Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
4 judgments · newest first · showing 1–4
Mukesh Khatik sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 54 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he has a clean criminal record, was not arrested on the spot, did not have possession of the liquor, and …
The petitioners, Virendra Ram and his son Pritam Kumar, were named in an FIR for alleged assault on an informant, accused of using a sword, farsa and hand knuckles, leading to head and bodily injuries. The defense argued that the injuries were simple lacerations not consistent with sharp-edged …
The petitioner, Baby Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 200 litres of liquor from a public riverbank. He argued that no liquor was seized from his possession, the alleged recovery site did not belong to him, and the FIR …
The petitioner, Munna Sah, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 4.5 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that the liquor was not found in his conscious possession and that he was unaware of his friend's alleged misuse of the …
