Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
10 judgments · newest first · showing 1–10
The petitioner, Akash Paswan, sought anticipatory bail after liquor amounting to 33.48 litres was recovered from a motorcycle he owned, though the liquor was not in his immediate possession and the alleged offender fled the scene. He argued that he had a clean antecedent and that ownership of the …
The petitioner, Sandeep Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly recovering 248.10 litres of liquor from a bush. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and …
The petitioner, Dewanti Devi, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 9 litres of liquor in a seized motorcycle. She argued that she had a clean antecedent, was a woman, and was …
The petitioner, Pintu Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 30 litres of liquor from a public area not in his possession. He argued that the informant, a chowkidar with whom he …
The petitioner, Raju Chaudhary, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for allegedly recovering 499.5 litres of liquor from a field adjacent to his residence. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the location did not …
Petitioner Prakash Singh sought bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022 for allegedly selling country-made liquor. The police seized 16 litres of liquor and, based on statements of two arrested individuals, identified the petitioner as …
The petitioner, Sanjeet Rai, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that the liquor seized from a ditch did not belong to him and that he was implicated solely on secret information without proper investigation. He argued that …
The petitioner, Prahlad Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a), 41(1), 31(1) and 31(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 5,385.12 litres of liquor from a truck and a car. He contended that he was …
The petitioner, Saligram Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for alleged possession of liquor and destruction of Jawa Mahua at a property that is part of a joint family. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, that no liquor …
The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after the police alleged that 26.1 litres of liquor were recovered from two motorcycles linked to him. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure, and that the case against him was based …
