Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
21 judgments · newest first · showing 1–21
The appellant filed an application under Section 156(3) of the Cr.P.C. alleging that the respondents had abused him with filthy language and threatened him, claiming the conduct amounted to an offence under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The Special Judge …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a chargesheet and the criminal case (Criminal Case No. 1977 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. They claimed they were falsely …
The applicants Diwari Lal and nine others filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 3928 of 2021, which stemmed from offences under Sections 147, 148, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. Both parties had entered into a verified compromise deed, which was examined and …
The applicant, Mohd. Ikram, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet and cognizance order in a criminal case (State vs. Mohd. Ikram) involving offences under Sections 376 and 506 IPC. The applicant and the prosecutrix had married on 16 December 2025, and …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal case No. 13113 of 2025 (State v. Kamlesh Ojha et al.) involving offences under IPC sections 147, 323, 325, 504, 506 and 308. The parties had entered into a compromise on 29 July 2025, which was verified by …
The petitioner, Mithlesh Kumar, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a kidnapping case (PS Case No. 92 of 2024) alleging offences under Sections 363, 366A and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The FIR alleged that he abducted the informant’s daughter with intent to sell her, but the victim’s statement under …
The complainant, a daily labourer, alleged that the appellant, Birendra Chaudhary, assaulted him, used caste-based slurs, and stole money while refusing to pay wages, invoking Sections 379 and 504 of the IPC and Sections 3(i)(r) and 3(i)(s) of the SC/ST Act. The appellant applied for anticipatory …
The appellants, who are relatives of the husband of the informant, appealed against the Additional Sessions Judge’s order rejecting their anticipatory bail application in a case registered under multiple IPC offences and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The …
Devesh Kumar Rai, a serving Sepoy in the Indian Army, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a FIR alleging offences under several IPC sections and the Dowry Prohibition Act. He contended that the allegations, including a claim of a second marriage and dowry demands, were false and …
Gautam Kumar sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case (Jalley P.S. Case No. 129 of 2024) alleging offences under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code for his alleged role in a fraudulent GST‑ITC scheme. The prosecution alleged that he helped file zero GST returns and …
The petitioner, Amardip Kumar, was implicated in a complaint alleging offences under Sections 498(A) and 323 of the IPC for alleged dowry harassment and assault. He applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest. The State opposed the application, but the court, relying on the Supreme Court's decision …
Shiv Shankar Chaudhary, husband of the complainant Juli Kumari, was implicated in a complaint (No.1363 of 2022) alleging assault and torture for dowry demands under Section 498A of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The petitioner applied for anticipatory bail, claiming …
The petitioner, Md. Sajib Khan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in Mahila Police Station Case No. 60 of 2024, which involved offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 of the DP Act. Both parties informed the court that the dispute had been settled through the …
The petitioner, Sushila Devi, feared arrest in a case involving multiple serious offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Immoral Trafficking (Prevention) Act. She applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that she has a clean record and is a woman, and that similar applicants in Criminal …
Ranjan Kumar was charged in Complaint No. 5494(C)/2021 for alleged offences including assault, robbery and offences under the Prevention of Witch (Dain) Practices Act, with the prosecution alleging he snatched a golden chain. The petitioner contended that the allegations were false, arising from a …
The petitioner, Md. Sanaur, was arrested in connection with a complaint under Section 498A IPC alleging dowry harassment and his alleged ouster of his wife, Afreen Perveen, from the matrimonial home. The petitioner pleaded innocence, asserted no dowry demand, and offered to pay Rs. 50,000 to the …
The petitioner, Sandeep Sahani, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a kidnapping case (Harsidhi P.S. Case No. 686 of 2023) involving offences under Sections 363, 365, 366A/34 of the IPC and Section 8 of the POCSO Act. The prosecution alleged the petitioner had kidnapped a minor girl, while …
Sanoj Kumar was named in a 2023 complaint alleging cruelty, dowry demand of Rs. 2 lakh, and an attempt to murder the complainant by pouring kerosene oil, invoking Sections 498A and 307 of the IPC, Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, and a second marriage claim. The petitioner’s counsel argued …
Mukesh Sah was arrested in a criminal case (Jhanjharpur C.R. No. 282 of 2022) for alleged cruelty under Section 498A of the IPC and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, based on a claim that he refused to pay Rs.5 lakh demanded for starting a business. The complainant, Jyoti Devi, was alleged to …
The petitioners, Aakash Kumar and Bittu Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 206 litres of liquor from a vehicle. They argued that they were not arrested on the spot, no liquor was found in their …
The petitioner, Md Aminul Hassan, was named in an FIR for alleged cheating and criminal breach of trust under Sections 406 and 420 of the IPC, accused of taking an advance of Rs. 7.98 lakh for a sale deed that was never executed. He contended that the property is in his father's name, he is a …
