Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
5764 judgments · newest first · showing 1201–1400
The appellant, Saroj Singh, filed a criminal appeal before the Patna High Court. While the appeal was pending, he was arrested. The appellant’s counsel then applied for permission to withdraw the appeal on the ground of his arrest. The learned Special Public Prosecutor opposed the withdrawal. The …
The petitioner, Sumit Kumar, was arrested on 18 November 2025 in connection with the alleged recovery of 60 litres of liquor from an auto‑rickshaw and 20 litres from a scooty, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022. He contended that he had no prior criminal record, was …
The petitioner, Ram Nivash Rai, was charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 480 litres of liquor from a public riverbank near Sabalpur. He has three prior cases, two under the Excise Act, and has been in custody since 31‑12‑2025. The petitioner …
Vijay Yadav was arrested in connection with PS case No.459 of 2025 and filed a regular bail application before the Patna High Court. After initial arguments, the petitioner sought the Court's permission to withdraw his bail application, requesting liberty to file a fresh bail petition after the …
The petitioner, Sakesh Sahiba (also known as Sakesh Kumar), was arrested in connection with offences under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging the recovery of 3049.98 litres of liquor from a third‑party's house and the seizure of a …
The petitioner, Rajiv Gupta, applied for regular bail in a criminal case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 219.425 litres of liquor from his old house. He has four prior cases under the Excise Act and has been in custody …
The petitioner, Dilip Kahar, applied for regular bail in a criminal case registered under Sections 30(a), 41(1), 31(1) and 31(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 3062.52 litres of liquor from two Scorpio vehicles. The petitioner argued that he was not …
Umesh Sah was arrested on 17 September 2025 after police recovered 132 litres of codeine syrup from an auto he was driving. He was charged under Sections 21(c) and 22 of the NDPS Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner argued that he had no prior criminal …
Sonu Kumar, a resident of Begusarai, was arrested in connection with a FIR alleging that he was part of a group of armed criminals who opened fire on police and fled from Amit Kumar Gupta's house, where a large cache of illegal arms and 94 litres of codeine cough syrup were recovered. The …
The petitioner, Ram Narayan Rai, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 171 litres of liquor from a public bush. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was found in his …
The petitioners, Ramesh Chaudhary and Bhushan Singh, were arrested in connection with a case registered under several IPC offences (including murder, attempt to murder, and criminal conspiracy) and provisions of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 relating to illegal liquor. They contended …
Jaikant Rai was arrested in connection with the recovery of 330 litres of liquor and two motorcycles from a house belonging to Ramakant Rai, alleged to be a joint family property. He faces charges under Sections 414 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and …
The petitioner, Lalu Kumar, was arrested in connection with alleged offences under Sections 30(a)(e)(4) and 33 of the Bihar Excise Act for the purported recovery of 525 litres of spirits from a van. He has seven prior cases under the Excise Act and has been in custody since 22‑12‑2025. The …
Vikash Kumar sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 30(a), (b) and (c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, for alleged recovery of 100 litres of liquor from two motorcycles and 2000 litres of fermented Jawa Mahua, which were destroyed at the …
The petitioner, Jai Kumar, was arrested on 10-12-2025 for allegedly possessing 40 litres of liquor, an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He pleaded that he has a clean antecedent and was falsely implicated after an accused discarded liquor on the …
The petitioner, Kabari Umanath, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 60 litres of liquor from a canal area not belonging to him. He argued that the accusation stemmed from a hostile chowkidar and that no liquor …
Shankar Sah was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 457.8 litres of liquor from two vehicles, charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. The petitioner argued that he was not caught in the act, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and was not the owner of the …
The petitioner, Jugal Kumar Baitha, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 200 litres of liquor from two motorcycles and an auto. He contended that he had no conscious possession of the liquor and was only the owner …
Bicky Kumar, a resident of Saran district, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 900 ml of liquor from a shop and the seizure of a motorcycle. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent, had no direct …
The petitioner, Khakhra Yadav, was arrested in connection with offences under Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging the recovery of 275 litres of liquor from two cycles. He has nine prior cases, two of which are also under the Excise Act, but was not apprehended at the scene and no …
The Patna High Court heard a bail application filed by Deepak Kumar, who was arrested for the alleged recovery of 118 litres of liquor from a car and two motorcycles under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. The petitioner contended that he has a clean antecedent, is not the owner of the seized …
The petitioner, Satyawan Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where 115.720 litres of liquor were recovered from five motorcycles. He contended that he was not in possession of the seized vehicles, was …
The petitioner, Dippu Yadav, was charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 6 litres of liquor from a motorcycle and 270 litres from a public area near a river. He was not arrested at the scene, no liquor was found in his possession, and the vehicle involved was not …
The petitioner, Pawan Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 351 litres of liquor from a public bush. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the location did not belong to him, and …
The petitioner, Dinesh Nut, was charged with multiple offences under the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, relating to alleged violent acts and the recovery of 75 litres of liquor. He had been in custody since 30‑01‑2026 and claimed that the liquor was seized from a public …
The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar Tiwari, was charged with offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly serving spurious liquor that caused a death and serious illness. He had been in custody since January 2026 and was not originally named in the FIR; …
Mahesh Rai, also known as Mahesh Roy, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 274, 275 of the B.N.S.S. and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 1,840 litres of liquor from a pickup vehicle. He contended that he was not caught in …
The petitioner, Chhotu Pandit @ Prince Raj, was charged under IPC Sections 414 and 34 read with Bihar Excise Act Sections 30(a), 36 and 41(1) for allegedly recovering 5,727.24 litres of liquor from a truck and a Swift Dzire. He was not seized at the scene, did not possess the seized vehicles, and …
The petitioners, Saroj Kushwaha and others, were named in a criminal miscellaneous case (No.14822 of 2026) arising from a police‑station case in West Champaran. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners, while the State was represented by Mr. Sanjay Kumar. The court noted the absence of any …
The petitioner, Raju Jha, feared arrest in a case under the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 205.5 litres of liquor from his vehicle. He argued that he was not in possession at the time of seizure and was unaware that others would misuse his vehicle, contending that ownership alone should …
Anil Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous petition (No.15060 of 2026) arising from a police station case (No.141 of 2021) in Begusarai. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, while the State of Bihar was represented by Advocate Rabindra Kumar. The High Court examined whether the petition …
Shankar Mahto applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 alleging recovery of 3062.52 litres of liquor from two Scorpio vehicles and a verandah not owned by him. He contended that he was not arrested on the spot, had no …
The petitioner, Ajay Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 160 litres of liquor from an auto he was driving. He argued he had a clean antecedent, was not the owner of the vehicle, and had no liquor …
The petitioners, six individuals from Bhawanipur village, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under multiple sections of the B.N.S. alleging assault, robbery and related offences. They contended that the FIR was lodged eight days after the alleged incident, that they were falsely …
The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 1,071 litres of liquor from a bush in a litchi orchard belonging to Laxman Rai. He was not arrested at the scene, no liquor was found in his possession, and he has a clean …
The petitioners, six residents of Bhagwanpur village, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging recovery of 15 litres of cough‑syrup and offences under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. They contended that they were …
The petitioner, Chandeshwar Ray, was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 2,053.08 litres of liquor from three vehicles and charged under Sections 30(a), 32(2), 38(2) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he had no prior criminal record, was not caught in the act, and …
Manoj Paswan applied for bail in a criminal case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that the alleged seizure of 22 litres of liquor was made from a third person, Sudhir, with whom he has no connection. The petitioner highlighted that he was not apprehended at the scene, has no …
The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 41(1) and 41(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 320 litres of spirit from a field belonging to another person. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, …
The petitioner, Vipin Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 200 litres of liquor from a vehicle not owned by him. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor at the time …
Sunita Devi was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 50 litres of liquor from a motorcycle she owned. She contended that she had no knowledge of the liquor being in the vehicle and that she was not in possession of it, emphasizing her clean …
The petitioner, Ramesh Thakur, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 486 litres of liquor from three motorcycles, one of which he owned. He was not arrested at the spot and claimed he had no knowledge of the misuse of his vehicle by another …
The petitioners, Nitish Kumar and Anil Kumar Chaudhary, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 15 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle. They argued they had clean antecedents, were not in actual possession, and were not owners of the …
The petitioner, Raju Mukhiya, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 168 litres of liquor. He argued that no liquor was found in his possession and the case was based solely on a confessional statement made by another …
The petitioner, Dharmendra Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail in a case alleging recovery of 8.640 litres of liquor and offences under Sections 272 and 273 of the IPC and Sections 30(a), 41 and 45 of the Excise Act. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his …
The petitioner, Nanhak Ray, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 27 litres of liquor recovered from an e‑rickshaw he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the …
The petitioner, Ajay Nut, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 560 litres of liquor from a public pond. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the site did not belong to him, and the complaint …
The petitioner, Raushan Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a kidnapping case under Sections 363 and 366(A) of the Indian Penal Code. The FIR, lodged on 11 June 2023, alleged that the petitioner had abducted the informant’s 15‑year‑old daughter who had allegedly eloped with him …
The petitioner, Niraj Kamal, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act alleging recovery of 50 litres of liquor from a field near the Budhi Gandak River. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious …
The petitioner, Sheshnath Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 272, 273 and 34 and Bihar Excise Act sections 30(a), 38(i) and 41(i) for alleged recovery of 2,220.48 litres of liquor from a car and four motorcycles. He contended that he had no …
The petitioners Rajeev Kumar and Ranjan Paswan filed anticipatory bail applications in a case concerning alleged offences under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act. During pendency, Ranjan Paswan was arrested, and his counsel sought to withdraw his anticipatory bail application. The court permitted the …
The petitioner, Shivandra Kumar Ray (aka Shivam Mishra), sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120(b) and Bihar Excise Act sections 30(a) and 41(1). He argued that he was not caught in possession of the alleged liquor, that the only …
The petitioner, Indrajit Nat, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of liquor from a location not owned by him. He argued that he was not caught in possession and that the police relied on secret information without proper investigation. The State …
The petitioners, three residents of Koirgawa Bin Toli, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of liquor from a distillery not owned by them. They contended that no liquor was found in their …
The petitioner, Rajnish Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 30(c) and 30(d) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of liquor from two locations. He argued that he was not caught in the act, no liquor was seized from his possession, and the FIR did not disclose the informant, …
The petitioner, Ranjay Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, where 45 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not …
The petitioner, Md. Iftakhar, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged alleging his involvement in a shooting incident under Sections 126(2), 109, 61(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The informant claimed that Iftakhar drew a firearm at a market …
Surya Kumar Sharma applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code after a police case (PS Case No. 346 of 2025) alleged his involvement in the illegal possession of 557.73 litres of liquor, seized from a house and a Suzuki car he owned. The petitioner argued that the …
The petitioner, Ravi Kumar Gupta, a Bhojpuri singer, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in an arms case under Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act based on a police informant’s report and a confession by Bittu Kumar, who alleged the pistol recovered from him belonged to the …
Ritik Yadav applied for anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged possession of 60.12 litres of illicit liquor and a country-made pistol, alleged under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, Sections 25(1‑b)a and 26 of the Arms Act and Section 414 IPC. The prosecution’s case rests on a confessional …
The petitioners, Md. Samsad Ansari and Md. Nazeer Ansari, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, for the alleged recovery of 564 litres of liquor from five vehicles. They argued that they have clean …
The petitioner, Md. Aslam, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Sections 30(a), 30(c) and 30(d) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 95 litres of liquor from five locations. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, …
Bihari Rai applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 880 litres of liquor. The petitioner asserted a clean criminal record and argued that no liquor was found in his possession and that the …
The petitioner, Dharm Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Section 30(d) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 500 litres of Jawa Mahua from a location adjacent to his house, of which 495 litres were destroyed. He argued that he had no possession of the liquor, the …
The petitioner, Md Asraful, was implicated in a case concerning the seizure of 648 litres of liquor from a pickup vehicle he owned, alleged to be offences under IPC sections 272 and 273 read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor being in the …
The petitioner, Sanjiv Kumar @ Modi, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 25 litres of liquor, seizure of a motorcycle, and destruction of 1,600 litres of raw material. He contended that he was not present at the spot, had …
The petitioners, Ramjit Ram and Rekha Devi, feared arrest in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 137(2), 87, 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. following an allegation by an informant that they had kidnapped her minor daughter. The FIR was lodged three days after the alleged incident, and the …
Rampravesh Kumar filed an anticipatory bail application which was pending when he was arrested. He subsequently approached the court seeking permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The court, after hearing counsel for both sides, granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the …
Munni Devi and Kismati Devi, both women with clean antecedents, were charged under several IPC sections and the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act in a case arising from Ramgarhwa. They applied for anticipatory bail, which was denied by the Special Judge. On appeal, …
The appellants, Sagir, Salik and Sadaruddin, were charged under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and several IPC offences for allegedly assaulting an informant and his family over a land dispute, with accusations of caste-based abuse. They sought anticipatory bail, which was denied by the …
The appellants, Sagir, Salik and Sadaruddin, were charged under several IPC offences and sections of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act arising from a land‑dispute incident in which the informant alleged caste‑based abuse and assault at his house on 24 July …
Om Prakash Kumar, the petitioner, feared arrest in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 323, 498A, 406, 504, 506/34 of the IPC and Section 4 of the D.P. Act. He alleged that his wife, Sunidhi Kumari, had falsely implicated him and was simultaneously pursuing a divorce (Divorce Case No. …
The petitioner, Om Prakash Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under several sections of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He asserted a clean record and claimed he was falsely implicated due to a property dispute with the informant, arguing that the injury …
The petitioners, directors of a real‑estate firm, applied for anticipatory bail in a complaint alleging cheating, criminal breach of trust, intimidation and criminal intimidation under IPC sections 341, 406, 504 and 506. The complainant claimed he had paid Rs 41 lakh (loan from SBI) for a flat that …
The petitioners were accused of an acid attack on an informant, leading to FIR and multiple criminal cases. They obtained anticipatory bail for three of them earlier, but later the trial court took cognizance of additional offences, including the non‑bailable Section 326A IPC, and ordered regular …
Ashok Sahani sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 272 and 273 of the IPC and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. He contended that the alleged seizure of 270 litres of liquor was from a location not under his control and that the …
Satendra Yadav applied for anticipatory bail but was arrested while the application was pending. His counsel sought the court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The court examined the request and granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application …
The petitioner, Sudhir Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, where liquor was allegedly recovered from his house and from relatives' houses. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the …
The petitioner, Pramod Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022 for the alleged recovery of 58.97 litres of liquor from his auto, although the liquor was not found in his immediate possession. He argued that he had a clean antecedent and was …
Avinash Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where liquor and two motorcycles were allegedly recovered from a joint family house. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, had no conscious …
The petitioner, Sabir Siddiqui, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for alleged recovery of 81 litres of liquor from an auto and a motorcycle. He was not arrested at the spot and no liquor was found in his possession; the …
The petitioners, three residents of Bhagwanpur Devarsaukhi, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 300 litres of liquor from a mustard field near the Punpun …
The petitioner, Umesh Sahni, filed an anticipatory bail application under the Criminal Procedure Code. While the application was pending, he was arrested by the police. The petitioner then approached the court seeking permission to withdraw his anticipatory bail application. The learned counsel for …
The petitioner, Umesh Mandal, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under IPC sections 272, 273, 279, 427, 379, 34 and Excise Act section 30(a) for allegedly recovering 6.5 litres of liquor from a vehicle. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, did not have …
Manish Bharti sought anticipatory bail after learning that he may be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 70,500 litres of liquor from a scooty. He argued that he was not in possession of the vehicle, was not the owner, and that the case …
The petitioner, Gora Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where 90 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a public area near Sone Diyara. He argued that the liquor was not found in his …
The petitioner, Jaikali Devi, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of large quantities of liquor from premises not belonging to her. She contended that she has a clean antecedent, is a woman, and was falsely implicated by a …
The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 70.5 litres of liquor from a scooty. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the vehicle, and …
The petitioner, Matlub, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 101,400 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He asserted a clean criminal record and claimed he neither owned nor had possession of the …
Sonu Paswan filed an anticipatory bail application in the Patna High Court. While the application was pending, he was arrested by the police. The petitioner then moved the court seeking permission to withdraw his anticipatory bail application. The court, after hearing counsel for both sides, granted …
Petitioner Janjali Rai sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that liquor was recovered from a pickup vehicle not owned by him and that he was implicated solely on secret …
The petitioners, Sitaram Yadav and Mahendra Mukhiya, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 810 litres of liquor from a boat. They argued they were not arrested at the spot, had no possession of the liquor, and …
Santosh Ray sought anticipatory bail after learning that he was implicated in a case involving offences under Sections 272, 273, 420, 467, 468 and 120B of the IPC and Sections 30(a), 36, 32 and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was recovered …
The petitioner, Bankelal Mali, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 414.72 litres of liquor from five bicycles. He claimed he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the bicycles, and was implicated solely on secret information. The …
Vishwaraj Kumar sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for allegedly transporting 7 litres of liquor in a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean criminal record, was not arrested at the spot, …
The petitioners, four members of the Paswan family, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 45 of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 30 litres of liquor from a shop owned by a relative. They …
Bipul Singh, the petitioner, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 414.72 litres of liquor. He claimed he was not in possession of the seized liquor, was not …
Guddu Yadav sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 306 litres of liquor from the Bagmati River. He argued that he was not caught in possession, the alleged liquor was recovered from a public river, …
The petitioner, Shyamdev Yadav, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for allegedly recovering large quantities of liquor and Mahua from a riverbank. He contended that he has a clean antecedent, that the alleged contraband was not in his …
The petitioner, Tunna Yadav, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for allegedly recovering large quantities of liquor and Mahua from a riverbank. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and that the …
The petitioner, Vijay Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code (272, 273, 328, 307, 302 read with 34, 120B) and the Excise Act (30(a), 30(c), 37(b)). The allegations relate to the recovery of illicit liquor, the death …
Ajay Kumar and Mithilesh Chaudhary applied for anticipatory bail after learning that they might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, alleging possession of large quantities of liquor recovered from a house and a hut. The petitioners argued that …
Arvind Kumar Yadav applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with offences under Sections 30(a), 41(1) and 41(2) of the Excise Act, alleging that liquor was recovered from a house and from a truck he owned. The petitioner argued that he had a clean …
The petitioner, Ratnesh Chaudhary, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where liquor was allegedly recovered from premises not belonging to him. He argued that no liquor was found in his possession and …
The petitioner, Baiju Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2012 for allegedly possessing 345.6 litres of liquor in a Bolero pick‑up. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in actual possession at the time of seizure, and …
Petitioner Birju Kumar feared arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging that the alleged seizure of 600 litres of liquor and 6000 litres of fermented Jawa Mahua from the Ganga river was not in his possession and that the informant (a chowkidar) …
The petitioner, Md. Akhtar Raza, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under IPC sections 272 and 273 and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 (sections 30(a), 33, 41, 47). He argued that he was not in possession of the seized spirits, was not arrested at the spot, and that the …
The petitioner, Mithlesh Kumar, was implicated in a case (PS Case No. 271 of 2022) for alleged conspiracy under Section 120B of the IPC and for offences under Sections 30(a) and 32(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, involving the seizure of 1,604.475 litres of liquor from …
The petitioners, Resma, Asmira and Fida Hussain, feared arrest in a case involving offences under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and the Bihar Excise Act. They had earlier filed an anticipatory bail application (Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3442 of 2026) which they later …
Ritesh Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 133,500 litres of liquor from the house of the deceased Harihar Paswan. The petitioner argued that he was not …
The petitioner, Govind Ray, sought anticipatory bail after liquor amounting to 18.360 liters was seized from a motorcycle he owned, though he was not present at the spot and had no conscious possession of the liquor. He argued that he had a clean antecedent and that his friend, who fled, misused the …
The petitioner, Shiv Shankar Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving numerous offences under the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act and the Bihar Excise Act, relating to the alleged recovery of 930 ml of liquor from a road near Jaiprakash’s house. He asserted a clean …
The petitioner, Ranvijay Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, alleging recovery of 2,615 litres of liquor from two vehicles. He contended that he was not arrested on the spot, had no …
The petitioner, Aman Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that the alleged seizure of 612 litres of liquor was from a location not belonging to him and that the investigation relied on secret information. He has four prior …
The petitioner, Sanjay Ram, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where liquor and Mahua were seized. He argued that the seized items were not in his possession, the recovery occurred on property not belonging to him, and that a hostile …
The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of large quantities of liquor from motorcycles, though he claimed he was not in possession and was unaware of the misuse of his vehicle. He sought anticipatory bail, arguing that …
The petitioner, Raj Kishor Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 306 litres of liquor from a public area near the Bagmati river. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the location did not belong to …
The petitioner applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of liquor from locations not owned by him. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his …
The petitioners, five individuals from Sohagi village, feared arrest in a case (PS Gaurichak, Case No. 546 of 2022) involving numerous offences under the Indian Penal Code. They had earlier obtained anticipatory bail (Cr. Misc. No. 34636 of 2023) which the court allowed them to withdraw on the …
Vikash Kumar and Usha Devi sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case registered under Sections 126, 115(2), 132, 121(1), 121(2), 127(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 1.125 litres of …
The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 115.56 litres of liquor from an auto. He contended that he had no possession, was not the owner of the vehicle, and the case was based solely …
The petitioner, Nanhak Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of liquor and Jawa Mahua from a forest area. He contended that he was not arrested on the spot, had no …
The petitioner, Butan Mahto, a 71‑year‑old senior citizen with a clean record, applied for anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged recovery of liquor and cash and the death of a person who consumed poisonous liquor. He was not named in the FIR, and his name surfaced only after two years of …
The petitioners, Ramdeo Mahto and Santosh Mahto, applied for anticipatory bail in a case (PS‑Case No.730 of 2021) involving alleged offences under several IPC sections (272, 273, 328, 307, 302, 34, 120B) and the Excise Act (30(a), 30(c), 37(B)). The allegations relate to the recovery of large …
The petitioner, Indal Kamat, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 252 litres of liquor from a Mahindra Bolero Maxi truck. He asserted that he has a clean criminal record, was not arrested at the scene, did not have the seized vehicle …
The petitioner, Jyoti Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging possession of 56.5 litres of liquor recovered from his joint family house, invoking sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He argued he has a clean antecedent, the …
The petitioner, Pramod Mukhiya, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the application, he was arrested by the police. His counsel subsequently moved the court seeking permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The court considered …
The petitioner, Akash Poddar, sought anticipatory bail after learning of a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 400 litres of liquor from a Tata Sumo Gold vehicle. He argued that he was not arrested at the scene, had no possession of the …
The petitioner, Hemant Kumar Yadav, was implicated in a case involving alleged offences under IPC sections 273, 274 and 34 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 227.530 litres of liquor from a vehicle. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no possession …
The petitioner, Rupam Anand, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 41(1), 31(1) and 32(2) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 3062.52 litres of liquor from two Scorpio vehicles. He contended that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the …
The petitioner, Pankaj Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 1,842 litres of liquor from a truck. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the truck, and was implicated solely on secret information …
Sudish Singh filed an anticipatory bail application in the Patna High Court. While the application was pending, he was arrested. He then sought permission from the court to withdraw his anticipatory bail application. The court, after hearing counsel for both sides, granted permission to withdraw. …
Manish Patel sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 129.24 litres of liquor from an auto and a motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, had no possession of the liquor, was not the owner of the …
The petitioner, Jeetesh Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with alleged offences under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Excise Act involving the recovery of liquor and jaggery solution. The petitioner argued that he was not in …
The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 5,257.065 litres of liquor from three vehicles. He argued that he was not present at the …
The petitioner, Jitendra Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 30 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, …
The petitioners, Chotu Kumar, Sujit Kumar, Surendra Ray and Ramnath Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the B.N.S.S. 2023 alleging assault on an informant and his wife. They contended they have clean antecedents, were falsely implicated, and …
Shiv Shankar Prasad, the petitioner, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 37 of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 720 ml of liquor in a vehicle he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, the liquor was not found in his …
Balindra Yadav and Sunil Yadav sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022, where 396 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from four motorcycles. They argued that they were not arrested on the spot, no liquor was …
Sushant Kumar applied for anticipatory bail in a criminal case registered under Section 85 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He feared arrest and sought relief under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The petitioner’s wife, Nikki Kumari, …
The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 13(1)(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. He argued that his situation was analogous to that of Pankaj Rajak, whose anticipatory bail had been granted in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 70583 of 2025. …
The petitioner, Rahul Kumar Yadav, was implicated in a complaint alleging cheating under Sections 420 and 504 of the IPC and a cheque bounce under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, stemming from a claim that he accepted Rs.2.90 lakh from the complainant for a promised job and issued two …
Awlesh Kumar Parmar petitioned the Patna High Court for anticipatory bail in a criminal case registered under Section 498A of the IPC, alleging false implication by his wife, Priyanka Singh. The parties had earlier attempted mediation, which failed, and a divorce proceeding is pending in the Family …
Ram Swarath Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous petition against the State of Bihar. No counsel appeared on his behalf when the matter was listed on 06-02-2026 and again on 10-04-2026. The State was represented by Mr. Akbar Ali, A.P.P., and counsel for the informant. The court observed that the …
Vikash Kumar was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 712.501 litres of liquor from two vehicles and charged under Sections 318(2), 336(3) and 340(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Sections 30(a), 32, 36 and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise & Prohibition Amendment Act, 2022. The …
The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar (alias Ritesh Yadav), was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 300 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He was not arrested at the scene, no liquor was found in his conscious possession, and he does not own the …
The petitioner, Rajeev Kumar, feared arrest in a case registered under Sections 272 and 273 of the IPC and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 90 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the …
The Patna High Court considered the bail application of Nitin Kumar (alias Nitin Patel), who is charged under Sections 103(1) and 61(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act for a shooting that led to the death of an informant’s husband. The FIR alleges that the …
Gyani Mahto sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise (Amendment) Act for alleged recovery of 62.3 litres of liquor. He argued that the alleged recovery was not from his conscious possession, occurred at a location not belonging to him, and that a …
The petitioner, Uplesh Kumar Rai, applied for anticipatory bail in a criminal complaint originally registered under multiple IPC offences and the Dowry Prohibition Act, though the court had taken cognizance only of IPC section 498A and the two DP Act sections. He claimed the case stemmed from a …
The petitioner, Prabhakar Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case involving offences under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. He argued that the FIR was based on a complaint case that had already been dismissed under Section 203 of the Cr.P.C., …
The petitioner, Bala Nut, was charged under multiple serious IPC sections and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 75 litres of liquor from a bush near a canal. He has seven prior excise cases and has been in custody since 9 January 2026, with charges already framed. The …
The petitioner, Gautam Kumar, was arrested in connection with a violent incident alleged to have occurred on 28 March 2025, for which he was charged under Sections 191(2), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 109 and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. He applied for regular bail, asserting a clean antecedent, …
Anil Yadav was arrested in connection with a violent incident alleged to have occurred on 22 March 2025, wherein he allegedly assaulted an informant with a sword and was implicated in several offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The petitioner, claiming a clean record and asserting that he …
Guddu Kumar and Pappu Ray were charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 105 litres of liquor near Marine Drive, Patna. The petitioners argued they were not arrested at the scene, no liquor was found in their possession, and the case relied solely on a confessional …
Sudama Yadav was arrested in connection with illegal sand mining and charged under Sections 305(e) and 317(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated, noting that the informant who named him was not mentioned in the FIR and that he has two prior cases. He had …
The appellants appealed under Section 14‑A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against a Special Judge's refusal to grant anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged caste‑based abuse and offences under the IPC. They argued they had clean antecedents, were falsely implicated by the …
The petitioner, Ajim Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 968.76 litres of liquor from two cars and a motorcycle. He contended that he was not arrested on the spot, had …
The petitioner, Sampat Sahni, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that no liquor was recovered from his conscious possession and that the house involved …
The petitioner, Chulbul Pandey, filed an anticipatory bail application alleging that the charges of firing were general and no one was injured. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and instead surrender to obtain regular bail. …
The petitioner, Sachin Kumar, was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 85 litres of liquor and 1000 litres of fermented Jawa Mahua solution and charged under Section 30 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He contended that he has a clean antecedent, was not …
The petitioner, Shakti Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving multiple offences under the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, relating to the alleged recovery of 870 ml of liquor from another person's house. He …
Prince Kumar was arrested while his anticipatory bail application was pending. He approached the High Court seeking permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the arrest rendered the bail application moot and requested its withdrawal. The Court, …
The petitioner, Raman Mahto, was charged under IPC sections 272, 273, 414 and 34, and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, for allegedly recovering 629.64 litres of liquor from five motorcycles. He has seven prior cases, six under the Excise Act, but was not …
The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, had a regular bail application pending before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of that application, he was granted relief under Section 187(3) of the BNSS. He then moved the court seeking permission to withdraw his regular bail application. The court, after …
The petitioner, Virendra Yadav, was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 12.6 litres of liquor from an open space and charged under Section 30 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. He contended that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the place of …
Suraj Kumar was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 250 litres of liquor from a motorcycle and charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He contended that he had no prior criminal record, was not arrested at the spot, did not have …
The petitioner, Chunnu Singh, had been granted anticipatory bail by the High Court with a condition to surrender to the police within a stipulated time. He failed to surrender before the deadline and subsequently filed a modification application seeking an extension of the surrender period. The …
Manoranjan Kumar Singh sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving offences under the IPC (sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120(B), 34) and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act (sections 30(a), 32, 41). He argued that he was not caught in possession of liquor, was not the owner of the …
The petitioner, Chhotu Kumar, had been granted anticipatory bail on 3 February 2026 with a requirement to surrender within six weeks and to deposit Rs.5,000 with the Advocates’ Association. He attempted to surrender on 24 February 2026, but the court refused because the deposit had not been made, …
The petitioner, Babulal Mahto, filed a restoration application seeking to have Criminal Miscellaneous No. 7629 of 2026 reinstated to its original file. The State of Bihar opposed the application. Both parties were represented by counsel, with Mr. Ashok Kumar appearing for the petitioner and Mr. …
The petitioners, Sandeep Kumar and Karan Kumar, had been granted anticipatory bail on 27-02-2026 with the condition that their father, Virendra Vishwas, would act as one of the bailors. Subsequently, the father became implicated in the case, rendering him ineligible to serve as bailor. The …
The petitioner, Ramnath Ray, filed a restoration application seeking to have Criminal Miscellaneous No.16295 of 2026 reinstated to its original file. The State of Bihar opposed the application. The High Court, after hearing counsel for both sides, considered the grounds presented in the restoration …
Petitioner Shiv Kumar Ray filed a restoration application for Criminal Miscellaneous No.16391/2026, seeking to have the case reinstated in its original file. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Shivjee Singh, argued that the grounds for restoration were valid, while the State, represented by Mr. Raj …
The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 760 litres of spirit from a Bolero, charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He had been in custody since 23 January 2026 and claimed he was not arrested at the spot, …
The petitioner, Ranjit Mehta, was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 378 litres of liquor from three motorcycles, an offence punishable under Section 30 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He has five prior criminal cases and has been in custody since 16 …
The petitioner, Niranjan Rai, filed a restoration application seeking to have Criminal Miscellaneous No. 15959 of 2026 reinstated in the court’s original file. The State of Bihar opposed the application. The sole issue before the High Court was whether the grounds raised by the petitioner justified …
The petitioner, Chhabila Nut, had been granted anticipatory bail by the High Court with a condition to surrender to the police within a specified time. The petitioner failed to surrender within that period and subsequently filed a modification application seeking an extension of the surrender …
The petitioner, Raghav Rai, filed a restoration application seeking to have Criminal Miscellaneous case No.73493 of 2025 reinstated to its original file. The State of Bihar opposed the application. The learned counsel for the petitioner and the Additional Public Prosecutor for the State were heard …
Anil Kumar, the petitioner, filed a restoration application seeking to have Criminal Miscellaneous No.87693 of 2025 reinstated to its original file. The application was heard before Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma of the Patna High Court on 10‑04‑2026. The petitioner was represented by Mr. …
Lakshmi Mahto filed a criminal miscellaneous petition before the Patna High Court seeking modification of an order. The State of Bihar opposed the petition. During the hearing on 10-04-2026, counsel for the petitioner requested permission to withdraw the pending modification application. The Court, …
The petitioner, Sandip Kumar Sinha, had been granted anticipatory bail by the High Court with a condition to surrender to the police within a time specified in the order. He failed to surrender within that period and subsequently filed a modification application seeking an extension of the surrender …
Petitioner Subhash Singh applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case registered under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) of the B.N.S., alleging that he was falsely implicated by an informant. The informant claimed that Singh, as Panchayat Secretary, appointed Dilip Kumar as a teacher …
The appellants, a group of Chaudhary family members, were charged under several IPC sections and the SC/ST Act for alleged caste‑based assault, lathi beating, and theft of a gold locket. They contended that the FIR was vague, the allegations were omnibus, and they were falsely implicated, noting the …
The petitioner, Jivendra Kumar, applied for bail anticipating arrest in a case involving offences under Sections 498A, 341, 323, 379, 34 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Both parties asserted that the matrimonial dispute had been settled amicably, with a one‑time payment …
Manjit Kumar Thakur applied for anticipatory bail in a criminal case registered under Sections 137(2) and 96 of the B.N.S., alleging that the alleged victim’s statements were contradictory and made under parental pressure, and that a cover notice had been validly served on the second opposite party. …
Prem Shankar Jha applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 103, 61, 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly shooting the son of an informant at DMCH gate on 5 August 2025. The informant alleged that the shooting stemmed from a family dispute …
The petitioner, Amarjeet Kumar Paswan, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 105/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for allegedly giving an injection that led to his daughter's death. He argued that the FIR was based on a false informant report, …
Abbas Ansari petitioned the Patna High Court for bail in a case registered under Sections 8(c) and 21(a) of the NDPS Act, 1985. The court noted that the prosecution evidence had been completed on 23 March 2026 and the matter was scheduled for further statements. Considering that the trial evidence …
The petitioner, Rishikant Kumar, filed an anticipatory bail application in the High Court of Patna. After hearing, the petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw that anticipatory bail and instead surrender to seek regular bail. The Court granted permission to withdraw the anticipatory …
Mukesh Paswan was arrested in July 2025 for alleged involvement in a 2018 FIR that charged him with offences under the IPC, Arms Act, Explosive Substances Act and the UAPA, including alleged Maoist activities. He applied for bail, arguing that co‑accused had been released on regular bail and that he …
The petitioner, Rishabh Kumar, was arrested in connection with a murder case (PS Case No. 249 of 2023) involving offences under Sections 302, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The deceased, Rohani Nandan, was found buried on a farm and his mother identified him; she later alleged that the …
The petitioner, Binay Kumar Sahni, was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged firing of a pistol that caused injuries, charged under several sections of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated, asserting that he did not fire the …
The petitioners Kundan Kumar, Chandan Kumar and Bipin Kumar were charged under several sections of the Bihar Non‑Statutory (BNS) Act for allegedly attacking a police team that was raiding a river bed to curb illegal sand mining. The informant claimed the accused injured police personnel, and they …
Shankar Das, a resident of Khagaria, was arrested after a police raid on his house where 25.605 kg of ganja was seized. The informant, father of Abhishek, alleged that Abhishek was dealing narcotics and that the petitioner fled when police arrived. The petitioner claimed he had no knowledge of his …
The appellants, Tukan Mandal and Kundan Mandal, filed a criminal appeal (SJ) No.256 of 2026 before the Patna High Court challenging orders passed in a POCSO case (PS Case No.510 of 2025). The State, through the Special Public Prosecutor, contended that the appeal was not maintainable because the …
Kaisar Alam applied for anticipatory bail in a case filed under Sections 498A, 420, 120B, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, alleging false implication by his wife Rukhsana Khatun. The wife had obtained a maintenance order of Rs.5,000 per month, leading to arrears of …
Vishal Singh applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS Case No. 358/2024) involving offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the POCSO Act. He alleged that the informant’s allegations were false and that the investigating police, after a cursory inquiry, …
The petitioner, Poonam Devi, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case registered under Sections 103(1), 238 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. concerning the murder of her husband. She alleged that the informant falsely implicated her, stating that the actual assailant was her brother-in‑law …
