Created by Fuzzy Cloud

SATYAVRAT VERMA

5764 judgments · newest first · showing 1001–1200

Subhash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Subhash Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that a case had been registered against him under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 75 litres of liquor from a Tata Sumo, with two motorcycles also seized. He contended that …

Rajgeer RaiversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Petitioner Rajgeer Rai was arrested while his anticipatory bail application was pending before the Patna High Court. The petitioner, through counsel, sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application on the ground of his arrest. The Court, after hearing counsel for both sides, granted …

Puja KumariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Puja Kumari applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Sections 274, 275 and 317(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 80 litres of liquor and a motorcycle from a location behind a hut. She asserted that she has a clean antecedent, is a …

Bharat Rai @ Bharat Prasad YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Bharat Rai, Guriya Devi and Sethi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 720 ml of liquor recovered from their joint family house. They argued they have clean antecedents, the liquor …

Reena DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Reena Devi sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act for allegedly possessing six litres of liquor at her joint‑family house. She argued that she had no conscious possession, had a clean antecedent, and was falsely …

Nitish Kumar RajbharversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nitish Kumar Rajbhar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 144 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that his friend …

Sunil SawversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sunil Saw, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with alleged offences under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Excise Act involving the recovery of liquor and semi‑prepared spirits from a public jungle area. He asserted that he has …

Vinayak Pratap Singh @ TarzanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Vinayak Pratap Singh, Suman Kumar and Raftar Singh, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 134.2 litres of liquor from a semi‑constructed room near a school. They argued that the liquor was not seized from their …

Bablu Yadav @ Bablu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bablu Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly concealing 11.75 litres of liquor. He contended that the liquor was recovered from a location not belonging to him, he was not arrested on the …

Gaurav SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Gaurav Sharma, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), (c) and (d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 50 litres of liquor and 800 litres of semi‑prepared liquor were recovered from his maize field but not from his …

Sanjay Kumar Pandey @ Sanjay ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar Pandey, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging he concealed 35.28 litres of liquor. He argued that the liquor was recovered from a location not belonging to him, that he was not apprehended on the spot, and …

Umesh PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Umesh Paswan, was implicated in a case under Sections 47(A) and 47(F) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 60 litres of liquor and 570 kg of Jawa Mahua from a public place. He argued that he was not apprehended at the spot, no contraband was found in his possession, and …

Mannu @ Abhimanyu @ Abhimanyu Kumar @ Abhimanyu PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Mannu @ Abhimanyu Kumar Paswan, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act alleging recovery of 13.58 litres of liquor from his house. The petitioner argued that the liquor was not …

Sanjay Lal SrivastavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Sanjay Lal Srivastav sought anticipatory bail after learning that he may be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging possession of eight litres of liquor by his brother Ramakant Srivastav. The petitioner argued that he had …

Lal Mohan RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Lal Mohan Rai, had been granted anticipatory bail on 20 April 2026. He later pointed out that the order incorrectly stated that he had nine pending cases under the Excise Act, whereas the application disclosed eleven such cases. He sought a modification of paragraphs 3 and 6 of the …

Sajjad Ali @ Md. SajjadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Sajjad Ali, owner of a vehicle, was implicated in a case involving the seizure of 14 litres of liquor from two motorcycles, although he was not arrested at the spot and no liquor was found in his possession. He claimed a clean antecedent and argued that he was unaware that his vehicle was …

Urmila DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Urmila Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Negotiable Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. She argued that the alleged liquor was recovered from a location adjacent to her house, not in …

Lalan YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Lalan Yadav applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 123.75 litres of liquor from a straw house on his premises. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and that the …

Jitendra Kumar @ Kallu YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jitendra Kumar (Kallu Yadav), sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, for allegedly transporting 650 ml of liquor in his vehicle. He argued that the liquor was recovered …

MASIDUR RAHMANversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Masidur Rahman, the owner of a Bolero pickup, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 after 609.84 litres of liquor were recovered from his vehicle. He was not arrested at the spot and the liquor was not found in his conscious …

Brijesh Sahni @ BrijeshversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Brijesh Sahni, feared arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(1),(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022, alleging that 60 litres of liquor were recovered from a public bush and that he was implicated through a chowkidar’s statement. He argued that no liquor …

Vidyanand RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vidyanand Ram, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 105 litres of liquor from his auto. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and that the driver, who fled the scene, misused the …

ARVIND CHOUDHARY @ ARVIND KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Arvind Choudhary was implicated under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 10 litres of liquor found in a joint family house. He contended that he had no conscious possession, the liquor was not recovered from him at the spot, and the concept …

DUDHNATH SINGHversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dudh Nath Singh, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 110 litres of liquor from his auto. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not present at the spot of seizure, and was unaware …

Mithun PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mithun Paswan, the owner of a vehicle from which 123.570 litres of liquor was seized, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure, and was unaware of his driver’s alleged …

Ranjit Sahani @ Ranjit SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ranjit Sahani, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic and Psychotropic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging that the liquor recovered (60 litres from a motorcycle and 170 litres …

Sunil KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sunil Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2013 for allegedly possessing 5 litres of liquor recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, …

Suraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Suraj Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 414/34 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Sections 30(a), 32(ii) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. He contended that the allegations of liquor recovery from several vehicles were based solely on …

Parwati DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Parwati Devi, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in a case alleging recovery of 229.725 litres of liquor from two vehicles, invoking Sections 30(a), 32(ii) and 41(i) of the Excise Act. She argued that she has a clean antecedent, is a woman, and was not in …

Guddu PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Guddu Paswan was implicated in a case alleging recovery of 50 litres of liquor from a motorcycle, charged under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not the owner of the …

Pawan Tiwary @ Pawan TiwariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Pawan Tiwary was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 17 litres of liquor recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in actual possession, and that the vehicle was misused by others …

Ravi Ranjan Manjhi @ Ravi Ranjan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ravi Ranjan Manjhi, applied for anticipatory bail in a case involving offences under Sections 338, 336(3) and 304(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 30(a), 41(c), 33 and 34 of the Excise Act. He argued that he was not arrested at the scene, had no possession of the seized Scorpio, and was …

Bechan DasversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bechan Das, was implicated in a case where 96.84 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle he owned, leading to charges under Sections 274, 275, 317(5) of the Bihar Negotiable Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he had a …

Guddu YadavversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Guddu Yadav filed an anticipatory bail application in the Patna High Court. While the application was pending, he was arrested. He then sought the court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The court granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the anticipatory bail …

ANSHU PATEL @ ANSHU KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The appellant, Anshu Patel, was implicated in a case involving alleged robbery, assault and caste-based abuse, with charges under several IPC sections and the SC/ST Act. He sought anticipatory bail under Section 14‑A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, claiming he was not present at the …

PARWATI DEVIversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Parwati Devi and Jitendra Yadav appealed against the State of Bihar and Renu Devi. While the appeal was pending, the appellants were arrested. They applied to the High Court for permission to withdraw their appeal. The Court, after hearing counsel, granted the permission. Consequently, the appeal …

SANTOSH KUMAR SHARMA @ SANTOSH SHARMAversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Santosh Kumar Sharma appealed against the refusal of anticipatory bail in a case registered under IPC sections 341, 323, 504, 506, 34 and SC/ST Act sections 3(i)(r)(s). The appellant claimed he was falsely implicated over a trivial dispute about plucking mangoes and argued that the FIR was vague, …

Rakesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioners, Rakesh Kumar and Satrudhan Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the BNS and Section 37 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. They argued they have clean antecedents and that the FIR does not …

AMRESH RAI @ AMRESH KUMAR RAYversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Amresh Rai and Shivam Kumar Ray appealed against the refusal of anticipatory bail under Section 14‑A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. They were charged under IPC sections 341, 323, 504, 34 and SC/ST Act sections 3(i)(r)(s) for allegedly assaulting an informant who claimed they blocked …

SUBHASH CHANDRA GUPTAversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

ALLOWED

Subhash Chandra Gupta appealed against the refusal of anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 379 of the IPC and several provisions of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The trial court had denied bail on 18‑11‑2021. The appellant …

Alam Mian @ Aalam MianversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Alam Mian, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 96, 351(2), 61(2) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, alleging involvement in the alleged abduction of an informant's daughter. The victim, after being recovered from Jammu and Kashmir, gave a …

Rahul Kumar SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar Sharma, applied for bail in a criminal case (Baroon P.S. Case No. 20 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 103(1), 3(5), and 61(2) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The informant’s counsel alleged that the case pertained to the killing of the …

Amar Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Amar Kumar Singh, applied for regular bail in a case registered under multiple sections of the BNS, 2023, alleging theft of Rs.20,000 and jewellery. He argued that he has a clean record, has been in custody since 24‑08‑2025, and that the FIR contains no specific allegation of assault …

Anant SahversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, Anant Sah and his son Manish Kumar, were charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act for alleged assault on a minor named Aman. They applied for anticipatory bail, but the Special Court refused, …

Rajiv Madal @ Rajiv Singh @ Rajiv KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rajiv Mandal, was arrested in connection with a violent incident that resulted in the death of Suman Kumar Singh and alleged injuries to others. He is charged under IPC sections 307 (attempt to murder), 302 (murder), 120(b) and 34 (criminal conspiracy), and Section 27 of the Arms …

Dinesh Mahto @ Dinesh Kumar @ Umesh Kumar @ Umesh MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Dinesh Mahto, sought regular bail in a case registered under Sections 302, 34, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleging a clean antecedent and false implication by the informant. The FIR alleged that on 17 September 2018 the petitioner, along with …

Vikash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Vikash Kumar, was charged under Section 109 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly firing a pistol and causing injuries to his brother Shubham Kumar during a birthday celebration. The petitioner argued that he was falsely implicated, …

Satyendra Kumar @ Satendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Satyendra Kumar, was arrested in connection with offences under Section 354B of the IPC and Sections 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act, alleged to have attempted rape and indecent assault on a minor. He contended that he has a clean record, has been in custody since 7 October 2025, and that …

Jaleshwar MahatoversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Jaleshwar Mahato, was charged under multiple IPC offences and sections of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act in connection with a 2023 case. He appealed the trial court’s refusal to grant anticipatory bail, arguing that he was not an accused in a related earlier case and that …

Ashok Rai @ Ashok Kumar @ Ashok PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, four residents of Hajipur Town, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under multiple sections of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleging they were falsely implicated in an assault where the informant claimed they, along with others, attacked him with a sword …

Nageshwar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, six residents of Badhar village, feared arrest in a case (PS‑Kalpa, Jehanabad) involving offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. They alleged that the FIR stemmed from a land‑dispute in which an informant and his son were assaulted and …

Aditya Anand @ Ady @ Aditya @ HarishankarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Aditya Anand, was charged under IPC sections 279 and 336, the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022 (sections 30(a) and 41), and the Indian Electricity Act (section 139). He had seven prior cases, two under the Excise Act, and had been in custody since 2 June 2025. After a previous …

Ram Sikeel KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ram Sikeel Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bihar Negotiable Substantive (BNS) law. He claimed to have a clean record and alleged that the informant falsely implicated him, citing a three‑day delay between the alleged …

Parwez Alam @ Parvez AlamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Parwez Alam sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of the IPC, alleging that the FIR was filed without a show‑cause notice despite his alleged use of a forged teaching certificate. He also disclosed two prior cases under …

Biranj Chaudhary @ Viran ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Biranj Chaudhary, was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 100 litres of liquor and 2,000 litres of Jawa Mahua from a riverbank, offences punishable under Sections 30(a), (b) and (c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act. He argued that the seized material …

Suraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Suraj Kumar and Saurav Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in an FIR alleging assault with an axe and a dabia, resulting in injuries to the informant who later died during treatment. The petitioners argued they have clean antecedents and that the informant’s complaint lacked …

VIMLESH KUMARversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

BAIL GRANTED

Vimlesh Kumar was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 916.20 litres of liquor from a motorcycle and charged under Section 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022. He contended that he was not caught in possession, …

Pawan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, a group of villagers from Simra, were charged under multiple sections of the Bihar Negotiable Sale (BNS) Act, 2023 for alleged assaults that arose from a neighbour dispute over the use of a drain. They contended that the FIR was false, that there was no motive, and that several of …

UmangversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Umang, a postal assistant, was accused of misappropriating Rs.48,77,066 under Sections 316(2), 316(4) and 318(4) of the BNS, 2023. He claimed a clean antecedent, that the alleged withdrawal was inadvertent and the money was deposited before the FIR, and that a departmental inquiry was pending which …

Punam DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Petitioner Punam Devi sought anticipatory bail after learning that she might be arrested in a case under Sections 303(2) and 62 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, relating to alleged chain snatching. The petitioner argued that she is a woman with a prior case, that the alleged incident …

Laddu Kumar @ Laddu RamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Laddu Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case alleging kidnapping, rape, and related offences under Sections 366, 376, 506 and 34 of the IPC and Section 67 of the IT Act. The petitioner asserted that he has a clean record, that the allegations are false, and that he and …

Nirdosh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Nirdosh Kumar, was charged under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 84 litres of liquor from a scooty. He argued that he was not arrested at the scene, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and was not the owner of the vehicle, claiming he was implicated by …

SANJEVAN MAHTO @ SANJEEV KUMARversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sanjevan Mahto, a government school teacher, was named among fifteen accused in an FIR alleging assault and murder that occurred on 08-11-2025 in an agricultural field. The informant claimed the accused entered the field armed, assaulted her husband, leading to his death, and …

Shyam Singh @ Shyam KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Shyam Singh, accused under Sections 30(a), 34 and 36 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022, sought bail. He alleged that the spirits seized (1360 litres from a four‑wheeler and 840 litres concealed in a husk, along with three motorcycles) were not in his possession and that he was …

Vivek Das @ Vevek KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Vivek Das, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a kidnapping case involving a minor girl, with charges under Sections 64, 87, 126(1), 127(1) of the B.N.S.S. and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The informant alleged that the petitioner abducted her daughter, but the …

Md. AahidversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Md. Aahid, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 4523.04 litres of liquor from a seized vehicle he owned. This was his second anticipatory bail application; a prior petition was mistakenly withdrawn on the ground …

Bhadru @ Badaru Paswan @ Akash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bhadru Paswan, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 37 of the Excise Act and Sections 8(c), 21(b), 8 and 20(B)(II)A of the NDPS Act for alleged recovery of 15.20 grams of smack, 2.81 grams of ganja and 6 litres of liquor from another person, Chandra …

Santosh Kumar Yadav @ Mithailal @ MithlalversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Santosh Kumar Yadav was charged under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly being involved in the recovery of 2,142 litres of liquor from five vehicles. He contended that he was not arrested at the scene, no …

Raju Kumar Singh @ Raju SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, four brothers from Jhauwa village, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 109(1) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023. They contended they have clean antecedents and were falsely implicated by an informant who …

Sonu Kumar Yadav @ Sonu Yadav @ SonuversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sonu Kumar Yadav, was charged under Sections 30(a), 41(1), 31(1) and 31(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly facilitating the recovery of 5,290.08 litres of liquor from a truck and 95.04 litres from a Maruti car. He contended that he was not …

Pukar RayversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Pukar Ray, was charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018 for allegedly recovering 198 litres of liquor from six plastic sacks on the bank of the Bagmati River. He was not arrested at the scene and the alleged liquor was not found in his …

Sunil YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sunil Yadav, was implicated in a case (PS Case No. 290/2025) for alleged possession of 210.6 litres of liquor seized from two vehicles, one of which he owned. He was not arrested at the spot and no liquor was recovered from his personal possession. The petitioner argued that he was …

Biranj Chaudhary @ Viran ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Biranj Chaudhary, was charged under Sections 30(a), (b) and (c) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 205 litres of liquor and 100 litres of jaggery solution from two locations. He contended that he was not arrested at the scene, no contraband was found in his possession, and …

Raushan Sahni @ Raushan Kumar @ Raushan ChaudhariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Raushan Sahni, was charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly recovering 250.56 litres of liquor from a vehicle. He contended that he was not arrested at the spot, had no possession of the liquor, was not the owner of the vehicle, and was …

Raj Kumar @ Raj Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Raj Kumar Singh, applied for regular bail in a criminal case under Sections 30(a), 32 and 41(i) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that he was not in possession of the seized liquor and that the case is based solely on a confessional statement made by …

Shankar MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Shankar Mukhiya, sought regular bail in a case under Sections 30(a), 30(b), 30(c), 32 and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, alleging recovery of liquor from a distillery. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, and the …

Ranjeet KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ranjeet Kumar, was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 131.250 litres of liquor from a vehicle, charged under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. He claimed to have a clean antecedent and argued that he was falsely …

Karu Singh @ Santosh SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Karu Singh, was charged under Sections 338, 336(3) and 318(4) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly recovering 166.125 litres of liquor from a Bolero. He was not arrested at the scene, no liquor …

Loha MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Loha Mahto applied for regular bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2016 and Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The allegations involve the recovery of 35 litres of liquor from a kiosk and a country‑made gun from the petitioner’s …

Mukesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Mukesh Kumar, was arrested in connection with the seizure of 4,518 litres of liquor and three motorcycles under the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he was not caught in possession of the liquor, that the motorcycles were owned by him but were misused by another person, and that he …

Pappu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Pappu Kumar, was charged under Section 30 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 832 litres of spirit from the house of Ravan Manjhi. He contended that he was not arrested at the spot, that no liquor was found in his possession, and that he …

Sonu NutversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sonu Nut, was charged under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code (147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 325, 332, 333, 307, 353) and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly recovering 75 litres of liquor near a canal. He has six prior cases …

Saulesh Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Saulesh Kumar Singh, the owner of a vehicle from which 178.125 litres of liquor was recovered, was charged under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. The petitioner argued that he was not present at the spot of seizure, had no conscious possession of the liquor, …

Munna Kumar @ Munna YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Munna Kumar, was charged under Section 317(5) of the BNS, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly recovering 135 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He had twelve prior cases, ten under the Excise Act, and argued that he was not …

Sipahi Ray @ Sipahi Kumar@ Shipahi RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Sipahi Ray, a resident of Baramahpur, was arrested on 24 November 2025 in connection with offences under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act. An earlier bail application was dismissed as withdrawn, with the court allowing a fresh application after the charges were framed on 25 February 2026. The …

Danayia @ Pintu Kumar @ Pintu @ Danayia Kumar @ DhanayiaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Danayia @ Pintu Kumar, was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 1,189.455 litres of liquor from a location behind a brick kiln, under Section 30 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He contended that he has a clean record, was not arrested at the …

Akhilesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Akhilesh Kumar, was charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly recovering 62.25 litres of liquor from Muzaffarpur Railway Station. He was not arrested at the scene and no liquor was found in his immediate possession; the case …

Nawab KhanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Nawab Khan, a driver, was arrested for allegedly transporting 8,769.6 litres of liquor in a truck seized by the Excise police. He claimed he was not the owner of the vehicle, had no knowledge of the contraband, and possessed a clean criminal record. The petitioner sought regular bail, arguing he …

Deepak KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, was charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly recovering 1,560 litres of spirit and 36 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He has nine prior criminal cases, although he initially disclosed only one when seeking …

Uday KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Uday Kumar was charged under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 340.200 litres of liquor and 1,600 kg of Mahua flower from a pick‑up vehicle. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no conscious …

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioners Rahul Kumar and Moti Tamoli applied for bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 33 litres of liquor from a ruin near their house. They argued that they were not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in their conscious possession, and …

Umesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, four accused persons, were arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 514 litres of liquor from a truck, alleged offences under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act. Petitioners No.1, 2 and 3 claimed they had clean antecedents and were merely passengers unaware of the cargo, …

Rinki DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The appellants, members of a family involved in a land dispute, were charged with multiple offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting a land broker and seizing his property. Their anticipatory bail …

Bhuar TurhaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bhuar Turha, was arrested in connection with an alleged recovery of 1,000 litres of liquor and seizure of a motorcycle under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor or the vehicle and that the complaint was based on the testimony …

Pappu Sahani @ AppuversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Pappu Sahani and Dhanik Lal Sahani, were arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 306 litres of liquor and a seized motorcycle under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act. They contended that they have no prior criminal record, were not arrested at the spot, did not have the …

SAROJ KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Saroj Kumar was arrested in connection with the seizure of 235.815 litres of liquor from a Tata Indica car, alleged under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act. The petitioner, who has twelve prior excise cases, claimed he was not the owner of the car, was not arrested at the spot, and was implicated by a …

Raja Singh @ Raj Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Raja Singh was arrested in connection with alleged recovery of large quantities of liquor from various locations, under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act. He contended that he was not caught in possession, the seized liquor was not on his premises, and he was implicated solely on secret information. …

Bali Nut @ Balli NutversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bali Nut, was arrested in connection with offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code (147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 325, 332, 333, 307, 353) and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He had been in custody since 11‑11‑2025 and earlier sought regular bail, which was denied …

Rahul SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Rahul Sahani was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 240 litres of liquor from a public place near a river, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. The petitioner, who has six prior excise cases, argued that he was not apprehended at the spot, had no conscious possession of the …

Bhola Chaudhary @ Bhola ChaudhariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bhola Chaudhary, applied for bail in a criminal case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that liquor was recovered from a joint family house and that he was not apprehended in possession. He argued that the 2018 amendment to the Excise Act abolished the concept of …

Bagha @ Akhilesh MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Bagha @ Akhilesh Mukhiya was charged under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 168 litres of liquor, based primarily on a confessional statement of another person in police custody. The petitioner, who has six prior Excise cases, was not arrested at the scene and no liquor was …

Nandlal Manjhi @ Nandlal MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Nandlal Manjhi, applied for bail in a criminal case under Sections 30(a), 32 and 41(i) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that 50 litres of liquor were recovered from the house of Suresh Manjhi and another 50 litres from his own residence. He contended that he had no conscious …

Rajesh Singh @ Rajesh Kumar Kushwaha @ Rajesh KushwahaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The Patna High Court heard an anticipatory bail application filed by Rajesh Singh, who feared arrest in a case involving offences under several IPC sections and the Bihar Excise Act. The petitioner contended that his name does not appear in the FIR and that the police were unlawfully seeking to …

Kanchan Kumar Nishad @ Kanchan NishadversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Kanchan Kumar Nishad, was arrested in connection with the seizure of 3,372.84 litres of liquor from a truck he owned, alleged to be a violation of Sections 30(a), 32, 36 and 41 of the Excise Act. He contended that he was not present at the spot of seizure, had no conscious possession …

Baban RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Baban Ray and his son Sonu Kumar, feared arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of liquor and Mahua. They contended that no contraband was found in their possession and that the accusation stemmed from a hostile …

Ajit Rai @ Ajeet Kumar @ Ajit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ajit Rai, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with alleged offences under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Excise Act involving the recovery of 600 litres of liquor and 6000 litres of fermented jawa mahua from the Ganga river. …

Sunil SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Sunil Singh was arrested for offences under Sections 272, 273 and 420 of the IPC and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleged to have recovered 89.200 litres of illicit liquor. He has seven prior cases, five under the Excise Act, and has been in custody since 7 March 2026. He previously …

Bharat KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Bharat Kumar and Manish Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. in connection with an excise case alleging recovery of 1,049.640 litres of liquor from a truck, invoking Sections 30(a) of the Excise Act. They argued they have clean antecedents, were …

Mohan Kumar @ Mohan SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mohan Kumar, a resident of Jalalpur, Patna, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for allegedly recovering liquor from a riverbank and a cattle shed. He contended that he has a clean criminal record, was not in possession of the liquor …

Subhash Kumar Yadav @ Kirkiriya @ Subhash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Subhash Kumar Yadav, was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 324 litres of liquor from an open field behind Pawan's house, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he was not caught at the spot, had no possession of the liquor, and was implicated …

Ravi Ranjan PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ravi Ranjan Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where 20 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from his motorcycle and from a cattle house belonging to a friend, Mintu. He argued that he had no knowledge of the …

Sushil SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Sushil Sahani and his wife Sarita Devi, feared arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic and S... Act, 2023 read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging recovery of liquor from their joint family house. They argued they had no …

Rahul Kumar @ Raidar @ RiderversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 228.885 liters of liquor from a school and a nearby location, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he was not caught in possession of the liquor, that the alleged recovery occurred on …

Baudhi Devi @ Shanti DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Baudhi Devi, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of five litres of liquor from her residence. She argued that she has a clean antecedent, is a woman, and that the liquor was found in a joint family house, …

Dev Ray @ Rajdev RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dev Ray @ Rajdev Rai, was arrested in connection with an alleged seizure of 1,000 litres of liquor and charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he was not caught in the act, that the liquor was recovered from a public riverbank and not from his …

Jitendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Jitendra Kumar, was charged under Section 111 of the BNS read with Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 105 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He argued that the liquor was seized from the motorcycles, not from his personal possession, and that …

Suraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Suraj Kumar applied for bail in a criminal case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that the alleged seizure of 750 ml of liquor was from Radhe Shyam Kumar, not from his own possession. The petitioner has a history of eleven prior excise cases, but contends he was not apprehended …

Chula Mukhiya @ Ramesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chula Mukhiya Ramesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of liquor. He contended that he had no …

Akhilesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Akhilesh Yadav, had filed an anticipatory bail application under the Criminal Procedure Code. While the application was pending, he was arrested by the police. The petitioner’s counsel then sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The Court, after …

Vikki KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Vikki Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging the recovery of 15 litres of liquor, two country‑made pistols and three live cartridges from his residence. He asserted a clean antecedent and argued that nothing was seized from his conscious possession, …

Vijay Kumar @ Vijendra Kumar @ Bijendra SinghversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Vijay Kumar, the petitioner, was implicated in a criminal case (PS Case No. 728 of 2021) and filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner argued for more than ten minutes but subsequently requested permission to withdraw the …

Rasendra YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rasendra Yadav, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 190 litres of liquor near a cremation ground. He argued that he was not caught in possession, the alleged recovery site was public, and the case was based …

Ranjit Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ranjit Kumar Singh, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 36 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He asserted that he has a clean …

Golu kumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Golu Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 50 litres of liquor from the Gandak river. The petitioner claimed a clean antecedent, no possession of the liquor, and that …

Pankaj Kumar @ PankajversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pankaj Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 54.69 litres of liquor from an auto-rickshaw and 1.8 litres from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, the liquor was not found in his …

Ranjit Sahani @ Ranjit SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Ranjit Sahani and Dilip Sahani, were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of liquor and Mahua from a public place. They sought anticipatory bail, arguing that the liquor was not in their conscious possession, the …

Md. Irshad @ BachheversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Md. Irshad and Md. Raja, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that liquor was recovered from a house that is a joint family property. They argued that they were not in actual possession, that the concept of …

Kariman Rai @ Amrendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kariman Rai, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with offences under Section 111 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act. He claimed that he was not arrested at the scene, no liquor was …

Madan RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Madan Rai applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 785.88 litres of liquor from a pick‑up vehicle. He contended that he had no prior criminal record, was not in possession of …

KRISHNA MANDAL @ KANHAIYA MANDALversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Krishna Mandal, owner of a Scorpio vehicle, was implicated in a case (PS 334/2022) for alleged recovery of 180.36 litres of liquor, violating Sections 30(a), 32(i), 32(ii) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act. The petitioner argued that he was not apprehended at the spot, had no liquor in his conscious …

Sonu Kumar SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sonu Kumar Sah, was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 701.25 litres of liquor from his pickup vehicle, facing charges under IPC sections 272, 273 and 34 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he had a clean record, was not apprehended at the …

Shaurabh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Shaurabh Kumar sought anticipatory bail in a complaint alleging he received marriage expenses after a marriage was called off, leading to charges under IPC sections 406, 420 and 34. He contended he had a clean antecedent, that the informant’s daughter voluntarily married another person before the …

Raj Kumar Yadav @ Raj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Raj Kumar Yadav, was charged under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable and Settlement Code, 2023 and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 for allegedly assaulting an informant by dragging him with a towel around the neck. The trial court …

Md. Daud AliversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Four brothers from Belahriya, Gaya applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under multiple sections of the Arms Act. The informant alleged that on 2 July 2025 the accused assaulted her husband and others, causing injuries and stealing jewellery. The petitioners contended they …

Shiv Balak RamversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The appellants, Shiv Balak Ram and his sons, filed a criminal appeal (SJ) No.4988 of 2025 before the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar and Poonam Devi. During the hearing on 18‑April‑2026, the appellants’ counsel, Mr Amaresh Kumar, sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the appeal. The …

Rakesh Kumar @ Rakesh Kumar Ray @ Raka KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar, was arrested in connection with a land‑dispute incident in which several persons were allegedly assaulted with rods, sticks and a danda, resulting in grievous injuries. He is charged under multiple sections of the Bihar Non‑Applicable (BNS) Act, 2023, including sections …

KanupriyaversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Kanupriya, sought permission to withdraw a contempt application and requested liberty to approach the Superintendent of Police regarding the alleged absconding status of O.P. No.2, who had obtained anticipatory bail but failed to surrender. The learned counsel argued for withdrawal …

Nabab Giri @ Nevav GiriversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Nabab Giri, applied for regular bail in a criminal case registered under Sections 126(2), 127(2), 115(2), 118(1) and 109 of the BNS, 2023, alleging assault during a land dispute. The FIR alleges that the informant's father was attacked with a rod, sword and kulad, and the petitioner …

Ajay Kumar @ Pannalal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Ajay Kumar, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Section 108 of the B.N.S., alleging a clean antecedent and claiming false implication by the informant. The informant alleged that the petitioner threatened a married woman, leading to her daughter's suicide. The …

Amit Kumar @ Amit PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Amit Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 52 litres of liquor found in a jointly owned house. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, the liquor was not recovered from his immediate possession, and the …

Santosh Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Santosh Kumar Yadav was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 36 litres of liquor from a sack behind his house, charged under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act. The petitioner argued that the liquor was not found in his …

Ali HasanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ali Hasan, brother of Nabi Hasan, was implicated in a FIR alleging recovery of 15 litres of cough syrup and assault on police officers during a disturbance at Nabi Hasan's house. He applied for anticipatory bail, asserting a clean criminal record and lack of specific allegations …

Deepak Kumar @ Deepak Kumar Sahni @ Deepak ShahaniversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, was charged under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 80 litres of liquor from Bajraha Tola. He has three prior cases, two of which are also under the Excise Act, and has been in custody since 27 January 2026. The petitioner argued that he was …

Arjun RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Arjun Rai was arrested in connection with offences under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, relating to alleged possession of liquor seized from two motorcycles. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the scene, had no conscious possession of the …

Chandrabhusan Kumar @ Sahul Don @ chandra Bhusan KumrversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Chandrabhusan Kumar, was arrested on 14 November 2025 in Phulwarisharif, Patna, for alleged possession of 15.20 grams of smack, 2.81 grams of ganja, and six bottles of liquor, offenses under the NDNDPS Act and the Excise Act. He applied for regular bail, claiming a clean antecedent …

Indal Chaudhary @ Lotha ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Indal Chaudhary, was charged under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged possession of 22 litres of liquor and large quantities of jawa mahua seized from his residence, which is a joint family property. He was not arrested at the scene and the seized items were not found in his …

Dudhnath NutversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Dudhnath Nut was arrested in connection with a case (PS Marhowrah Case No.746 of 2023) alleging offences under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, including alleged recovery of 75 litres of liquor. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the …

Santosh MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Santosh Mahto, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS No. 728/2021) involving serious offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Bihar Excise Act, including murder, attempt to murder and illegal liquor possession. He contended that the liquor (27 litres) was …

Vijay Mahto @ Vijay Kumar PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vijay Mahto, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, alleging that 125 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was not the owner of the vehicle, and that the case was …

Mukesh SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Mukesh Sahni, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018-22 for alleged recovery of 82.350 litres of liquor from a seized SUV. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not present at …

Subodh Rai @ Sabodh RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Subodh Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging recovery of 171 litres of liquor from a bush near a bond. He argued that he was not caught in possession, the alleged liquor was not on his property, …

Amarjit Kumar @ MitthuversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Amarjit Kumar, the petitioner, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, together with several provisions of the Bihar Excise Act. He alleged that the liquor seizure of 2,359.44 liters from multiple vehicles was not …

Pankaj Das @ Pankaj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pankaj Das, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where 30 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a public field. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, no conscious possession of …

Awadhesh RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Awadhesh Rai applied for anticipatory bail in a case involving offences under IPC sections 272, 273, 420, 120(B) and 34, and several provisions of the Excise Act. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, had no liquor in his conscious possession, and was implicated only through a confession …

Raushan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, three brothers, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 1,000 litres of liquor. They argued that they were not caught in possession, were not owners of the seized vehicle, and were …

Sunil ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Sunil Manjhi, filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal miscellaneous case. While the application was pending, he was arrested by the police. The petitioner’s counsel then sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The Court, after hearing …

Mithu Kumar Mandal @ Nitish Kumar MandalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Mithu Kumar Mandal, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 108 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, had no possession of the liquor, was …

Chunmun ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioners Chunmun Manjhi and Sudhir Manjhi applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 240 litres of liquor on two motorcycles. They argued they have clean antecedents, were …

Dev Kumar Paswan @ Dev KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dev Kumar Paswan, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 133.5 litres of liquor from the house of Harihar Paswan. He argued that he had no possession of the liquor, no …

Mintu Mahto @ Mintu Kumar MahatoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mintu Mahto petitioned the Patna High Court for anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that the alleged seizure of liquor – 10 litres hidden near a hut, 5 litres from a scooty, …

Mahesh Kumar Ray @ Mahesh RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mahesh Kumar Ray sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case involving offences under several IPC sections (279, 353, 307, 427, 272, 273, 34) and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act relating to the alleged recovery of 108 litres of liquor from a sack …

Naim @ NayeemversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Naim and Ashique, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, alleging they were merely neighbors who happened to be present at the scene of a reported …

Pappu Kumar @ Pappu YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pappu Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 79.125 litres of liquor from a four‑wheeler. He argued that he was not in possession of the vehicle, had no prior criminal record, and the case was based solely on a confessional …

JITENDRA YADAVversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jitendra Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 38(1) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, relating to the alleged recovery of 4,462.905 litres of liquor from a truck. He argued that he was not arrested at the …

Ajit Kumar @ Ajit Yadav @ Ajit Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ajit Kumar Yadav was implicated in an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018, alleging recovery of large quantities of liquor from premises not belonging to him. He claimed the allegation arose from a hostile chowkidar and that he was not in conscious possession of …

Bigan MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Bigan Mahto sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 198 litres of liquor from a bush. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the location did not belong to him, and that he …

Muslim @ Mohd. MuslimversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Mohd. Muslim, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for the alleged recovery of 968.76 litres of liquor from three vehicles, one of which he owned. He argued that he had no prior …

Raju Kumar @ Raju GuptaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raju Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 55.6 litres of liquor from a garbage heap. He argued that he was not apprehended at the spot, that no liquor was found in his conscious possession, and that …

Kamlesh Prasad @ Babloo Kumar @ Ballu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kamlesh Prasad, sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for alleged recovery of 50 litres of liquor from the Sone River. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious …

Ajay Rai @ PandubaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ajay Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly recovering 210 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He contended that he was not in possession of the seized vehicle, was not its owner, and was …

Abhishek KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Abhishek Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, for allegedly possessing 40 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in …

Abhishek Kumar Sahni @ Abhishek Kumar @ AbhishekversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Abhishek Kumar Sahni, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 900 litres of liquor from five vehicles, of which he owned one. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was unaware of his friend’s misuse of the …

Virendra SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Virendra Singh, was implicated in an excise case for allegedly transporting 861.6 litres of liquor in a truck he owned, though the liquor was seized from the vehicle and not from his personal possession. He sought anticipatory bail, arguing he had a clean criminal record and was …

Pappu sahani @ Pappu chaudhariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Pappu Sahani sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He argued that no liquor was recovered from his possession, the alleged recovery sites were …

Sunil KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sunil Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act alleging that 6 litres of liquor were recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, had a clean antecedent, and was implicated only …

Prabhakar KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Prabhakar Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 54 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean criminal record, was not in actual possession of …

Ajay RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ajay Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 21 litres of liquor near the Balan River. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no liquor in his possession, …

Yuvraj Kumar @ Bunty KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Yuvraj Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC in connection with alleged offences under IPC Sections 272, 273 and 34 and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, relating to the alleged recovery of 79.02 litres of liquor. The petitioner claimed he was not in …

Manjeet Kumar @ Majeet Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manjeet Kumar Yadav applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly concealing 90 litres of liquor. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested on the spot, that the liquor was recovered from a …

Bhanu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bhanu Kumar, a 19‑year‑old with a clean record, was implicated in a case registered under Sections 137(2), 140(3), 87 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 for alleged kidnapping of a girl who was actually his lover. The FIR was lodged ten days after the alleged …

Lalan Kumar Sah @ Raushan Kumar SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Lalan Kumar Sah, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 11.4 litres of liquor from a straw house. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent, …

Vishwanath SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vishwanath Sah applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case alleging offences under Sections 30(a) and 41(i)(ii) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 574.2 litres of liquor from a pick‑up vehicle he owned. He argued that he had a …

Dilip SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Dilip Sahni applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with offences under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Excise Act, where 60 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from two motorcycles he owned. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, …

Murli SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Murli Singh applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 427.2 litres of liquor from his house. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, …

Prem SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Prem Sahani, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking a modification in the proceedings arising from PS case No.306 of 2021. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the modification application. The court considered the request and, …

Smt. Munni DeviversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Smt. Munni Devi filed a petition seeking cancellation of the anticipatory bail that had been granted to Sunil Singh in Cr. Misc. No.61849 of 2023. The bail was conditioned on Sunil Singh paying a monthly maintenance of Rs.4,000 to the petitioner, with a provision that the bail could be cancelled if …

Kamlesh PanditversusThe State of Bihar and others

DISPOSED

Kamlesh Pandit filed a criminal appeal (DB) No.8 of 2022 against the State of Bihar, which had been dismissed or stayed due to procedural defects. The petitioner moved a restoration application seeking to have the appeal reinstated in the original file. The State, represented by an Assistant Public …

Ajay Kumar MadhesiyaversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Ajay Kumar Madhesiya, filed a contempt application before the Patna High Court. The petitioner later sought permission to withdraw the contempt application, stating that the order passed in the underlying writ petition had been complied with. The court considered the petitioner's …

Ajay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Petitioners Ajay Kumar and Kailash Prasad filed a writ and a contempt application against the State of Bihar and several officials, alleging non‑compliance with a prior order. The petitioners later sought the court's permission to withdraw the contempt application, stating that the writ order had …

Dilip PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dilip Paswan, applied for bail in a criminal case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 130 litres of liquor and 3000 litres of semi‑manufactured jawa‑mahua solution from a joint family house. He …

Akhilesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Akhilesh Kumar, filed a regular bail application in a criminal case arising from PS. Case No.-459, Year-2025, Thana- Giriyak, District- Nalanda. After hearing, the petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the bail application, requesting liberty to refile after the charge …

Shivam KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Shivam Kumar applied for bail in a criminal case (PS Case No.448/2023) registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, alleging recovery of 83 litres of liquor from a ruined house. The petitioner, represented by Mr. Arvind Kumar, argued that he was not arrested at the …

Umar Farooque @ Md FarooqueversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Umar Farooque was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 8,000 litres of raw spirit and charged under IPC sections 272 and 273 and Excise Act sections 30(a), 33, 41 and 47. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no raw spirit was found in his possession, and the …

Ganesh RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ganesh Rai, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Section 317(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 28.4 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He has nine prior cases, seven under the Excise Act, but contends he was not arrested at …

Kishan Kumar @ Kishun Kumar @ Kishan MandalversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Kishan Kumar, was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 2,604.12 litres of liquor from four vehicles and charged under Sections 30(a), 32, 36 and 41 of the Excise Act. He sought regular bail, arguing that he was not arrested at the scene, had no conscious possession of …