Patna High Court
Mukesh Khatik @ Mukesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
- Bench
- SATYAVRAT VERMA
Holding
The Court provisionally granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to verification of his antecedent and compliance with the conditions under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
Summary
Mukesh Khatik sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 54 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he has a clean criminal record, was not arrested on the spot, did not have possession of the liquor, and was not the owner of the seized vehicle, and that the FIR did not name him. The State opposed the bail. The Court granted provisional anticipatory bail conditioned on a Rs. 500 bond with two sureties and directed verification of his antecedent. If any prior case is found, the bail will not be confirmed; otherwise, it will be confirmed immediately. The order is subject to the provisions of Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriateness of granting anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act?
- Does the petitioner’s lack of ownership of the seized vehicle and omission of his name in the FIR affect the bail decision?
- Whether the conditions imposed under Section 482(2) of the BNSS are satisfied for provisional anticipatory bail?
Legislation cited
- Bihar Excise Act — s. 30(a)
- Bihar Negotiable Subordinate Service (BNSS) — s. 482(2)
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- Bihar Excise Act
- Section 30(a)
- Section 482(2)
- clean antecedent
- seizure of liquor
- provisional bail
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37507 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-14 Year-2026 Thana- PHULWARIYA District- Gopalganj
======================================================
Mukesh Khatik @ Mukesh Kumar S/o Ramchandra Khatik @ Ramchandra
Prasad Resident of Village- Gosaisiya, (Gosaeiya), P.S.- Bhorey, District-
Gopalganj
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Javed Aslam
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Khurshid Anwar
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
ORAL ORDER
2 17-06-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case
registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the
Bihar Excise Act.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and allegation is of
recovery of 54 litres of liquor from a motorcycle.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was
recovered from his conscious possession and is not the owner of
the seized vehicle and he came to be implicated at the instance
of local people, but then the name of the person, who disclosed
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37507 of 2026(2) dt.17-06-2026
2/3
the name of the petitioner, is not disclosed in the FIR, which
casts an aspersion on the case of the prosecution.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for
anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned
counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the
event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks
from today, be released on Provisional anticipatory bail on
furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) with
two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the
learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in
connection with Phulwariya P.S. Case No. 14 of 2026, subject to
the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
7. It is made clear that thereafter the learned Trial
Court shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and
in the event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of even
one case then it would be presumed that petitioner, for the
purposes of seeking anticipatory bail, had concealed his
antecedent before this Court, as such, the provisional
anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed, but after
verification if it is found that petitioner is a person with clean
antecedent in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37507 of 2026(2) dt.17-06-2026
3/3
shall be confirmed forthwith.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
Sumit/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.