Patna High Court
AMRESH RAI @ AMRESH KUMAR RAYversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
- Bench
- SATYAVRAT VERMA
Holding
The appeal was disposed, directing the appellants to surrender before the trial court, effectively denying anticipatory bail due to the order of cognizance.
Summary
Amresh Rai and Shivam Kumar Ray appealed against the refusal of anticipatory bail under Section 14‑A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. They were charged under IPC sections 341, 323, 504, 34 and SC/ST Act sections 3(i)(r)(s) for allegedly assaulting an informant who claimed they blocked a road and snatched his jewellery. The appellants argued they had clean antecedents, were falsely implicated, the informant did not allege caste‑based abuse, and the offences were bailable, while the prosecution contended that cognizance had been taken and Section 18 of the SC/ST Act applied. The High Court, while inclined to grant anticipatory bail, held that the order of cognizance precluded it and disposed of the appeal, directing the appellants to surrender before the trial court on 1 May 2026 for immediate disposal. The appeal was therefore disposed without granting anticipatory bail.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail can be granted when cognizance has been taken under the SC/ST Act and IPC bailable offences.
- Whether the absence of a specific caste‑based allegation affects the applicability of Section 18 of the SC/ST Act.
- Whether the appellants’ clean antecedent and alleged false implication warrant anticipatory bail.
Legislation cited
- Indian Penal Code — s. 323, 34, 341, 504
- Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 — s. 14-A(2), 18, 3(i), 3(r), 3(s)
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- SC/ST Act
- cognizance
- Section 18
- bailable offences
- false implication
- IPC offences
- bail jurisprudence
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.3895 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-59 Year-2020 Thana- ASHOK PAPER MILL District-
Darbhanga
======================================================
1. Amresh Rai @ Amresh Kumar Ray S/O Ratnesh Rai R/O Village- Pator, Ps.
Pator Op (APM), Dist. Darbhanga
2. Shivam Kumar Ray @ Shivam Rai S/O Amresh Rai @ Amresh Kumar Ray
R/O Village- Pator, Ps. Pator Op (APM), Dist. Darbhanga
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar
2. Rajesh Kumar Paswan S/O Sri Bhado Paswan R/O Village- Pator, Tola
Mangalpur Ps. Pator Op (apm), Dist. Darbhanga
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mr. Saurav Anand
For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sadanand Paswan
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
ORAL ORDER
8 20-04-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellants and the
learned Special P.P. for the State. No one appears on behalf of the
respondent no.2.
2. This is an appeal under Section 14-A(2) of the
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities)
Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as the “SC/ST Act”) against the
refusal of prayer for anticipatory bail vide order dated 21.07.2022
passed by the learned Exclusive Special Judge, SC/ST Darbhanga,
in connection with Pator OP (APM) P.S. Case No.59/2020,
registered under Sections 341, 323, 504, 34 of the Indian Penal
Code and Sections 3(i)(r)(s) of the SC/ST Act.
3. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that
despite notice being validly served, the informant chooses not to
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.3895 of 2023(8) dt.20-04-2026
2/3
appear and contest. It is next submitted that appellants are persons
with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on 20.02.2020
at 5.30 P.M. seven named accused persons including the appellants
had blocked the road by tractor, it is next alleged that informant
was coming from Mahanpur and when he asked the accused
persons to give way, they assaulted and snatched his chain and
ring.
4. Learned counsel submits that appellants have been
falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next
submitted that from perusal of the allegations as alleged in the
FIR, it would manifest that informant does not allege that he was
abused by taking caste name rather it is alleged that when he
requested the appellants to give way, when he was assaulted but
then allegation of assault is not specific. It is also submitted that
appellants during the course of investigation cooperated with the
police as such police never felt the need of arresting the appellants
but then charge sheet came to be submitted, based on which,
cognizance was taken under sections 341, 323, 504 and 34 of the
Indian Penal Code read with Sections SC/ST Act. It is next
submitted that offences under the I.P.C. sections were bailable. It is
also submitted that when the police during the course of
investigation cooperated with the police as such police never felt
the need of arresting the appellants, whether it would be prudent
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.3895 of 2023(8) dt.20-04-2026
3/3
for the court to send the appellants to jail, based on an order of
cognizance.
5. Learned Special Public Prosecutor opposes the appeal
and submits that since charge sheet has been submitted and
cognizance taken, as such, a prima facie offence is made out,
hence rigors of Section 18 of the SC/ST Act shall apply.
6. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, the
Court was inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the
appellants but for the order of cognizance, as such, the appeal is
disposed of with a direction to the appellants to surrender before
the learned trial court on 01.05.2026, in the event, if the appellants
surrender before the learned trial court on 01.05.2026, the learned
trial court shall consider and dispose of the case on the same day
keeping in mind the fact that police during the course of
investigation never made any endeavour to arrest the appellants
and cognizance came to be taken under bailable sections of the
IPC and informant does not allege that he was abused by taking
caste name.
7. Accordingly, the appeal stands disposed of.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
amit/-
U T
Checking your session…