Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
8 judgments · newest first · showing 1–8
The petitioner, Dhananjay Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged alleging that he fraudulently sold a plot of land already sold to the informant. The informant claimed the petitioner sold the same land to co‑accused without any right, invoking several sections of the Bihar …
The petitioner, Amrnath Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a kidnapping case (Karja P.S. Case No. 164 of 2024) under Section 140(3) of the Bihar Negotiable Sale Act. He alleged that the accusation was false, that the alleged victim had previously gone missing and later reappeared, and …
Loknath Kumar, a resident of Paraiya, Gaya, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS No. 357/2025) involving offences under Sections 126, 115(2), 109, 74, 303(2) and 3(5) of the Bihar Negotiable Sale Act, 2023. The informant alleged that Kumar and several co‑accused created a ruckus at …
Dhanu Kumar was arrested for allegedly kidnapping a 13‑year‑old girl, a case registered under the POCSO Act and several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Sale (B.N.S.) Act. The petitioner sought bail, arguing that the relationship was consensual and that the victim’s statement indicated a love …
The petitioners applied for bail after being implicated in a violent incident arising from a land dispute, where they were alleged to have assaulted an informant and her relatives with weapons, causing serious injuries. The State opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the injuries, the presence of …
The petitioners, five members of a Yadav family, were implicated in a mob assault on an informant and his family over a land dispute, resulting in serious injuries. They applied for bail in connection with a FIR (Case No. 461 of 2025) that charged them under multiple sections of the Bihar Negotiable …
Manoj Kumar Mahto and Saroj Kumar Mahto were arrested in connection with a case involving the seizure of an informant's tractor and demand for ransom, during which they allegedly assaulted two individuals, causing grievous and simple injuries. The petitioners applied for anticipatory bail, arguing …
The petitioners, involved in a land dispute, were accused of assaulting an informant's family, causing injuries and alleged theft. They applied for bail, arguing that the injuries to both sides were minor and that they have a fair antecedent. The State opposed bail, emphasizing the seriousness of …
