Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Md Aminul Hassan @ Md AminulversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Bail was granted to the petitioner subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

Summary

The petitioner, Md Aminul Hassan, was named in an FIR for alleged cheating and criminal breach of trust under Sections 406 and 420 of the IPC, accused of taking an advance of Rs. 7.98 lakh for a sale deed that was never executed. He contended that the property is in his father's name, he is a research scholar, and the agreement forming the basis of the charge was not signed by him, only by the informant. The court noted that the police report indicated his signature appeared only on a compromise document and that the underlying dispute appears to be civil, with a title suit already pending. The State could not refute the claim that the agreement was not signed by the petitioner. Considering the civil nature of the dispute and lack of prima facie evidence of his participation, the court ordered his release on bail with a bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties, subject to surrender within four weeks and conditions under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted in a case of alleged cheating and criminal breach of trust when the agreement alleged to be the basis of the offence is not signed by the accused.
  • Whether the civil nature of the underlying property dispute precludes continuation of criminal proceedings without bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • cheating
  • criminal breach of trust
  • IPC
  • Section 482
  • BNSS
  • civil dispute
  • property sale
  • agreement signature

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33821 of 2025
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-135 Year-2024 Thana- KATIHAR NAGAR District- Katihar
                 ======================================================
                 Md Aminul Hassan @ Md Aminul S/O Md Rafiqul Hassan Resident of
                 Bhikhanpur Hatia Chowk, P.S.- Bhagalpur, Dist.- Bhagalpur.

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr.Rabindra Prasad Singh
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr.Anil Kumar
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

5   05-01-2026                    Heard the parties.

                                2.The petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and

                   apprehending his arrest in connection with Katihar (N) P.S.

                   Case No. 135 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable

                   under Sections 406 and 420 of the IPC

                                3. The allegation against petitioner is to cheat

                   informant as not to execute the sale deed in terms of

                   agreement dated 01.02.2022 after receiving advance of Rs.

                   7,98,000/- against total considerations of Rs. 12,00,000/-.

                                4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on

                   behalf of the petitioner that the property in issue is in name of

                   father of petitioner. It is submitted that petitioner is highly
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33821 of 2025(5) dt.05-01-2026
                                            2/3




          qualified person and presently he is a research scholar of IIT,

          Mumbai. It is submitted that the agreement which is the basis

          of entire allegation, which annexed as P/16 of the present bail

          petition is without any signature of this petitioner and it was

          only signed by informant. It is pointed that upon verifications

          even the police report suggests that petitioner signed only on

          compromise when he was called by the police.

                       5. Arguing further, it is submitted by learned

          counsel that primarily the dispute between the parties

          appears civil in nature arising out of land dispute for which

          title suit bearing no. 211 of 2024 is pending before learned

          Sub-Judge, Katihar. While concluding argument, it is

          submitted that petitioner is a man of clean antecedent.

                       6. Learned APP while opposing the prayer of bail

          could not disputed the submissions that the agreement in

          issue was not signed by this petitioner as submitted aforesaid.

                        7. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by

          taking note of fact as dispute primarily appears civil in nature

          for which title suit is pending before appropriate civil court as

          mentioned aforesaid, coupled with the fact that the
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33821 of 2025(5) dt.05-01-2026
                                                          3/3




                        agreement which is the calyx of the present dispute not

                        appears prima-facie signed by this petitioner (Annexure

                        P/16), accordingly petitioner above-named, in the event of his

                        arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of

                        four weeks, is directed to be released on bail, furnishing bail

                        bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two

                        sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the

                        learned CJM, Katihar/concerned Court, where the case is

                        pending in connection with Katihar (N) P.S. Case No. 135 of

                        2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section

                        482(2) of BNSS.



                                                                (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)
Sudha/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.