Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Satendra Yadav @ Sato Yadav @ SatoversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn upon the court’s permission.

Summary

Satendra Yadav applied for anticipatory bail but was arrested while the application was pending. His counsel sought the court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The court examined the request and granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn. The petitioner’s request for bail was therefore not entertained.

Issues considered

  • Whether an anticipatory bail application can be withdrawn after the petitioner has been arrested?

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal of bail application
  • arrest
  • criminal procedure code

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7941 of 2026
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-459 Year-2025 Thana- GRIYAK District- Nalanda
                  ======================================================
                  Satendra Yadav @ Sato Yadav @ Sato S/o Rupa Yadav R/o Village- Giryak
                  Nichali Bazar, P.S.- Giryak, District- Nalanda

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :       Ms.Kumari Sujata Sinha
                  For the Opposite Party/s :       Ms.Sangeeta Sharma
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    15-04-2026               1.    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                    learned APP for the State.

                              2.    Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission

                    to withdraw the anticipatory bail application, as petitioner was

                    arrested during pendency of the instant anticipatory bail

                    application.

                              3.    Permission is accorded.

                              4.    Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is

                    dismissed as withdrawn.



                                               (Satyavrat Verma, J)
Sumit/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.