Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
5446 judgments · newest first · showing 601–800
The petitioner, Akhilesh Kumar, was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 865.59 litres of liquor from a pickup vehicle and charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he was not the owner of the vehicle, was not arrested at the spot, and was …
The petitioner, Ruman Ali, applied for anticipatory bail after the police seized 160 litres of liquor and two vehicles in connection with an alleged offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He contended that the liquor was recovered from a location …
The petitioner, Sujit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 120 litres of liquor from an auto near the Falgu River. He contended that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was …
Ram Babu Mahto was charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, in a case registered in 2019. He had earlier obtained provisional anticipatory bail, subject to verification of his criminal antecedent. The State argued that the verification revealed four prior cases, …
The petitioner, Deepak Kumar Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 351 litres of liquor. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at …
The petitioner, Rambabu Sahni, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(A) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 501 litres of liquor from a straw house belonging to Krishna Mohan. The petitioner argued …
The petitioner, Pawan Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 300 litres of liquor near the Punpun river. He contended that he was not arrested at the …
Santosh Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 60 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure, and was unaware that …
Rahul Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous petition before the Patna High Court. No counsel appeared on his behalf despite repeated calls, while the State’s counsel was present. The court noted the petitioner’s failure to prosecute the case. Consequently, Justice Satyavrat Verma dismissed the …
The petitioner, Umesh Sahani, was charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2025 for allegedly possessing 250 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle and a nearby sack. He contended that he was not arrested at the scene, the liquor was not in his conscious …
Mojahid, a resident of Pathraha village, was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 75 litres of liquor from a maize field and charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 (Amended), 2022. He applied for bail, asserting a clean antecedent, lack of possession …
The petitioner, Gopal Sah, was charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018 for allegedly recovering 67.245 litres of liquor from a straw house. He was not arrested at the scene and no liquor was seized from his possession; the informant who named him was not identified …
The petitioner, Durga Bind, was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 120 litres of liquor from a public area behind a school, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He argued that the liquor was not found in his possession, the location did not belong to him, and …
Gautam Kumar and Pappu Kumar Kewat sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple IPC offences and Section 45 of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of five litres of liquor from Karu Chaudhary's house. They asserted they have clean antecedents, were not …
Petitioner Brajesh Yadav applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in an FIR under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 115.72 litres of liquor from five motorcycles. He contended that he was not in possession of the liquor, was not the owner of the seized vehicles, and …
The petitioner, Vipin Kumar Ram, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged seizure of 133.2 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that another …
The appellant, Md Saif Shahid, was charged under several IPC sections and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for alleged caste‑based abuse, demolition of a boundary wall, and extortion in a land dispute. He sought anticipatory bail under Section 14‑A(2) of the …
The petitioner, Sanatan Choudhary, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving multiple offences under the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The FIR stemmed from a land‑related dispute where two groups allegedly fired at each other; the police apprehended two individuals who, …
The petitioner, Shantanu Singh, was accused of fraudulently withdrawing large sums from a dormant bank account, with allegations involving Sections 419, 420, 467 and 471 of the IPC. He contended that he has a clean record and was falsely implicated, pointing out discrepancies in the name on the …
The petitioner, Balinder Ray, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that he was not arrested on the spot, had no possession of the seized liquor, and was implicated solely on a confessional statement made by another person in police custody. He …
The petitioners, Nazim Hussain and Deepu Prasad, applied for anticipatory bail in a case where they were alleged to have caught an informant who was subsequently stabbed by others. The FIR charges them under several sections of the B.N.S., although the police investigation concluded with a final …
The petitioner, Dinesh Sahani, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. While the application was pending, he was arrested by the police. The petitioner's counsel, Mr. Ranjana Srivastava, subsequently sought the Court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail …
The petitioners, Ashwini Vatsya and Awanish Vats, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 103, 61, 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 27 of the Arms Act. The informant alleged that his son Rahul was shot by Prem Shankar Jha and that the …
The appellant, Shivsankar Pal, was charged with offences under the IPC and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act arising from a disputed land sale in which the informant alleged fraud and caste-based assault. The appellant contended that the matter was essentially …
Mithilesh Yadav, a 19‑year‑old, was arrested in connection with an alleged kidnapping of a minor girl and charged under Sections 137(2), 96, 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The petitioner argued that he was falsely implicated, that the FIR was …
The appellant, Deepu Kumar, was charged under several IPC provisions and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting, caste‑abhorrently abusing, and robbing the informant on 22 July 2025. He applied for anticipatory bail, which was rejected by the Exclusive Special Judge. On …
The petitioner, Md. Kalam, was named among 23 accused in an FIR alleging offences under Sections 147, 341, 323, 504, 506, 354B, 307 and 379 of the IPC, stemming from a property‑related altercation on 13‑04‑2024. He contended that the informant, who is a relative, falsely implicated him to settle a …
Vicky Kumar, the petitioner, had been granted default bail in a criminal case. He subsequently filed a regular bail application but sought to withdraw it after receiving the default bail. The petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the regular bail application. The court, after hearing …
Dilip Kumar Singh was charged under Sections 302, 120(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code in a 2016 case. He applied for regular bail for the third time after earlier rejections by this Court and the Supreme Court. The trial had examined all prosecution witnesses except the investigating officer and …
The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, was arrested in connection with the alleged dowry death of his wife under Sections 80(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He applied for regular bail, claiming a clean antecedent, that he was not present at the scene, and that the …
The petitioner, Raju Kumar, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged murder. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, has been in custody since 22‑08‑2025, and that the FIR specifically implicates another person, Bablu Sahni, for …
The petitioner, Jhunnu Kumar Singh, was charged under Sections 103(1), 61(2), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly assaulting the son of an informant. He has been in custody since 23‑12‑2024 and previously applied for regular bail (Cr. Misc No. 35637 of …
The petitioner, Chhatu Kumar, a contractual driver at a police station, was arrested in connection with a violent incident alleged to have occurred on 13‑04‑2025, involving multiple assaults, stabbings, and robbery, and charged under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. He sought regular …
The petitioner, Dilip Sahani, was arrested in 2018 for alleged participation in a gathering where explosives were found, leading to charges under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 414 and Explosive Substances Act sections 4 and 5. He has nine prior criminal cases, including a conviction for a serious …
The petitioner, Suraj Kumar, sought regular bail in a case registered under Sections 85, 80 and 3(5) of the BNS, alleging that he was falsely implicated in the alleged dowry‑related death of his wife. The informant claimed the wife was tortured for dowry and subsequently strangulated, while the …
The petitioner, Manoj Yadav, sought regular bail in a case involving multiple serious offences under the Indian Penal Code, including assault with a sword and other violent acts arising from a land dispute. He had been in judicial custody since 28 November 2025 and claimed he was falsely implicated …
Shivjee Mahto was arrested in connection with a case registered under PS. Case No.-79 Year-2025 at Mansurchak, Begusarai. He filed a regular bail application before the Patna High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the bail application, citing …
Chandan Kumar Bharti was arrested on 17 November 2025 in connection with offences under Sections 69, 294 and 351(2) of the B.N.S., alleged to have established a physical relationship with the informant by falsely promising marriage. The petitioner, claiming a clean antecedent and that the …
The petitioner, Raushan Kumar, was involved in a criminal miscellaneous case (No.9209 of 2026) arising from a police report in Bhagwanganj, Patna. The trial had already commenced when the petitioner filed a regular bail application before the High Court of Patna. During the hearing, the petitioner’s …
The appellants, six Yadavs, were charged under several IPC sections and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for an alleged assault, caste abuse, robbery and threats that occurred on 27 October 2023. The trial court rejected their anticipatory bail application. In appeal, the appellants argued …
The petitioner, Suresh Yadav, was arrested in a case alleging assault and other offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, arising from a property‑related dispute. He claimed that the informant, an agnate relative, had falsely …
The petitioner, Rakesh Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, where liquor was allegedly recovered from a motorcycle he owned and a house. He argued that the liquor was not found in his immediate possession and that …
The petitioners, Arvind Singh and Mukesh Yadav, were implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged possession of liquor and raw material. They applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that the alleged contraband was recovered …
The petitioner, Soni Devi, sought anticipatory bail after learning of a pending case under the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 34 litres of liquor from a joint family house. She argued that she was not apprehended at the scene, no liquor was found in her conscious possession, and the concept …
Anil Kumar filed an anticipatory bail application under the criminal procedure against alleged charges. The petitioner later sought the court's permission to withdraw the application. The learned counsel for the petitioner requested that the anticipatory bail be withdrawn, and the court considered …
The petitioner, Arvind Ray, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 141.840 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his house. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was not found in his …
Vikash Kumar, the owner of a motorcycle, was implicated in a case where 100 litres of liquor were recovered from his vehicle, although he was not arrested at the spot and claimed no conscious possession. He asserted a clean criminal record and argued that the actual misuse of the vehicle was by …
The petitioner, Sanjeev Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 2,203.2 litres of liquor from three vehicles. He argued that he was not arrested at the scene, had no possession of the liquor, and was not the owner of the vehicles, …
Shivam Das, the owner of a motorcycle from which 750 ml of liquor was seized, applied for anticipatory bail under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, claiming he was not present at the spot of seizure and was unaware of his friend’s alleged misuse of the vehicle. The …
The petitioner, Jaykant Sahu, challenged a typographical error in the order dated 23-04-2026 where the case number was recorded as 'Bakhri PS Case No. 172 of 2026' instead of the correct year 2016. The petitioner, through counsel Mr. Prabhat Kumar, sought a correction of this clerical mistake. The …
The petitioner, Santosh Chaudhary, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) and (b) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 14 litres of liquor recovered from his house and 4 litres from a nearby location. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the house is joint …
The petitioner, Lalu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that 10.35 litres of liquor were recovered from a sack he allegedly threw in an open field, with no possession or arrest at the spot. He argued that the recovery was …
The petitioner, Bhuar Ray (Nirmal Ray), was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 240 litres of liquor and 3000 litres of Mahua, which were later destroyed. He argued that nothing was recovered from his conscious possession, the alleged …
The petitioner, Sunil Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging recovery of liquor from premises adjacent to his house and a temple. He argued he had a clean antecedent and that the alleged liquor was not found in his …
The petitioner, Pawan Mahto, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 300 litres of liquor from a bamboo orchard adjacent to his house. The petitioner argued …
The petitioner, Upendra Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 111(2) of the B.N.S. and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 750 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no …
The petitioner, Anil Kumar Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 37 of the Excise Act for allegedly possessing 360ml of liquor in a Honda City. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not in actual …
The petitioner, Hasan Nadaf, was implicated in a case under Section 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic and Smuggling Act, 2023 read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 99 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was …
The petitioner, Praveen Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of liquor from a motorcycle and a ghat. He contended that he was not arrested at the spot, had …
Vinod Choudhari filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal case arising from a 2015 incident. He later sought permission to withdraw that application and to surrender, requesting regular bail instead. The Court, after hearing counsel, granted permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail …
Ram Kumar Mahto was implicated in a case under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly transporting 13,500 litres of liquor in a motorcycle. He was not arrested at the spot and the seized liquor was not found in his immediate …
The petitioner, Ranjit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where 197.280 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a vacant premises not owned by him. He argued that the allegation was based …
The petitioner, Vidyanand Sahani, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 28.5 litres of liquor from a bush. He argued that the liquor was not found in his possession, the location did not belong to him, and the case was …
Petitioner Sanjit Mandal sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 15.465 litres of liquor from his joint family house. He argued that the liquor was not found in his conscious possession, the house being a joint …
The petitioner, Ramakant Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, alleging that liquor was recovered from a vehicle he owned but that he was not in possession of the liquor at the time of arrest. He argued that …
The petitioner, Kundan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 6.6 litres of liquor from a location not under his control. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor …
The petitioner, Prakash Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 320.760 litres of liquor from a vehicle he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not present at the spot, and had no …
The petitioners, three Yadav brothers, applied for anticipatory bail after a police case was registered under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of liquor from several motorcycles. Petitioners 1 and 3 argued they were not in possession …
The petitioner, Janak Kumar, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 270.9 litres of liquor from a room adjacent to his house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the location did not belong to him, and …
The petitioner, Ramchandra Mukhiya, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case alleging offences under Sections 30(a), 32 and 41(1) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 120 litres of liquor from a public bridge area and 102 …
The petitioners, three brothers from Dakaramma, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic and Smuggling Act, 2023 read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging recovery of 2,926 litres of spirit and a seized auto. They argued that …
The petitioner, Abdhesh Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 8.250 litres of liquor from his residence. He argued that he was not arrested at the scene, …
The petitioner, Md. Rahamtullah, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 272, 273, 414, 34 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 360 litres of liquor from four motorcycles. He argued that he was not present at the spot of seizure, …
The petitioner, Subhash Mahto, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a), 32 and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 288 litres of liquor and 1500 litres of Mahua from a paddy field that does not belong to him. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent, that nothing was found …
The petitioner, Shubham Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, alleging recovery of 413.840 litres of liquor from a bush. He contended that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his …
Pinki Kumari, the wife of Krishna Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case involving the alleged recovery of 30.48 litres of liquor from a motorcycle registered in her name. She argued that she had no knowledge of the vehicle's misuse, had no liquor in her possession, and …
The petitioner, Chhotu Ray (Ayush Kumar), sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018. He argued that the alleged seizure of liquor and a motorcycle occurred at a location not owned by him and that he was not caught in …
The petitioner, Sachin Yadav, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 512.460 litres of liquor from a Scorpio vehicle. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, had no possession of the liquor, was not the vehicle's owner, and that the …
The petitioner, Samol Ray, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing three litres of liquor recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and was unaware …
The petitioner, Lalu Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly recovering 39 litres of liquor from his auto-rickshaw. He argued that he had a clean record, the liquor was not found in his possession, and …
Kiran Devi sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, the BNS 2023, and the Drugs and Cosmetic Act. She contended that no liquor was recovered from her possession, the alleged liquor was in a joint family house, and the only evidence was a …
The petitioner, Santosh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, where 60 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the vehicle's owner, …
Suraj Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging that 120 litres of liquor were recovered from his auto. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and had …
The petitioner, Subodh Thakur, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where police alleged recovery of liquor from bushes near his residence. He argued that the liquor was not found in his possession and the …
The petitioner, Karan Kumar Sahni, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 24.99 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not the owner of the vehicle, …
Lalbabu Ray was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 600 litres of liquor from the bank of Nurddinganj Ghat, a public place. He applied for anticipatory bail, asserting a clean criminal record and that the alleged liquor was not in his possession …
The petitioner, Ajad Mandal, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where liquor was allegedly recovered from premises not belonging to him. He argued that he had no possession of the liquor and was implicated due to an animosity with a …
The petitioner, Dhrup Mahto, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 33.6 litres of liquor from a field belonging to another person. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not in …
The petitioner, Surendra Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where 62 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a motorcycle. He contended that he was not arrested on the spot, had no possession of the liquor, was not the …
The petitioner, Chandeshwar Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 11.25 litres of liquor recovered from his joint family house. He contended that the liquor was not found in his conscious possession, the house being a joint …
Pappu Kumar was accused under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for allegedly possessing 3.420 litres of liquor recovered from his meat shop. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and that the police investigation …
The petitioner, Ravindra Kumar, was arrested while his anticipatory bail application under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code was pending. He approached the court seeking permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application after his arrest. The court, after hearing counsel for both …
Manju Devi, a resident of Rewan village, was implicated in a case (PS No. 907/2025) under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 10 litres of liquor concealed near her house. She pleaded that she has a clean antecedent, is a woman, and that the liquor was not found in her …
The petitioner, Abhishek Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 317(5), 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, relating to alleged recovery of 120 litres of liquor from six vehicles and a container …
The petitioner applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 889.920 litres of liquor from a truck. He argued that he was not in possession of the seized goods, was not the owner of the …
The petitioner, Kanhaiya Nut, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 30 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not present at the spot of seizure, and was …
The petitioners, Sikendra Yadav and his son Pankaj Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 210 litres of liquor from the bank of the Tilawe River. They argued they have no prior …
The petitioner, Kunal Anand, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 99 litres of liquor from his Maruti car. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, that the …
The petitioner, Bablu Singh, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with alleged offences under Section 30(a)(d) of the Excise Act involving the recovery of liquor and mahua. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no contraband was …
The petitioner, Vikash Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 9.36 litres of liquor from his joint family house. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, …
The petitioner, Nandu Yadav, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 1,200 litres of liquor from three motorcycles. He argued that he was not caught in possession, did not own the motorcycles, and was implicated by a hostile chowkidar, …
The petitioner, Govind Saw, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 23.6 litres of liquor from a public place behind a temple. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested …
The petitioner, Saroj Chauhan, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 20 litres of liquor from his residence. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, the …
Rahul Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 53.75 litres of liquor from a public place. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the spot, the …
Manoj Manjhi applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 12 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his house. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession and that the complaint was motivated by an …
The petitioner, Raju Paswan, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 266.4 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the vehicle's owner, and the case was based solely on a confessional statement …
Vivek Singh, the petitioner, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 375 ml of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that a person named Kundan misused …
Mukesh Nut sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where liquor was allegedly recovered from locations adjacent to his house and those of others, with no material seized from his possession. He asserted a clean criminal record …
Petitioner Jitendra Yadav was arrested while his anticipatory bail application was pending before the Patna High Court. His counsel sought the court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application in view of the arrest. The court considered whether the application could be withdrawn after …
The petitioner, Shashi Ranjan Yadav, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, for alleged recovery of 50 litres of liquor and seizure of a motorcycle near the Dumri River. He contended that he had no prior criminal record, was …
The petitioner, Ajit Lal Ganesh, was implicated in a case under the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 300 ml of liquor recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor being in the vehicle and that he was not in possession at the time of seizure, emphasizing …
The petitioner, Rohan Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 after 14.5 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor being in his vehicle and that the actual …
The petitioner, Sanjit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of ten litres of liquor from a public place. He asserted a clean criminal record and argued that the alleged recovery was not from his possession …
The petitioner, Laldas Yadav, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 390 litres of liquor from a public garden. He argued that he was not apprehended at the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, and the complaint was filed by a …
The petitioner, Bhola Sahani, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 180 litres of liquor. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no …
Khushbu Devi, the petitioner, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where 125 litres of liquor were recovered from two motorcycles, one of which she owned. She argued that she had no conscious possession of the liquor, had a clean …
The petitioner, Binod Ram, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in anticipation of arrest for an alleged offence under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act involving the recovery of 69.6 litres of liquor from a cowshed adjacent to his house. The petitioner argued …
The petitioner, Alok Kumar Singh, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 7.875 litres of liquor from a toilet roof adjacent to his house. The petitioner asserted …
Chandan Kumar, a resident of Shahpur Diara, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 alleging that 94 litres of liquor were recovered from a public area near the Ganga river and that he was implicated by a …
The petitioner, Vivek Kumar, feared arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 680 litres of spirit from a Maruti car, which he did not own and from which nothing was found in his conscious possession. He pleaded …
The petitioner, Nitish Kumar Bharti, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 30 litres of liquor from the house of Sarup Lal Pandit. He argued that he had no …
The petitioner, Sumit Mukhiya, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 621 litres of liquor from a public area near the Kosi river. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the location did not …
The petitioner, Sunny Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, alleging recovery of 58.25 litres of liquor from an under‑construction house belonging to his father. He argued that no liquor …
Mahavir Sahni, a resident of Damla Ghat, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 18 litres of liquor …
The petitioner, Sudhanshu Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 15 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was not the owner of the vehicle, and that the case was based solely on a …
The petitioner, Arvind Patel, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 13.92 litres of liquor. He argued that the alleged recovery was from a public place, not in his possession, and that the police relied on secret …
Petitioner Bablu Dom was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 44.9 litres of liquor from a location that does not belong to him. He was not arrested at the spot and no liquor was found in his possession. The petitioner, claiming …
The petitioner, Rajendra Ray, applied for anticipatory bail after a FIR (Case No.20/2026) alleged his involvement in offences under multiple sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, the Arms Act and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He claimed he was not arrested at the scene, no …
The petitioner, Gopal Sah, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 62.625 litres of liquor from his auto. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not …
Petitioner Pramod Kumar Rai feared arrest in a criminal case registered under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and the D.P. Act. Both parties agreed that the matter had been referred to mediation, which was successful as per the mediation report dated 24‑03‑2026. The …
The appellants, two brothers, were charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act, 2023 for allegedly intimidating and obstructing a woman (the informant) from constructing a house on land she …
The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, filed an anticipatory bail application under Sections 82 and 83 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the process under these sections had already been issued and executed, and that the petitioner intended to surrender to the …
Vimla Devi and Ratan Kumar sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case involving multiple IPC offences relating to an alleged assault that led to the death of Vimla's husband. They argued that the FIR was lodged on 27‑05‑2024, after the victim’s death on 26‑05‑2024, and that the …
The appellant, Subhankar Kumar, a driver, was implicated in a case filed under several IPC sections and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, based on a dispute over a Rs.4.10 lakh loan allegedly taken by the accused. The informant claimed caste-based abuse …
The appellant, Golu Raj, was charged under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 for an alleged firing incident in which no one was injured. The Special Judge had rejected his prayer for bail, …
The appellant, Raghunath Mandal, was implicated in a dowry‑related homicide where the informant’s daughter was allegedly killed after refusing a dowry demand. The FIR charges the appellant along with others under Sections 85, 80, 238 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Sections …
The petitioner, Suresh Prasad, applied for bail in a criminal case registered under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, alleging that he was falsely implicated based on a complaint that he obtained a teaching appointment using forged documents. He asserted a clean …
The appellants, six individuals, filed a criminal appeal (SJ) No.85 of 2026 against the State of Bihar and Uma Devi. No counsel appeared on their behalf, while the State was represented by Special Public Prosecutor Sadanand Paswan. The court noted that the appellants had been given a week to rectify …
Mahendra Chouhan was arrested in connection with offences under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, including assault, extortion and other serious crimes. He had earlier filed an anticipatory bail application which he later withdrew and subsequently surrendered to the trial …
The petitioner, Birendra Prasad Singh, aged about 72, was charged under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 307, 302 and Arms Act section 27 for allegedly assaulting the son of an informant, leading to the victim's death. He had earlier applied for regular bail which was rejected, but after charge …
Badal Kumar petitioned for bail in a cyber‑crime case (PS‑Case No.51 of 2025) involving offences under the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and the Information Technology Act, 2000. The police alleged that a mobile number used by Badal was involved in a fraud, leading to a raid on his brother …
Sonu Kumar was arrested in connection with a robbery and shooting incident where a motorcycle was snatched at gunpoint, resulting in injury to the owner. He is charged under IPC Sections 393 (dacoity) and 307 (attempt to murder) and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner, a 20‑year‑old with a …
The petitioner, Rakesh Giri, was charged under Sections 130(1), 61(2) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly firing a weapon that injured the father of an informant. The informant identified Giri as the assailant, while also naming three …
The petitioner, a student named Ankur Kumar Sharma, applied for regular bail in a case involving multiple offences under the Bihar Negotiable Substances Act, 2023, including sections 126(2), 115(2), 127(2), 125, 109, 140(1), 117(2), 61(2) and 3(5). He had been in custody since 1 November 2025 and …
The petitioner, Ajit Kumar, applied for regular bail in a criminal case registered under multiple sections of the BNS, 2023, alleging that he was falsely implicated in an assault on the informant's mother due to a land dispute. The petitioner claimed a clean antecedent and asserted that the …
The petitioner, Viccky Singh, applied for regular bail in a case involving offences under Sections 307, 302, 120B, 34 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petition was his fourth attempt to obtain bail. The learned counsel informed the court that the trial had already concluded and the …
The petitioner, Niranjan Kumar, was arrested in connection with a triple murder case (PS Case No. 1234 of 2023) involving offences under Sections 302 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He applied for regular bail, marking his third attempt after earlier bail …
Ganesh Yadav was arrested in connection with a violent incident in which the complainant alleged that he, along with two others, entered her house, assaulted her, fired indiscriminately causing a firearm injury to her son, and stole cash and ornaments worth Rs.25,000. The petitioner sought bail, …
The petitioner, Talu Hansda, was arrested in connection with a violent altercation that resulted in multiple injuries and was charged under several sections of the Bihar Penal Code, including 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1), 76, 352 and 351(2). He pleaded that he has a clean …
The appellant, Sitaram Mahto, was charged under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and several IPC sections for allegedly assaulting a child and using caste-based slurs. He sought anticipatory bail under Section 14‑A(2) of the SC/ST Act, arguing that he has a clean record, the FIR was filed …
The petitioners, three residents of Mahishi, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 406, 420 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code concerning alleged theft of temple offerings. They claimed the allegations were false, stemming from a dispute with the informant who was the …
The petitioner, Dheeraj Varma, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 170 litres of liquor from an auto and 180 litres from a scooty. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time …
The petitioners, Ajit Kumar, Shriman Narayan Singh and Manu Singh, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case involving multiple offences under the B.N.S., including sections 126(2), 115(2) and others. They alleged that the FIR was filed by a neighbour with whom they have a passage …
The petitioner, Dhiraj Kumar Thakur, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 256.575 litres of liquor from a third party's house. He argued that the liquor was not found in his possession and that the only link to the offence was a …
The petitioner, Sandesh Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 1,200 litres of liquor from three motorcycles. He claimed he was not in possession of …
The petitioner, Umal Ray, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with alleged offences under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, involving the recovery of 180 litres of liquor from his …
The petitioner, Jayprakash Ram, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with alleged offences under Sections 274 and 275 of the B.N.S. and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, involving the alleged recovery of 206.58 litres of liquor from a jointly …
The petitioner, Ravi Jee (Sunil Kumar Gupta), feared arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 17.5 litres of liquor recovered from a room in his house. He contended that the room was rented to a third‑party, Rahul, and …
The petitioners, three women, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 143, 447, 341, 323, 379 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code relating to an alleged assault on 17 May 2022. Their counsel argued that they have clean antecedents, are falsely implicated, and that the FIR …
Bade Manjhi sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act alleging that 15 litres of liquor and 150 litres of fermented Jawa Mahua were recovered from his house, which he claims is joint family property and that no …
Petitioner Rajesh Kushwaha filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court in a criminal case. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the application. The court considered the request and granted permission for withdrawal. Consequently, the …
The petitioner, Vinod Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 48 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the …
The petitioners—Manju Yadav, Arun Yadav and Bhim Kumar—sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 15 litres of liquor from a public area. They argued that nothing was seized from their possession, the alleged site was …
The petitioner, Dablu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 7.02 litres of liquor and seizure of a motorcycle. He argued that he was not present at the spot of the alleged offence, that the liquor was recovered from …
The petitioner, Ramesh Mahto, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged possession of liquor recovered from a neighbour’s house, his own shop and a motorcycle. He contended that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was …
The petitioner, Tarabul (Md. Jauwad), feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging the recovery of 813.5 litres of liquor from a Bolero vehicle. He contended that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the vehicle, and was implicated solely on a …
The petitioners, two widows, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for alleged recovery of 118.8 litres of liquor from a field belonging to another person. They argued they had clean antecedents, were women, and …
Petitioner Prashant Kumar applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 43.5 litres of liquor. He contended that he was not arrested, the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and he denied ownership of the hut where …
The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 25.92 litres of liquor at his cloth shop. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the scene, and that the liquor was …
Mithlesh Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he may be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of liquor near a poultry farm and from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested on the …
The petitioners, Jitendra Sahani and Sukai Mukhiya, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 50 litres of liquor from the bank of the Tilave river. …
Avinash Kumar, the owner of Welcome Hotel, feared arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 37 of the Bihar Excise Act after 590 ml of liquor and empty bottles were recovered from two rooms of his hotel. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in actual possession of the liquor, and that …
The petitioners, Ranjit Sahani and Dilip Sahani, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 80 litres of liquor. They argued that the liquor was not in their conscious possession, the location was a public area, …
Chunmun Kumar sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 44 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018, alleging recovery of 2.7 litres of liquor from his possession. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated, citing his prior cases and asserting …
The petitioner, Jatha Bind, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 65 litres of liquor. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, the liquor was recovered from a location not belonging to him, and the complaint …
Arvind Singh sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 55.5 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued he had no possession of the liquor, was not the vehicle owner, and the case was based solely on another accused's …
The petitioner, a manager named Rai, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly recovering 200 litres of liquor from a public place. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, the liquor was not in his possession, and …
Manish Kumar Santhaliya, a resident of Begusarai, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 30 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean criminal record, was not in possession of the …
Phoolbabu Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 4.455 litres of liquor from a poultry farm. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested, no liquor was …
Savitri Devi, a woman with no prior criminal record, sought anticipatory bail after learning that she might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, concerning the alleged recovery of nine litres of liquor from a public bush. She argued …
Petitioner Pawan Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous petition against the State of Bihar. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, while the State was represented by Ms. Asha Devi. The court noted the absence of any prosecution in the matter. Consequently, Justice Satyavrat Verma dismissed …
Dinesh Sahni filed a criminal miscellaneous petition before the Patna High Court seeking relief against the State of Bihar. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner despite repeated calls by the court. The State was represented by Advocate Umanath Mishra. The court observed the petitioner’s …
The petitioner, Rajesh Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering ten litres of liquor from a sack near his house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, that the …
Harendra Gond sought anticipatory bail after learning that he may be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 19.23 litres of liquor from the Ganga river and seizure of a motorcycle. He argued that he had no conscious possession, was not the owner of …
The petitioner, Sanny Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He argued that he was not caught in possession, did not own the seized vehicles, and …
The petitioner, Pappu Goswami, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 25.50 litres of liquor from a drain adjacent to his house. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, that the liquor was not found in his possession, and that the …
Vikash Kumar was arrested while his anticipatory bail application was pending before the Patna High Court. The petitioner, through counsel, sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application on the ground that he had already been taken into custody. The court considered whether a …
The petitioner, Lilat Mandal, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 131.015 litres of liquor from an under‑construction house. He argued that he has a clean criminal record, …
The petitioner, Sanjay Mahto, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 3.5 litres of liquor from a public place. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, and the …
The petitioner, Ramratan Ray, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for alleged recovery of 54 litres of liquor from a bush adjacent to his house. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, …
The petitioner, Ratan Mandal, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 25 litres of liquor from his premises. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, the liquor …
Sandhya Devi sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 25 litres of liquor from her residence, which is a joint family property. She argued she has a clean antecedent, was not caught in possession, and that the 2018 …
The petitioner, Jai Prakash Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of nine litres of liquor from an orchard not belonging to him. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, the liquor was not found in his possession, …
The petitioner, Md. Mobin Kuraishi, applied for anticipatory bail after a police case was registered under Sections 272, 273 and 414/34 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged possession of 1,479.960 litres of …
The petitioner, Satyam Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022, alleging that 4.5 litres of liquor were recovered from a bag he allegedly threw. He claimed he had a clean antecedent and that the identification by a …
The petitioner, Dharmendra Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for the alleged recovery of two litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean criminal record, was not in possession of the liquor at …
The petitioner, Lalbabu Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022, alleging recovery of liquor from multiple houses including his own. He argued that the liquor was in a joint family property, he had no conscious …
Rekha Devi, the wife of Ramesh Sah, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 13.5 litres of liquor from a scooty she owned. The petitioner argued that she had …
The petitioner, Sujay Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that the alleged liquor recovery was from a location not owned by him and that he had no possession of the liquor. He has four prior …
The petitioner, Ramu Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 16 litres of liquor from a bamboo orchard adjacent to his house. He argued that the liquor was not found in his possession, the orchard did …
