesh

          Yadav, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42026 of 2026(2) dt.02-07-2026
                                                          3/3




                        court below within a period of four weeks, is directed to be

                        released on bail, furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-

                        (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

                        each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Banka

                        /concerned Court, where the case is pending in connection

                        with Barahat P.S. Case No. 29 of 2026, subject to the

                        conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of BNSS.



                                                                   (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)
Sudha/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.