Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sunil ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Sunil Manjhi, filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal miscellaneous case. While the application was pending, he was arrested by the police. The petitioner’s counsel then sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The Court, after hearing counsel for both sides, granted permission to withdraw the application. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner may withdraw an anticipatory bail application after being arrested and does such withdrawal require the Court's permission

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • arrest
  • criminal procedure
  • high court

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 19899 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-348 Year-2025 Thana- HULASGANJ District- Jehanabad
                  ======================================================
                  Sunil Manjhi S/o Suresh Manjhi R/o Adarkhi Bigha, P.S.- Hulasganj, District-
                  Jehanabad

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Pushkar Prashant
                  For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Kanhiya Kishor
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    17-04-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                    A.P.P. for the State.

                                 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission

                    to withdraw the anticipatory bail application as petitioner was

                    arrested during pendency of the same.

                                 3. Permission is accorded.

                                 4. The anticipatory bail application of the petitioner is

                    dismissed as withdrawn.



                                               (Satyavrat Verma, J)
amit/-

U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.