Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
5446 judgments · newest first · showing 201–400
The petitioner, Sudhir Kumar, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of large quantities of codeine cough syrup recovered from his poultry farm and vehicles. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the …
The petitioners, members of the Sahni family, sought anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging they were involved in the recovery of 410 litres of liquor and 20,000 litres of Jawa Mahua solution from a site near the Gandak river. They argued they …
Petitioner Raju Ray, accused under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 872 litres of liquor from government land, applied for anticipatory bail. He claims he was not arrested at the spot, had no possession, and that the complaint originated …
The petitioner, Sanoj Rai, was arrested in connection with the seizure of 324 litres of liquor from a pickup van, alleged under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act. He contended that he was not arrested at the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and was implicated merely as the owner of the …
Mukesh Kumar Singh was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for the recovery of 889.56 litres of liquor from two vehicles, including 34.56 litres from his motorcycle. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, that he …
Virajan Kumar, a resident of Muzaffarpur, was implicated in a case under Sections 414 and 34 of the IPC read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 136.8 litres of liquor from a vehicle. He claimed he had a clean antecedent, was not caught in possession, and was …
The petitioner, Amarjeet Yadav, feared arrest in a case under Section 281 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He had earlier obtained anticipatory bail in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 16396 of 2026, but the trial court found he had concealed an …
Santosh Kumar applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under several IPC offences (sections 414, 467, 468, 471, 420/34) and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. He contended that he was not caught in possession of the alleged liquor, was …
Guddu Sahani applied for regular bail in a criminal miscellaneous case arising from an alleged offence under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, involving the recovery of 300 litres of liquor and 800 litres of semi‑prepared liquor near a riverbank. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the …
Manish Kumar was apprehended in a case under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly transporting 92.250 litres of liquor. He argued that the liquor was not found in his possession, he was not the owner of the vehicle, and the case was based solely on an informant’s tip without …
Arjun Rai applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered against him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged possession of 600 litres of liquor in a Scorpio vehicle. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, did not own the vehicle, …
Suraj Kumar was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 27 litres of liquor from an e‑rickshaw under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. The petitioner contended that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his conscious possession, he is not the owner of the vehicle, …
The petitioner, Pankaj Yadav, was implicated in a case under Section 37 of the Bihar Excise Act read with Sections 25(1‑b)a and 26 of the Arms Act after an informant reported that four persons fled from police, one of whom was seized drunk and a pistol was recovered. The petitioner argues he had no …
The petitioner, Sheshnath Mukhiya, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic and Smuggling Act read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that the alleged seizure of 84 litres of liquor and 9,000 litres of …
The petitioner, Chandan Mukhiya, applied for bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 100 litres of liquor from a public ghat. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, and the alleged incident occurred …
The petitioner, Raushan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving numerous offences under the Bihar Penal Code and the Bihar Excise Act, relating to the alleged recovery of liquor. He asserted a clean criminal record and argued that the allegations were vague and that the …
The petitioner, Rohan Yadav, was implicated in an excise case for the alleged recovery of 100 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor being in the vehicle and that he had a clean criminal record. The State opposed his request for anticipatory …
The petitioner, Gaurav Kumar Jha, was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 841.650 litres of liquor from a pickup vehicle and charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he was not caught in the act, no liquor was found in his possession, and his implication …
The petitioner, Ranjit Kumar, was arrested in connection with the recovery of 1,017 litres of liquor from four vehicles and charged under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code together with Sections 30(a), 32(ii), 38(ii) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act. He pleaded that he has a clean …
The petitioner, Vicky Chaudhary, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 35 litres of liquor from a location near a graveyard and pond. He contended that he has a clean antecedent, was not caught in possession, and the alleged liquor was …
The petitioner, Ranjay Kumar, was arrested on 17 February 2026 for alleged possession of 266.4 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle, an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He contended that he had no prior criminal record and was falsely …
The petitioner, Mantu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 557.5 litres of liquor from a Mahindra tractor. He contended that he was not arrested on the spot, had no possession of the liquor, was not the vehicle's owner, and that …
The petitioner, Sonu Yadav, applied for regular bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 146.80 litres of codeine cough syrup from a house owned by Rita Devi. The petitioner argued he had no prior criminal record, was not …
Rakesh Kumar was arrested in connection with an alleged recovery of 600 litres of liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. The petitioner argued that he was not caught in possession, the liquor was recovered from a public bank, and the case was filed …
The petitioner, Madhurendra Madhukar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 2,356.720 litres of liquor from vehicles he owned. He argued he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that his vehicle was …
The petitioner, Savitri Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of liquor recovered from two houses. She argued she has a clean antecedent, is a woman, and the liquor was found in joint family property, not in her …
The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 111 and 112 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging recovery of 200 litres of liquor from a field not owned by him. He argued that he was not …
The petitioner, Vidhan Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 94 litres of liquor from a public area near the Ganga River. He contended that the liquor was not in his possession, the location did not belong to him, and …
The petitioner, Md. Ansarul Nadaf, was implicated in a case under Section 414 of the IPC and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 585 litres of liquor from four motorcycles and a sack. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time …
The petitioner, Sohan Marandi, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 100 litres of liquor and 6,000 litres of fermented mahua from a forest. He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that he was not arrested at the spot, that the …
Munna Yadav (appellant 1) and Gorak Yadav (appellant 2) were charged under multiple sections of the Bihar Penal Code, the Arms Act and the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act in connection with a violent incident in Dhobaha where several persons were assaulted and …
The appellants, Ramu Mahto and Bhundul Mahto, were charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and several sections of the Indian Penal Code for alleged caste-based assault on 16‑03‑2025. They contended that the FIR was filed five days after the …
The appellants, a group of individuals surnamed Sharma, were charged under several provisions of the Bihar National Security Act, 2023 and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 for alleged assault and other offences. They sought anticipatory bail under …
The appellants, nine individuals from Gaya district, appealed under Section 14‑A(2) of the SC/ST Act against a refusal of anticipatory bail in a case alleging caste‑based assault and vandalism on 25‑9‑2024 and 26‑9‑2024. The informant claimed that a large group, including the appellants, attacked …
The appellant, Aman Kumar, was charged under several IPC sections and Section 3(i)(r) of the SC/ST Act in connection with a violent incident alleged to have occurred on 09.08.2021. He applied for anticipatory bail, which was denied by the Exclusive Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Saran. The appellant …
The appellants Harendra Rai, Suchindra Rai, Abhishek Kumar and Ajit Kumar appealed under Section 14‑A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against a Special Judge's order refusing anticipatory bail in a case alleging caste‑based assault and other offences under the Bihar Negotiable …
The appellants, a group of villagers, were charged under Sections 191(2), 115(2) and 126(2) of the Bihar Negotiable Sale Act and Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) and 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly demolishing a temple wall and assaulting …
Petitioner Pawan Yadav applied for anticipatory bail in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 120(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The respondent, Rukmani Devi, claimed the dispute was matrimonial and alleged that the petitioner was evading the court. The …
Santosh Kumar petitioned for anticipatory bail after learning that an FIR had been lodged against him under Section 80/3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, alleging his involvement in the death of his wife. The informant claimed that after their marriage the petitioner’s family demanded …
The petitioner, Ravindra Ram, was implicated in a case alleging theft of Rs.50,000 and jewellery and the alleged sexual offence under the POCSO Act involving a 17‑year‑old girl. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated, asserting that the girl was his consensual partner and that they had …
The petitioner, Dhanu Kumar, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 103(1), 238 and 61(2) of the BNS, 2023, relating to the murder of his brother Prince. Although his name does not appear in the FIR, the investigating officer stated that the petitioner was identified by …
The petitioners, Suraj Kumar and Rohit Kumar, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 115(2), 118(2), 127(1), 109, 303(2) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, alleging that Rohit stabbed the victim while Suraj snatched a golden chain. The petitioners argued that Suraj …
The petitioner, Sanjay Singh, sought anticipatory bail after being charged under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code for alleged assault and theft related to a loan dispute with the informant, who is his sister-in-law. The informant claimed the petitioner had taken a loan of Rs. 4,50,000 and …
The appellant, Abhijeet Kumar Giri, was convicted in a criminal case (PS Case No.115, 2025) in Samastipur. While the appeal (Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.452 of 2026) was pending before the Patna High Court, the appellant surrendered. The appellant’s counsel applied to the court for permission to …
The appellant, Md. Minhaj Alam, was charged under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, Section 27 of the Arms Act and Sections 3(1)(r)(s) and 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for alleged involvement in a killing. He sought regular bail, arguing that a …
Ram Karan Rai and Sree Ram Rai filed a criminal appeal before the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar and Punpun Sada. The appellants, through counsel Mr. Ajay Kumar, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the appeal. The Court, after hearing the parties, granted the request for …
The petitioner, Amitabh Ray, filed a modification application in Criminal Miscellaneous No.19260 of 2026 arising from a 2021 police case. After hearing arguments and reviewing a report from the Exclusive Special Excise Judge, the petitioner sought the court's permission to withdraw the modification …
The petitioner, Pramod Prasad, filed a bail application before the Patna High Court against the Union of India represented by the Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB). The trial court had concluded the prosecution evidence, after which the petitioner submitted written arguments on 08.05.2025, but the …
Petitioner Abhishek Kumar filed a restoration application seeking to have Criminal Miscellaneous No.10191 of 2026 restored to its original file. The petitioner argued that the earlier removal of the case was erroneous. The State opposed the application. The High Court examined the grounds raised in …
Soumabir Bose filed Criminal Miscellaneous No.20508 of 2026 arising from a police case in Kishanganj. The petitioner moved a restoration application seeking to have the case reinstated in its original file. The learned counsel for the State opposed the application. Justice Satyavrat Verma examined …
Shivlal Marandi filed a petition in the Patna High Court seeking relief in a criminal miscellaneous matter arising from a case registered at Tikapatti Police Station, Purnia. The petitioner later moved the court for permission to withdraw his application for modification of the proceedings. The …
The petitioner, Md. Safik, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition seeking modification of an order arising from PS case No.‑59 of 2025. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the modification application. The court considered the request and, after hearing …
The petitioners, Raju Kumar Singh and Nitish Kumar, filed Criminal Appeal (SJ) No. 4194 of 2025 against the State of Bihar and Deepak Kumar arising from a 2024 police case. The appeal had been dismissed, prompting the petitioners to file a restoration application. The petitioners were represented by …
The petitioner, Ritesh Kumar, had been granted provisional anticipatory bail on 5 January 2026 with a direction to surrender to the trial court within six weeks, i.e., by 16 February 2026. He failed to surrender, claiming he was suffering from Hepatocellular Jaundice and filed a modification …
Kundan Singh, also known as Kundan Kumar, was arrested in connection with an alleged illegal sand‑mining offence (PS case No.246 of 2025) and has been in custody since 10 March 2026. He applied for bail, contending that the lower court’s order incorrectly recorded four antecedent cases when only two …
Vishwanth Kumar filed a restoration application seeking to have Criminal Miscellaneous No. 18061 of 2026 reinstated to its original file. The petitioner was represented by Mr. Rajesh Kumar Singh, while the State of Bihar was represented by Mr. Surendra Prasad Singh. The High Court examined the …
The petitioner, Mithun Yadav, filed a regular bail application which was taken up on 09‑07‑2025. The coordinating bench gave him three weeks to rectify defects, but the defects remained uncorrected, leading the State to argue that the petitioner had lost interest. The petitioner’s counsel then …
Petitioner Saurabh Kumar filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal miscellaneous case. He sought to withdraw the application, relying on a Supreme Court order in Nidhi Kumari v. State of Bihar, where the Court had granted protection to a minor forced into marriage under Article 32. The …
The petitioner, Praveen Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving offences under IPC sections 323, 341, 498A and 379, together with Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He alleged marital discord with his wife (OP No.2), claimed false implication of his …
The petitioners, six members of the Paswan family, applied for anticipatory bail in a case alleging offences under several sections of the B.N.S. arising from a land dispute where the informant claimed they assaulted her and demanded extortion. The petitioners argued that the case was false, …
The petitioner, Md. Ashik, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Statutes, 2023. He asserted that he had a clean record, had eloped and married the alleged victim, who is a major according to her matriculation certificate showing …
The Patna High Court considered anticipatory bail applications filed by two petitioners, Binod Kumar and Sunny Kumar, who were alleged to be part of an organized gang involved in extortion of real‑estate builders. The allegations arose from a separate FIR (Case No.129 of 2025) and a later FIR that …
The appellants, Satyendra Bind and Ravi Bind, were charged under several IPC provisions and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for alleged assault on 19‑04‑2025. They applied for anticipatory bail, which was denied by the Special Judge. The appellants contended …
The Patna High Court considered anticipatory bail applications filed by two petitioners, Binod Kumar and Sunny Kumar, who were alleged to be part of an organized gang involved in extortion of real‑estate builders. The allegations arose from a separate FIR (Case No.129 of 2025) and a later FIR that …
The petitioners, Anup Singh and Haripal Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition arising from a police case registered at Rasulpur, Saran. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners, while the State of Bihar was represented by Mr. Braj Kishore Pd. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor …
The appellant, Bhai Ram Paswan, was charged with murder, conspiracy, and offences under the SC/ST Act and Arms Act. He has been in custody since April 2024 and has repeatedly applied for regular bail, the third attempt being before this Court. The trial is underway with eight of fourteen prosecution …
The petitioners, Bindeshwar Rai, Kanhaiya Rai and Sona Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 80 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita concerning the death of the informant's daughter, who allegedly committed suicide after dowry-related torture. They …
Chanda Devi and Shinodh Ray sought anticipatory bail in a case alleging they assaulted Vakeel Sharma, who later died. The FIR alleged that the petitioners used a sword and other weapons, but the post‑mortem report recorded death as asphyxia due to heart disease with no external injuries. The …
The petitioner, Md. Qayum Ansari, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under IPC sections 379 and 411 and several provisions of the Bihar Minerals (Concession Prevention of illegal Mining, Transportation and Storage) Rules for alleged illegal mining and storage of sand and stone chips. …
Chanda Devi and Shinodh Ray sought anticipatory bail in a case alleging they assaulted Vakeel Sharma, who later died. The FIR alleged that the petitioners used a sword and other weapons, but the post‑mortem report recorded death as asphyxia due to heart disease with no external injuries. The …
The appellant, Prashant Poddar, was charged with murder, conspiracy, and offences under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and the Arms Act. He was not named in the FIR; his alleged involvement emerged from a confessional statement of co-accused Bhaskar Jha, who had earlier been granted …
The petitioners—Nikhil Kumar Chaurasiya, Guddu Chauraisa and Javed Mian—applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, alleging they were falsely implicated in a stabbing incident. They argued that the police investigation concluded with a final …
Shubham Chaudhary was arrested in a case involving offences under several IPC sections and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, noting that his name was absent from the FIR and that the informant and another witness identified other accused as the shooters. The …
The petitioner, Vidya Nand Ram, was arrested in connection with a murder alleged to have occurred after he allegedly stabbed the deceased, as narrated in the confessional statement of co‑accused Bucchi Devi. The petitioner, claiming a clean antecedent and that the statement is unreliable due to …
Manaini Devi, the mother‑in‑law of the deceased, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a dowry‑death case (Sections 304B and 34 IPC) concerning the death of her daughter‑in‑law, who was found near a well. The petitioner argued that she has a clean record, the informant is not an …
The petitioners – Lalan Rai, Una Rai and Lalbabu Rai – applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the B.N.S., including assault‑related offences. The FIR alleged that a police raid to arrest other individuals led to a mob assault on police, with the …
Deepak Pandey and Ravi Shankar Pandey applied for anticipatory bail in a criminal case (PS No.223 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 74, 303(2), 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The police had issued a notice under Section 35(3) of the B.N.S.S., indicating that they did not …
The petitioners, Md. Sarwar and Md. Manjar Alam, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bihar Negotiable Statutes, 2023, relating to alleged assault during a Tazia procession. They contended that the FIR contains a general and omnibus …
The appellants, Shrawan Yadav and Girja Yadav, were charged under several provisions of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 for alleged robbery, assault and caste‑based abuse. The trial court refused anticipatory …
The petitioner, Md. Riazul, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case alleging multiple offences under the B.N.S., including assault and use of a pistol. He claimed a clean antecedent and asserted that the informant had falsely implicated him, noting that no injury resulted from …
The petitioners applied for anticipatory bail in three criminal miscellaneous cases arising from a land dispute in Sahebpur Kamal where the informant alleged that a group of accused, including the petitioners, assaulted her husband, leading to his death. The court examined the FIR allegations, …
The petitioners applied for anticipatory bail in three criminal miscellaneous cases arising from a land dispute in Sahebpur Kamal where the informant alleged that a group of accused, including the petitioners, assaulted her husband, leading to his death. The court examined the FIR allegations, …
Surendra Prasad Singh and his wife Sita Devi were implicated in a criminal case (PS No. 59 of 2025) and filed an anticipatory bail application under the Criminal Procedure Code. Subsequently, they approached the High Court seeking permission to withdraw a second anticipatory bail application they …
The petitioner, Suman Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case registered under Sections 303(2), 317(2) and 111 of the B.N.S. for alleged illegal mining of stone chips and seizure of tractors. He argued that he is not named in the FIR, the seized tractors do not belong to …
The petitioner, Md. Zakir Hussain, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 409 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code alleging misappropriation of Rs.7,500 received under the Swachh Bharat Mission for constructing a laboratory. He claimed a clean antecedent and asserted that the …
The petitioner, Bheem Rai, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case registered under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the BNSS for allegedly assaulting a victim who later died. He argued that he has a clean antecedent and that the FIR contains a vague, omnibus …
The petitioner, Sonu Shukla, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a FIR alleging robbery, assault, and other offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. He claims the allegations are false, arising from a property dispute between the informant and a third party, Khalid, who had …
The appellant Deo Kumar Dubey appealed under Section 14‑A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against the Special Judge’s refusal to grant anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 132, 303(2), 224 of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act, 2023 …
Vivek Kumar, a 20‑year‑old student with a clean record, applied for anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged alleging his involvement in a violent incident that resulted in the death of Satrudhan. The FIR charges him under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, including offences relating …
The petitioners applied for anticipatory bail in three criminal miscellaneous cases arising from a land dispute in Sahebpur Kamal where the informant alleged that a group of accused, including the petitioners, assaulted her husband, leading to his death. The court examined the FIR allegations, …
The petitioner, Bebi Devi, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition against the State of Bihar. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner on the scheduled dates of 28-04-2026 and 30-04-2026. The State was represented by Advocate Sanjay Kumar. The Court observed that the petitioner had shown no …
The appellant, Sarupan Yadav, was charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 for alleged assault, robbery and caste-based abuse. He appealed the trial court’s refusal to grant anticipatory bail under Section 14‑A(2) of the SC/ST Act, contending that …
Rakesh Kumar Azad, the owner of an e‑rickshaw, was implicated in a case where 50 litres of liquor were recovered from the vehicle, although he was not arrested at the spot and claims he had no knowledge of the alleged misuse. He sought anticipatory bail, asserting a clean criminal antecedent and …
The petitioner, Bihans Bind, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 15.375 litres of liquor from a public area. He asserted a clean criminal record and argued that the alleged liquor was not in his possession and the …
Jogindra Sahani sought anticipatory bail after learning that a case had been registered against him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 50 litres of liquor recovered from his house, which is a joint family property. He argued that he …
Manjay Kumar Ray sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 112.14 litres of liquor from the premises of Rajendra Chaudhary. The petitioner argued he had no direct involvement, no possession of the liquor, and a …
The petitioner, Gorelal Bind, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging possession of liquor recovered from a neighbour and his backyard. He argued that no liquor was found in his immediate possession, the recovery was based on a confessional statement …
The petitioner, Ramesh Mahto, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 4.350 litres of liquor found in a washroom of his joint family house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, that the property is jointly owned, and …
The petitioner, Sonu Baitha, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging offences under sections 338, 336(3), 304(2) of the B.N.S and sections 30(a), 41(1), 33, 34 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly recovering 800 litres of spirit from a Scorpio vehicle. He …
Bittu Kumar and Jitendra Kumar sought anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging that 313 litres of liquor were recovered from a Scorpio vehicle and a mustard field. The petitioners contended that they have clean antecedents, were not in …
The petitioner, Sidharth Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 40 litres of liquor from an e‑rickshaw that he owned. He contended that he had a clean criminal record, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that a third …
The petitioners, three brothers from Dardha Chausaj, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 380 litres of liquor from a public riverbank. They …
Awadh Rai sought anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 9.540 litres of liquor from a bush near his house and 49 litres from a government field. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the scene, no liquor was found in his …
The petitioner, Akhilesh Rai, sought anticipatory bail after learning of a pending case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging possession of 17 litres of liquor recovered from a joint family house. He argued that he had no conscious possession, the …
The petitioner, Ranjeet Sah, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic (BNS) Act, 2023 read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where 931.2 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a Xylo car. He contended that he was not caught in …
The petitioner, Satyendra Rajwanshi, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged possession of five litres of liquor. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, the liquor was …
Petitioners Rajesh Paswan and Dilip Kumar (also known as Govind Kumar Singh) feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 7.44 litres of liquor from the Balaji Marriage Complex. They contended that no liquor was found in their possession, …
The petitioner, Vijay Prasad Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 83.5 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was unaware of the misuse of his vehicle by …
The petitioner, Sujit Kumar Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 50 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his house. He claimed the alleged contraband was …
The petitioner, identified as Dipti Singh (also known as Ranjan Singh and Ranjan Kumar), feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, where 6.800 litres of liquor were recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent …
The petitioner, Sanjay Rishidev, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 58.200 litres of liquor recovered from the courtyard of his joint family house. He argued that he was not arrested at the scene, the liquor …
Pinki Kumari applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 10.620 litres of liquor from a spot adjacent to her house. She asserted that she has a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was falsely implicated …
The petitioner, Manager Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 100 litres of liquor from an auto. He contended that he was not caught in possession, that the seizure was based solely on confessional …
The petitioner, Nandlal Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that liquor was recovered from locations adjacent to his house but not from his possession. He contended that the police had mechanically implicated him based on …
Petitioners Deepak Kumar and Prakash Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 11 litres of liquor from a plastic sack thrown from a motorcycle. They argued that no arrest or seizure …
The petitioner, Virat Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 316.6 litres of liquor from a Tata Indigo car. He contended that he was not in possession of the vehicle, was not its owner, and was implicated by a …
Rohit Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, where 99 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a scooty. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the scene, had no conscious possession of …
The petitioner, Amitabha Bachchan Chaudhari, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where the police alleged recovery of liquor from a neighbour's house and concealed behind his house. He argued that no liquor was found in his possession, the …
Santosh Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 200 litres of liquor and 20,000 litres of raw jaggery. The petitioner argued that the seized …
The appellants, who are members of a Scheduled Caste, were accused of assault and caste-based abuse arising from a dispute over a tractor purchase. The informant alleged that the appellants forcibly took the tractor and verbally abused him using caste slurs, leading to an FIR filed 78 days after the …
The appellants, four brothers from Mahamdpur, were charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting a man and his nephew and snatching a chain, with the complainant alleging caste-based abuse. They applied for anticipatory bail, but the …
The appellants, Baby Devi and Priyanka Kumari, appealed against the refusal of anticipatory bail in a case filed under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The informant alleged that the appellants had stolen her mobile, assaulted her, and taken jewellery …
The appellants, members of the Mandal family, appealed to the Patna High Court under Section 14‑A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against the lower court's refusal to grant anticipatory bail in a case alleging caste‑based assault, murder‑attempt and …
The petitioners, two sisters from Gaya, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Civil Line PS‑282/2023) alleging offences under IPC sections 354‑B, 506 and 509, IT Act sections 66(c) and 66(d) and POCSO Act section 14(1). The FIR alleged that their brother Anuraj used their mobile phones …
The petitioner, Amit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 341, 354(c), 354(b), 504, 506, 34 of the IPC and Section 8 of the POCSO Act, alleging that he and another person clicked an inappropriate picture of a minor and threatened to make it viral. He …
Subodh Kumar was charged under several provisions of the Indian Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for alleged assault and caste-based offences. He applied for anticipatory bail, which was rejected by the Special Judge. The appellant contended that …
The appellants, members of the Jha family, were charged under multiple IPC sections, the Arms Act and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act based on a complaint alleging assault, intimidation and use of caste slurs. They applied for anticipatory bail, which was rejected by the Special Judge, …
The petitioners, Sourav Kumar Sah and Gaurav Kumar Sah, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with FIR No.207/2024, which alleges offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 354A, 385, 506 and IT Act section 66(c). The informant alleges that a person named Shubham kidnapped her …
The petitioner, Suhel Ansari, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 87 of the BNS, 2023, alleging that he was falsely implicated in the alleged abduction of the informant's daughter. The informant claimed the petitioner enticed and took his daughter away, while the …
Rohit Raj filed an anticipatory bail application under the Criminal Procedure Code. While the application was pending, he was arrested. He then sought the court's permission to withdraw his anticipatory bail petition. The court, after hearing counsel for the petitioner and the State, granted …
Maqsood Ali, alleged to have defrauded a woman of Rs.24.5 lakh and cash, was charged under IPC sections 420, 406 and 34. He sought anticipatory bail under Section 41A of the CrPC after a non‑bailable warrant was issued, although no charge‑sheet had been filed. An earlier anticipatory bail …
Amaresh Upadhyaya applied for anticipatory bail in a case alleging theft of 16,768.50 quintals of rice, with offences under Sections 409 and 34 of the IPC. He contended that he was falsely implicated by the Chairman of Gonawan PACS, was not named in the FIR, and has a clean antecedent. The …
The petitioner, Arvind Paswan, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case involving alleged forgery and cheating related to a teacher appointment, with offences under IPC sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120(B). He argued that he was falsely implicated, that the forged marksheet …
Mahendra Purvey applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a 2013 FIR alleging offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 474 of the IPC relating to a disputed land transaction. He contended that the dispute was purely civil, involving alleged forged sale deeds and partition of …
Ramesh Singh, a resident of Rohtas, applied for anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita alleging that he colluded with Bhanu Ram in a house‑construction contract and threatened to implicate him under the SC/ST Act. The petitioner …
The petitioners, Md Wasik and Md Chalu, sought anticipatory bail after learning that a case had been registered against them under IPC sections 147, 149, 302, 120 B and Section 27 of the Arms Act. They claimed they were falsely implicated and that the investigating police, after a “threadbare” …
The petitioner, Mohit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita arising from a communal ruckus during the immersion of a Lord Ganesha idol. The incident involved stone‑pelting between members of two communities, and the …
Petitioner Sanjay Tiwari filed an anticipatory bail application in the Patna High Court. While the application was pending, he received a notice under Section 35(3) of the BNSS, and the police indicated they would not arrest him. The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail …
Petitioners Pramila Devi and Jitendra Ram filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal miscellaneous case. The State opposed, arguing that their case differed from a prior anticipatory bail order granted to Surendra Ram and others. Petitioners sought permission to withdraw their anticipatory …
The petitioner, Sanju Devi, filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal miscellaneous case arising from PS Harsidhi. After hearing, the petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The court considered the petitioner's request and exercised its …
The petitioner, Chuman Patel (also known as Chuman Raut), sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving multiple offences under the B.N.S. Act, alleging that he was falsely implicated in a land‑mafia scheme orchestrated by Deva Gupta and Sugandh Kumar Gupta. He asserted that he runs a …
Santosh Kumar Singh was arrested and subsequently released on regular bail. He had earlier filed an anticipatory bail application but, after obtaining regular bail, sought to withdraw that application. The petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail petition. The …
The petitioner, Ravi Raj (Rajesh Yadav), sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 191(2), 191(32), 190 and 103(1) of the B.N.S. The incident involved an accident where Rahul Kumar attempted to help an injured cyclist, was mistakenly assaulted by villagers, and …
Manoj Kumar Singh appealed against the State of Bihar and Ramu Manjhi in a criminal matter arising from PS case No. 261 of 2023. The appellant sought the court's permission to withdraw the appeal, stating that the parties had reached a compromise and that he intended to surrender and apply for …
Alok Kumar petitioned for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a cyber‑crime case registered under several sections of the B.N.S., 2023. He asserted a clean antecedent and claimed that the informant, an employee of the cyber‑cafe, falsely implicated him. The State opposed the bail. The court …
Sunita Devi filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal miscellaneous case. She later surrendered before the court and sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The petitioner’s counsel requested that the application be withdrawn, and the State’s counsel and the …
The petitioners, four members of the Paswan family, were implicated in a case registered under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, alleging assault, robbery and related offences on 2 June 2025. They sought anticipatory bail, contending they have clean records and that the …
The petitioner, Raushan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged possession of 155.520 litres of liquor recovered from his house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, …
The petitioner, Pundev Raut, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged possession of liquor. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was recovered from a …
The petitioner, Nishu, sought anticipatory bail in a shooting case (PS Case No. 96 of 2026) where he is charged under Sections 191(3), 190, 109, 118(1) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Sections 25(1‑B)(a) and 27 of the Arms Act. The State argued that CCTV footage recorded the …
The petitioner, Mithun Sahni, sought anticipatory bail after learning of a pending case under Sections 30(a) and 32(1), (2) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 60 litres of liquor from a public bush. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the location did not belong …
Petitioner Pramod Rajbhar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 62.5 litres of liquor near a temple. He argued he had a clean antecedent, no liquor was found in his possession, and the FIR did not disclose the informant, …
The petitioners, Ajay Paswan, Shambhu Paswan and Anil Tiwari, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 266.4 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. They contended that they were not caught in possession, were not owners of the …
The petitioner, Bittu Kumar Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 360 litres of liquor. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found …
Petitioner Rajan Kushwaha sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging that 60.480 litres of liquor were recovered from a location unrelated to him and that he was implicated by a hostile chowkidar. He has three prior …
Paras Parihar, a resident of Haripur, Saharsa, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 5.250 litres of liquor from a room adjacent to his house. The petitioner argued he has a clean antecedent, the liquor was not …
The petitioner, Sachin Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 309.60 litres of liquor from an open field adjacent to his house. The petitioner argued that the liquor was not in his …
The petitioner, Bhola Sahani, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of liquor from a sugarcane field and a pond area not belonging to him. He claimed the complaint was motivated by an inimical relationship with a chowkidar and that …
Anwara Begum, the owner of a motorcycle from which 0.650 ml of liquor was recovered, feared arrest under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act. She argued that she had no knowledge of the liquor being in the vehicle, had a clean criminal record, and was not in possession of the …
Gyanti Devi, the owner of a motorcycle from which 126 litres of liquor was seized, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act. She argued that she had no prior criminal record, was unaware of her friend’s alleged misuse of the vehicle, and that the …
Amarjit @ Mithu, a resident of Muzaffarpur, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with offences under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of large quantities of liquor from a vehicle and a mustard field. He contended …
Shailendra Kumar Gupta applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(d) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 100 kg of mahua flower from a motorcycle he owned. The petitioner argued that he had a clean …
The petitioner, Sanjay Nut, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 105 litres of liquor. He sought to correct a pleading error, claiming his criminal antecedent comprises six prior excise cases rather than five as …
The petitioner, Tabla Nut @ Raghvendra Nat, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 105 litres of liquor from a village area not owned by him. He argued that he was not apprehended at the spot, no liquor was found in his …
The petitioner, Ramesh Sah, was implicated in an excise case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of liquor recovered from his motorcycle and other locations. He argued that he had a clean antecedent and that the liquor was seized from his vehicle …
Munna Kumar, a resident of West Champaran, feared arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly recovering 620.82 litres of liquor from a pickup vehicle. He contended that he was not the owner of the vehicle, the liquor was not found …
The petitioner, Dhiraj Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 5.46 litres of liquor from a field adjacent to his house. The petitioner argued that the …
The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 32(3) and 33 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 420 litres of spirit from a public field. He argued that the police had no direct possession of the contraband, that …
The petitioner, Raghuwar Sah, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 151.68 litres of liquor from a vehicle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and that the driver of the vehicle …
The petitioner, Nagendra Kumar Baitha, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging seizure of liquor from two motorcycles he owned. The petitioner argued that he had a clean …
The petitioner, Ravi Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 90 litres of liquor from a public orchard. He claimed a clean antecedent, no possession at the time of arrest, and that the complaint was filed by a …
Shailesh Kumar was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 175 litres of liquor and 200 litres of Jawa Mahua from a kiln near the Ahra river. He contended that he was not caught in possession, the seized material was not on his property, and that …
Petitioners Rishikesh Kumar and Amresh Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in a case registered for offences under Section 111 of the B.N.S. and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging that 270 litres of liquor were recovered from a Maruti Suzuki car. They …
The petitioner, Dinesh Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 47(A)(F) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 90 litres of liquor and 600 litres of fermented Jawa Mauha recovered from his house, which is part of a joint family property. He contended that …
The petitioners, Md. Aftab and Manish Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 6.945 litres of liquor recovered from a house that is joint family property of petitioner No. 2. They argued that no liquor …
The petitioner, Ramakant Sahani, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 70 litres of liquor from a bush adjacent to his house. He argued he has a clean antecedent, the liquor was …
The petitioner, Bipin Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 872 litres of liquor from government land. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no possession of the liquor, and that the land is public and …
The petitioner, Bhola Sah, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 10.335 litres of liquor in a thatched hut on his agricultural land. He argued that he was not arrested at the scene, no liquor was recovered from his conscious possession, and the …
The petitioner, Anil Sah, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging recovery of 140.94 litres of liquor from his courtyard, alleged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He argued that the liquor was in a joint‑family house, he had no conscious possession, and …
The petitioners applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 10.375 litres of liquor. They argued that they were not arrested at the spot, the liquor was not in their conscious …
The petitioner, Shubham Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after the police recovered 67.5 litres of liquor, a motorcycle, mobiles and cash from his Mahindra vehicle in a case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. He contended that he had no knowledge of the liquor being in his vehicle and …
Anita Devi, a woman with no prior criminal record, sought anticipatory bail after learning that she might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, concerning the alleged recovery of 50 litres of liquor from a public area near a fish shop. She argued …
The petitioners, Mainejar Yadav and his son Jaiprakash Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 23.94 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. They argued that they have clean antecedents and were not in possession …
Petitioner Baby Kumar was arrested while his anticipatory bail application was pending. He sought the court's permission to withdraw that application. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Abhishek Rai, requested the withdrawal, and the State’s counsel, Ms. Asha Devi, was present. Justice Satyavrat Verma …
Amar Paswan applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he may be arrested in a case registered under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, relating to the alleged recovery of 49.5 litres of liquor from a motorcycle and …
Gayatri Devi sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(i) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 26 litres of liquor from a wall of Vikas Bhawan, a public place. The petitioner argued she had no possession of the liquor, the alleged location did …
The petitioner, Rupesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where 126 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a location adjacent to his house. He argued that no liquor was found in his possession and that the investigation …
The petitioner Ajit Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous petition (No.28779 of 2026) before the Patna High Court arising from a police case in Mirganj, Purnia. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, while the State was represented by Ms. Sucheta Yadav. The Court noted the absence of any …
The petitioner, Niraj Choudhary, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged possession of 20 litres of liquor. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was …
The appellants, three brothers, were charged under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for alleged caste-based abuse, assault with a rod and a sharp weapon, and other offences. The Special Judge had …
The petitioners, four residents of Chehra Khurd, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 74, 352 and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code alleging assault, extortion and related offences. They contended that they have clean …
The appellants, Shital Rai and his sons, appealed to the Patna High Court under Section 14‑A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, seeking anticipatory bail after a lower court refused it. The case arose from a land‑dispute in which the informant’s …
The appellants Sunil Yadav and Nagina Yadav appealed against the refusal of anticipatory bail in a case under the SC/ST Act where the informant alleged caste‑based assault and lathi‑chase stemming from a land dispute. The appellants contended they have clean antecedents, the FIR was filed three days …
The petitioner, Sudhir Kumar Bharti, was implicated in a case alleging fraud in the distribution of government relief (G.R.) to ineligible flood‑affected beneficiaries, with accusations of taking a commission of Rs. 500 and offences under IPC sections 406, 409 and 34. He applied for anticipatory …
The petitioner, Netilal Sahani, was implicated in a complaint under Section 498A of the IPC read with Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He applied for anticipatory bail, asserting a clean record and claiming the allegations were false. The petitioner offered to pay a monthly maintenance of Rs. …
Shubham Jyoti filed a criminal miscellaneous petition (No.88639 of 2025) against the State of Bihar. The petitioner failed to appear before the court on both the scheduled dates, 28-04-2026 and 29-04-2026. The learned counsel for the State was present, but no counsel represented the petitioner. The …
The petitioner, Acchhay Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case (PS‑387/2025) alleging offences under Sections 69, 351(2), 352, 89 and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023, including rape and forced abortion. The informant alleged that the petitioner had a consensual relationship that …
The petitioners, three residents of Rangpura, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bihar Negotiable Sale Act (B.N.S.S) for alleged assault and theft. They contended that the FIR was vague, the informant had a family dispute, and the petitioners …
The petitioner, Murshid Islam Nadvi, filed a second anticipatory bail application in the Patna High Court. He later sought the Court's permission to withdraw that application. The learned counsel for the petitioner requested the withdrawal, and the Court considered whether such a withdrawal could be …
Md. Imam, the petitioner, was implicated in a criminal case (PS Case No. 228 of 2023) and filed an anticipatory bail application. He later approached the court seeking permission to withdraw his second anticipatory bail application. The court considered whether a petitioner may withdraw an …
