Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
5446 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200
The petitioner, Md Sajid, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition (No. 66132 of 2025) arising from a police case registered in 2023 in West Champaran. No counsel or party appeared on behalf of the petitioner at the hearing. The State of Bihar and the informant were represented by an Additional …
The petitioner, Bipin Kumar, was arrested in connection with the death of his wife, who was alleged to have been murdered but the petitioner claims she committed suicide due to infertility-related depression. The informant, who is not an eyewitness, alleged that the petitioner and his family tried …
Vicky Kumar was arrested in a case registered under Sections 191(2), 190, 109, 115(2), 126(2), 351(2) and 352 of the BNS, 2023 for allegedly assaulting an informant with an iron rod. The petitioner claimed he has a clean antecedent, that the injury was simple and not repeated, and that the alleged …
The petitioner, Md. Kyamuddin, was facing criminal proceedings and had filed an anticipatory bail application under the Criminal Procedure Code. After surrendering to the authorities, the petitioner sought the court's permission to withdraw his anticipatory bail application. The petitioner was …
The petitioner, Ranjan Kumar, had filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal miscellaneous case. While the application was pending, he was arrested by the police. He then approached the court seeking permission to withdraw his anticipatory bail application. The court, after hearing counsel …
The petitioner, Bijal Mahto, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case involving multiple offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was falsely implicated by an informant, and is the father of one of the accused, Roshan. The prosecution …
The appellant, Dhan Kumar Singh, was charged with offences under the IPC (sections 341, 323, 307, 427, 120B), the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and the Arms Act for an alleged armed assault that began with a dispute over straw prices and escalated to arson and …
Amarjeet Kumar applied for anticipatory bail in a case where he is accused of multiple offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, including assault, robbery and other violent crimes. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated due to a land dispute with the informant and asserted he would …
Prince Kumar, a resident of Gaya, was arrested in connection with a robbery alleged to have occurred on 12‑June‑2024, for which he seeks bail under Section 394 of the IPC. The petitioner contends he has a clean record, is not named in the FIR, and that the only link to him is a confessional …
The petitioner Yogendra Chaudhary sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 308(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for alleged extortion and intimidation. He asserted a clean antecedent and claimed the informant’s allegations were false, contending that the …
The petitioners, four male relatives of a victim in a dowry‑death case, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Sections 80, 238 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. They argued they have clean antecedents, were falsely implicated by an informant, and that co‑accused in the same case had …
The petitioners, Budhraj Singh and his son Guddu Kumar, were arrested in connection with offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 351(2), 352, 117(2) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023. They applied for regular bail after an earlier anticipatory bail application was withdrawn …
The petitioner, Byas Yadav, was charged under several IPC sections (147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 325, 307) and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He had earlier applied for anticipatory bail and regular bail, both of which were rejected, but the court allowed him to renew his bail plea after charge …
The petitioner, Dhananjay Tiwari, was arrested in connection with a land‑sale dispute and charged under Sections 467, 468 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code for alleged forgery and criminal conspiracy. The FIR alleges that forged sale deeds and a fake power of attorney were used to cheat the …
The Patna High Court considered regular and anticipatory bail applications filed by three petitioners—Raja Kumar, Ravindra Kumar Paswan, and Girja Devi—who were implicated in a kidnapping case (PS Desari Case No. 200 of 2020) involving a minor girl. The FIR, registered against unknown persons, …
The Patna High Court considered regular and anticipatory bail applications filed by three petitioners—Raja Kumar, Ravindra Kumar Paswan, and Girja Devi—who were implicated in a kidnapping case (PS Desari Case No. 200 of 2020) involving a minor girl. The FIR, registered against unknown persons, …
The appellant Ajit Kumar appealed under Section 14-A(2) of the SC/ST Act against the trial court's refusal to grant regular bail in a case involving alleged murder, criminal conspiracy and other offences under the IPC and the SC/ST Act. The FIR stemmed from the disappearance and death of the …
The Patna High Court considered regular and anticipatory bail applications filed by three petitioners—Raja Kumar, Ravindra Kumar Paswan, and Girja Devi—in connection with a kidnapping case (PS Desari Case No. 200 of 2020) involving alleged offences under Sections 363, 365, 366(a) and 34 of the …
Madan Sah filed a criminal appeal (SJ) No.5012 of 2025 before the Patna High Court challenging the second anticipatory bail application filed by the State of Bihar and Mithlesh Devi. The appellant sought permission to withdraw the appeal, arguing that continuation was unnecessary. The learned …
Milan Kumar Sah and his wife Madhu Devi applied for anticipatory bail in a complaint filed by Anju Kumari alleging offences under Sections 403 and 420 of the IPC. The petitioners contended that the complainant had previously been cordial but later filed a false case after a business dispute, and …
Prakash Kumar was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, relating to the killing of a boy during a gang-related fight. The petitioner argued that he was not named in the FIR and that the incident stemmed from a …
The petitioners, Abhishek Kumar, Nagendra Mahto and Surjan Mahto, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita relating to assault with a knife and iron rod. They claimed they have clean antecedents and alleged that the informant, …
The petitioner, Shyam Kedia, sought anticipatory bail after a complaint was lodged alleging dowry demands, forced sexual intercourse, and other offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The informant, a purported executive of Indigo Airlines, claimed that her father …
The petitioners sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case alleging dowry demand, sexual assault and related offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Dowry Prohibition Act. They contended that the informant’s allegations were false, that the marriage had been called off, and …
Petitioner Tabish Khan, who had been granted default bail, filed a regular bail application. He later sought permission to withdraw that application. The petitioner’s counsel argued for withdrawal, and the State’s counsel was heard. The court, after hearing both sides, granted permission to withdraw …
The petitioner, Md. Shohrab, was charged under IPC sections 365, 364 and 120(B) for a 2019 case and has been in custody since 17‑10‑2025. He previously filed an anticipatory bail application (Cr. Misc. No. 62096 of 2025) which was rejected on 03‑09‑2025. The State highlighted that the petitioner now …
The petitioners, Nagendra Chandara Banshi and Naredra Chandara Banshi, applied for regular bail in a case registered as Paliganj P.S. Case No. 455 of 2024, which involves offences under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable (BNS) Act, 2023. Their earlier bail application (Criminal Miscellaneous …
The petitioner, Dev Raj, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS Case No. 613 of 2024) involving alleged offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Examination Act. The FIR alleged that a person named Chetan impersonated another, Abhishek, in a constable recruitment exam, and …
The petitioner, Dikshit Kumar, was arrested in connection with the death of his friend Sonu and charged under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023. The informant alleged that Sonu was found dead with injuries and that CCTV footage at the scene had been tampered with, …
Manish Yadav was arrested in connection with a sand‑mining incident where alleged firing occurred, leading to charges under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner argued that he was falsely implicated, that no one was injured, and that the seized …
Awadh Kumar was accused of kidnapping his minor daughter under Sections 366, 366A, 504, 506 and 34 of the IPC based on an informant’s allegation. The petitioner claimed a clean record and argued that the victim later returned and did not support the prosecution’s case, indicating false implication. …
The petitioners, Ghanshyam Ray and Nageshwar Mahto, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 26.64 litres of liquor from a joint family house. They argued they have clean antecedents, were not apprehended at the spot, and …
Manoj Kumar applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 40.8 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. The petitioner argued he was not in possession of the seized vehicles, the allegation rested on a confessional statement …
Vikash Kumar sought anticipatory bail after learning that he may be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, alleging recovery of 14.625 litres of liquor from a paddy field not belonging to him. He contended that the recovery was not from his …
The petitioner, Sushil Sah, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 20 litres of liquor from a bush adjacent to his house. He contended that he was not arrested at the spot, the liquor was not in his possession, and the …
The petitioner, Sima Kumari, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 3.060 litres of liquor from a motorcycle she owned. She argued that she had no conscious possession of the liquor, was unaware of her friend's misuse of the …
Umesh Rai was implicated in a case under Section 414 of the IPC read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 180 litres of liquor from three motorcycles. He argued that he was not present at the spot, that the seized vehicle belonged to him but was misused by a friend, and …
The petitioner, Guddu Sahni, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 300 litres of liquor near the Gandak river, though no liquor was found in his possession. He claimed the investigation was mechanical, based on …
Madhuri Devi sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. She has two prior criminal cases, one involving alleged recovery of 10 litres of liquor from a bush near her house, with no arrest at the spot and no possession …
Vinod Sahni, a resident of Shyampur, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a), 32 and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 10.5 litres of liquor recovered from a bag that did not belong to him. He claimed he had a clean antecedent and that the complaint was motivated by an …
The petitioner, Md. Javed, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 8.46 litres of liquor from his house, which is a joint family property. He argued that no liquor was found in his conscious possession and that the post‑2018 …
The petitioners, Munna Kumar and Sarjun Manjhi, were implicated under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of liquor recovered from a joint family house. They applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that they were not arrested on the spot, the liquor was not in their conscious …
The petitioner, Lal Babu Prasad, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, where 2.160 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a bicycle not owned by him. He has seven prior cases under the Excise Act and claims he was implicated by a local …
Monu Kumar was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for the alleged recovery of six litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his house. He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was not …
The petitioner, Ajit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 106.75 litres of liquor from a sack at village Bhelwatar. He contended that he was not present at the …
Kalendra Kumar sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging he concealed 28 litres of liquor under a tree. He argued he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and the allegation stemmed from a …
Murat Sah, also known as Ram Murti Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 45.525 litres of liquor from three motorcycles. He contended that he was not arrested at the …
The petitioner, Krish Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 24,600 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He contended that he was not in possession of the liquor, was not the owner …
The petitioners, Nitish Kumar and Mukesh Kumar Rai, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 2,384 litres of liquor from a DCM vehicle. They argued they have clean antecedents, were not in …
The petitioner, Sujit Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for the alleged recovery of 45 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and that …
The petitioners Vijay Ray, Bittu Kumar and Bharat Kumar sought anticipatory bail after learning that they might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly recovering 200 litres of liquor from a CNG auto. They argued they have clean antecedents, …
Meena Devi applied for anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 15 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to her house. She was not arrested and no liquor was found in her possession. The petitioner claimed she has a clean …
The petitioner, Sikandar Chaudhary, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 15 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he had no prior criminal record and that the liquor was not found in his conscious possession, …
The petitioner, Gautam Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 317(5) and 61(2) of the Bihar Narcotic and Psychotropic Substances Act (BNS) read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 54 litres of liquor from a Tata Magic …
The petitioner, Sujit Prasad, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 10 litres of liquor from a bag near a river, which was not in his conscious possession. He has a prior case under the Excise Act. He applied for anticipatory …
The petitioner, Ravindra Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 42 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and had no conscious possession of the liquor, claiming …
Jalim Ray applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act and Sections 317(5), 51 and 52 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, alleging recovery of 220.5 litres of liquor from three motorcycles. The petitioner, who has three prior criminal cases (two under …
Manoj Kumar Singh, the owner of a vehicle from which 192.75 litres of liquor was seized, applied for anticipatory bail, claiming he had no knowledge of the offence and that his driver acted independently. The State opposed the bail, arguing the seizure implicated the owner under Section 30(a) of the …
The petitioner, Sayad Ejazullah Hafifi, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 232.410 litres of liquor from a vehicle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of arrest, and was …
The Patna High Court considered an appeal under Section 14‑A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act challenging the refusal of anticipatory bail for four accused (the Yadavs) in a case of alleged firing on 4‑August‑2024. The prosecution alleged that the …
The appellants, Shiv Pujan Singh, Alvela Singh and Utam Singh, filed a criminal appeal (SJ) No.215 of 2026 arising from a 2018 case in Gaya. They sought to condone a delay of more than 14 months in filing the appeal, contending that they were outside the State of Bihar and therefore unable to file …
Mithilesh Kumar appealed to the Patna High Court under Section 14‑A(2) of the SC/ST Act against the lower court’s refusal to grant anticipatory bail in a case where the FIR alleged that he was among 16 persons who assaulted the informant’s father‑in‑law, allegedly using caste slurs. The appellant …
The appellant, Jay Prakash Yadav, was charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and several provisions of the Bihar National Security Act, 2023, as well as the Arms Act, for alleged involvement in a violent incident at a bus‑stand. He sought …
The petitioner, Ashish Kumar, was arrested in connection with offences under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He has been in custody since 1 November 2025 and the FIR does not name him as an eyewitness, but his name appears in the …
The petitioners, Chandeshwar Sahni and Arvind Sahni, applied for regular bail in a case involving multiple IPC offences, including murder (Section 302), stemming from an alleged assault on 31 May 2020 that resulted in the death of the informant's husband. They claim to have clean antecedents, argue …
The petitioner, Sikandar Kumar, sought regular bail in a case involving offences under IPC sections 323, 34, 341, 376‑D‑A, 504 and 506 and Section 4 of the POCSO Act, relating to the alleged rape of a minor on 10‑04‑2020. The petitioner was not named in the FIR; his name appeared only in the …
The petitioner, Bibi Khatoon, was arrested in connection with offences under Sections 126(2), 109 and 61(2) of the BNS, with Section 103(1) later added. The FIR alleges that on 30‑Oct‑2024 she invited her husband to her house where he was assaulted by several accused persons and later died in a …
The Patna High Court considered a bail application filed by Md. Sohail, who is charged under Sections 3, 4 and 5 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1984 for a bomb explosion that injured two minor children in Sherghati, Gaya. The petitioner asserted that he has a clean antecedent, was falsely …
The petitioners, Shyam Nath Rai and Sanjeet Kumar Rai, were charged under multiple sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 for assaulting an informant and others during a land‑related dispute. They have prior criminal antecedents—nine and six cases respectively—and have been in custody …
The petitioner, Gandhi Yadav, applied for regular bail in a criminal case registered under Sections 103(1) and 61(2) of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, and that his name only appeared in a …
Petitioner Prakash Panjiyar was arrested in connection with offences under several sections of the B.N.S. based on an informant’s allegation that a 15‑year‑old girl, identified as his lover, was seen with him on a motorcycle and that she took Rs 10,000 and jewellery from her house. The petitioner’s …
The petitioner, Shambhu Choudhary, sought anticipatory bail in a criminal case (PS Case No. 976 of 2025) alleging offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. He claimed a clean antecedent and argued that the informant’s allegations were false and stemmed from a land dispute. The …
Rinta Devi, the mother‑in‑law of a deceased woman, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 80, 238 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita alleging that she and other family members killed the daughter‑in‑law and disposed of the body. She applied for bail, contending she has …
The petitioner, Rakesh Sah, applied for regular bail in a criminal case registered under Sections 80 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, alleging that he was falsely implicated in the death of his wife, who was allegedly strangulated for not providing a dowry motorcycle. The petitioner claimed …
The petitioner, Lalu Yadav, was arrested in connection with a case (Sahebpur Kamal PS Case No. 183 of 2025) alleging that he shot an informant after a loan dispute, invoking several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He claimed to have a clean record, …
The petitioners, three individuals, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that liquor was recovered from a rented room not belonging to them and that they had no conscious possession. They contended that the investigation …
Chotu Mandal, the owner of two autos from which 180.27 litres of liquor were seized, sought anticipatory bail under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not caught in possession, and was unaware that his driver misused the vehicles. The State opposed …
The petitioner, Sajan Kumar Byadha, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 139.2 litres of liquor and seizure of two motorcycles from a room behind a hotel. He contended that he had no prior criminal …
The petitioner, Dhiraj Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging possession of 255 litres of liquor recovered from two motorcycles, under Sections 111(3), 111(4), 317(2), 317(4) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, …
Ghuran Yadav sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Non‑Compulsory Statutes (BNS) and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 90 litres of liquor recovered from three sacks. The petitioner argued that …
Manish Kumar sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under IPC sections 272, 273, 34 and Section 30(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for alleged recovery of 70 litres of liquor from two motorcycles he owned. He argued that he was not present at the spot, the liquor …
The petitioner, Sagar Ali, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly having 26 litres of liquor recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in conscious possession of the liquor, and was merely the owner of the vehicle …
Shambhu Sahni, a resident of Vaishali, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 60 litres of liquor near Moti Chimney. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, the liquor was not found in his possession, and the complaint …
The petitioner, Pavan Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 265 litres of liquor from a bamboo orchard. He has three prior cases under the Excise Act and argues that the liquor was not recovered …
Petitioner Baby Kumar was arrested while his anticipatory bail application was pending. He sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application after his arrest. The court considered whether such withdrawal could be permitted. The judge granted permission to withdraw the application. …
The petitioner, Sudhir Kumar Kunwar, sought anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged alleging his involvement in the recovery of 311.34 litres of liquor from a vehicle, invoking Section 281 of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he was …
Santosh Nut was accused under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 105 litres of liquor from a public place. He applied for anticipatory bail, asserting a clean criminal record, no arrest, and no possession of the liquor, and claiming that the allegation stemmed from an inimical …
The petitioner, Sanni Singh, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 203.97 litres of liquor. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, the alleged liquor was …
Bharat Pasi applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. after a case was registered against him for alleged offences under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act involving the recovery of liquor from various locations. The petitioner asserted that he had no prior criminal record, that …
The petitioner, Fuljhari Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging possession of 100 litres of liquor under Sections 274 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. She argued that the liquor was found …
The petitioner, Balindra Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(b) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 9.6 litres of liquor from a spot adjacent to his house. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the recovery site did not …
The petitioner, Sanoj Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 23.6 litres of liquor recovered from a cowshed on his premises. He contended that the liquor was hidden by hostile villagers and that he was …
Petitioner Bali Mukhiya feared arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly concealing 12 litres of liquor near his house. He argued that the liquor was recovered from a location not belonging to him, that the complaint originated from an inimical watchman, …
The petitioner, Sonu Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 317(5), 51, 52 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 220.5 litres of liquor from three motorcycles. He contended …
Mukesh Kumar was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 7.5 litres of liquor recovered from his scooter. He was not arrested at the spot, and the prosecution’s case rested on his ownership of the vehicle, which his younger brother …
Anuj Kumar and Raja Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that the liquor recovered was from a hut not belonging to them and that the case was based solely on a confessional statement made by Neeraj in police custody. They …
The petitioner, Hari Shankar Choudhary, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly possessing 5 litres of liquor recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the …
The petitioner, Kishore Kumar Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 486 litres of liquor from a Hyundai car. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the vehicle, and …
The petitioner, Md Firoz @ Gulab Hussain, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for the alleged recovery of 13.2 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He contended that he has a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the …
The petitioner, Subodh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where liquor was allegedly recovered from a motorcycle, a house, and a washroom. He contended he had no possession of the liquor, was not the …
The petitioner, Sonu, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(A) of the Excise Act, alleging that 32.22 litres of liquor were recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not in …
The petitioner, Sanjeet Kumar Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 120 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued he had no conscious possession, was not the vehicle owner, and the case was based solely on a …
Shyam Sahani, the petitioner, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that liquor was recovered from a river bank and not from his possession. He has three prior criminal cases, one relating to excise, and claims the accusation …
The petitioner, Dharmendra Keshari, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 23.40 litres of liquor from his scooter. He argued that he was not present at the spot of seizure, that the liquor was not in his conscious …
The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging that 237.165 litres of liquor were recovered from a banana orchard adjacent to …
The petitioner, Ajit Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 17 litres of liquor from a location not under his possession. He argued that he was not present at the spot, the liquor …
The petitioners, Sajan Mahto and Rajan Mahto, were implicated in a case alleging recovery of 125 litres of liquor from a public area, offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. The petitioners applied for anticipatory bail, contending that the liquor was not in their conscious …
Santosh Rai, a resident of Hamidpur, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for alleged recovery of 4,798.08 litres of liquor from four vehicles. He asserted a clean criminal record, denied possession of the …
Vishwakarma Mahto applied for anticipatory bail in a case alleging offences under Sections 336(3), 336(4), 340(2) and 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, claiming he was not arrested on the spot, had no possession of the seized liquor, and was not the …
The petitioner, Devnarayan Chaurasiya, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged possession of liquor recovered from a motorcycle, a house, and his washroom. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was not …
The petitioner, Ram Pravesh Ray, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 22.4 litres of liquor from a hut not owned by him. He argued that he was not caught in possession, that the recovery was based on a …
Ramji Sahni was arrested while his anticipatory bail application was pending before the Patna High Court. He approached the court seeking permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application after his arrest. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Rajeev Kumar, argued that the arrest rendered the bail …
The petitioners, Chandan Yadav and Raju Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018 relating to the alleged recovery of 1,512.36 litres of liquor from Ghorhat village. They contended that they were not …
The appellants, a group of individuals from Mahadah village, were convicted in a criminal case and subsequently surrendered before the trial court. They filed an appeal (Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.2960 of 2025) against the State of Bihar and another respondent. The appellants sought the court's …
The appellants, Pradeep Kumar and Navin Kumar, were charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act for allegedly threatening an informant after drinking. They sought anticipatory bail, arguing …
Syed Eqbal Masood appealed to the Patna High Court under Section 14-A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against the refusal of anticipatory bail by the Special Judge. The appellant, a clean‑recorded individual, alleged that the informant falsely implicated him in assault and abuse …
The petitioners, relatives of a widow, were implicated in a murder case after a dead body was found hanging from a tree, based on an FIR filed by an informant who claimed the deceased was threatened during a panchayati. The petitioners argued they have clean antecedents, the informant is not an …
The petitioner, Gaurav Kumar Sahani, was charged under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for murder and under Section 27 of the Arms Act. He contended that he did not fire the weapon and that the actual shooter was his brother. The petitioner had earlier sought anticipatory bail, which …
Surendra Pal was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged assault and murder under several sections of the Bhartiya Nayaya Sanhita, 2023. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated, arguing that the informant was not a reliable eyewitness and that the FIR lacked specific details. …
The petitioner, Sushil Kumar, was arrested in connection with offences under Sections 137(2) and 140(1) of the BNS, 2023, alleged to involve dowry demand, torture and the death of his wife. He claimed a clean antecedent and argued that he was falsely implicated, asserting that the informant’s …
Ram Prasad Badhhai was arrested in connection with alleged illegal arms manufacturing and charged under Sections 25(1‑A), 25(1‑AA), 25(1‑B), 25(1‑Ba), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. He applied for regular bail, claiming a clean antecedent, custody since 22‑Oct‑2025, and that he is not named in the FIR; …
The petitioner, Kameshwar Rai, was charged under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 302 and 120(B) and Section 27 of the Arms Act for a violent incident on 29 January 2021 in which two persons were killed. The FIR alleges that the petitioner, along with others, apprehended the informant's son who was …
The petitioner, Nandlal Mahto, was arrested in connection with a case registered under multiple sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, alleging assault and other offences. He sought regular bail, claiming a clean antecedent and that he had been falsely implicated by the informant, …
Sonu Sahani and Harendra Sahani were arrested in connection with a land‑dispute incident in which firearms were used, resulting in injuries to three persons. The FIR charges them under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act, although the petitioners contend …
The petitioner, Ashish Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 103(1) and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly shooting the husband of the informant, resulting in his death. The informant, a wife, claimed that the …
The petitioner, Abhimanyu Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 304B, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. He applied for regular bail, claiming false implication by the informant and having been in custody since March 2025. The court noted that the trial had …
The petitioner, Binod Yadav, was arrested in connection with a land‑related dispute in which he allegedly assaulted his brother with an iron rod, causing a grievous head injury. He is charged under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bihar Non‑Specific Act, 2023. The …
The petitioner, Sarswati Devi, was arrested in connection with a dowry‑related murder alleged to have occurred on 18‑06‑2025, where the deceased’s sister‑in‑law was allegedly strangulated. She contended that she has a clean antecedent, is a woman, and was falsely implicated by the informant, who is …
Manoj Kumar Keshari sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act alleging that he failed to deliver wheat and rice despite handing over a POS machine. The petitioner argued that his PDS licence had been cancelled before the alleged offence and …
Petitioner Shakti Kumar (Shakti Singh) sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and the POCSO Act, 2012, alleging assault on a minor and other offences. The informant alleged that the petitioner, along with …
Ramashish Yadav, the owner of a motorcycle from which 32.250 litres of liquor was seized, feared arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he was not present at the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and was unaware that a friend misused …
Petitioner Abhikesh Kumar filed an anticipatory bail application under the Criminal Procedure Code. While the application was pending, he was arrested, prompting him to seek permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail request. The petitioner’s counsel argued for withdrawal, and the State’s counsel …
The petitioner, Pintu Chaudhary, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, alleging that 18 litres of liquor were recovered from a spot in front of his house, not from his possession, and that the FIR omitted the informant's name. He has one prior …
Suraj Kumar applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 113(3) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 420 litres of liquor from a vehicle he did not own. He contended that …
The petitioner, Akash Kumar Chandravanshi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 9 litres of liquor from a public market. He argued that no liquor was found in his possession and that the allegation was based solely on …
The petitioner, Dinesh Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging recovery of 72 litres of liquor. He argued that he was not caught in possession, the …
The petitioner, Ajay Kumar Jha, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 1,800 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He was not arrested at the spot and no liquor was found in his personal possession; the prosecution’s case …
Manjesh Kumar Thakur was implicated in a case under Section 414 of the IPC and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 28 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle. He contended that he has a clean antecedent, was not the owner of the seized vehicle, and was implicated by a …
The petitioner, Md. Efham Ahmad, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 10.41 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, that the liquor was not found in his immediate …
The petitioner, Chhotu Sah, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 6.9 litres of liquor. He was not arrested at the scene and no liquor was found in his possession; the alleged recovery occurred at a public place …
The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 36 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not in actual possession, was not the owner of the vehicle, and that the case was based solely on a …
Vinod Mukhiya was arrested while his anticipatory bail application was pending before the Patna High Court. He subsequently sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Ravi Prakash, requested the court’s leave to withdraw, and the State’s counsel, …
The petitioner, Md. Safrez, feared arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 72 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no conscious possession, was not …
Petitioner Rajesh Kumar Patel sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of large quantities of liquor seized from his motorcycle and a Mahindra XUV. He argued that the liquor was not in his …
Manish Kumar Jaiswal sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, alleging recovery of 2,025 litres of liquor from a truck. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was not arrested on the spot, and was …
Mahendra Singh, the owner of a pickup vehicle, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly transporting 128.16 litres of liquor. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that his vehicle was misused by …
The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 81 litres of liquor from his joint family house. He contended that no liquor was found in his immediate possession, the property was …
Sunny Kumar, the owner of a motorcycle from which 9.37 litres of liquor were seized, sought anticipatory bail for alleged offences under Sections 317(4), 317(5), 111 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the …
The petitioner, Ajay Kumar Yadav, failed to appear in court despite repeated notices. No counsel was appointed for the petitioner, while the State was represented by Advocate Anil Kumar Singh. The presiding judge noted the absence of the petitioner and the presence of the State's counsel. …
The petitioner, Brijesh Bhagat, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, alleging recovery of 53 litres of liquor from a third party's house. He asserted a clean criminal record and no connection to the alleged …
Bikesh Ram applied for anticipatory bail in a criminal case. He later sought permission to withdraw that application and surrender to obtain regular bail. The petitioner’s counsel requested the court’s permission for withdrawal. The court, after hearing both sides, granted the request, allowing the …
Krishna Kumar, the owner of a scooty, feared arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 8.640 litres of liquor recovered from the vehicle. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the …
The petitioner, Pankaj Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 7.4 litres of liquor from a premises adjacent to his house. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession and that the informant, a local resident, …
The petitioner, Purn Mashi Yadav, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Sections 30(a) and 34 of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that liquor was recovered from a motorcycle he owned but he was not present at the spot. He argued that he had no knowledge of his friend's alleged misuse of the vehicle …
The petitioners, five individuals from Mahulani Bihtas, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 37 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 40 litres of liquor from co‑accused. They argued they had no conscious possession and …
The petitioner, Jamaludin, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 42 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, the liquor was not found in his immediate possession, and he was unaware that …
The petitioner, Subodh Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2016 for the alleged recovery of 1,500 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, that the liquor was not found in his …
Mahesh Chaudhary and Priyanka Kumari sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where police alleged recovery of 20 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to their house. The petitioners argued that the liquor was not in their conscious …
The petitioner, Chinta Devi, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 16 litres of liquor from her residence, which is a joint family property. She contended that she has a clean antecedent, was not in actual possession of the liquor, and was …
The petitioner, Santosh Kumar Tiwari, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where 136.22 litres of liquor were recovered from two motorcycles. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was not …
The petitioner, Uday Prasad, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 50 litres of liquor from two sacks. He argued that the liquor was recovered from a location not belonging to him, he had no conscious possession, and the case …
The petitioner, Jinish Rai, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 86.4 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his house. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the recovery was from property not owned by …
Manish Pal filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court in a criminal case arising from an excise matter. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner requested permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and to surrender to the authorities, seeking regular bail …
The appellants, Akhtar Khan and Jakir Khan, appealed under Section 14‑A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against the refusal of anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged assault on the informant's husband over unpaid wages. The informant claimed the …
The appellants, five residents of Rasulpur Kori village, appealed to the Patna High Court under Section 14A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against an order of the Exclusive Special Judge dated 19‑08‑2025 that had denied them anticipatory bail in a case …
The appellants, including Meena Devi and four male relatives, were charged under several sections of the Bihar Non-Applicable Sections (BNSS) and Section 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting an informant who claimed he was …
The appellants, four residents of Suraundha village, were charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act, 2023 for allegedly assaulting and abusing an informant on a motorcycle. The informant …
The appellant, Shubham Kumar, was charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(1)(s) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 for allegedly assaulting and abusing the informant and his wife over a monetary dispute. The Additional …
The appellants, Dhiraj Kumar Singh and Shivam Kumar, were charged under several IPC provisions and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 following an FIR in which the informant alleged that the accused had visited his house, used caste slurs, demanded money …
The appellant, Raushan Kumar, filed a criminal appeal (SJ) No.5191 of 2025 before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant was arrested. The appellant's counsel sought permission from the court to withdraw the appeal in view of the arrest. The court considered whether …
Ritesh Kumar Jha and Gagnesh Kumar Jha were arrested in connection with a dispute arising from a Panchayat election, alleged to have assaulted an informant with a bamboo stick and a pistol, and charged under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The petitioners, represented by Mr. …
The petitioner, Sharwan Yadav, was arrested in connection with offences under the IPC, Arms Act, Explosive Substance Act and the UPA Act and has been in custody since July 2, 2023. He previously applied for regular bail (Cr. Misc. No. 13733 of 2024) which was rejected, but after the charge‑sheet was …
Bir Bahadur Kumar, son of a pension‑holder informant, was arrested on 27‑11‑2025 in connection with a case (PS‑570/2025) alleging assault on his mother by his sister‑in‑law. The FIR implicates him under Sections 117(2), 118(2), 110, 351(2), 351(3) and 3(5) of the BNS, but the petitioner’s counsel …
The petitioner, Surendra Yadav, applied for regular bail in a criminal case involving offences under the IPC, Arms Act, Explosive Substance Act and UPA Act. Earlier, a group of co‑accused had obtained regular bail, which was later rejected, and they were directed to renew their bail plea after …
The petitioner, Sandeep Kumar, a 21‑year‑old student, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged robbery of a motor‑bike and cash. He has been in custody since 30 October 2025 and argues that he is not named in the FIR and that his alleged …
The petitioner, Sonal Kumar Sharma, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 308(4), 324(5), 352, 351 and 3(5) of the Bihar Negotiable S. He had been in custody since 8 December 2025 and had six prior criminal cases. The FIR alleged that he, along with an associate, …
Manish Kumar Beshra was arrested in connection with alleged misappropriation of funds under the Chief Minister Nal Jal Yojana and charged under Sections 406, 409 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner claimed a clean antecedent, asserted that the informant falsely implicated him and that …
The petitioner, Afroj Ali Nadaf, was charged under Sections 64, 115(2) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 for an alleged rape. He had earlier obtained anticipatory bail, which was conditioned to lapse upon filing of the charge sheet; the charge sheet was filed on 29‑10‑2024 and the …
The petitioner, Abhishek Kumar Singh, was arrested in connection with a violent incident in which several persons were assaulted, a minor was abused, and a victim named Buchun later died. He was charged under multiple sections of the B.N.S., including offences of assault, homicide, and robbery, and …
The petitioner, Ashok Kumar Singh, was arrested in connection with a violent incident on 13 April 2025 in which multiple persons were assaulted, a minor girl was abused, and a victim named Buchun later died. He is charged under several sections of the B.N.S. (including 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, …
Santosh Yadav and Gopal Yadav were charged under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 302 and 120(B), Arms Act section 27 and UAPA sections 16, 18 and 20 for alleged involvement in a Maoist attack that resulted in death. They had earlier applied for anticipatory bail, which was rejected on 12‑02‑2024, and …
Vishal Kumar, the petitioner, filed a second regular bail application in a criminal miscellaneous case arising from PS case No. 358 of 2022. After hearing, the petitioner's counsel requested permission to withdraw this bail application. The Hon'ble Justice Satyavrat Verma considered the request and …
The petitioner, Bittu Prakash, was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged looting of a businessman and was charged under IPC sections 399, 402, 413, 414 and Arms Act sections 25(1‑b)a, 26, 35. He has five prior cases and has been in custody since 12‑11‑2025. The prosecution’s case …
The petitioner, Binda Rai, was charged under several serious provisions of the Indian Penal Code, including sections 341, 342, 323, 324, 307, 504, 506 and 302/34. He previously applied for regular bail in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 29206 of 2025, which the Patna High Court rejected on 6 August 2025. …
The appellants, four Yadav youths, were charged under several IPC sections and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for alleged assault and caste-based abuse of an informant on 26 March 2024. They sought anticipatory bail, arguing they have clean antecedents, that …
The petitioner, Md Numan Khan, applied for anticipatory bail in a narcotics case (PS Case No. 323 of 2021) where he was alleged to be involved in the possession of brown sugar under Sections 414 and 34 of the IPC and Sections 20(b)(ii)B and 25 of the NDPS Act. The only link to the petitioner was a …
Amarjeet Kumar was arrested on allegations of hacking a departmental portal and illegally preparing ration cards, based largely on a co-accused's confessional statement. He has been in custody since 24 October 2025 and contends he has a clean antecedent and that the seizure of his laptop and mobile …
The petitioner, Ranjeet Kumar Sah, was arrested in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109 and 352 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, based on an FIR filed by an informant alleging that the petitioner assaulted him on 1 August 2025. The petitioner contended that he has a clean …
Ajmal Husain was arrested while his anticipatory bail application was pending before the Patna High Court. The petitioner, through counsel, requested that the anticipatory bail application be withdrawn in view of his arrest. The court considered whether a pending anticipatory bail application could …
The petitioner, Rohit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 457 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged theft. He has four prior cases, and his name was implicated through the confessional statement of an associate, Sanjay, who is frequently arrested …
The petitioner, Subash Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 317(4), 317(5) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.) for allegedly loading a stolen truck onto a pickup vehicle. The informant claimed the accused were loading the vehicle …
The petitioner, Rajendra Mukhiya, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where 102.240 litres of liquor were recovered from two motorcycles he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not …
The petitioner, Sandeep Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for the alleged recovery of 273.15 litres of liquor from two vehicles. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and …
The petitioners, Dileep Mahto and Deelep, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 300 litres of liquor. They argued that they were not apprehended at the spot, no liquor was found in their possession, and the case was based …
Muntun Mandal was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 57.75 litres of liquor from his potato field and faces charges under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his conscious possession, and the …
The petitioner, Dev Rai, applied for bail in a criminal case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 880 litres of liquor from two kilns. He argued that he was not arrested at the scene, that the liquor was not found in his possession, and that the premises did not …
Vijay Rai was implicated in a case alleging recovery of 680 litres of spirit from a vehicle, charged under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he was not arrested at the spot, did not own the vehicle, and was implicated solely on secret information, …
The petitioner, Guddu Ray, was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 600 litres of liquor from the bank of the River Ganga, an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He had seven prior cases under the Excise Act and had been in custody since 10 March 2026. The petitioner …
The petitioner, Vipin Pandit, was arrested in connection with the seizure of 440.9 liters of liquor from a pickup van, alleged to be a "magic" vehicle, under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he was not present at the spot, had no liquor in his possession, and was …
The petitioner, Deepak Singh, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 760 litres of spirit from a Bolero vehicle. He argued that he was not the vehicle's owner, was not arrested on the spot, and was implicated solely …
