Patna High Court

Akhilesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided: 16 April 2026
Disposal: WITHDRAWN
Bench: SATYAVRAT VERMA

Holding

The court held that the petitioner may withdraw the bail application and the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Akhilesh Kumar, filed a regular bail application in a criminal case arising from PS. Case No.-459, Year-2025, Thana- Giriyak, District- Nalanda. After hearing, the petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the bail application, requesting liberty to refile after the charge is framed. The court considered the request and granted permission for withdrawal. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh application post charge framing. No substantive merits of the bail application were adjudicated.

Issues considered

Whether the petitioner may withdraw the regular bail application and be allowed to refile after framing of charge

Subjects

regular bail
withdrawal of application
criminal procedure

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7224 of 2026
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-459 Year-2025 Thana- GRIYAK District- Nalanda
                  ======================================================
                  Akhilesh Kumar Son of Om Prakash Paswan Resident of village - Nichli
                  Bazar, Ps- Giriyak, Dist- Nalanda

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Aatish Kumar
                  For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Suresh Prasad Singh
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    16-04-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                    learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner, after some

                    argument, seeks permission to withdraw the instant regular bail

                    application with liberty to the petitioner to move afresh after

                    framing of charge.

                                 3. Permission is accorded.

                                 4. Accordingly, instant petition is dismissed as

                    withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.


                                               (Satyavrat Verma, J)
vikash/-

U          T

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…