Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
223 judgments · newest first · showing 201–223
Raja Kumar Singh was arrested in connection with a theft of approximately 500 LPG cylinders, alleged under IPC sections 461 and 379 and corresponding sections of the Bihar Non‑Commercial Sale Act. The petitioner contended that he was not named in the FIR and was implicated only through the …
The petitioner, Pramod Kumar, was arrested in connection with FIR No.655 of 2024 alleging assault, attempted rape and related offences under Sections 75(2), 76, 115(2), 351(2), 352 and 127(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023. He contended that he is the husband of the informant, that the …
Ajay Kumar Singh was arrested in a case alleging assault, attempted strangulation, attempted burning, and dowry-related offences under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The petitioner claimed innocence, arguing that the FIR was lodged 25 days after …
Rupesh Kumar was arrested in connection with a theft of a motorcycle, the charge arising solely from a co-accused's confessional statement. The petitioner argued that he was falsely implicated, was not arrested on the spot, and no stolen property was recovered from his possession. The State opposed …
The petitioner, Vicky Pandit, was arrested in connection with a narcotics case (Haraiya P.S. Case No. 26 of 2024) for alleged possession of 134 grams of brown sugar, contravening several sections of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act. He contended that the seized quantity was …
The petitioner, Shankar Singh, sought bail in a case under Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act where police recovered a pistol, magazine and live cartridges from a co‑accused’s house. The prosecution’s case relied mainly on the confessional statement of the co‑accused Mannu Kumar, with no …
Raushan Kumar was arrested in connection with a case (Chakia P.S. Case No. 424 of 2025) alleging that he and co‑accused assaulted the son and daughter of an informant with an iron rod, intending to kill them, under sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 352, 351(2), 303(2) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023. The …
Hareram Mandal and Bijay Mandal were arrested in connection with a case (PS Kahalgaon case No. 387 of 2021) alleging assault with a knife, extortion of Rs.2,00,000 and threats to kill, punishable under several IPC sections. The petitioners contended that they were falsely implicated because of an …
The petitioners, Kundan Kumar and Mandan Kumar, were arrested in connection with a theft of Rs.5,00,180 and two mobile phones under Section 309(4) of the B.N.S. The FIR does not name them; their alleged involvement stems solely from a co-accused's confessional statement, and no stolen items were …
In Civil Revision No.236 of 2019, the petitioners filed an application before the Patna High Court seeking permission to withdraw the same. The petitioners were represented by Mr. J. S. Arora, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate, Ms. Prakriti Prakash, Advocate, and Ms. Supriya, Advocate. The …
The petitioners filed Civil Revision No.122 of 2023 before the Patna High Court. Subsequently, they approached the court seeking permission to withdraw the revision application. The learned counsel for the petitioners requested that the court allow the withdrawal. The court, exercising its inherent …
The petitioner, Rohit Pandey, was arrested in connection with a murder allegedly committed during a land dispute, charged under Sections 103(1) and 61(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He applied for bail, but the Patna High Court had earlier rejected his bail …
The petitioner, Jitendra Yadav, was in judicial custody for offences under Sections 137(2), 140(3), 109, 3(5) of the B.N.S, Section 27 of the Arms Act and later Section 103(1) of the B.N.S, alleged to have kidnapped an informant's son. He contended that he was falsely implicated and that his earlier …
The petitioner, Jhingan Manjhi, is in custody for offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code arising from a case registered in Hisua Police Station, Nawada. He previously applied for regular bail, which was rejected by the Patna High Court in Criminal Miscellaneous …
The petitioner, Piyush Kumar, was arrested in connection with PS 209 of 2024 for offences under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323 and 307 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He filed a regular bail application which was rejected on 14 May 2025, and he has remained in custody since 6 June 2024. On 9 …
Mithun Kumar filed an application before the Patna High Court in a criminal miscellaneous proceeding. The petitioner, through counsel Mr. Sunil Kumar, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the application. The Court considered whether such permission could be granted. Justice Ramesh Chand …
The petitioner, Saurabh Kumar, was arrested in August 2024 for alleged possession of a country‑made pistol and live cartridges under Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, based on information from a police informant. He had previously applied for bail, which was denied by the High Court, …
The petitioners, comprising Rakesh Kumar Bhagat and family members, filed Civil Revision No. 74 of 2023 before the Patna High Court against respondents Arun Kumar Mahto and Satya Narayan Mahaseth. The petition sought relief (the specific relief is not detailed in the order). The petitioners later …
The petitioners, a group of heirs and relatives from Village Raghopur, filed a civil revision (No.136 of 2017) before the Patna High Court. During the hearing on 6 January 2026, the petitioners' counsel sought the Court's permission to withdraw the petition. The Court considered whether it could …
The petitioners filed Civil Revision No.139 of 2018 before the Patna High Court challenging a decision of the lower court. During the proceedings, the petitioners' counsel applied for permission to withdraw the revision petition. The court considered whether such permission could be granted under …
The petitioners, tenants of two commercial shops in a building owned by the respondents, challenged an eviction decree dated 29‑03‑2023 that ordered them to vacate within 60 days. The respondents, a co‑owner of the property, claimed bona‑fide personal necessity to use the premises for a showroom …
The petitioners filed a civil revision seeking permission to withdraw the pending petition. They approached the court requesting that the proceedings be terminated. The central issue was whether the court could, at its discretion, allow the withdrawal of a petition. The court held that it has …
The appellants filed a first appeal in 2011 before the Patna High Court. On multiple scheduled dates in 2025, no counsel or party appeared on behalf of the appellants despite repeated notices. The respondent's counsel was present throughout. The court examined the record and, noting the continuous …
