Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Jaykant Sahu @ Jaykant SawversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The Court corrected the clerical error, reading the reference as 'Bakhri PS Case No. 172 of 2016'.

Summary

The petitioner, Jaykant Sahu, challenged a typographical error in the order dated 23-04-2026 where the case number was recorded as 'Bakhri PS Case No. 172 of 2026' instead of the correct year 2016. The petitioner, through counsel Mr. Prabhat Kumar, sought a correction of this clerical mistake. The Court examined the submission and held that the error was purely typographical and did not affect the substantive content of the order. Accordingly, the Court directed that the reference be read as 'Bakhri PS Case No. 172 of 2016'. The order dated 23-04-2026 was modified to reflect this correction. No other substantive changes were made.

Issues considered

  • Whether the reference to 'Bakhri PS Case No. 172 of 2026' constitutes a clerical error that warrants correction

Subjects

  • clerical error
  • order correction
  • high court
  • criminal miscellaneous

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27143 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-172 Year-2016 Thana- BAKHARI District- Begusarai
                  ======================================================
                  Jaykant Sahu @ Jaykant Saw S/O Arjun Sahu @ Arjun Saw Resident of
                  Village- Sohma, P.S- Bithan, District- Samastipur, Bihar.
                                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                  The State of Bihar
                                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Prabhat Kumar
                  For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr.Md. Mushtaque Alam
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

3    05-05-2026               1.    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                    learned A.P.P. for the State.

                              2.    Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at

                    para-5 of the order dated 23-4-2026, it has been recorded that

                    “Bakhri PS Case No. 172 of 2026” instead of “Bakhri PS Case

                    No. 172 of 2016”.

                              3.    After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, at

                    para-5 of the order dated 23-4-2026, “Bakhri PS Case No. 172

                    of 2026” shall be read as “Bakhri PS Case No. 172 of 2016”.

                              4.    The order dated 23-4-2026 is modified to the extent

                    indicated above.



                                               (Satyavrat Verma, J)
Sumit/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.