Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Jitendra GondversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Bail was granted to the petitioner subject to a bond and sureties under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

Summary

The petitioner, Jitendra Gond, sought bail in connection with a criminal case (Darauli P.S. Case No. 327 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 324(4), 126(2), 352, 109, 351(3) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that he, along with co‑accused, assaulted an informant and his wife. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated and argued that his co‑accused Basudeo Gond and Achhelal Gond had been granted bail, whereas his application was rejected solely because he failed to disclose two prior excise‑act cases. The State opposed bail. The Court noted the inconsistency and, after directing the petitioner to be vigilant about disclosing antecedents, granted bail on the condition of a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, invoking Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. The order was made pending his arrest or surrender within six weeks.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail despite non‑disclosure of prior criminal antecedents.
  • Whether the trial court’s refusal to grant bail, unlike that granted to co‑accused, violates the principle of equality before law.

Legislation cited

  • B.N.S. — s. 109, 126(2), 324(4), 3(5), 351(3), 352
  • B.N.S.S. — s. 482(2)

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal antecedent
  • equality before law
  • Section 482
  • non‑disclosure
  • excise act
  • Criminal Procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11353 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-327 Year-2025 Thana- DURAULI District- Siwan
                 ======================================================
                 Jitendra Gond S/o Achhelal Gond R/o vill - Tadava Parasiyaa, P.S.- Darauli,
                 Distt.- Siwan

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Raghav Prasad, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Syed Ehteshamuddin, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND
                 MALVIYA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   23-02-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State

                                2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection

                   with Darauli P.S Case No. 327 of 2025 registered for the

                   offences punishable under Sections 324(4), 126(2), 352, 109,

                   351(3), 3(5) of B.N.S.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, petitioner along with

                   co-accused have assaulted the informant and his wife.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is next

                   submitted that co-accused Basudeo Gond and Achhelal Gond

                   have been granted bail by the trial Court but on similar footing

                   petitioner bail application is rejected only on the basis that he
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11353 of 2026(2) dt.23-02-2026
                                            2/3




          failed to disclose his criminal antecedent of two case of excise

          act. It is further submitted that petitioner undertakes that in

          future he will be vigilant in mentioning his criminal antecedent

          and he seeks unconditional apology for his conduct.

                       5. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer

          for bail of the petitioner.

                       6. From perusal of the F.I.R., impugned order and

          materials available on record it appears that co-accused Basudeo

          Gond and Achhelal Gond have been granted bail by the trial

          Court but on similar footing petitioner bail application is

          rejected only on the basis that he failed to disclose his criminal

          antecedent of two case of excise act. Petitioner is hereby

          directed that in future he will be vigilant in mentioning his

          criminal antecedent.

                       7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

          of the case, submissions made on behalf of the petitioner, let the

          above named petitioner be released on bail in the event of his

          arrest or surrender before the trial court within a period of six

          weeks from today on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten

          thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

          satisfaction of learned JM-I, Siwan in connection with Darauli

          P.S Case No. 327 of 2025 subject to the condition laid down
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11353 of 2026(2) dt.23-02-2026
                                                       3/3




                     under Section 482(2) of B.N.S.S.



                                          (Ramesh Chand Malviya, J)
Mayank/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.