Created by Fuzzy Cloud

RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA

223 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200

Rakesh Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Rakesh Kumar Singh filed a writ petition challenging the Technical Bid Evaluation Committee's decision that disqualified him from a water supply scheme tender and also challenging the financial bid decision that declared another respondent the lowest bidder. He sought quashing of both …

HANUMAN SINGH AND OTHERSversusUDAI SHANKAR SINGH

DISMISSED

The petitioners sought a civil revision of the Sub‑Judge’s order rejecting their application under Order VII Rule 11(a) of the CPC, which aimed to dismiss the plaintiff’s title suit alleging irregularities in a 1983 family partition. The plaintiff claimed that lands entrusted to the petitioners were …

Dev Kumar Ray @ Debu RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Dev Kumar Ray and Pintu Kumar were accused of assaulting an informant's father with a sword during a land dispute, an FIR being lodged twelve days after the alleged incident. They applied for anticipatory bail, contending that they were falsely implicated, that the informant was not an eye‑witness, …

Bittu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Bittu Kumar, a 23‑year‑old resident of Samastipur, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS No. 116 of 2025) alleging his participation in a mob assault that injured an informant. The prosecution alleged that the mob, including co‑accused Saurav Kumar Singh and Sonu Kumar Singh, …

Sarswati DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners – Sarswati Devi, her husband Ram Pravesh Singh and their son Gautam Kumar – sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Kurtha P.S. Case No.184 of 2025) alleging assault, robbery and other offences under several sections of the BNS. The FIR, based on a report by informant …

Asim Raja @ Md. Asim Raza @ RajaversusMd. Wasim Akhtar Parwez

D.F.D. FOR NON APPEARANCE

Asim Raja filed a civil revision application against Md. Wasim Akhtar Parwez and Rukhana Khatoon. No counsel appeared for either side on 5 May 2026. The High Court noted that the petitioner’s counsel had not complied with the court’s order dated 16 January 2026 despite several opportunities. …

Laljhari DeviversusGangajali Devi

D.F.D. FOR NON APPEARANCE

The appellants, Laljhari Devi and Parasnath Singh, filed a first appeal (No. 365 of 1981) in the Patna High Court against a large group of respondents. The court scheduled hearings on 6 April 2026 and 20 April 2026, but no counsel appeared on behalf of the appellants on either date, nor on the …

Shri Sheo Dyal PrasadversusState Bank of India

D.F.D. FOR NON APPEARANCE

The appellants, three individuals from East Champaran, filed a first appeal (No. 499 of 1981) against the State Bank of India and three other respondents. No counsel appeared on behalf of the appellants on the scheduled hearing dates of 16‑03‑2026 and 20‑04‑2026, nor on the date of the oral order. …

Srimati Panmati DeviversusRaghunath Lal

D.F.D. FOR NON APPEARANCE

The appellant, Srimati Panmati Devi, filed a first appeal (No. 484 of 1981) in the Patna High Court. No counsel appeared for either party on multiple scheduled dates, including 26.03.2026 and 20.04.2026. The court observed that the appellant had effectively lost interest in pursuing the appeal. …

Most. lalliaversusHarihar Singh

D.F.D. FOR NON APPEARANCE

The petitioners filed a First Appeal (No. 73 of 1981) in the Patna High Court but failed to appear before the court on multiple dates, including 26.03.2026 and 20.04.2026, despite repeated notices. The court observed that the appellants had effectively abandoned the appeal, showing no interest in …

Lalji SahversusRam Parikha Sah

D.F.D. FOR NON APPEARANCE

The appellants filed a first appeal (No. 434 of 1982) in the Patna High Court but failed to appear before the court on two scheduled dates, 31 March 2026 and 20 April 2026, and also did not appear on the day of the oral order. The court noted that despite repeated calls, no counsel or party …

Anil KumarversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

Anil Kumar, a 23‑year‑old male, was charged under Section 65(1) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act for allegedly raping the minor daughter of the informant. He applied for bail before the Patna High Court. The court …

Satish Kumar @ Chhabila YadavversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Satish Kumar, was charged in a 2022 case for murder under Section 302 IPC, criminal conspiracy under Section 120B IPC, and illegal possession of arms under Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleged to have fired on an informant’s father resulting in death. He applied for bail before the …

Manju Devi @ Sumitra DeviversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners – Manju Devi, Damodar Sahni, Saint Lal Sahni and Ram Prasad Sahni – had been granted anticipatory bail by the Patna High Court on 12 March 2026. A typographical error in paragraph 7 of that order mistakenly referred to "both the petitioners" instead of "all the above named four …

Golu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

Golu Kumar, a 19‑year‑old, had been granted anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (A) Act, 2022, with a condition to surrender within six weeks. He failed to surrender on time because of a communication gap between his counsel and the substitute counsel, …

KEJRIWALversusUNION OF INDIA and ORS

WITHDRAWN

The appellant, M/s Kejriwal Agencies, filed a petition before the Patna High Court seeking permission to withdraw the suit. The learned counsel requested the court's leave to withdraw, and the court granted the permission. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive merits …

Shree Ram SinghversusRam Kishore Singh

D.F.D. FOR NON APPEARANCE

The appellants filed a First Appeal (No. 690 of 1977) in the Patna High Court many decades after the original decree, with the matter being listed on 23 April 2026. No counsel appeared on behalf of the appellants and a vakalatnama had not been filed, indicating a lack of representation. The …

Madhuri RoutversusRajeshwar Rout

D.F.D. FOR NON APPEARANCE

The appellants filed a first appeal (No.154 of 1977) in the Patna High Court on 23 April 2026, seeking relief from a prior order dated 5 February 2026. No counsel appeared for either side despite repeated notices. The court examined the office notes and observed that the appellants had not complied …

Navneet Kumar and OthersversusAshok Singh

DISMISSED

The petitioners filed a civil revision under Section 115 of the CPC challenging the Sub‑Judge’s order refusing to reject the plaint under Order VII Rule 11. The plaint sought declaration that four sale deeds were void and claimed title over the disputed property. Petitioners argued that the suit was …

Tasleem KhanversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Tasleem Khan, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition before the Patna High Court. The petitioner, through counsel Mr. Nihal Beg and Mr. Shive Kumar, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the petition. The respondent, the State of Bihar and the petitioner's wife, were represented …

Dhirendra Das @ Dhirendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Dhirendra Das, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No.22249 of 2026 before the Patna High Court. He subsequently sought the court's permission to withdraw the petition because he had already been arrested by the police. The petitioner was represented by Advocate Praveen Kumar, …

Ramdeni SharmaversusBaleshwar Sharma

D.F.D. FOR NON APPEARANCE

The appellant, Ramdeni Sharma, filed a first appeal in 1983 but failed to appear before the Patna High Court on multiple scheduled dates in 2023 and 2026. No counsel represented the appellant, and repeated notices went unanswered, indicating a loss of interest in pursuing the appeal. The court …

MOST.KESHRI DEVIversusLAXMI DEVI

D.F.D. FOR NON APPEARANCE

The appellant, Keshari Devi, filed a first appeal (No. 80 of 1985) before the Patna High Court against the respondent, Laxmi Devi. Over several scheduled dates (02-09-2024, 30-09-2024, 11-11-2024, 31-03-2026) no counsel appeared on behalf of the appellant, and the appellant herself was absent. The …

Pintu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Pintu Kumar was arrested in connection with Bathnaha P.S. Case No. 456 of 2025 for alleged assault with the back portion of a spade, causing injuries to the informant. The petitioner claimed innocence, alleging the case stemmed from a property dispute and that the FIR was lodged after an …

Dinesh Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

D.F.D. FOR NON APPEARANCE

The petitioner, Dinesh Kumar Yadav, filed a Civil Revision (No. 77 of 2019) before the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar and several officials of the Road Construction Department. The petition was scheduled for hearing on three occasions—06-02-2026, 25-02-2026, and 24-03-2026—but no …

Most. Shiv Dulari DeviversusRamagya Rai

D.F.D. FOR NON APPEARANCE

The petitioner, Shiv Dulari Devi, filed Civil Revision No.218 of 2019 in the Patna High Court. Hearings were scheduled on 13.03.2026, 31.03.2026 and 09.04.2026. On each date, no counsel or party appeared on behalf of the petitioner despite repeated calls. The court examined the record and noted the …

Saurav KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Saurav Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the BNS, 2023, alleging assault and other offences. He contended that he was falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, and that no incriminating material was found on him. The State …

Nitesh TiwariversusThe state of bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Nitesh Tiwari was implicated in a FIR alleging robbery at gunpoint, offences under Sections 392, 397 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, with an alleged attempt to kill an informant. He applied for anticipatory bail, claiming he was falsely implicated, that his name …

Jagjitan MahatoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioners, Jagjitan Mahato, Munna Kumar and Daroga Sah, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging offences under the Bihar National Security Act and the Damage of Public Property Act. The FIR alleged that they participated in a mob that blocked a road, attacked police …

Najo BibiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Najo Bibi, a 50‑year‑old woman, was named as one of nine accused in FIR No. 286 of 2025 for alleged assault, robbery and other offences under multiple sections of the BNS. She applied for anticipatory bail, claiming innocence, a clean antecedent and that the allegations against her were vague and …

Ashish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Ashish Kumar, a 21‑year‑old, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in an FIR alleging that he, along with two unknown persons, attacked the son of an informant with an iron rod, causing a grievous head injury and threatening his life. The petitioner claimed false implication and …

Chandradeep TiwariversusRam Lakhan Pandey

D.F.D. FOR NON APPEARANCE

The petitioners filed a First Appeal (No.141 of 1976) in the Patna High Court seeking relief against the respondents. The appeal remained pending for decades and, despite notices dated 06-04-2026, none of the parties appeared before the Court. The Court observed that the appellants had lost interest …

Anil Kumar SinhaversusSuresh Singh

D.F.D. FOR NON APPEARANCE

The petitioners, Anil Kumar Sinha and Pappu Sinha, filed a civil revision in 2020 but failed to appear before the court on multiple scheduled dates despite repeated adjournments. The court noted their continued absence on 27‑11‑2025, 08‑01‑2026, 30‑01‑2026, 18‑02‑2026 and 13‑03‑2026. No counsel …

Mahesh Kumar SinghversusThe State Of Bihar and Ors

D.F.D. FOR NON APPEARANCE

The petitioner filed Civil Revision No.195 of 2018 against the State of Bihar and several officials of the Road Construction Department. The petitioner failed to appear before the Patna High Court on two scheduled dates, 24 February 2026 and 30 March 2026, despite repeated notices. The court …

Lalu YadavversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Lalu Yadav, was in custody for offences under several sections of the BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleged to have fired at an informant and looted valuables. He claimed false implication and sought regular bail, arguing the FIR was concoced. The State opposed bail, …

Sanjay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar, a salt supplier, was arrested in connection with alleged illegal sale of non‑iodised salt and related equipment, violating several provisions of the BNS and the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006. The FIR alleged that large quantities of various branded salts and …

Sudhir Bhagat @ Sudheer BhagatversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Sudhir Bhagat was arrested in connection with a 2014 case alleging participation in a Naxalite outfit, charged under several sections of the IPC, UAPA, CLA and Arms Acts. The FIR was based primarily on an informant's report and the confessional statements of co‑accused who were apprehended at the …

Ranjan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ranjan Kumar, filed an application for bail before the Patna High Court in a criminal miscellaneous case. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel sought the Court's permission to withdraw the bail application. The Court considered whether it could grant such permission to …

Raj Kishor RayversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Raj Kishor Ray and Rajesh Ray, were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 306 litres of Nepali Saufi liquor recovered from the Bagmati river. They contended that the allegations were politically …

Smt. Kiran SinghversusSmt. Anjushree Banerjee

ALLOWED

The plaintiff, Kiran Singh, sued the defendants to enforce a specific performance of a 1974 re‑conveyance agreement, alleging that a 1973 sale deed was merely a security transaction and that she had paid the consideration but was dispossessed. The trial court held the sale deed was an absolute sale, …

Bipin Bihari Prasad and OrsversusArun Kumar and Ors

WITHDRAWN

The petitioners filed an application before the Patna High Court seeking permission to withdraw the same. The learned counsel for the petitioners requested the court’s leave to withdraw. The court granted the permission sought. Consequently, the application was dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive …

Subhash RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Subhash Ram, filed a writ petition seeking the release of a vehicle seized under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for alleged possession of 20.750 litres of illicit liquor. The High Court granted the petitioner liberty to file an application under Rule 12A(2) of …

Anita GuptaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Anita Gupta, filed a writ petition seeking the release of a Mahindra/Bolero vehicle seized under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for alleged possession of 420 litres of illicit codeine phosphate and triprolidine syrup. The petitioner argued …

Kanhaiya Prasad GuptaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Kanhaiya Prasad Gupta filed a writ petition challenging the sealing of his shop by the Excise Department of Bihar. The petition alleged that the shop had been sealed by the authorities. While the petition was pending, the shop was subsequently de‑sealed. Both parties submitted that, in …

Guddu KhanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Guddu Khan, filed a writ petition seeking the release of a three‑wheeler Toto vehicle seized under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for alleged recovery of 18 litres of illicit beer. The High Court, after hearing, granted the petitioner liberty …

Raju SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Raju Sharma sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in FIR No. 166 of 2025 for alleged assault with intent to kill, under multiple sections of the BNS, 2023. He claimed innocence, alleging the dispute was civil in nature, that the FIR was lodged after a seven‑day delay, and that …

Savitri DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Ruby Devi (Petitioner No.4) and Ram Chandra Sahni (Petitioner No.5), applied for bail in a dowry‑death case (Bhagwanpur P.S. Case No. 333 of 2025) where the deceased allegedly died from asphyxia due to hanging. The prosecution alleged offences under Sections 80, 61(2) and 3(5) of …

Vipin Kumar @ Vipin YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, six members of the Yadav family, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Pipra P.S. Case No. 230 of 2025) alleging assault with lathi, danda, iron rod and gunfire, resulting in injuries to an informant and his cousin. The FIR charged them under Sections 191(2), 115(2), …

Chiranjeevi Kumar @ Bhim SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Chiranjeevi Kumar was implicated in a Sandesh police case for alleged assault using 'Sabal' and 'Khanti', resulting in head and leg injuries to the informant and his family. The petitioner claimed innocence, alleging the charges stemmed from a land dispute and personal enmity, and argued that the …

Vishal Kumar @ Ajay RayversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

Vishal Kumar, accused of offences under Sections 326, 307, 120B and 302 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act for an alleged contract killing, applied for bail. He contended that he was falsely implicated and that only co‑accused confessional statements linked him to the crime, with no other …

Shahnawaj @ Shahnawaz @ Rijwanul Haque @ Rizwanul HaqueversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Shahnawaj, is in custody for multiple IPC and Arms Act offences stemming from an alleged assault and indiscriminate firing that resulted in a death. He contends that he was falsely implicated due to local village politics and seeks bail, having been in custody since August 2023. The …

Dinesh SahniversusShiv Narayan Sahani

DISPOSED

In Title Suit No. 44 of 2015, the sole plaintiff Durga Sahani died on 06‑04‑2021. His legal heirs filed a petition on 01‑09‑2021 under Order I Rule 10 of the CPC seeking substitution of their names, but the trial court dismissed it, holding that the suit had abated on 07‑07‑2021 under Order XXII …

Sanjay KumarversusUday Kumar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar, filed a civil revision petition before the Patna High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner requested permission to withdraw the petition. The court considered the request and, finding no objection, granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the …

Dewanti Devi and OrsversusSharda Devi @ Shanti Devi

D.F.D. FOR NON APPEARANCE

The petitioners, a group of individuals, filed a civil revision against Sharda Devi. No counsel appeared for either side. The court had previously granted the petitioners six weeks, on 5 December 2025 and 20 January 2026, to rectify stamp‑reporter defects, but the deadline passed without compliance. …

Sheo Bhagat Prasad alias SahversusSushila Kumari

CONVERTED

The petitioner, Sheo Bhagat Prasad, filed Civil Revision No.233 of 2025 before the Patna High Court. He sought permission to convert this revision into a Civil Miscellaneous application within three weeks. The court examined whether such a conversion is permissible under procedural rules. The judge …

Rakesh JhaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Rakesh Jha and Amod Jha, were apprehended for possible arrest in a dowry‑related assault case (Benipatti PS Case No. 280 of 2024) where several offences under the B.N.S. were alleged. They contended that they were falsely implicated, had no criminal antecedent, and that the FIR did …

Saurabh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Saurabh Kumar, a 24‑year‑old student, was named among 51 persons in FIR No. 381 of 2024 for allegedly throwing stones at an informant and police and raising slogans against the administration. The FIR, filed three days after the alleged incident, charges under multiple sections of …

Amit Kumar @ Amit Yadav @ Amit Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Amit Kumar and Surendra Yadav, were implicated in Bachhwara P.S. Case No. 244 of 2025 for assaulting and outraging the modesty of Usha Kumari under several sections of the Bihar Non‑Sexual Offences Act, 2023. They argued that they were falsely implicated because of a long‑standing …

Bhuneshwar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Bhuneshwar Singh and Lalji Singh, sought bail fearing arrest in connection with Nawanagar Police Station Case No. 92 of 2025, which alleged offences under several sections of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners assaulted an informant and his family, while the …

Mukesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

Mukesh Kumar was arrested in connection with a case involving offences under Sections 302, 394, 201, 354A, 120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 8 of the POCSO Act. He contended that he had been falsely implicated and had been in judicial custody since July 11, 2023. The petitioner …

Md. SakilversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Md. Sakil, is in judicial custody for offences under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code arising from a murder case (S.T No. 539 of 2022). He contended that he was falsely implicated and sought regular bail, having been in custody since July 2022. The High Court noted that …

Ramashankar TiwariversusLallan Tiwari

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Ramashankar Tiwari, filed a civil revision seeking relief against the respondents. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the petition, stating that the dispute had been settled in the trial court. The respondents’ counsel did not oppose the …

Ajay Kumar SinghversusJai Jai Ram Singh and Ors

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Ajay Kumar Singh, filed Civil Revision No.226 of 2017 against a large group of respondents concerning a dispute whose details are not elaborated in the order. The petitioner later sought the court's permission to withdraw the revision application. The sole issue before the court was …

Anuj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

Anuj Kumar, accused of firing a bullet that injured and later caused the death of an informant's husband, is in judicial custody for offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Arms Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated and sought regular bail, having previously been …

Vikram VishwasversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioners, Vikram Vishwas and Shahabul Sheikh, were arrested in connection with a seizure of 179.80 liters of codeine-based cough syrup, alleged to violate Sections 8(c), 21(c) and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act. They applied for regular bail, claiming …

Ankit Kumar @ Rahish Yadav @ Rahish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The appellant, Ankit Kumar, is in judicial custody for alleged murder under Sections 302/34 of the IPC, along with charges under Section 27 of the Arms Act and Section 3(2)(V) of the SC/ST Act. The FIR alleges that he, with co‑accused, abused an informant’s son and that the appellant fired a pistol, …

Jahir NadafversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Jahir Nadaf and Md. Majar Nadaf, sought bail fearing arrest in connection with PS Madhepura Case No. 76 of 2024, which alleged offences under IPC sections 147, 323, 307, 354A, 504 and 506/34 for assault with an iron rod. They contended that the dispute stemmed from a land conflict …

Jitendra GondversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Jitendra Gond, sought bail in connection with a criminal case (Darauli P.S. Case No. 327 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 324(4), 126(2), 352, 109, 351(3) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that he, along with co‑accused, assaulted an informant and his wife. The …

Vikash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vikash Kumar sought anticipatory bail after learning that a FIR (Case No. 682/2025) had been lodged against him for alleged conspiracy to commit loot and possession of a loaded pistol, invoking Sections 310(4), 310(5) of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act and Sections 25(1‑b)(a), 26 and 35 of the …

Md. Mahfooz @ Md. Mahfooz RahmanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Mahfooz Rahman, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under IPC Sections 366(A) and 34 alleging that he, along with co‑accused, abducted a girl for a forced marriage. The petitioner contended that the alleged victim voluntarily left her home, went to Nepal and later to …

Rajeev KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Rajeev Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he was likely to be arrested in a case (Mahanar PS Case No. 201 of 2025) alleging offences under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code for obtaining a forged employment letter. He contended that he was innocent, …

Raja Kumar Sharma @ Raja RohitversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Raja Kumar Sharma, filed an application in a criminal miscellaneous proceeding and later sought permission to withdraw the same. The learned counsel for the petitioner requested the court's permission to withdraw the application. The Hon'ble Justice Ramesh Chand Malviya granted the …

Sudhir Sharma @ Sudhir KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Sudhir Sharma sought bail after being implicated in a case (Pipra PS No. 89 of 2025) for alleged firing on an informant's son, alleged offences under Sections 109, 3(5) of the B.N.S.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged his participation, but the injured’s statement identified …

Jay Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Jay Kumar Yadav was arrested in connection with a FIR alleging that he and co‑accused, armed with deadly weapons, attempted extortion and looted construction materials from a residential school site, firing at an informant. The petitioner claimed innocence, noting that the FIR lacked details of the …

Dukhi Yadav @ Dukhi Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Dukhi Yadav, is in custody for a murder case involving the killing of the informant’s uncle, Jagarnath Yadav, and is charged under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code. He applied for regular bail for the fifth time, having previously been denied bail in four earlier …

Bhim KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Bhim Kumar, a 27-year-old resident of Gaya district, was arrested in connection with a theft of a motorcycle and charged under Sections 317(5), 318(4), 336(3) and 338 of the BNS. He contended that he was falsely implicated due to village politics, that no stolen property was recovered from his …

Tarkeshwar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Tarkeshwar Singh, was in custody for alleged offences under several sections of the BNS, stemming from an alleged assault on a neighbour informant amid a land dispute. He filed a bail petition claiming innocence, lack of criminal antecedent, and that the allegations were general and …

Amina KhatoonversusMd. Rasid Ansari

WITHDRAWN

The petitioners filed a Civil Revision (No.44 of 2022) before the Patna High Court seeking relief against the respondents. They later approached the Court requesting permission to withdraw the revision and instead file an appeal before the concerned District Judge within thirty days. The Court, …

Nago RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, four residents of Naya Tola Mekra, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a FIR (Case No. 156 of 2025) for alleged looting of 16 quintals of wheat at gunpoint and assaulting an informant. The prosecution alleged offences under Sections 329(3), 115(2), 119(1), 352, 351(2) …

Dinbandhu KanharversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner filed an application seeking the court's permission to withdraw the same. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Nityanand Neeraj, requested that the court allow the withdrawal. The court, after hearing the counsel, granted permission to withdraw the application. Consequently, the application …

Bhulawan Tiwari @ Mansha TiwariversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Bhulawan Tiwari, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging assault and stabbing of an informant and another person. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner attacked the informant with a lathi and a knife, causing a waist wound, and also injured Shivshanker Mahto. …

Sunil Patel @ Sunil RautversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, eight residents of Naya Tola, Dhaka, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a 2018 case (PS No.338) involving alleged offences under several IPC sections, including rioting, assault, and dowry death. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners kept the dead body of Shobha Devi …

ABHINAV KUMAR @ GAURAVversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Abhinav Kumar, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in a case (PS No.354 of 2025) alleging kidnapping of a minor girl for the purpose of marriage, punishable under Section 96 of the BNS. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with co‑accused, abducted the …

Sujata Kumari @ Sujita KumariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Sujata Kumari and Nitish Kumar, feared arrest in a criminal case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 64, 89, 351, 352 and 3(5) of the BNS, which alleged that co‑accused Gaurav Kumar had pretended marriage with the informant and later refused to marry her. The petitioners …

Mamta DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Mamta Devi, sought bail in connection with a case (Goghardiha P.S. Case No. 74 of 2025) alleging offences under various sections of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and co‑accused assaulted an informant, causing a sharp‑cut injury. The petitioner contended that …

Santosh SinghversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

The petitioners, Santosh Singh and Sanjay Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018 for allegedly possessing 20 litres of illicit Mahua liquor recovered from an open field. They contended that they had no …

Ajay KumarversusThe State Of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ajay Kumar was implicated in a case alleging possession of 110 litres of illicit country-made chulai liquor recovered from a motorcycle, which he does not own. The prosecution’s case relied on the statements of a co-accused and an informant, with no direct evidence of Kumar’s conscious possession. …

Golu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Golu Kumar, a 19‑year‑old, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (A) Act, 2022 for alleged possession of foreign liquor recovered from a scooty. The prosecution’s case relied on the statement of co‑accused Aryan Raj, and the liquor was found in the …

Rita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Rita Devi, a 56‑year‑old woman, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 30 litres of illicit Mahua liquor recovered from a pit behind a house she does not own. She contended that no contraband was found in her conscious …

Ram Singhasan SinghversusSri Bhagwan Singh

DISMISSED

The plaintiffs Mahabir Prasad and Vijay Kumar Singh filed title suits in 1968 seeking specific performance of a contract for sale of land, alleging the defendants had taken an advance and failed to execute the sale deed. The trial court granted specific performance, but the appellate court set aside …

Kumar Manish ChandraversusSmt. Laxmi Chandra

DISPOSED

The appellant, Kumar Manish Chandra, filed a miscellaneous appeal (No. 455 of 2021) before the Patna High Court against his wife, Laxmi Chandra. The appellant's counsel informed the Court that the parties had amicably settled the dispute. He sought the Court's permission to withdraw the appeal. The …

Md. Faziruddin @ FajiruddinversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Md. Faziruddin and his son Abdullah, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging illegal sand mining under Sections 303(2), 317(2) and 223 of the Bihar Non‑Statutory (BNS) Act and Sections 4(1), (2) and 21 of the Mining Rule, 1957, which purportedly caused a loss of …

Vikas Sah @ Vikas Kumar SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Vikas Sah, was implicated in a case (Kotwa PS Case No. 269 of 2025) for alleged unauthorized sale of diesel, with 160 litres seized from his possession. He claimed he was falsely implicated and had no prior criminal record. The prosecution alleged he was involved in illegal diesel …

Sk. Ajim @ Md. AjimversusThe State Of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, three brothers from Harpurnag Tola, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Trial No. 1998 of 2022) stemming from a 2000 FIR that alleged they assaulted and strangled an informant, invoking IPC sections 447, 341, 323, 504 and 307/34. They contended that they were …

Md RahishversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Md Rahish, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition (No.80269 of 2025) before the Patna High Court seeking relief in a case arising from PS. Case No.-360, Year-2025, Darbhanga. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the petition. The Court, after …

Suraj Kumar @ Suraj PrakashversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Suraj Kumar was named in an FIR for alleged assault on a police constable during an incident at Barabar hill, with charges under several IPC sections including assault and attempt to murder. He contended that he was not present at the scene, the allegations were vague, and he had a clean antecedent. …

Gouri Mandal,versusNanda Devi

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Gouri Mandal and others, filed a civil revision challenging the Sub Judge VIII, Bhagalpur's order dated 12 January 2022, which had set aside a 2017 order in Title Suit No. 890 of 2013 without awarding costs. The petitioners sought a reversal of that decision and an award of costs …

Kalawati Devi @ Kalawati and AnrversusSunaina Devi and Anr

DISPOSED

Kalawati Devi and Pabitri Devi filed a civil revision challenging the order of the Additional District Judge, Gopalganj, who had set aside a 2013 order in Miscellaneous Case No. 20 of 2005. The petitioners argued that the appellate decision should stand without cost against them. The High Court …

Harendra SinghversusBirendra Pandey

D.F.D. FOR NON APPEARANCE

The appellants, including Shail Kuar and her children, filed a first appeal in 2010 before the Patna High Court. Over several scheduled dates in 2025, no counsel or representative appeared on behalf of the appellants. The court noted the repeated non-appearance despite repeated calls. Upon reviewing …

Chhathu Sah Gond @ Chhathu SahversusThe State Of Bihar and Ors

ALLOWED

The petitioner sought to deposit a cost of Rs.5,000 that was conditionally ordered by the trial court when restoring his Title Appeal No.12 of 2013. He missed the three‑week deadline and filed a petition on 6 July 2017 for permission to pay the cost, which the trial court rejected on the ground of …

RAM CHANDRA SAOversusSHATRUGHAN PRASAD SWARNKAR andAN

D.F.D. FOR NON APPEARANCE

The appellant filed a second appeal in 1995 against the respondents. Over several scheduled dates in 2025, the appellant’s counsel failed to appear, and no representative attended the hearings despite repeated notices. The court examined the record and noted the appellant’s continued absence. Under …

The Chairman, Bihar State Electricity BoardversusGorakh Nath Singh

D.F.D. FOR NON APPEARANCE

The Bihar State Electricity Board filed a second appeal in 1995 against Gorakh Nath Singh. The appellant failed to appear before the court on multiple dates (17.01.2025, 16.09.2025, 04.12.2025) despite repeated notices. No counsel represented the appellant at any of these hearings. The court …

Pramod Kumar AgrawalversusSanjay Kumar Agrawal

DISMISSED

The petitioner, a tenant of a shop premises, sought dismissal of an eviction suit under Section 151 of the CPC, claiming that a subsequent sale of a 50% undivided share in the premises to him rendered the suit infructuous. The trial court rejected this application, and the petitioner appealed by …

Kuldeep KashyapversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Kuldeep Kashyap, was arrested in connection with offences under Section 364(A) and 411 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1‑b)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. He applied for regular bail, claiming a clean antecedent and having been in custody since 28‑11‑2023. The High Court …

ABDUL KALAM @ ABUL KALAMversusHARIHAR SINGH and ORS.

D.F.D. (PRE-EMPTORY)

The petitioner filed an application seeking the court's permission to withdraw the same. The learned counsel for the petitioner requested that the application be withdrawn. The court granted permission to withdraw the application. Consequently, the application was dismissed as withdrawn. No …

Rambachchan SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Rambachchan Sharma, was charged under Section 87 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances (BNS) Act and Sections 8 and 12 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act for allegedly abducting a minor girl with the intention of marrying her. The petitioner pleaded innocence, …

Sanjeet ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Sanjeet Chaudhary was arrested in connection with a dacoity and robbery of ICICI Bank, alleged under IPC sections 395 and 397. He had been in custody since January 2024 and his earlier bail application was rejected. The petitioner claimed innocence, stating his name was added to the FIR only on the …

Smt. Shanti DeviversusVidyasagar Pathak

WITHDRAWN

The petition was filed by Smt. Shanti Devi against several respondents including Vidyasagar Pathak and others in Civil Revision No.74 of 2019 before the Patna High Court. The petitioner’s counsel later sought the court’s permission to withdraw the petition. The matter was heard by Hon’ble Justice …

Manish Kumar @ Manish Kumar SahniversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Manish Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case (PS No. 123 of 2025) alleging offences under several sections of the B.N.S., including assault on an informant and her family. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated, asserting no prior criminal record and that the …

Sanjay SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioners, Sanjay Sharma and Pintu Sharma, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition (No. 5320 of 2026) before the Patna High Court challenging an action by the State of Bihar. During the hearing on 4 February 2026, the petitioners' counsel sought the Court's permission to withdraw the petition. …

Md. SalimversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Md. Salim, a 72‑year‑old resident of Marwaghat, was implicated in FIR No. 108 of 2025 under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109(1), 74, 352 and 3(5) of the BNS for allegedly participating in an assault on informant Abdul Kadir. The petitioner pleaded innocence, claiming the allegations were …

Santosh Chaudhary @ Abhishek AnandversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Santosh Chaudhary, sought bail fearing arrest in a case (PS No. 400 of 2025) involving alleged assault on an informant and her husband, charged under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 329(3) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that unknown persons attacked the victims with …

Pramod Kumar @ Pramod YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Pramod Kumar, sought bail fearing arrest in a case (Turkauliya PS No. 422 of 2025) alleging offences under several sections of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that he, along with co‑accused, assaulted an informant and his wife with weapons. The petitioner’s counsel argued that he …

Nitish Kumar @ Nitish PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, was implicated in a case (Minapur P.S. Case No. 335 of 2023) involving alleged mob assault, robbery and other offences under various IPC sections. He contended that he was merely a member of the mob and that no specific allegation of assault was made against him, …

Panchanand SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Panchanand Sah was implicated in an FIR alleging assault with a lathi on the informant's wife, resulting in head injuries. The petitioner claimed false implication, noting a family dispute and a case‑and‑counter‑case with only simple injury to the informant's side and a clean antecedent. The State …

Prabila Devi @ Pramila DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Prabila Devi, a 40‑year‑old woman, was implicated in a case (Kako P.S. Case No. 257 of 2025) alleging assault with an iron rod and theft of jewellery, under multiple sections of the Bihar Negotiable Substances Act. She claimed innocence, asserting that the allegations were politically motivated and …

Bhagirath ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

Bhagirath Chaudhary, a 20‑year‑old resident of Thalposh, was implicated in an FIR alleging that he, along with others, assaulted an informant and his brother over a neighbourly land‑dispute on 17 October 2025. The FIR, lodged three days later, charges him with offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), …

Most. Birata KuerversusRamanuj Thakur

D.F.D. FOR NON APPEARANCE

The first appeal No.351 of 1976 was filed by a large group of appellants against several respondents, with Mr. Anish Chandra Sinha appearing for the appellants. No counsel appeared for the respondents. The appellants' counsel informed the court that the parties had lost interest in the litigation …

Most. RukminiaversusMost. Piyariya Kuer

D.F.D. FOR NON APPEARANCE

The Patna High Court considered three second appeals (Nos. 165, 166 and 167 of 1992) filed by various widows, sons and wives concerning a dispute in Rohtas district. On several dates (04‑09‑2025, 11‑09‑2025, 09‑10‑2025, 13‑10‑2025 and 06‑01‑2026) no counsel appeared on behalf of the appellants. The …

Anurag KumarversusSantosh Kumar Chokhani

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Anurag Kumar, filed a civil revision petition before the Patna High Court. During the hearing on 2 February 2026, the petitioner's counsel sought the Court's permission to withdraw the petition. The Court considered whether it could grant such permission, noting its inherent …

Vikash YadavversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

Vikash Yadav was arrested in connection with a case where he allegedly shot a bullet at an informant's stomach and stole Rs.5,000, a gold chain, and an Aadhaar card. The charges include offences under Sections 126(2), 303(2), 308(2), 109(1), 3(5) of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act and Section …

Ranjit Roy @ Ranjeet RayversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

Ranjit Roy was arrested in connection with the recovery of 602 kg of ganja from a truck, alleged to have violated Sections 8, 20(b)(ii) and (c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. He applied for bail before the Patna High Court, having previously been denied bail in Criminal …

Mithilesh Kumar Ray @ Mithilesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, a 19‑year‑old driver, was declared a juvenile and charged under Sections 8(c), 20(ii)(c), 25 and 29 of the NDPS Act for the alleged recovery of 112 kg of ganja from a truck. He claimed he had no knowledge of the contraband and that the recovery was not from his conscious possession. …

Anuplal YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Anuplal Yadav was arrested after a police raid recovered a loaded country-made pistol with a live cartridge from his conscious possession, leading to charges under Sections 25(1‑b)(a) and 26 of the Arms Act. He had been in custody since 26‑10‑2024 and his earlier bail application was rejected by the …

Saurabh Kumar Singh @ Saurabh Singh @ Saurabh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Saurabh Kumar Singh, was arrested in connection with a case registered under multiple sections of the Bihar National Security Act, 2023 and the Arms Act for allegedly short-firing at an informant. He previously applied for bail, which was denied by the Patna High Court in Criminal …

Naushad AhmadversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Naushad Ahmad, is in custody for alleged offences under Sections 406, 467, 468, 471, 420/34 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code relating to a fraudulent Hajj and Umra tour scheme. The FIR alleges that the petitioner, along with co‑accused, misrepresented themselves as reliable tour …

KEDAR PASWANversusFUSHAN PASWAN

D.F.D. FOR NON APPEARANCE

The appellants filed a second appeal (No.185 of 1991) in the Patna High Court, which was scheduled for hearing on several dates in 2025 and 2026. Despite repeated notices, no counsel appeared on behalf of the appellants on any of the scheduled dates. The court examined the record and noted the …

MOSTT.SANTI DEVIversusJANAKI SARAN GUPTA

D.F.D. FOR NON APPEARANCE

The appellant filed a second appeal in 1991 but failed to appear before the court on multiple scheduled dates in 2025. No counsel represented the appellant despite repeated notices. The court examined the record and noted the appellant’s continued absence. Applying Order XLI Rule 17 of the Code of …

Shiv Shankar raut @ Shankar RautversusChandrakala Devi

DISMISSED

Petitioners Shiv Shankar Raut and Hari Raut filed a civil revision seeking to set aside the Munsif Court’s order rejecting their application under Order VII Rule 11(d) of the CPC, alleging that the plaint was barred by res judicata, was vexatious and time‑barred. The High Court noted that the …

Daya Kant @ Tantu YadavversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Daya Kant Yadav, was charged under Sections 25(1‑BA), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act for allegedly possessing a country‑made pistol and two live cartridges. The prosecution contended that the weapon and cartridges were recovered from the petitioner’s conscious possession, while the …

Jitendra DasversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Jitendra Das, aged about 65, was in judicial custody for offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 118, 351(3) and 352 of the Indian Penal Code arising from an alleged assault with an iron rod. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and co‑accused injured an informant, but …

Khurshid SiddiquiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Khurshid Siddiqui was arrested in a case of alleged robbery under Section 392 of the IPC, where two unknown persons on gunpoint allegedly looted Rs.3,50,000 from a motorcyclist. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, was not named in the FIR, no stolen money or the alleged …

Vipul Paswan @ Vipul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vipul Paswan applied for bail in a case (Sare P.S. Case No. 67 of 2025) involving multiple offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Arms Act. The prosecution alleges that the petitioner, along with others, assaulted an informant and his family using firearms and sharp weapons on the …

Abhishek Kumar @ Chintu SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Abhishek Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case alleging possession of 430 grams of ganja and 35 grams of heroin recovered from his residence. He applied for bail, contending that the quantities were below the commercial threshold under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic …

Birendra Kumar Sinha alias Virendra Kumar SinhaversusRaj karan Chaudhary

ALLOWED

The appellant, Aditya Pratap Sinha, claimed to be the real purchaser of land in 1980 whose sale deeds were placed in the names of his sister and brother‑in‑law due to service constraints, asserting they were mere name‑lenders and that he has exclusive possession, having built a house and shops. The …

Dnyanti Devi @ Gyanti Devi @ Gayatri DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dnyanti Devi, a mother‑in‑law, was in judicial custody for a dowry‑death case (Kargahar P.S. Case No. 326 of 2025) under Sections 80(2), 103(1) read with 3(5) of the BNS, 2023. The prosecution alleged dowry death due to non‑fulfilment of dowry demand, but no specific allegation was …

Santosh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Santosh Kumar was arrested in connection with a case alleging possession of 7.55 grams of heroin (Brown Sugar) recovered from his pocket, charged under Sections 8(c) and 21(b) of the NDPS Act. The petitioner claimed innocence, arguing that the quantity was below the commercial threshold and that the …

Ranjeet Bhagat @ Ranjeet Kumar @ Ranjeet BindversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ranjeet Bhagat, was arrested in connection with an assault and extortion case filed under several sections of the Bihar Penal Code. He contended that the FIR was fabricated as part of a counter‑case against him and that there were no independent eyewitnesses. The State opposed his …

Md. Shahnabaj @ Md. DanishversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Shahnabaj, was charged under Sections 8 and 20(b)(ii)(B) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act for alleged possession of 2.480 kg of ganja. He claimed innocence, argued that the seized quantity was below the commercial threshold, and pointed out the lack of …

Sukumal Kumar Ghosh @ Sukamal Kumar GhoshversusThe State of Bihar

D.F.D. FOR NON APPEARANCE

The petitioners, two senior brothers, filed a civil revision (C.R. No.1 of 2022) before the Patna High Court challenging certain actions of the State of Bihar and education officials. The petition was scheduled for hearing on 08‑12‑2025 and 05‑01‑2026, but no counsel appeared on either date despite …

Chhote Prasad SinghversusDr. Virendra Kumar Singh and Ors

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner filed an application seeking the court's permission to withdraw the pending proceedings. The learned counsel for the petitioner requested that the court allow the withdrawal. The court granted permission to withdraw the application. Consequently, the application was dismissed as …

Kamal SinghversusMost. Lali Devi

D.F.D. FOR NON APPEARANCE

The appellant, Kamal Singh, filed a second appeal (No.115 of 1992) against Nagina Harijan. The appellant failed to appear before the court on two scheduled dates, 11-12-2025 and 08-01-2026, despite repeated calls. No counsel represented the appellant on either occasion. Upon reviewing the record, …

DURGA PRASAD and ANRversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR and ORS

D.F.D. FOR NON APPEARANCE

The appellants, Durga Prasad and Bashistha Prasad, filed a first appeal in 1995 against the State of Bihar and other respondents. The appeal remained pending for over three decades, with no appearance by the appellants' counsel on multiple dates in 2023, 2024, and 2026. The Court examined the record …

BiharversusM/s Bharat Infracon Pvt. Ltd.,

WITHDRAWN

The State of Bihar filed a civil revision petition (No.106 of 2023) against M/s Bharat Infracon Pvt. Ltd. The petition was presented before the Patna High Court. During the hearing on 22-01-2026, counsel for the petitioner sought the Court's permission to withdraw the petition. The Court granted the …

Sanny KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sanny Kumar, was in judicial custody for alleged possession of two live cartridges under Sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that the cartridges were recovered from his conscious possession, but no independent witness to the seizure was recorded. …

Ravi KumarversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

Ravi Kumar, a 19‑year‑old, was arrested in connection with an alleged sexual relationship with a 16‑year‑old girl, alleged to have been pursued on the pretext of marriage. He was charged under Section 64 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Sections 4 and 6 of the Protection of Children from …

Md. Zahid @ Ghutti @ ZahidversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

Md. Zahid was implicated in a theft case (Kalyanpur P.S. Case No. 216 of 2025) for the alleged snatching of Rs. 34,000, an Aadhaar card and a mobile phone. The petitioner claimed innocence, arguing that he was not named in the FIR, no direct or indirect evidence linked him to the crime, and nothing …

Renu DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Renu Devi, aged about 35, was arrested in connection with an alleged abduction of the informant’s son and charged under Sections 137(2), 140(1) and 3(5) of the BNS. She contended that she was falsely implicated due to village politics, that there were no eyewitnesses, and that the FIR was lodged …

Santosh Kumar GuptaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Santosh Kumar Gupta was arrested in connection with an NDPS case (Case No. 103 of 2025) after the police recovered 1,026 grams of brown sugar from a co-accused, Jai Prakash Kumar, and other items from Mukesh Kumar. The petitioner’s name was entered in the FIR solely on the basis of confessional …

Brajesh Rai @ Brajesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Brajesh Rai, accused in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bihar Penal Code for assaulting an informant and his family, has been in judicial custody since September 8, 2024. He contended that he was falsely implicated and had no prior criminal record, seeking regular bail after an …

Ravi Shankar Yadav @ Aman KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ravi Shankar Yadav, was arrested in a fraud case (IPC §§420, 467, 468, 471, 472, 34) after the informant alleged he was the informant's son, a claim the informant denied. The petitioner contended he was falsely implicated and that the informant fabricated the FIR to shift liability, …

Vicky Kumar @ Surya Narayan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Vicky Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case of alleged kidnapping of a minor girl for the purpose of marriage, charged under Sections 137(2) and 140(3) of the BNS, 2023. The victim, aged about 14‑15, had earlier given a statement that she had married the petitioner and lived …

Chandan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Chandan Kumar was arrested in July 2025 on allegations of possessing a loaded pistol, violating Sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated due to local village politics and that no weapon was actually recovered from him, nor had any charge been …

Keshav Kumar Singh @ Keshav SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Keshav Kumar Singh, was arrested in connection with a road accident that resulted in the death of an informant's parents. The FIR charged him under Sections 281, 106(1), 105 and 238 of the BNS, although his name was not originally mentioned. The petitioner argued that he neither …

Krishna Kumar @ Krishna KunwarversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

Krishna Kumar, the petitioner, is in custody for alleged assault on the informant's sister, charged under multiple sections of the BNS and the Dowry Prohibition Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, the FIR was filed after an unexplained delay, and pointed to the grant of bail to a …

Dindayal YadavversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Dindayal Yadav, was arrested in connection with the shooting of an informant's son and charged under Sections 109 and 61(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, Sections 307 and 120B of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He argued that he was not named in the FIR, no …

Chhedi MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

Chhedi Mukhiya was arrested in connection with a kidnapping case involving the minor daughter of an informant, alleged under Sections 137(2), 96, 126(2), 115(2), 352 and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023. The petitioner pleaded innocence, arguing that the FIR was based solely on suspicion, that call‑detail …

Shanti DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Shanti Devi and Arvind Yadav were arrested in connection with a case involving assault on an informant's family, resulting in the mother’s death. The prosecution alleged that both were armed and participated in the assault, charging them under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. The …

Annu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Annu Kumar, a 24‑year‑old resident of Darbhanga, was arrested in a case under Sections 8(c), 29, 35 and 21(c) of the NDPS Act after a police raid recovered large quantities of cough syrup and tablets from a co‑accused’s house and a motorcycle. The petitioner contended that no contraband was found in …

Suraj Kumar GuptaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Suraj Kumar Gupta, a 21‑year‑old, was arrested in connection with an alleged kidnapping of an informant’s daughter under Sections 96, 351(3) and 3(5) of the BNS. The prosecution claimed he abducted the girl, while the petitioner asserted that he was falsely implicated and that the victim’s own …

Aatish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The Patna High Court considered a bail petition filed by Aatish Kumar, who had been in judicial custody since 2 August 2025 for alleged theft of an informant’s motorcycle, charged under Sections 303(2), 112(2), 317(4) and 3(5) of the BNS. The prosecution relied on the FIR, case diary and CCTV …

Uday KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Uday Kumar was arrested in connection with an alleged theft of 1,549 litres of petrol and 2,682 litres of diesel from Anshu Fuel Centre, charged under Sections 303(2) and 317 of the BNS. The FIR alleged that the accused, along with co‑accused, switched off lights using an emergency button and stole …

Sanjay Kumar @ Sanjay RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Sanjay Kumar was arrested on 26 September 2025 in connection with a case arising from a Tazia procession in which the son of an informant was allegedly dragged, injured and later died. He is charged under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023, including sections 190, …

Gita Devi @ Asha DeviversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

Gita Devi, the mother‑in‑law of the deceased Rangeela Devi, was charged under Sections 80 and 3(5) of the BNS Act for a dowry death. The petitioner sought bail, claiming she was falsely implicated and has a clean antecedent. The State opposed bail, alleging the petitioner demanded a motorcycle and, …

Deepak Kumar SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Deepak Kumar Sah, was arrested in connection with a dowry death case under Sections 108, 85 and 3(5) of the BNS. He contended that he was falsely implicated due to a family dispute, that there were no eyewitnesses to the alleged crime, and that no abetment charge was made against …

Rustam AliversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The High Court considered bail applications of Krishnanandan Kumar and Rustam Ali, who were in custody for alleged offences under IPC sections 384, 386, 427, 504 and 506 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The FIR alleged that they threatened an informant via a mobile call demanding Rs 20 lakh and later …

Akhilesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, five Yadav brothers, were arrested in a case (PS Halsi Case No.81 of 2025) alleging they abducted a minor girl, attempted to assault her modesty, and assaulted an informant with lathi and weapons, under multiple sections of the Bihar Naxal (BNS) Act, 2023. The petitioners contended …

Pradeep Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Pradeep Kumar Yadav was in judicial custody for offences alleged under Sections 137(2), 87 and 3(5) of the BNS, later deemed true under Section 306 of the IPC. The prosecution alleged that he, along with co‑accused, abducted the informant’s daughter. The petitioner claimed he was falsely …

Krishnanandan Kumar @ Krishnandan KumarversusThe State Of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The High Court considered bail applications of Krishnanandan Kumar and Rustam Ali, who were in custody for alleged offences under IPC sections 384, 386, 427, 504 and 506 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The FIR alleged that they threatened an informant via a mobile call demanding Rs 20 lakh and later …

Mohammad AliversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Mohammad Ali, a 21‑year‑old, was arrested in a case registered under Section 137(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Sections 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act for alleged sexual harassment of the minor daughter of an informant. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated due to local village …

Arvind Yadav @ Arvind KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Shanti Devi and Arvind Yadav were arrested in connection with a case involving assault on an informant's family, resulting in the mother’s death. The prosecution alleged that both were armed and participated in the assault, charging them under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. The …

Vinod ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vinod Chaudhary and Ramjeet Singh were named in an FIR for alleged possession of 1515.98 litres of illegal liquor, a vehicle, and live and dead cartridges, invoking sections of the IPC, Arms Act and Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. They applied for bail, claiming innocence, lack of conscious …

Vishal Kumar @ ChhotuversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

Vishal Kumar, a 19‑year‑old, was arrested in connection with the death of his brother‑in‑law after a quarrel in which a brick was allegedly thrown at the victim, causing him to fall into a well and die. The petitioner claimed innocence, asserting that the death was due to drowning and that he was …

Birendra PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, three Paswan brothers, were arrested in connection with the alleged murder of a 16‑year‑old girl, charged under Sections 103 and 238 of the BNS. They contended that they were falsely implicated, noting that they were not named in the FIR, no incriminating material was recovered, and …

Sheokumari Devi @ Shiv Kumari DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioners Sheokumari Devi and Kriti Kumari, two women, were arrested in a case alleging assault and firing that resulted in deaths, under multiple sections of the Bihar Penal Code and the Arms Act. The FIR alleged they ordered the attack during a land‑related dispute, but no direct allegation of …

ARYAN KUMAR @ AZAD @ MD. AZADversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Aryan Kumar alias Md. Azad, was charged under IPC sections 376, 420 and 506 and Section 4 of the POCSO Act for allegedly establishing a physical relationship with a minor Hindu girl under the pretext of offering her a job, threatening and blackmailing her with videos and photographs. …

Amresh Prasad @ BajrangiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Amresh Prasad, was arrested in a murder case under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the BNS, alleged to have killed the informant's father‑in‑law. The petitioner’s counsel argued that there were no eye‑witnesses, the post‑mortem showed death due to cardio‑respiratory arrest with no …

Baidyanath SharmaversusSmt. Rama Devi

DISMISSED

The plaintiff, Rama Devi, purchased a plot and leased it to the defendant, Baidyanath Sharma, for a monthly rent of Rs.500 with conditions against sub‑letting and structural changes. The plaintiff later sought eviction on the ground of bona‑fide personal necessity under Section 11(1)(c) of the Bihar …

RAM AUTAR PASWANversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Ram Autar Paswan, filed a criminal appeal in the Patna High Court. While the appeal was pending, the court received a report from the Superintendent of Police confirming that the appellant had died. The court examined the procedural implications of the appellant's death. It held that …

PARASU RAM SINGHversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

Parasu Ram Singh, the sole appellant in a criminal appeal before the Patna High Court, was reported dead by the Superintendent of Police during the pendency of the appeal. The court received a living status report confirming his death. Upon consideration, the bench held that the death of the sole …

Birendra Ram @ DomeversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

Birendra Ram was in judicial custody for offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 303(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S 2023. He filed a regular bail petition asserting that he had been falsely implicated. The State opposed the bail, pointing to his identification in a test identification parade and his …

Jishan AliversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Jishan Ali was arrested in connection with a murder case (Manjhagarh P.S. Case No. 139 of 2025) alleged under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the BNS. The FIR named only Sunil Kumar and two unknown persons; Ali's name surfaced later during investigation, with no material recovered from his possession …

Sunil MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

Sunil Mukhiya was arrested in July 2025 for alleged offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(2), 109, 329(3), 352 and 351(2) of the Bihar Negotiable Statutes, accused of striking the informant’s husband with a sword causing a grievous facial injury. He contended that he is innocent, asserting …

Chandan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Raj Narayan Kumar and Chandan Kumar, were arrested in a case under Sections 8(c) and 21(b) of the NDPS Act for allegedly possessing 0.2 grams of cannabis (smack) recovered from a four‑wheeler. They contended that they were neither owners nor drivers of the vehicle, that no …

Deepak KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Deepak Kumar was arrested in connection with a murder case (Wazirganj P.S. Case No. 339 of 2025) under Sections 103(1) and 238 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023. The FIR alleged that an unknown woman, later identified as his wife Sulekha Kumari, was killed by strangulation. Kumar contended …

BADAL PASWANversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

Badal Paswan was arrested in connection with the theft of a gold chain allegedly snatched from a schoolgirl, Soni Kumari, as recorded in a FIR under Section 309(4) of the BNS. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, and that the allegation was based solely on …

Raj Narayan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Raj Narayan Kumar and Chandan Kumar, were arrested in a case under Sections 8(c) and 21(b) of the NDPS Act for allegedly possessing 0.2 grams of cannabis (smack) recovered from a four‑wheeler. They contended that they were neither owners nor drivers of the vehicle, that no …

Md. Javed @ Md. JawedversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Md. Javed was arrested in connection with a case under the NDPS Act for allegedly possessing 2.9 kg of ganja, alleged to be more than the small quantity but less than commercial quantity. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated, noting the absence of independent witnesses to the seizure …

Subham KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Subham Kumar was arrested in connection with alleged offences under Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, based on a FIR that claimed he was the mastermind behind the recovery of a desi katta and bullets. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, relying on a confessional …

Krishna Kumar @ Rahul Kumar @ Krishna RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Krishna Kumar, was in judicial custody for offences under Section 309(6) of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act, alleged to have participated in an assault and robbery. The prosecution’s case was based solely on the confessional statement of a co-accused, with no incriminating …

Manjoor Ansari @ Md. Manjoor AnsariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manjoor Ansari and Abdul Gani were arrested in connection with a case alleging assault on an informant and his family and a missed gunshot, under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 118(2) and 109(1) of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act. The petitioners contended that they were falsely implicated, …

Rajesh JhaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Rajesh Jha was arrested in a case alleging abduction of a minor for marriage, under Sections 137(2) and 96 of the BNS, 2023. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, was not named in the FIR, and that the minor voluntarily went with the alleged abductor, denying any …