Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bihar Negotiable Security Act (BNSS)

6 judgments · newest first · showing 1–6

SAROJ SAHNI @ SAROJ KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Saroj Sahni, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 435 litres of liquor and 15,000 litres of fermented jaggery from the Gandak river. He argued that the seized material was not in his possession, the riverbank is a public …

Rajgeer Kumar @ Rajgir KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rajgeer Kumar, was named in an FIR under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022 for allegedly engaging in the illegal trade of illicit liquor, with 13.125 litres recovered. He contended that his name was implicated solely because a motorcycle he owned was used by …

Dinesh PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Dinesh Paswan applied for bail after police raided his residence and seized 85 litres of illicit country-made liquor in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. The petitioner argued that the seizure violated Sections 103 and 105 of the …

Shambhu SawversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Shambhu Saw, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 55 litres of liquor recovered from his house, which is a joint family property. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the scene, and that the 2018 …

Manish Kumar @ ChintuversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manish Kumar had been in custody since 19 February 2024 for a case registered as Vaishali P.S. Case No. 328 of 2020. Only six of ten prosecution witnesses had been examined, and an informant had given a clean chit to the petitioner. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the two‑year detention without …

Shivam KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Shivam Kumar, a 21‑year‑old, was charged under Sections 137 and 96 of the BNSS for allegedly kidnapping a 14‑year‑old girl with the intention of marrying her. He claimed the marriage was consensual, citing a statement recorded under Section 183 BNSS that the girl had voluntarily married him. The …