Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Amrnath @ Amarnath KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The petitioner is granted anticipatory bail subject to the conditions imposed by the Court.

Summary

The petitioner, Amrnath Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a kidnapping case (Karja P.S. Case No. 164 of 2024) under Section 140(3) of the Bihar Negotiable Sale Act. He alleged that the accusation was false, that the alleged victim had previously gone missing and later reappeared, and that his brother, a co‑accused, had already been granted regular bail. The petitioner highlighted his clean criminal record and pointed to inconsistencies in witness statements and the investigation report. The State opposed the anticipatory bail. The Court, considering the lack of antecedent, the brother’s bail, and the circumstances, ordered anticipatory bail subject to a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, under Section 482(2) of the BNSS, for six weeks from the order date.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 482(2) of the BNSS in the kidnapping case.
  • Whether the facts and circumstances justify the grant of anticipatory bail despite the pending charge under Section 140(3) of the BNS.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • kidnapping
  • Section 140(3)
  • Section 482(2)
  • bail bond
  • clean antecedent

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21868 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-164 Year-2024 Thana- KARJA District- Muzaffarpur
                 ======================================================
                 Amrnath @ Amarnath Kumar S/o Dharmvir Ray R/o Village - Jiyan, P.S -
                 Karja, District - Muzaffarpur

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Hari Kishore Thakur, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Dr.Mrityunjaya Kr.Gautam, APP
             ======================================================
         CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA
                                   ORAL ORDER

3   06-05-2026                         Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned APP for the State.

                                   2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in

                   connection with Karja P.S. Case No. 164 of 2024 registered for

                   the offences punishable under Sections 140(3) of the BNS.

                                   3. Allegation against the petitioner and his brother

                   is to have kidnapped the wife of the informant, who is still

                   traceless.

                                   4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner is innocent has committed no offence and has falsely

                   been implicated in this case. He submits that wife of the

                   informant in the past also had become traceless and she had

                   returned after one year. He further submits that name of this

                   petitioner and his brother, namely, Somnath Kumar has been
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21868 of 2026(3) dt.06-05-2026
                                            2/3




          added in this case during the course of investigation. He next

          submits that from para-17, 18, 19 and 20, it appears that

          witnesses have stated that informant’s wife was in habit of going

          to go other places. He next submits that from perusal of the case

          dairy, it appears that with regard to co-accused, Somnath

          Kumar, the police has concluded the investigation and has also

          submitted the chargesheet. He next submits that the brother of

          the petitioner, namely, Somnath Kumar has already been granted

          Regular Bail by a co-cordinate Bench of this Court vide order

          dated 15.11.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No.56215 of 2025. He

          further submits that petitioner has got clean antecedent as stated

          in para-3 of the bail petition.

                          5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for

          anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

                       6. Considering the above facts and circumstances of

          the case and submissions made by learned counsel for the

          petitioner and also the fact that petitioner has got no criminal

          antecedent, let the above named petitioner be released on

          anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the

          Trial Court within a period of six weeks from today on

          furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two

          sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction learned
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21868 of 2026(3) dt.06-05-2026
                                                         3/3




                       Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Court No.06, Muzaffarpur(West)

                       in connection with Karja P.S. Case No-164 of 2024 subject to

                       the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.



                                            (Ramesh Chand Malviya, J)
Harshita/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.