Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
5446 judgments · newest first · showing 801–1000
Dharmendra Manjhi was implicated in the recovery of 62 litres of liquor from a motorcycle, an offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. He was not arrested at the spot and the seized vehicle was not in his conscious possession, although it was registered …
The petitioner, John @ Nand Kishore Manjhi, was implicated in a case under Sections 37 and 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing two litres of liquor recovered from his joint family house. He argued that he was not arrested at the scene, that the liquor was not in his conscious …
The petitioner, Ashok Rai, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act alleging recovery of large quantities of liquor from land adjacent to his house. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, the alleged recovery …
Ankit Kumar was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a), 41 and 56(b) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018 for the alleged recovery of 27 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, that he was unaware of the misuse …
The petitioner, Kunal Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly recovering 600 litres of liquor from a public ghat. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of …
The petitioner, Dilip Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 19.650 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, that he was merely the …
The petitioner, Chandraket Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 150 litres of liquor from a scooty. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the scooty, and that the …
Kanchan Kumar was arrested while his anticipatory bail application was pending. He approached the High Court seeking permission to withdraw the application. The court, after hearing counsel for both sides, granted the permission to withdraw. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was …
The petitioner, Sugriv Chouhan, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 46.06 litres of liquor and seizure of three motorcycles. He argued that he had no prior criminal record and that the liquor was found in a …
The petitioner, Sangita Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 50 litres of liquor from her joint family house. She argued she had no conscious possession, the liquor was not recovered from her, and the 2018 …
The petitioner, Rahul Choudhary, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 139.2 litres of liquor from a room in a line hotel. The petitioner asserted that …
The petitioner, Amit Sharan, feared arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 37 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act for alleged recovery of liquor from two motorcycles, one of which he owned. He argued that he had no possession of the liquor, had a clean antecedent, and was unaware …
Gorelal Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 111(3) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022, relating to alleged recovery of 420 litres of liquor from a Hyundai car. He argued that he was not arrested at …
The petitioner, Dilip Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 93.34 litres of liquor from premises he rented but had vacated before the incident. He argued that no liquor was …
Kavita Kumari applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 11.25 litres of liquor from a motorcycle she owned. She asserted that she has a clean antecedent, was not in conscious …
Ripu Devi, the owner of a motorcycle from which 17.28 litres of liquor was seized, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. She argued that she had no prior criminal record, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure, and …
The petitioners, Bhutay Yadav and Chandan Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 210 litres of liquor from a public area. They argued they have clean antecedents, …
The petitioner, Md. Aslam Khan, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 102 litres of liquor from a bus. He argued he had no direct possession, was not the bus owner, and the case was based solely on a confessional statement of another accused made in …
The petitioner, Shankar Mahto, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing five litres of liquor recovered from a cowshed. He contended that the cowshed did not belong to him, no liquor was found in his conscious possession, and he has …
Harendra Yadav, the owner of a motorcycle from which 6 litres of liquor were recovered, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with offences under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Excise Act. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not …
Guddu Rajbhar, a resident of Siwan, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 26 litres of liquor recovered from a public area near a temple. He applied for anticipatory bail, asserting a clean criminal record and arguing that the liquor was not in …
Chinta Devi, the widow of the late Arjun Manjhi, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 15 litres of liquor and 200 litres of mahua from a public place (palani). …
Petitioner Chuman Yadav sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of liquor from a river bank, a motorcycle and sacks, none of which were in his conscious possession. He argued that …
Vikash Kumar was charged under Sections 64, 352, 351(2) and 351(3) of the BNS, 2023 for alleged rape and assault following an incident on 15 July 2024. The petitioner contended that the FIR was lodged 57 days later without explanation, that the complainant was a relative (her nephew) and that the …
The appellants, four Yadavs from Sangrampur, were charged under several provisions of the Bihar Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 for alleged assault and caste-based abuse while intoxicated. They applied for anticipatory bail, which was …
The appellants appealed under Section 14-A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against the trial court's refusal to grant anticipatory bail. They contended that they have clean antecedents and that the FIR contains vague, omnibus allegations of caste-based …
Surendra Yadav and his wife Punam Devi, the father‑in‑law and mother‑in‑law of the complainant Kanchan Kumari, were charged under IPC Section 498A and Sections 3(i)(r)(s) of the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for alleged dowry demand, caste‑based abuse and ousting …
Petitioner Pawan Giri was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 304B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for the alleged dowry‑related death of his wife. He applied for bail, claiming a clean antecedent, that the informant was not an eye‑witness, and that the post‑mortem report …
Harishankar Ray, husband of a woman who died by hanging in 2025, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 80, 238 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023. The petitioner claimed a clean antecedent, alleged that the informant was not an eyewitness, and argued that the …
Muskan Ansari was arrested in connection with offences under Sections 303(2), 126(2), 109 and 3(5) of the BNS read with Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner claimed that the informant’s version of the incident – being robbed of Rs.25,000 at 1:30 a.m. after a birthday party – was implausible …
The petitioner, Vikash Yadav, was arrested in connection with offences under Sections 310(4) and 310(5) of the B.N.S. and Sections 25(1‑B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act after a police raid recovered a pistol, cartridges, a double‑barrel gun and other items from his house. He argued that the arms were …
Nagendra Manjhi was arrested in connection with offences under Sections 302, 201 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code for the alleged abduction and killing of a child. He applied for regular bail, asserting a clean antecedent and that he had been in custody since 5 July 2025. His counsel highlighted …
Petitioner Rajeev Das, charged under IPC sections 326, 307, 120(B) and Arms Act section 27, applied for regular bail in a Sessions trial. The State opposed bail, highlighting his three prior criminal cases and the seriousness of the current offences. The trial had already begun, with two of eight …
The petitioner, Ashok Sah, applied for regular bail in a Sessions trial for offences under IPC sections 326, 307, 120(B) and Arms Act section 27, alleging that he is not named in the FIR and his name appears only in the confessional statements of co‑accused who have already been granted bail. He …
The petitioner, Gholu @ Keshri Nandan, was arrested in connection with the murder of a schoolboy allegedly abducted and shot by Raunak and Kanhaiya. The informant claims his son was taken to the Ganga bank, shot, and the body recovered. The petitioner is not named in the FIR; the prosecution’s case …
The petitioner, Md. Nasim Ansari, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 406, 420 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 of the BPID Act, 2017, alleging cheating and criminal conspiracy involving a loan of Rs. 4 lakh. The petitioner contended that the allegations …
Satrudhan Yadav applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with an alleged offence under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act involving the alleged recovery of 111.750 litres of liquor from a bush near his house. The petitioner, who has five prior criminal cases, argued …
Najara Khatun was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 362.880 litres of liquor from a room she owned but had rented to Suresh, who was apprehended at the scene. The petitioner, a woman with a clean criminal record, sought anticipatory …
Manish Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 40 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. The petitioner argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was unaware of …
The petitioners, three brothers from Sheohar district, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 191(2), 190, 126(2), 115(2) and 192 of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act and Section 45 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging …
The petitioner, Ramji Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing five litres of liquor found in his joint family house. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, the liquor was not recovered from his …
Manoranjan Kumar, the petitioner, feared arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018, for allegedly possessing 20 litres of liquor recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, that the liquor was not in …
Petitioner Keshav Jha was arrested and filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. The petitioner’s counsel sought permission to file the anticipatory bail, which the court granted. However, the petitioner subsequently withdrew the application, leading the court to dismiss …
The petitioner, Ankush Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 52.5 litres of liquor from an orchard behind a poultry farm. He asserted that he had no prior criminal record, that the liquor was not found in his possession, and that the …
The petitioner, Dhirendra Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 1,800 litres of liquor from the verandah of his Champaran hotel adjacent to a petrol pump. He contended that he had no prior criminal record, that the liquor was not in …
Mukesh Kumar, the owner of a vehicle from which 356.04 litres of liquor were seized, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Sections 274, 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act. He argued that he had no prior criminal …
Manoj Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 alleging recovery of liquor from a location adjacent to his house and from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested, that the seized liquor was …
The petitioner, Suraj Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 8.46 litres of liquor and Rs.1,66,600 from his joint family house. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no …
The petitioner, Golu Prasad, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 63 litres of liquor from a location not under his control. He argued that the FIR was based on the testimony of a …
The petitioner, Ganesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging possession of 270 litres of liquor recovered from two motorcycles, invoking Sections 272, 273 and 34 of the IPC read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he had no conscious possession of …
The petitioner, Saurabh Kumar, had filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal case. While the application was pending, he was arrested. He then sought the court's permission to withdraw his anticipatory bail application. The court granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the …
The petitioner, Amrendra Chaudhari, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 99 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He contended that he was not arrested at the spot, had no conscious …
The petitioner, Jiwacch Mahto, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act alleging that 270 litres of liquor were recovered from three motorcycles, one of which he owned. He argued that he was not in possession …
The petitioner, Laddu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 121.20 litres of liquor from an auto. He claimed he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was not the owner of the vehicle, …
Vikash Ram sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 alleging that 231.335 litres of liquor were recovered from his house, which is a joint family property. He argued that no liquor was seized from his …
The petitioner, Ramesh Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, alleging recovery of 6.135 litres of liquor from a bush adjacent to his house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession and that the …
The petitioner, Nand Kishore Sah, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 111 litres of liquor from a sack near his house. He contended that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the recovery site did not belong to him, …
Prem Sahani and Sanjay Sahani applied for anticipatory bail after a police case was registered under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Excise Act for allegedly possessing 50 litres of liquor and 200 litres of semi‑prepared jawa mahua, which were later destroyed. The petitioners claimed they had no …
The petitioner, Ajit Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for the alleged recovery of 178.125 litres of liquor from a vehicle he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, that the liquor was not found in his personal …
The petitioner, Kanhai Chaudhary, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging concealment of 30 litres of liquor under straw in a public area. He claimed he was not caught in the act, that the alleged recovery was from a place not belonging to him, and that the …
The petitioner, Umesh Paswan, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 47(A) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged offences from 2014. He filed the application twelve years after the FIR, despite having five prior cases. The court examined whether …
The petitioner, Rajesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 10 litres of liquor from a public river bank. He argued that he was not caught in possession, the alleged recovery site did not belong …
The petitioners, Nagendra Mukhiya and Shatrudhan Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act alleging recovery of 172.8 litres of liquor from a place adjacent to the second petitioner's house. They contended that they had no conscious possession of …
Sharma Singh applied for anticipatory bail after the police alleged that 164.16 litres of liquor were recovered from his poultry farm in violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. The petitioner argued that the liquor was actually recovered from a location …
The petitioner, Bikesh Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 60 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his semi‑constructed house. The petitioner …
The petitioner, Dinesh Ray, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 60.840 litres of liquor. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, that the liquor was …
The petitioner, Subhash Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 15.75 litres of liquor recovered from his joint family house. He was not arrested at the scene and no liquor was found in his immediate …
Petitioner Baban Singh sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 9.900 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was implicated only …
Vijay Kant Yadav applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC in connection with a case under the Excise Act alleging possession of 2.880 litres of liquor on his scooty. The petitioner argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not in actual possession of the liquor at the time …
The petitioner, Nilesh Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 111(i) and 111(ii) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Sections 30(a), 36 and 41(2) of the Excise Act, relating to the alleged recovery of 1,075.68 litres of liquor from a Mahindra …
The petitioner, Rudal Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where police alleged recovery of five litres of liquor from a hut not belonging to him and no conscious possession was established. He argued that the informant’s identity was …
The petitioner, Sanjan Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving alleged possession of narcotics and illegal firearms. The prosecution alleged recovery of 3.83 g of smack, 338 g of ganja, 8.5 L of codeine, a country‑made pistol, live and empty cartridges, and claimed …
Jayram Yadav sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022 alleging recovery of liquor from bushes near canals, none of which was found in his possession. He argued that the alleged liquor was …
The petitioner, Pawan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 200 litres of liquor from a location not in his possession. He has an antecedent of eleven prior excise cases and …
The petitioner, Haidar, was implicated in a case under IPC sections 272 and 273/34 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for allegedly possessing 3.60 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not …
Awadhesh and Lalbabu Mandal were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 4.35 litres of liquor recovered from two motorcycles. They argued they had no conscious possession, were not arrested on the spot, and that …
The petitioner, Sakila Khatoon, applied for anticipatory bail in a case where 47.115 litres of liquor were seized from an auto she owned, alleged to be a violation of Section 317(2) of the B.N.S. and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act. She argued that she had no prior criminal record, was not present …
The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 25(1‑B) and 26 of the Arms Act and Section 37 of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. The police had recovered a country‑made pistol from another individual …
The petitioner, Shatrudhan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where 146.88 litres of liquor and two motorcycles were allegedly recovered from a location adjacent to his house. He argued that he was …
Petitioner Pankaj Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 318(4) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 read with Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging recovery of 2,800.4 litres of liquor and seizure of a vehicle. He contended he has a clean …
The petitioner, Vikash Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 15 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, had no conscious …
The petitioner, Birendra Raut, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, for alleged recovery of 35 litres of liquor. He argued that no liquor was found in his possession, the alleged recovery site …
The petitioner, Kundan Singh, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 7 litres of liquor. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, the liquor was not found …
The petitioner, Devendra Sahni, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, alleging that 10 litres of liquor were recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested on the …
Ramakant Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 36 litres of liquor. He argued that he was not arrested, no liquor was found in his possession, and the FIR omitted the name of the …
The petitioner, Md. Rahil, filed an anticipatory bail application in the High Court of Patna. He later approached the court seeking permission to withdraw that application and to surrender, intending to apply for regular bail. The court considered his request and, noting his difficulty, granted …
Mahesh Kumar, the owner of a truck from which 225 litres of liquor and 440.25 litres of liquor were seized, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Sections 30, 30(a) and 37(b) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, was unaware of any misuse of …
The petitioners, Sanjay Sahani, his wife Sona Devi, and his brother Vinod Sahani, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS 370/2025) that alleged offences under numerous sections of the BNS and Section 45 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act. They contended that they have …
The petitioner, Golu Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 60 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He asserted that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that a friend misused his …
Ranjan Kumar applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 35 litres of liquor from a straw house. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and that the liquor was not in his conscious possession …
Petitioner Chanarik Rai sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 56 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued he has a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was implicated merely as the vehicle …
Wakil Manjhi, a resident of Mangolapur, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case (PS‑Jalalpur Case No. 87 of 2026) alleging he was involved in the recovery of three litres of liquor from a hut adjacent to his house, an offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar …
Petitioners Mohit Kumar and Dhananjay were arrested while their anticipatory bail application was pending before the Patna High Court. They moved the court seeking permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The court, after hearing counsel for both sides, granted the petitioners' …
The petitioner, Chhotu Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 900 litres of liquor and seizure of a motorcycle. He contended that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and that the alleged contraband …
The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 294 litres of liquor from the bank of the Ganga River. He argued that no liquor was found in his possession, the alleged recovery site is a public area, and the informant’s …
The petitioner, Pramod Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 150 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he did not own. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession …
The petitioner, Saheb Kumar Yadav, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 15.750 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, had no knowledge of its misuse, and possessed a clean …
The petitioner, Ankit Verma, sought anticipatory bail after liquor amounting to 97.5 litres was seized from his Hyundai vehicle in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not apprehended at the spot, and had no conscious possession of …
The petitioner, Sunil Manjhi, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 170 litres of liquor and 500 litres of jaggery solution from a public canal area. He argued that he had no possession of the contraband, the site did not belong to …
Petitioner Raja Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging that the liquor was recovered from a scooty not owned by him and that he was implicated by an unnamed local informant without proper investigation. He argued …
Mukul Kumar approached the Patna High Court seeking anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 250 litres of liquor from two scooties. He contended that he was not in possession of the …
Amin Chaudhary and his wife Pinki Devi sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing five litres of liquor at their joint family house. They argued that no arrest had occurred, the liquor was not in their conscious …
The petitioner, Ashok Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, where 10 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a location adjacent to his courtyard. He argued that the liquor was not found in his possession, …
The petitioner, Prakash Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of liquor from a house not owned by him. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, had no …
The petitioner, Kittu Kumar Singh, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of liquor from two motorcycles he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not in …
The petitioner applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered for offences under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, involving the alleged recovery of 50 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. The …
Lilawati Devi and Manawati Devi appealed against the rejection of their anticipatory bail applications in a case filed under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and several IPC offences relating to alleged fraudulent purchase of land and caste‑based abuse. They contended that the land was …
The appellants Sanjeet Kumar and Budhan Rai appealed against the rejection of their bail application in a case involving alleged assault, injury, and caste-based abuse under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and several IPC offences. They argued that the notice served on the second respondent …
Lilawati Devi and Manawati Devi appealed against the rejection of their anticipatory bail applications in a case filed under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and several IPC offences relating to alleged fraudulent purchase of land and caste‑based abuse. They contended that the land was …
The appellant, Ujwal Kumar, was charged under Sections 25(1‑b)a and 26 of the Arms Act and Section 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly threatening a neighbour with a country‑made pistol during a land‑irrigation dispute. He applied for …
The appellants appealed under Section 14-A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against the Special Judge's refusal to grant anticipatory bail in a case arising from a neighbour dispute over a drain. The FIR alleged that Pintu Kumar assaulted the informant with a knife, causing a head …
Petitioner Radhe Shyam Singh was arrested in a case alleging rape under Section 376(D)(A) of the IPC and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act. He contended that in three earlier cases against him, police investigations concluded with final reports exonerating him, and that the present case was …
Suraj Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after a complaint was lodged against him under Section 498A of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He feared arrest and argued that the complainant, Rubi Devi, was willing to live with him at his matrimonial home in Lalganj and would …
Surendra Kumar sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under sections 115(2), 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the Bihar Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The informant, Nisha Kumari, alleged that the petitioner had married her in a temple and a court …
The appellants, four members of the Yadav family, were charged under several IPC sections and the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for alleged assault, intimidation and caste-based abuse arising from a land dispute with the informant, Lakhan Bhuiyan. Their …
Balram Mahto was charged under several IPC offences and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for alleged theft and caste‑based abuse in a shop on 4‑5 June 2024. He sought anticipatory bail under Section 14‑A(2) of the SC/ST Act, arguing that the allegations were …
The appellants, five brothers from Gopalganj, were charged under several sections of the Bihar Non‑Serious (BNS) Act, 2023 and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 for allegedly assaulting an informant and others, using caste slurs and causing injuries. A …
The petitioner, Nayan Kumar, was accused in a complaint of cheating under Sections 420 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and of issuing a bounced cheque under the Negotiable Instruments Act. He claimed to have a clean record and argued that the complainant failed to appear despite receiving notice, …
The appellants appealed under Section 14‑A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against the Special Judge’s refusal to grant anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged assault and caste‑based abuse. The appellants argued that the notice was validly served …
The petitioner, Dhananjay Singh, was charged under Sections 103(1), 3(5) and 61(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He had earlier filed a bail application which was rejected, but was given liberty to reapply. The present bail application was filed after the …
The petitioner, Love Kumar, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleging that he was falsely implicated. He contended that his name was derived solely from a confessional statement made by …
The petitioner, Prem Paswan, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 80(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, alleging that he was falsely implicated in the death of his wife, who died within seven years of marriage. The …
The petitioner, Shivam Kumar, was arrested in connection with a robbery on 3 February 2025 and charged under Section 309(4) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023. He has been in custody since 1 May 2025 and his alleged involvement was disclosed in the confessional statement of co‑accused …
Mithun Paswan was arrested in connection with a case where he allegedly fired a firearm, injuring three persons but causing no death. He faces charges under multiple sections of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner, represented by Mr. Alok Kumar Sinha, sought bail, arguing …
Amit Kumar was arrested for the death of his wife, who died within seven months of marriage. The FIR alleged that the husband demanded a dowry of Rs. 50,000, tortured the wife, and that she was later found dead with injuries, the post‑mortem indicating asphyxia due to hanging. The petitioner sought …
The petitioner, Deolal Sahani, was arrested in connection with a violent robbery and arson incident alleged to have occurred on 22 July 2024, involving looting of valuables worth several crores. He filed a regular bail petition, contending that the FIR contains only vague, omnibus allegations …
Santosh Paswan was arrested on 30 September 2020 in connection with a case registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 307 and 323 of the Indian Penal Code, alleging assault leading to death. He applied for regular bail, claiming a clean antecedent and that this was his second bail application …
The petitioner, Md. Jamal, applied for anticipatory bail in a case alleging offences under Sections 64 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., relating to a purported rape incident. He claimed a clean antecedent and asserted that the FIR was false, alleging that the informant had an illicit relationship with his …
Manish Kumar, the petitioner, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court in connection with a criminal case arising from PS Tekari, Gaya. During the hearing on 20-04-2026, the petitioner, through counsel, sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The …
Balram Kumar and Sushil Kumar, former branch manager and assistant branch manager of BSS Micro Finance Ltd., were implicated in a case alleging misappropriation of Rs. 24,30,996 while granting loans to 47 members. They contended that the informant, the Zonal Manager of the company, falsely …
The petitioner, Harendra Nut, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where 40 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a house not belonging to him and 50 litres from sacks. He argued that he was not caught in possession, the recovery was …
The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal miscellaneous case arising from PS. Case No. 850 of 2025. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The Hon'ble Justice Satyavrat Verma considered …
Mithu Kumar Mandal applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 24.09 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the spot, …
Manjay Kumar was apprehended for alleged offences under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) of the BNSS and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, relating to the recovery of 161 litres of liquor from an auto. He claimed a clean antecedent, argued that the liquor …
The petitioner, Lalan Yadav, was taken into custody on 7 February 2026 in connection with a case involving the alleged recovery of liquor, arms, and cartridges. The petitioner’s name appeared in a confessional statement made by another accused, Akhilesh, while in police custody, but the counsel …
The petitioner, Umesh Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 317 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was recovered from his …
Jhapasi Manjhi applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly possessing 15 litres of liquor. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and the …
The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 56(3) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of ten litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he has a clean …
The petitioner, Rakesh Manjhi, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 52 litres of liquor recovered from a straw house. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, the liquor was not …
Supen Sardar sought anticipatory bail after learning of a pending case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging recovery of 27 litres of liquor from a courier office. He argued that he was not caught with the liquor, was not the owner of the courier agency, and that the case was based …
The petitioner applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with alleged offences under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, where recovery of 449.28 litres of liquor was reported from a public place. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at …
The petitioner, Ramu Manjhi, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 24 litres of liquor from a public place. The petitioner asserted a clean criminal record and …
The petitioners, Sonu Singh and Vicky Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 35.6 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle. They argued they have clean antecedents, were not caught in …
The petitioner, Jitendra Chaudhary, applied for anticipatory bail after learning that a case had been registered against him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing five litres of liquor recovered from his house. He contended that the …
Mukesh Yadav applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 8.56 litres of liquor from land jointly owned with Devendra Yadav. The petitioner argued that he has a clean …
The petitioner, Pintu Ram, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 14 litres of liquor near his house. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the spot, …
The petitioner, Ashok Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with an FIR alleging violation of Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 83.92 litres of liquor from a bush near his house. The petitioner argued that the …
The petitioner, Dablu Paswan, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018 for allegedly possessing 15 litres of liquor recovered from his house. He argued that the liquor was stored in a joint family property, that he had no conscious possession, and …
The petitioner, Ranjan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where liquor was allegedly recovered from a bag and from a person named Ranjan. He argued that he had no clean possession, the alleged recovery occurred at a location not …
The petitioner, Sonu Paswan, feared arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 13.5 litres of liquor on a scooty. He contended that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the vehicle, and that his name was absent from the FIR, …
Santosh Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly possessing 17.28 litres of liquor. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and the liquor was …
The petitioner, Prince Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 20.880 litres of liquor recovered from a location adjacent to his house, based solely on a confessional statement made by his brother while in …
The petitioner, Nagendra Chaurasia, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 concerning the alleged recovery of 26 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, the liquor …
The petitioner, Nivash Yadav, was implicated in a case (PS Case No. 716 of 2025) for allegedly possessing 63 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle he owned, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not …
Petitioner Ranjeet Kumar, owner of a motorcycle from which 47.88 litres of liquor was seized, sought anticipatory bail under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, claiming he had no knowledge of the liquor and was not in possession of it. He argued that the seizure was based solely on his ownership …
The petitioner, Sunil Kora, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 360 litres of liquor from his motorcycle and house. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, that the …
The petitioner, Vilat Mukhiya, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 21 litres of liquor from a field adjacent to his house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, he has a clean …
Petitioners Raja Mahto and Saroj Mahto sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 200 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. They argued they have clean antecedents, were not caught in possession, are not owners of the seized …
Raja Kumar, the owner of a pick‑up vehicle, was implicated in a case involving the alleged recovery of 1,419.54 litres of liquor, alleged offences under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He applied for anticipatory bail, asserting a clean criminal record and that the liquor was …
The petitioners, three villagers from Andhra in Madhubani district, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Sections 30(a), 30(c) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 21 litres of …
The petitioners, Ranjay Yadav and Ghamandi Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case alleging offences under Sections 30(a), (c) and (d) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of liquor and jawa mahua near the Sone river. They …
Mukesh Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 27 litres of liquor near his agricultural land. The petitioner argued that he has a clean antecedent, the …
The petitioner, Suresh Pasi, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in a case involving alleged seizure of 5,440.14 litres of liquor and firearms under the Bihar Excise Act and the Arms Act. He claimed he was implicated because he was purportedly the owner of one of the seized …
Petitioner Kamlesh Das sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 alleging recovery of 45 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, had no conscious possession of …
The petitioner, Ravi Kant Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 147 and 153 of the Railway Act, 1989 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He argued that the alleged liquor recovery was from a public place, that he had no …
The petitioner, Subhash Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that a case had been registered against him under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 75 litres of liquor from a Tata Sumo, with two motorcycles also seized. He contended that …
Petitioner Rajgeer Rai was arrested while his anticipatory bail application was pending before the Patna High Court. The petitioner, through counsel, sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application on the ground of his arrest. The Court, after hearing counsel for both sides, granted …
Puja Kumari applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Sections 274, 275 and 317(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 80 litres of liquor and a motorcycle from a location behind a hut. She asserted that she has a clean antecedent, is a …
The petitioners, Bharat Rai, Guriya Devi and Sethi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 720 ml of liquor recovered from their joint family house. They argued they have clean antecedents, the liquor …
Reena Devi sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act for allegedly possessing six litres of liquor at her joint‑family house. She argued that she had no conscious possession, had a clean antecedent, and was falsely …
The petitioner, Nitish Kumar Rajbhar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 144 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that his friend …
The petitioner, Sunil Saw, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with alleged offences under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Excise Act involving the recovery of liquor and semi‑prepared spirits from a public jungle area. He asserted that he has …
The petitioners, Vinayak Pratap Singh, Suman Kumar and Raftar Singh, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 134.2 litres of liquor from a semi‑constructed room near a school. They argued that the liquor was not seized from their …
The petitioner, Bablu Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly concealing 11.75 litres of liquor. He contended that the liquor was recovered from a location not belonging to him, he was not arrested on the …
The petitioner, Gaurav Sharma, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), (c) and (d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 50 litres of liquor and 800 litres of semi‑prepared liquor were recovered from his maize field but not from his …
The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar Pandey, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging he concealed 35.28 litres of liquor. He argued that the liquor was recovered from a location not belonging to him, that he was not apprehended on the spot, and …
The petitioner, Umesh Paswan, was implicated in a case under Sections 47(A) and 47(F) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 60 litres of liquor and 570 kg of Jawa Mahua from a public place. He argued that he was not apprehended at the spot, no contraband was found in his possession, and …
The petitioner, Mannu @ Abhimanyu Kumar Paswan, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act alleging recovery of 13.58 litres of liquor from his house. The petitioner argued that the liquor was not …
Petitioner Sanjay Lal Srivastav sought anticipatory bail after learning that he may be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging possession of eight litres of liquor by his brother Ramakant Srivastav. The petitioner argued that he had …
The petitioner, Lal Mohan Rai, had been granted anticipatory bail on 20 April 2026. He later pointed out that the order incorrectly stated that he had nine pending cases under the Excise Act, whereas the application disclosed eleven such cases. He sought a modification of paragraphs 3 and 6 of the …
Petitioner Sajjad Ali, owner of a vehicle, was implicated in a case involving the seizure of 14 litres of liquor from two motorcycles, although he was not arrested at the spot and no liquor was found in his possession. He claimed a clean antecedent and argued that he was unaware that his vehicle was …
The petitioner, Urmila Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Negotiable Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. She argued that the alleged liquor was recovered from a location adjacent to her house, not in …
Lalan Yadav applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 123.75 litres of liquor from a straw house on his premises. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and that the …
The petitioner, Jitendra Kumar (Kallu Yadav), sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, for allegedly transporting 650 ml of liquor in his vehicle. He argued that the liquor was recovered …
Masidur Rahman, the owner of a Bolero pickup, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 after 609.84 litres of liquor were recovered from his vehicle. He was not arrested at the spot and the liquor was not found in his conscious …
The petitioner, Brijesh Sahni, feared arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(1),(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022, alleging that 60 litres of liquor were recovered from a public bush and that he was implicated through a chowkidar’s statement. He argued that no liquor …
The petitioner, Vidyanand Ram, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 105 litres of liquor from his auto. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and that the driver, who fled the scene, misused the …
Arvind Choudhary was implicated under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 10 litres of liquor found in a joint family house. He contended that he had no conscious possession, the liquor was not recovered from him at the spot, and the concept …
The petitioner, Dudh Nath Singh, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 110 litres of liquor from his auto. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not present at the spot of seizure, and was unaware …
Mithun Paswan, the owner of a vehicle from which 123.570 litres of liquor was seized, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure, and was unaware of his driver’s alleged …
The petitioner, Ranjit Sahani, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic and Psychotropic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging that the liquor recovered (60 litres from a motorcycle and 170 litres …
The petitioner, Sunil Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2013 for allegedly possessing 5 litres of liquor recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, …
Suraj Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 414/34 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Sections 30(a), 32(ii) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. He contended that the allegations of liquor recovery from several vehicles were based solely on …
The petitioner, Parwati Devi, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in a case alleging recovery of 229.725 litres of liquor from two vehicles, invoking Sections 30(a), 32(ii) and 41(i) of the Excise Act. She argued that she has a clean antecedent, is a woman, and was not in …
Guddu Paswan was implicated in a case alleging recovery of 50 litres of liquor from a motorcycle, charged under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not the owner of the …
Petitioner Pawan Tiwary was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 17 litres of liquor recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in actual possession, and that the vehicle was misused by others …
The petitioner, Bechan Das, was implicated in a case where 96.84 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle he owned, leading to charges under Sections 274, 275, 317(5) of the Bihar Negotiable Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he had a …
Guddu Yadav filed an anticipatory bail application in the Patna High Court. While the application was pending, he was arrested. He then sought the court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The court granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the anticipatory bail …
The appellant, Anshu Patel, was implicated in a case involving alleged robbery, assault and caste-based abuse, with charges under several IPC sections and the SC/ST Act. He sought anticipatory bail under Section 14‑A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, claiming he was not present at the …
Parwati Devi and Jitendra Yadav appealed against the State of Bihar and Renu Devi. While the appeal was pending, the appellants were arrested. They applied to the High Court for permission to withdraw their appeal. The Court, after hearing counsel, granted the permission. Consequently, the appeal …
