Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Abhishek Kumar @ Chintu SinghversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court grants bail to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Abhishek Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case alleging possession of 430 grams of ganja and 35 grams of heroin recovered from his residence. He applied for bail, contending that the quantities were below the commercial threshold under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act and that no contraband was found in his conscious possession. The petitioner also highlighted his clean record and the fact that a co‑accused had already been granted bail in a related matter. The State opposed the bail on the ground of the seriousness of the offences under Sections 8, 20(b)(ii)(B) and 29 of the NDPS Act. The Court, considering the sub‑commercial quantities, the petitioner’s lack of prior criminal history, and the precedent of bail to the co‑accused, decided to grant bail. Bail was ordered on a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of the same amount.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted in an NDPS case where the seized narcotics are below commercial quantity but above small quantity for heroin.
  • Whether the absence of conscious possession and a clean antecedent justify bail under the NDPS Act.
  • Whether the grant of bail to a co‑accused influences the decision on bail for the petitioner.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • NDPS Act
  • narcotics
  • small quantity
  • commercial quantity
  • possession
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2826 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-245 Year-2025 Thana- JANDAHA District- Vaishali
                 ======================================================
                 Abhishek Kumar @ Chintu Singh S/o- Vijay Singh Village- Dih Buchauli @
                 Dih Bichauli, PS- Mahisaur Jandaha District- Vaishali

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Vasant Vikas, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Jai Narain Thakur, Advocate
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND
                 MALVIYA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   28-01-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with

                   Jandaha P.S. Case No. 245 of 2025, instituted for the offences

                   punishable under Sections 8, 20(b)(ii)(B) and 29 of the

                   Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act.

                                3. The prosecution case, in short, is that there is

                   recovery of 430 grams of Ganja and 35 grams of Heroin (Kota)

                   from the house of the petitioner.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the

                   present case only on the basis of suspicion and to harass the

                   petitioner. He further submits that the quantity of Ganja
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2826 of 2026(2) dt.28-01-2026
                                            2/3




          recovered is less than the small quantity as per N.D.P.S. Act and,

          so far as Heroine (Kota) is concerned, the same is also slightly

          higher than the small quantity but, much less than the

          commercial quantity and, hence, Section 37 of the N.D.P.S. Act

          is not applicable in the present case. Nothing incriminating

          material has been recovered from the conscious possession of

          the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits

          that the petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery

          of alleged Heroine (Kota) or the Ganja. The petitioner is in

          custody since 13.08.2025 and has got no criminal antecedent. It

          is next submitted that co-accused has already been granted bail

          by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated

          05.08.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 48548 of 2025.

                       5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently

          opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

                       6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

          of the case, the recovered contraband being below the

          commercial quantity, the period of custody undergone by the

          petitioner. Moreover, co-accused has already been granted bail

          by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated

          05.08.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 48548 of 2025, this Court is

          inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2826 of 2026(2) dt.28-01-2026
                                                        3/3




                                   7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing

                     bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of

                     the    like     amount      each      to   the      satisfaction   of   Court

                     below/concerned Court in connection with Jandaha P.S. Case

                     No. 245 of 2025.



                                          (Ramesh Chand Malviya, J)
Mayank/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.