Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
5446 judgments · newest first · showing 401–600
The petitioners, six residents of Bhorambag village, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 305(e) and 317(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for alleged illegal sand mining from the Naki river. The State and the Mines Department opposed the bail, alleging that 15,114 cft of …
The appellants appealed to the Patna High Court under Section 14‑A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 against the Special Judge’s refusal to grant anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged caste‑based assault, robbery and humiliation of the …
Manish Bind, a 22‑year‑old with no prior record, was named in an FIR alleging extortion and several other offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. He contends that the allegations arise from a commercial dispute and that he was falsely implicated, noting that the FIR does not specifically charge …
The petitioner, Amirilal Patel, sought anticipatory bail after learning that a case had been registered under Sections 317(2), 317(4), 317(5) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita concerning illegal trade in animal bones. The FIR named seven accused who were arrested and confessed that additional …
Muresh Paswan was arrested while his anticipatory bail application was pending before the Patna High Court. The petitioner, through counsel, requested permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application after his arrest. The court considered the request and the circumstances of the arrest. It …
The petitioners, Tuntun Sah and Mantu Kumar, were implicated in a 2020 FIR (PS Case No. 337) for offences under Sections 341, 323, 385, 387, 436, 379, 504 and 34 of the IPC. They filed an anticipatory bail application in January 2026, having previously had similar applications rejected by the …
The appeal (Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.259 of 2025) arose from a 2022 complaint case in Madhubani involving several members of the Shukla and Mandal families as appellants. The State of Bihar and Arti Devi were the respondents. The matter was listed twice at 3:00 p.m. and 3:45 p.m., but no counsel or …
The petitioner, Anil Kumar Prasad, feared arrest in a case registered under Sections 317(2), 317(4), 317(5) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita concerning illegal trade of animal bones. The FIR listed seven accused who were seized with animal bones, but none named the petitioner, who has a prior …
The petitioner, Lalu Yadav, feared arrest in a case involving multiple offences under the BNS, 2023. He had previously filed an anticipatory bail application before the 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Benipur, which resulted in an order dated 15‑12‑2025. Counsel for the petitioner sought the Court’s …
The petitioner, Amarjeet Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving multiple offences under the Bihar Narcotic Substances (B.N.S.) Act, 2023. He alleged that he was falsely implicated by an informant following a disturbance where a crowd attacked police and seized liquor, and …
The petitioner, Narendra Kumar Jha, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for alleged robbery and assault. He claimed a clean record and asserted that the informant falsely implicated him, stating that the police …
The petitioner, Bhikhar Sah, was implicated in a FIR alleging assault and other offences arising from a land dispute over house construction. He claimed a clean antecedent and argued that the informant falsely implicated him, asserting that the alleged injuries were minor and the allegations against …
The petitioners, Jitendra Bind and his son Pappu Bind, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS Makhdumpur Case No. 346 of 2025) involving offences under the Bihar National Security Act, 2023 and the Arms Act. The allegations stem from a family dispute that allegedly led to an …
Munna Yadav sought anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged violations of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023. The petitioner argued that his co‑accused, Manish Kumar, had already been granted anticipatory bail with a condition that non‑cooperation could lead to cancellation, and that the …
The petitioner, Pappu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 110.125 litres of liquor. He argued that no liquor was seized from his possession, the alleged recovery site was public, and the FIR omitted the informant's name, …
Petitioner Sunil Yadav filed an anticipatory bail application in the Patna High Court. While the application was pending, he was arrested. He then moved the court seeking permission to withdraw his anticipatory bail application. The court, after hearing counsel, granted permission to withdraw. …
Ramchal Yadav applied for anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged offences under sections 274, 275, 132, 352 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and section 30(a) of the Excise Act. He argued that the case diary and his criminal antecedent report had not been produced, that he was …
The petitioner, Dharo Manjhi, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in anticipation of arrest for alleged offences under Sections 30(a) and (d) of the Excise Act involving the recovery of liquor and fermented fruit. He argued that the case diary and his …
The petitioners, an elderly couple and their son, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a FIR alleging offences under Sections 115(2), 118(1), 109, 103(1) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023. They argued that they have clean antecedents, are senior citizens, and that the FIR contains only a …
The petitioner, Suraj Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 12.75 litres of liquor from the roof of his joint family house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the house being jointly owned, and …
Srikant Chaudhary filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. During the hearing, his counsel requested permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail and to surrender so that regular bail could be sought. The court granted the request, dismissing the anticipatory bail …
The petitioners, two brothers, sought anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged alleging offences under Sections 341, 323, 324, 354, 504, 379, 506 and 34 of the IPC, including assault with an iron rod, theft of Rs 5 lacs and a mobile phone, and threats. They argued that they have clean antecedents, …
The petitioners, aged 78 and 75, are the father‑in‑law and mother‑in‑law of a woman who was found hanged, and they were implicated in a dowry‑death case under Sections 103(1), 80 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. They sought anticipatory bail, arguing that they are senior citizens with clean …
Amarjeet Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case involving offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(2), 308(4), 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023. He alleged that the informant’s sons were assaulted by him and others, but the …
Shiv Dular Paswan applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018, alleging recovery of 10 litres of liquor and 150‑200 litres of semi‑prepared liquor from a hut not owned by him. The …
The petitioner, Biekchhan Kora, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel requested permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application, seeking instead to surrender and apply for regular bail. The court granted permission …
Petitioners Raja Kumar Singh and Sonu Kumar Singh applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with PS Mohiuddin Nagar Case No.116/2025, which alleges offences under several sections of the B.N.S., 2023. They contend they have been falsely implicated by the informant, arguing …
The petitioners, five residents of Nadraganj village, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the BNS, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The FIR alleged that petitioners No.3 and No.5, while intoxicated, assaulted an informant with the butt of …
The petitioner, Dhananjay Sah, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for the alleged recovery of 87.51 litres of liquor from a vehicle he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not …
Shyam Sundar Yadav sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 274, 275 of the B.N.S.S. and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. He claimed the liquor allegedly recovered from a field did not belong to him and that the police investigation was …
The petitioner, Ankit Kumar Yadav, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 172.8 litres of liquor from a truck, although the liquor was not found in his possession and he claims he was unaware that his vehicle was used by another person, …
The petitioner, Md. Suleman Ansari, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 39 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, …
The petitioner, Poonam Devi, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under IPC Sections 272 and 273 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for alleged possession of 5 litres of liquor recovered near her verandah. She argued that she has a clean antecedent, …
The petitioner, Dhanji Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, where 77.760 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from an auto. He contended that he was not arrested on the spot, had no …
The petitioners, Guddu Kumar and Sona Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 18 litres of liquor from a location behind Rakesh's house and 325.080 litres from an auto. They argued they have clean …
The petitioner, Ravi Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, for allegedly possessing 9 litres of liquor recovered from Roushan Kumar. He argued that he was not arrested at the scene, had no …
The petitioner, Nagendra Yadav, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 272 litres of liquor in a sack and 8.6 litres in a motorcycle. He contended that he has a clean antecedent, was not in actual possession at …
Butan Yadav was arrested while his anticipatory bail application was pending before the Patna High Court. He approached the court seeking permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The court, after hearing counsel for both sides, granted the petitioner's request. Consequently, the …
The petitioner, Raj Kumar Sah, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 318(4) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act, relating to the alleged recovery of 2,800.4 litres of liquor from a vehicle. He argued that he …
Munna Chaudhary sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where police alleged he was involved in the recovery of 20 litres of liquor from a scooty. He argued that he was not in possession, not the vehicle owner, and the case …
The petitioner, Dilip Ram, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 41 and 47 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 67.38 litres of liquor from an e‑rickshaw he owned. He argued that he was not present at the spot, nothing was seized from his …
Dauly Devi, the wife of Kamlesh Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail after a police case (Excise P.S. Case No. 229 of 2026) alleged that 26.5 litres of liquor were recovered from a scooty she owned. She argued that she had a clean antecedent, was not present at the spot of seizure, and was unaware …
The petitioner, Sanoj Chaudhary, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 30 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, the liquor was not found in his possession, and he was unaware that …
The petitioner, Ankit Maharaj, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 9.9 litres of liquor from a third‑party's hut. He …
Bankatesh Sharma filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. After hearing, he sought permission to withdraw that application and instead surrender to face trial and apply for regular bail. The Court granted permission to withdraw, dismissing the anticipatory bail application …
The petitioner, Raju Bhai, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 74.4 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no liquor in his possession, and was unaware that a person named Chhotu …
Manisha Devi and Mithun Sahni filed an anticipatory bail application in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 160 litres of liquor from a joint family house. Mithun Sahni was arrested while the application was pending, and his counsel sought to …
Gourav Kumar filed an anticipatory bail application in the High Court of Patna. During the hearing, his counsel requested permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail and to surrender, seeking regular bail instead. The Court granted the request, allowing the withdrawal and dismissing the petition. …
Shiva Sahni was implicated under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 13 litres of liquor recovered from his joint family house. He argued that he had no conscious possession, the house is jointly owned, and the amendment to the Excise Act in 2018 abolished the concepts of …
The petitioner, Taranand Mandal, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for allegedly recovering 54.56 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He contended that he had sold the motorcycles to another party by agreement, and …
Rekha Devi, a resident of Bettiah, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where liquor was allegedly recovered from a location adjacent to her house. The petitioner argued that no liquor was found in her possession, the FIR was based on …
Petitioner Raj Lal Yadav, owner of a vehicle from which 225 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under IPC Sections 272, 273 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not present at …
The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Sections 30(a), 41(1) and 41(2) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 20 litres of liquor near a brick kiln. He contended that the liquor was not in his possession, the recovery was based solely on …
The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act for the alleged recovery of 225 litres of liquor from his vehicle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not present at the spot of seizure, and that the …
The petitioner, Vikram Kumar, was implicated in an excise case for the alleged recovery of 38 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that a friend misused his vehicle. The State opposed his request …
The petitioner, Brijesh Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 210 litres of liquor from a sugarcane field. The petitioner argued that he was not …
The petitioner, Raj Kumar, was implicated in a case involving the alleged recovery of 36 litres of liquor from a motorcycle, alleged offences under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was …
The petitioner, Chinta Devi, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 125 litres of liquor from a kitchen behind her house. She argued that the liquor was not in her possession, that the location did not belong …
Petitioner Rajesh Manjhi was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing two litres of liquor recovered from a field that he does not own. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, the liquor was not found in his conscious possession, and the police …
The petitioners, Sanjay Sahani and Rakesh Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. They contended that the alleged liquor recovery was not from their possession, …
Dharmendra Yadav was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 585 litres of liquor concealed under straw. He contended that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, and the alleged recovery site did not belong to him. …
The petitioner, Munna Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 52 litres of liquor and 250 litres of Mahua from his residence, which he claims is a joint family property and that he had no conscious possession or knowledge of the …
The petitioner, Badhiya Devi, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 45 litres of liquor from her residence. The petitioner argued that the liquor was found in a joint family …
Sunil Kumar Mukhiya applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 12 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no conscious possession of the …
The petitioner, Sandeep Sao, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 24 litres of liquor from an auto. He contended that he was not arrested on the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, was not the owner …
Mangru Thakur sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act alleging that 40 litres of liquor were recovered from his house and 30 litres from a neighbour's house. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at …
The petitioner, Md. Mojahid, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for allegedly possessing 43.5 litres of liquor recovered from his motorcycle. He contended that the vehicle was stolen and he had no conscious possession of the liquor, and …
The petitioner, Pappu Sahani, sought anticipatory bail after fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 91.25 litres of liquor from a rented house. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, the liquor was not found in his possession, …
Manoj Singh was implicated in an excise case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for allegedly possessing 2769.120 litres of liquor. He contended that the liquor was recovered from a location adjacent to his shop and that he was not arrested at the spot, …
Bhola Chaudhari, charged under IPC Section 498A and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest. The parties had undergone mediation, resulting in a settlement whereby the petitioner agreed to pay a specified amount. The complainant (Lalsa Devi) did not …
Shashi Kumar filed an anticipatory bail petition in the Patna High Court arising from a criminal case registered in Gaya. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the matter had been referred to mediation, which reportedly succeeded as per the mediator’s report dated 11‑02‑2026. However, the petitioner …
The petitioners, Rohit Kumar and Anjan Singh, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 30.240 litres of liquor from a house that does not belong to them. They argued that they were not arrested at the spot, no liquor …
The appellants Manju Devi, Rohit Kumar and Abhishek Kumar appealed under Section 14‑A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against a trial court order refusing anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged assault, caste‑based abuse and theft of a mangalsutra. They contended that the FIR …
Ravindra Yadav appealed against the order of the Additional District & Sessions Judge that rejected his anticipatory bail application in a case involving multiple IPC offences and violations of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. He argued that he has a clean record, was falsely implicated, …
The appellant, Raushan Kumar, was charged with murder under IPC section 302 and an offence under section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST Act. He applied for anticipatory bail under section 14‑A(2) of the SC/ST Act, which was denied by the Special Judge. The appellant argued that he had a clean record and was …
The appellants, four members of the Giri family, appealed against a Special Judge's refusal to grant anticipatory bail in a case registered under several IPC offences (sections 341, 323, 504, 506, 34) and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (section …
The appellant, Anjay Kumar, was charged under IPC sections 420, 406, 323, 504 and Section 3(x)(r) of the SC/ST Act for alleged caste‑based abuse during a money dispute. He applied for anticipatory bail, which was denied by the Special Judge. On appeal under Section 14‑A(2) of the SC/ST Act, the …
Rohit Mukhiya, facing charges under Sections 341, 323, 498A, 506 and 34 of the IPC, applied for anticipatory bail after a prior application was withdrawn under Section 41(1)(b) of the CrPC. The dispute is matrimonial; he is the husband of Rita Kumari, with whom the relationship has broken down and a …
Petitioner Balmiki Sharma filed an anticipatory bail application in the High Court of Patna. After hearing, he sought permission to withdraw that application and to surrender, requesting regular bail instead. The Court granted permission to withdraw, dismissing the anticipatory bail application as …
The petitioner, Ankit Yadav, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 32.8 litres of liquor from a scooty. He argued that he was not apprehended at the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, was not the owner of the …
The petitioner, Md Sadakat, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a criminal case (Araria Mahila PS Case No. 60 of 2024) involving offences under several sections of the BNS. He had earlier filed for anticipatory bail which was withdrawn after a notice under Section 35 of the BNSS, and a …
The petitioner, Sonu Chaudhary, was implicated in a FIR alleging that he, along with a co‑accused, extorted money by coercing a student to record an inappropriate video of a teacher and later threatened to publish the video unless she complied with further demands. The FIR charges under Sections 76, …
The petitioner, Hira Ram, applied for anticipatory bail in a case involving multiple offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1), 76, 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The counsel highlighted the petitioner’s clean antecedent and argued that the alleged assault resulted in only a …
The petitioner, Bholi Yadav @ Ravi Ranjan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 103(1) and 61(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleging a clean antecedent and that the FIR was lodged against unknown persons. He claimed that the …
The petitioners, a group of seven Yadavs, sought anticipatory bail in a case alleging extortion, threats with a pistol, and offences under the B.N.S. 2023 and the Arms Act. The informant claimed the accused intercepted him on 06.08.2024 and demanded Rs.5 lakh. The petitioners argued they were …
Ramashray Sahni applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 318(4) and 316(2) of the Bihar Narcotic/Criminal Statutes, 2023, alleging that the informant’s complaint actually pertained to a third party, Vikash, who allegedly cheated the informant in a sand and Gitti …
The petitioner, Rahul Bharti, was implicated in a case (PS Bihta Case No. 806 of 2025) for alleged possession of 200 litres of liquor seized from two motorcycles, one of which he owned. He claimed he had no knowledge of the liquor being in the vehicle and that he had a clean criminal record. The …
The petitioner, Govind Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 137(2) and 87 of the Indian Penal Code alleging kidnapping and abduction of the informant's daughter. He claimed a clean record, asserted that the victim voluntarily eloped, and alleged false implication …
Vishwajeet Kumar applied for bail anticipating arrest in a case registered under Sections 96, 140(1), 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The informant alleged that the petitioner kidnapped her minor daughter, but the alleged victim later gave a statement under Section 183 BNSS stating she left home …
The petitioner, Raja Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 14.92 litres of liquor were recovered from a vehicle owned by Sheikh Nasiruddin, not from the petitioner. He argued he had no …
The appellants, four Yadavs, appealed under Section 14‑A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 against the trial court’s refusal to grant anticipatory bail in a case involving offences under the Bihar Negotiable Substances Act, 2023 and the SC/ST Act. …
The appellant, Rajeev Yadav, was charged under several sections of the Bihar National Security Act, 2023 and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 for alleged offences including assault and caste-based abuse. He applied for anticipatory bail under Section …
The petitioner, Sandeep Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleging that the FIR was against unknown persons and that a co-accused, Aman, had confessed that the petitioner, who is the informant's …
The petitioner, Dilkhush Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS Case No. 359 of 2025) under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 19.8 litres of codeine cough syrup from a grocery shop owned by Bihari Kumar. The petitioner argued he has a clean record, …
The petitioners, Mithlesh Giri and Jogendra Giri, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 137(2) and 87 of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act, 2023 read with Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act, alleging kidnapping for marriage. The FIR was lodged on 3 August 2025, more …
The petitioners, Subhash Kumar and Mithu Kumar, were implicated in a criminal case (PS Case No.550 of 2021) arising from a government official complaint in Nawada district. They filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. During the hearing, the petitioners sought permission …
The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He alleged that the alleged seizure of 2,181.57 litres of liquor and a …
The petitioner, Kailash Sahni, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for allegedly transporting 342 litres of liquor in his pick‑up vehicle. He contended that he was not in possession …
The petitioner, Raj Kumar Mahto, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 99 litres of liquor. He argued that the liquor was not found in his possession, the alleged recovery site was public, and the FIR was based on …
The petitioner, Subodh Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case (PS. Case No.308 of 2025) alleging assault and other offences under the B.N.S., 2023. He claims a clean record and asserts that the allegations stem from a dispute over video‑recording a religious puja, …
The petitioners, who are the parents and brothers of Ajit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Patliputra P.S. Case No.445/2025) under Sections 137(2), 96 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. They alleged that the case was false because the victim, who had eloped with Ajit, had …
The petitioners, Subhash Kumar Paswan and Anil Kumar Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274, 275 and 3(3) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. They contended that …
The petitioner, Ramnath Ray, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for allegedly recovering 70 litres of liquor from Baburbani Diyara Area. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of …
The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2023 for the alleged recovery of 35 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned, while another motorcycle was also seized. He argued that he had a clean …
The petitioner, Ajay Kumar Yadav, was implicated in a case involving the seizure of 168.48 litres of liquor from a car and a motorcycle registered in his name, under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, had a …
The petitioner, Arun Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 2,701.8 litres of liquor from a truck. He contended that he was not present at the spot of seizure, that the liquor was not found in his conscious …
Beby Devi, a widow from Madhubani, feared arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 15 litres of liquor from a bush near her house. She claimed she had no possession of the liquor, that the recovery was from land not belonging to her, and that a …
The petitioner, Rajji Khan, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 60 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not in possession of the seized vehicle, was not …
The petitioner, Salman Gaddi, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 30.6 litres of liquor recovered from an e‑rickshaw he owned. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, had a clean …
Manish Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with a case under the Excise Act alleging possession of 750 ml of liquor and seizure of his motorcycle. The petitioner asserted a clean criminal antecedent and claimed he was not arrested at the scene, arguing …
The petitioner, Abhishek Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act alleging recovery of liquor from a vehicle. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the seized liquor, and that …
Mani Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 250 litres of liquor from an auto. He claimed he had no conscious possession of the liquor, was not the owner of the vehicle, and was implicated by a hostile …
The petitioner, Suran Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 18 litres of liquor from a public bush. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the location did not belong to him, and the …
Bullet Yadav sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging concealment of liquor in his fields. He argued that no liquor was recovered from his possession, the FIR omitted the informant's name, and that an …
Vivek Bharti applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with alleged offences under Sections 30(a), 41(1) and 41(2) of the Excise Act. He argued that he was not arrested, no liquor was recovered from his possession, and the case was based solely on a …
The petitioner, Vikrama Sahani, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 196 litres of liquor. He argued that the alleged recovery was from a …
The petitioners, Upendra Singh and Ranjeet Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act and Sections 217 and 248 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act read with Sections 25(1‑B)A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The court examined …
Indu Devi, a woman with a clean antecedent, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022 for allegedly having 15 litres of liquor recovered from the courtyard of her joint family house. She was not arrested at the spot and the liquor was not found in her …
The petitioner, Md Aslam, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 229.320 litres of liquor recovered from a poultry farm adjacent to his property. He contended that he has a clean antecedent, the liquor was not found in his immediate possession, …
The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case alleging offences under Section 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Excise Act, involving the alleged recovery of …
The petitioner, Srinarayan Sah, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging that liquor was recovered from a vehicle he did not own and that his implication rested solely on a custodial confession of another person. He …
The petitioner, Umesh Kushwaha, was implicated in a case alleging recovery of 285.06 litres of liquor from his Tata Tigor vehicle under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He argued that he was not present at the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and was …
Manoj Kumar Yadav was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 69.120 litres of liquor from his warehouse. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of arrest, and that the misuse was by an …
The petitioner, Dinanath Singh, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 100 litres of liquor from an auto he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that the driver misused his …
The petitioner, Pawan Kumar Yadav, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 900 litres of liquor from an orchard that does not belong to him. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, that the liquor was …
Ajay Sahni applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. after being implicated in an offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 542.4 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was …
Kamlesh Yadav, the owner of a motorcycle from which 26 litres of liquor was seized, applied for anticipatory bail, claiming he had no knowledge of the liquor being in his vehicle and that his friend had misused the vehicle. The petitioner asserted a clean criminal record and argued that ownership …
Ramawati Devi and Chandeshwar Prasad Singh sought anticipatory bail after learning that they might be arrested in a case registered under Sections 137(2) and 87 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for the alleged abduction of a girl by a person named Saurabh. They contended that they have clean …
The petitioner, Raghav Rai, owner of Janki Dhaba, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly concealing 4.125 litres of liquor under husk at his premises. He was not arrested at the scene and no liquor was found in his possession. He applied for anticipatory …
Sabita Devi and Indal Manjhi applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where police recovered 20 litres of liquor from their house and 8 litres from a co‑accused. They argued they have clean antecedents, the liquor was in a joint family …
The appellants, four members of the Mahto family, were charged under multiple provisions of the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 for alleged caste‑based assault and harassment on 15 July 2024. Their application for anticipatory bail was rejected by the Special …
The appellants, Ajay Yadav and Duly Yadav, were charged under several provisions of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and the BNS, 2023 for allegedly assaulting Gita Devi and others with rods and lathis, causing head injuries. They sought anticipatory …
The petitioner, Kishori Prasad Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly transporting 69.120 litres of liquor in his Bolero vehicle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not present at the spot of seizure, and …
The appellants, four Yadav brothers, were charged under several IPC sections and Section 3(x) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly entering a woman’s house, assaulting her and her daughter‑in‑law and snatching an earring on 31‑01‑2015. They …
The petitioner, Gopal Sahni, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 103(1), 61(2) and 3(5) of the Bihar Negotiable Substances Act (BNSS) relating to the alleged murder of his son Raja. He contended that the informant who lodged the complaint was not an eyewitness …
The petitioners, Vikash Kumar and Muntun Paswan, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a violent incident where an informant was set ablaze, resulting in severe injuries. They argued they have clean antecedents and that the FIR does not specifically allege their participation, …
The petitioner, Govind Kumar Thakur, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged alleging his involvement in offences under Sections 420, 120(B), 468, 471, 494 and 34 of the IPC, based on a complaint by an informant who claimed Thakur had married the informant's wife Mala without a divorce and …
The petitioners sought anticipatory bail in a dowry‑death case where the FIR alleged that members of the family strangulated the victim and cremated the body. The petitioners argued they have clean antecedents and that the informant is not an eye‑witness, making the allegations speculative. The …
The petitioner, Divesh Kumar Sharma, a Railway Inspector, was named in an FIR for offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleged to have participated in a shooting that resulted in the death of Renu Devi. The police, after …
The petitioner, Sachin Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case (PS Case No.71/2025) alleging his involvement in offences under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act. He claimed to have a clean record and asserted that the informant had falsely implicated him, describing an incident …
The petitioner, Sheikh Aliyas, a 69‑year‑old senior citizen with a clean record, was implicated in a murder case under Sections 302 and 34 of the IPC based on an informant’s allegation that he ordered a relative to strangle the informant’s mother‑in‑law. The petitioner contended that the informant …
Nagendra Kumar, a government teacher, was named in an FIR for offences under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 302 and 120(B) and Section 27 of the Arms Act, relating to a shooting incident during a Holi dispute. He contended that the informant falsely implicated him and that the police investigation …
The petitioners, Hewanti Devi, Ramesh Ray and Rohan Ray, filed an anticipatory bail application in a case registered under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. During the pendency, petitioner No.2 (Ramesh Ray) was arrested and sought to withdraw his anticipatory bail application, which …
The petitioner, Nandan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 305(e) and 317(4) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, relating to alleged illegal sand mining that caused a loss of Rs.18 lakh to the government. He contended that the FIR was based …
The petitioner, Munna Rai, filed an anticipatory bail application under the Criminal Procedure Code. While the application was pending, he was arrested by the police. The petitioner’s counsel then sought the court’s permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The learned counsel for …
Shankar Chandravanshi, the appellant, had filed a second anticipatory bail application in a criminal case. The Special Public Prosecutor for the State noted that this was the second such application. The appellant's counsel did not contest this observation and sought the court's permission to …
Shobha Devi filed an application seeking cancellation of the anticipatory bail that had been granted to Gaurav Rai (OP No.2) in a matrimonial dispute. The petitioner argued that the bail was obtained by misleading the court, that the respondent had refused to accept notice, and that he had failed to …
Umesh Kumar was arrested in connection with alleged dacoity and related offences under IPC sections 399, 402, 413 and 414, and Arms Act sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 35. He has been in custody since 4‑December‑2025, but no weapon was recovered from his possession; the case against him rests mainly on a …
Aman Kumar, a resident of Dhusar village, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged against unknown persons for offences under Sections 310(2) and 311 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, alleging robbery and assault on his tractor. He argued that he has a clean antecedent and that the FIR and a …
The petitioner, Azad Ansari, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving offences under Sections 498(A), 385, 376, 354(C), 354(D), 34 of the IPC, Section 3 of the D.P. Act and Sections 67 and 67(A) of the IT Act. He claimed the underlying dispute was matrimonial, now resolved …
Petitioner Pintu Yadav was implicated in an FIR for illegal sand mining under Sections 305(e) and 317(4) of the B.N.S., 2023, based on an informant’s claim that the activity caused a loss of Rs.18 lakh to the government. The petitioner asserted that he has a clean antecedent, no sand or equipment …
The petitioners, Ramanand Thakur, Ram Snehi Thakur and Sobha Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under several sections of the BNS. They had earlier obtained an order disposing of their anticipatory bail application (Cr. Misc. No.58556 of 2025) on 15‑Nov‑2025, which …
The petitioner, Aditya Kumar, had filed a modification application in Criminal Miscellaneous No.28399 of 2026 arising from a 2024 case in Siwan. During the hearing on 24-04-2026, the petitioner’s counsel sought the court’s permission to withdraw that application. The court, exercising its inherent …
The petitioner, Sachit Paswan, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Section 366 of the Indian Penal Code, alleging kidnapping with intent to marry. He claimed a clean antecedent and argued that the victim’s statement, recorded under Section 164 of the CrPC, was made under parental …
The petitioner, Upendra Sahni, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with an offence alleged under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, involving the recovery of 20 litres of liquor and 2400 kg of semi‑prepared jawa mahua that were destroyed at a river bank. He …
The petitioner, Raushan Sahni, was charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 816.48 litres of liquor from a Mahindra pickup vehicle. He has three prior excise cases and has been in custody since 2 February 2026. The petitioner argued that he was not caught in …
The petitioner, Sainullah Khan, filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal miscellaneous case. The application included an affidavit that was later discovered to have been sworn by a minor, rendering it defective. The petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail …
Guddu Kumar petitioned for anticipatory bail in connection with PS case No. 157 of 2025. The High Court set a condition that if the petitioner surrenders by 30 April 2026, the provisional anticipatory bail will be accepted upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 500 with two sureties of the same amount, …
The petitioner, Md. Waris Khan, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022 after 85.5 litres of liquor were recovered from a truck he owned. He contended that he had no prior criminal record, was not in possession of the liquor, and was …
Guddu Yadav sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case registered under Sections 112(2) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that the alleged seizure of 705.9 litres of liquor and two …
The petitioner, Sachin Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of liquor from a poultry farm and a motorcycle. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent, …
The petitioner, Shushil Kumar Ram, filed a modification application in Criminal Miscellaneous No.28288 of 2026 arising from a complaint case. He later approached the court seeking permission to withdraw that application. The learned counsel for the petitioner requested the court's leave to withdraw, …
The petitioner, Baban Sahani, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He alleged that the alleged seizure of 80 litres of liquor and 2000 litres of Mahua was made at a kiln …
The petitioners, Parvindra Singh and Raja Sharma, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, alleging that 1633.92 litres of liquor were recovered from a Bolero pick‑up. They contended that they were not …
Petitioner Rahul Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 694.2 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He contended that he was not in possession of the liquor, did not own the motorcycles, and was …
Basudev Yadav sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 1,130.4 litres of liquor from a hut near his residence. He argued he had no conscious possession of the liquor, the hut did not belong to him, and the …
Bhukhani Devi, the wife of Satyanarayan Thakur, sought anticipatory bail after learning that a case had been registered against her under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 14.875 litres of liquor from a motorcycle she owned. She argued that she had a clean antecedent, …
The petitioner, Saurav Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for alleged possession of 438.75 litres of liquor recovered from a godown not owned by him. He claimed a clean antecedent and argued that the recovery was made from …
Umesh Sahani was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 290 litres of liquor and 8,000 litres of raw material from a kiln near a river, offences punishable under IPC sections 272, 273 and 34 and several provisions of the Bihar Excise Act. The petitioner argued that he was not caught in …
The petitioners, Binod Mahto, Ranjan Mahto and Sonu Mahto, filed a criminal miscellaneous application before the Patna High Court seeking modification of an earlier anticipatory bail order that had been granted to them. The State of Bihar opposed the modification, contending that the bail had been …
Amarjeet Kumar was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 100 litres of liquor from the courtyard of Akhilesh Kumar, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. The petitioner argued that he was not caught in possession, the liquor was recovered from a …
Vinod Yadav was charged under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 90 litres of liquor from the Sone Diyara area. The petitioner, represented by Ms. Rupa Kumari, applied for regular bail, contending that he was not apprehended at the spot and that the liquor was …
The petitioner, Abhishek Ranjan, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 109(1) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 991.50 litres of liquor from several vehicles. He argued that he had a clean …
The petitioner, Hitesh Kumar, was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 1,089 litres of liquor from a pickup vehicle, an offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022. He contended that he was not the owner of the vehicle and was …
Guddu Kumar filed a petition seeking restoration of Criminal Miscellaneous No. 15112 of 2026, which had been removed from the court's file. The petitioner, represented by Mr. Durgesh Nandan, argued that the case should be reinstated for further adjudication. The State, represented by Mr. Rajiv …
The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. He argued that he was not caught in possession of liquor, was not the owner of the seized motorcycle, and was implicated by a watchman with whom …
The petitioner, Ranjeet Saw, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 30(a), 30(c), 36 and 56(c) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 15 litres of liquor from Pappu Singh's premises. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the scene, had no …
The petitioner, Rajesh Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 110 litres of liquor from a location behind Raju Manjhi's house. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not caught in possession, and was …
The petitioner, Gulshan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly recovering 40 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and …
The petitioner, Anil Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of liquor from a motorcycle he owned and from a house belonging to another person. He argued that he had a clean criminal record, that the liquor …
The petitioner, Raju Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 320.4 litres of liquor from a sack on a cart. He argued that he was not in possession, was not the cart owner, and was …
Santosh Kumar sought anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged alleging his involvement in the illegal recovery of 786.660 litres of liquor from a wheat field, invoking Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. The petitioner argued that he …
Mukesh Sardar sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging that 30 litres of liquor and 80 litres of semi‑prepared liquor were recovered from a bamboo orchard adjacent to his house. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested on …
The petitioner, Vidarthi Raj Nishan, was charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 700 litres of liquor from the courtyard of Asha Devi. He was not apprehended at the scene and no liquor was found in his possession; the prosecution’s case relied on a confessional …
The petitioner, Dwarika Mukhiya, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act and Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, alleging recovery of 31.17 litres of liquor from a public riverbank. He contended that the liquor was not in his …
The petitioner, Vijay Choudhary, was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 168.75 litres of liquor from an auto, alleged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he was not in possession of the liquor, was not the owner of the vehicle, and was …
The Patna High Court entertained an anticipatory bail application filed by Jitendra Sahani, who was alleged to have been involved in the recovery of 47.5 litres of liquor and 2,500 litres of spirit from a house that is part of a joint family property. The petitioner, who has ten prior criminal …
Petitioner Ajay Ram was arrested while his anticipatory bail application was pending before the Patna High Court. He approached the court seeking permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application after his arrest. The court, after hearing counsel, granted the request to withdraw. …
The petitioner, Pintu Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 19.80 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He was not arrested at the scene, no liquor was found in his possession, and the case against him relied on a confessional statement …
Shiva Kumar (Shiva Manjhi) sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Sections 30(a), 30(c) and 44 of the Bihar Excise Act alleging that 110 litres of liquor and 1,000 litres of Mahua jaggery solution were recovered from a shed and bush at Ward No. 3, which did not belong to …
The petitioner, Shubhash Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 123.75 litres of liquor. The petitioner argued that he was not in possession of the …
Suraj Kumar applied for bail in a criminal case (PS Case No. 74 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 336(3), 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Sections 30(a) and 41(i) of the Bihar Excise Act. The petitioner has three prior cases, one relating to the alleged …
The petitioner, Saroj Kumar, applied for bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 135 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. The petitioner has 14 prior cases, 12 under the Excise Act, but contends he was not apprehended at the spot, did not have …
Rahul Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 180 litres of liquor. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his conscious possession, and the allegation …
Vikash Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 15 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he was not present at the spot, the liquor was not found in his …
The petitioner, Manish Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of large quantities of liquor from locations not belonging to him. He argued that he was not apprehended at the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, …
Petitioner Rajesh Rai, accused under several IPC sections (272, 273, 420, 467, 468, 120(b)) and sections of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, applied for bail. He has ten prior cases, one involving alleged recovery of 1,845 litres of liquor, but was not arrested at the scene and no seized …
Suraj Kumar was arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He had earlier obtained provisional anticipatory bail, but the trial court, after verifying his criminal antecedents, found additional prior offences and refused to accept the bail bond. …
Dev Kumar, a resident of Begusarai, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 982.44 litres of liquor from a mini Tata truck. He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, did not …
The petitioner, Amit Kumar Ranjan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving alleged recovery of 70.5 litres of liquor and offences under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He contended that he was not …
