Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
5764 judgments · newest first · showing 1401–1600
Ravindra Rai filed an anticipatory bail petition under the criminal procedure code, seeking protection from arrest. The State of Bihar opposed the application. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The court granted the …
The petitioners, Gautam Kumar and Dinesh Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple offences of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. They contended that they have clean antecedents and were falsely implicated by an informant, arguing that the FIR does not specifically …
The petitioners, three brothers from Rohtas district, were implicated in a criminal case (Natwar PS Case No. 73 of 2025) alleging offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, stemming from a land‑dispute‑related altercation on 9‑April‑2025. They contended that the allegations were …
The petitioners, Deepak Kumar and Aman Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail in a case alleging offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 302 and 504, stemming from an alleged assault and death of the informant's father at a temple. They contended that they were falsely implicated, highlighting the …
Nitish Kumar, the petitioner, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a criminal case under Section 498A of the IPC, alleging that his wife (OP No.2) had falsely implicated him. He claimed marital breakdown, loss of employment, and expressed willingness to pay a monthly maintenance of Rs.5,000 to …
The petitioner, Suraj Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under several sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.). He alleged that he was falsely implicated through a re‑statement made by the informant sixteen days after the incident, whereas the FIR …
The petitioner, Praveen Kumar Jha, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered in 2011 under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468 and 120(B) of the IPC. He argued that his name was only added to the FIR in 2024, he was unaware of any involvement, and he is the regional manager of the alleged …
The petitioners, relatives of a man named Dipendra, were implicated in a murder case after Dipendra’s confession that he had strangulated his wife on their advice. The FIR was filed under Sections 103(1), 238, 61(2) read with Section 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. The petitioners, …
The petitioner, Harendra Sah, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a FIR alleging offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 504, 379, 307 and 34 arising from a violent incident on 4 June 2020 involving multiple accused. The FIR described specific assaults on the informant and his family …
Salman Hussain, a 22‑year‑old resident of Sonbarsa, was named in an FIR (Panapur PS Case No. 365 of 2025) for an alleged robbery attempt and charged under Section 309(4) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023. The petitioner argued that the only material linking him to the crime was the …
The petitioner, Shyam Sundar Rajwanshi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 120(B) and 34 of the IPC. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent, was merely present at the scene as a witness, and was falsely implicated. The State opposed …
The petitioner, Mahakant Thakur, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, alleging that he was falsely implicated. The prosecution’s case relied on a confessional statement of an accused, Jai Kumar, who claimed the pistol recovered from the …
The petitioner, Sampat Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail in a case alleging violation of Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly possessing 32.25 litres of liquor recovered from his joint family house. The petitioner argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and …
The petitioner, Deepa Kumari, wife of Gaurav Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged alleging her involvement in a large-scale misappropriation of funds related to a drug agency, with offences under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 336(4), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., …
The petitioners, Yogendra Bhagat and Sadanand Rao, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 466.02 litres of liquor from a pickup van. They contended that they were not in conscious possession, were not owners of the vehicle, and were …
The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with an alleged offence under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act involving the recovery of 6.375 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not in conscious …
The petitioners, Bigan Manjhi and Basant Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 21 litres of liquor from a spot adjacent to their house. They contended that they have a clean criminal record, that …
The petitioner, Sudhir Kumar Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with alleged offences under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Excise Act, involving the recovery of 1,803 litres of liquor and a vehicle. He argued that he was not in actual …
The petitioner, Shyam Sundar Verma, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for the alleged recovery of 159.84 litres of liquor from a Tata Magic vehicle he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not in possession of the liquor …
The petitioners, six individuals from Durgaur village, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 concerning the alleged recovery of 158.35 litres of liquor from four motorcycles. They argued that they were not …
The appellants, Bimla Devi, Bhim Kumar and Chhotu Kumar, appealed under Section 14‑A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against the Special Judge's refusal to grant anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged assault and caste‑based abuse. The FIR …
The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 450 litres of liquor from three motorcycles. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, …
The petitioner applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 54 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. The petitioner argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in …
Jitendra Kumar Sinha applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act alleging recovery of 10,500 litres of liquor from a vacant land belonging to Sohan Sah. The petitioner contended that he was not …
Guddu Kumar was implicated in an excise case for the alleged recovery of 54 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that a friend misused his vehicle. The State opposed his request for anticipatory …
The petitioner, Saurav Paswan, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 21 litres of liquor recovered from his house, which is a joint family property. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the scene, and …
Ram Babu Ray sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under IPC sections 272 and 273 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 180 ml of liquor recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not …
The petitioner, Ravi Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 7.05 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor being in his vehicle and that his friend, who was apprehended at …
The petitioner, Sandeep Bind, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 120 litres of liquor from a sack. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and the alleged recovery occurred on …
The petitioner, Rani Sonkar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018/2022, alleging recovery of 13.905 litres of liquor from a public market. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the recovery site …
Saheb Ray, the owner of a vehicle from which 72.75 litres of liquor was seized, faced an accusation under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He argued that he had a clean criminal record, was not in conscious possession of the liquor, and that the alleged misuse …
The petitioners, Nirmala Devi, Puspa Sahani and Subodh Sahani, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 190, 132, 121(1), 263 of the B.N.S and Sections 30(a) and 45 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 50 litres of liquor from a house …
The petitioner, Ramkripal Kumar, was implicated in a case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 240 litres of liquor from two motorcycles, one of which he owned. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, was unaware that the vehicle …
The petitioner, Sonu Mallik, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 25.540 litres of liquor from his joint family house. The petitioner argued that the liquor was not found …
The petitioner, Anil Sah, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 19.260 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not the owner of the vehicle, no liquor was found in his possession, and the case was based solely on a confessional …
Petitioner Priya Kumar Singh sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, based on the recovery of 620.250 litres of liquor from a hut belonging to a third‑person, Deepak, and on Deepak’s confessional …
The petitioner, Suraj Ram, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 5 litres of liquor from a hut not owned by him. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, the liquor was not found in his possession, and the informant’s …
The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar, was implicated in a case alleging recovery of 105 litres of liquor concealed under a tyre, an offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He claimed to have a clean criminal record and argued that the liquor was …
The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 32.4 litres of liquor from a bamboo orchard behind his house. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession and the location did not …
Amar Kumar was implicated in a case (PS Case No. 625 of 2022) for allegedly possessing 50 litres of liquor recovered from his scooty, though he was not arrested at the spot and claims the vehicle was misused by a friend. He asserted a clean criminal record and argued that ownership of the vehicle …
Ganesh Kumar Sah applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with offences under Sections 30(a), 32(3) and 41(1)(2) of the Excise Act, alleging that the liquor seizure was made from a vehicle he did not own and that he was implicated through secret …
The petitioner, Sanjay Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 40 litres of liquor were recovered from a location adjacent to his house and not from his possession. He argued that he has …
Amar Rajput applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he may be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, involving the alleged recovery of 76.3 litres of liquor from a rented room. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious …
Manish Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act alleging recovery of 80 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. The petitioner argued he was not in possession of the seized vehicle and was implicated based on …
Shankar Kumar Ray was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 27 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in actual possession of the liquor, and was unaware that a third party, …
The petitioner, Anshu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 30(c) and 44 of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of liquor and jaggery solution. He contended that nothing was seized from his possession, the alleged recovery site was public, and the sole …
The petitioner, Arunjay Singh, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 132.50 litres of liquor from his Omni car. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was …
Vivek Kumar, the owner of an e‑rickshaw from which 81 litres of liquor was seized, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482(2) of the BNSS, alleging that he was not present at the spot of seizure and had no conscious possession of the liquor. The petitioner argued that he has a clean …
The petitioner, Akhilesh Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a)(d) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that the alleged seizure of 110 litres of liquor and 2000 litres of soaked Mahua occurred at a furnace not belonging to him and that he was implicated by a …
Rina Devi applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged possession of 1.5 litres of liquor in a sack and 32 litres in her house. She argued that she has a clean antecedent, is a woman, and that …
Arvind Kumar sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case alleging recovery of 2,466.72 litres of liquor from a truck, offences punishable under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 (Amendment Act, 2018‑22). He contended that he was …
The petitioner, a 78‑year‑old retired teacher, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 28.95 litres of liquor from a tenant’s room. The petitioner argued that he …
The petitioner, Dilkhush Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 37 of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly concealing 350.250 litres of liquor behind the house of Ram Balak Yadav. The petitioner argued that no liquor was recovered from his possession, he was …
The petitioner, Sachit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, relating to alleged recovery of liquor from a motorcycle and a house. He argued that he was not in possession of the seized …
The petitioner, Sachit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 79.560 litres of liquor from a mango orchard not belonging to him. He contended that the chaukidar, with whom he had a …
Petitioners Suraj Kumar and Chandeshwar Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging recovery of 15 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. They argued that no liquor was found in their possession, that the second …
Balmiki Sahani sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, alleging recovery of 35 litres of liquor from a mango orchard owned by Harilal Prasad. The petitioner asserted that he has a clean antecedent, …
The petitioners, a group of individuals from Gaya district, filed an anticipatory bail application under the Criminal Procedure Code before the Patna High Court. They later approached the Court seeking permission to withdraw the application. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted a …
The petitioner, Srawan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 23 litres of liquor from a riverbank. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the location was public, and the complaint was filed by …
The petitioner, Bala Lakhindra Paswan, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 40 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he was not present at the spot, had no conscious possession of the …
The petitioner, Sarwan Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 24 litres of liquor from a public canal area. He argued that no liquor was found in his possession, the alleged recovery site did not belong to him, …
Munna Singh applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 11 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. The petitioner claimed a clean antecedent, that he was not in possession of the …
Amit Singh applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he may be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 22.460 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested on the …
Rohit Kumar and Sahil Kumar sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act alleging they possessed 13.82 litres of liquor recovered from a poultry farm and their house, which is a joint family property. The petitioners argued …
The petitioners, Akhilesh Yadav and Anup Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a), 30(c) and 30(d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 30 litres of liquor near a canal. They contended they have clean …
Kapil Choudhary sought anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 alleging his involvement in the recovery of 300 litres of liquor from a bush near the Sakari River. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no possession of …
Gopal Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with offences under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Excise Act, alleging that he was not arrested on the spot, had no possession of the seized liquor, and that his name was omitted from the FIR. …
The petitioner, Md. Sajjad, was implicated in an excise case (Case No. 912 of 2024) for the alleged recovery of 1,300 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean criminal record, was not present at the spot of seizure, and had no knowledge of the vehicle's misuse by …
Mithu Sahni applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 501 litres of liquor from a straw house belonging to Krishna Mohan. The petitioner argued that he was not in …
The petitioner, Kundan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving multiple offences under the Bihar Non-Compulsory Statutes and the Bihar Excise Act, arising from a vehicle stop where a scuffle with police occurred and breathalyzer tests were conducted. The petitioner claimed …
Bhola Prasad, the owner of a Brezza car, was implicated in a case where 224.28 litres of liquor were recovered from the vehicle. He was not arrested at the spot and had no conscious possession of the liquor; the driver allegedly misused the car and fled. The petitioner sought anticipatory bail, …
Banty Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. in a case alleging violation of Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 50 litres of liquor. The petitioner asserted a clean criminal record, no possession of the liquor, and that the FIR was based on …
The petitioner, Sushil Rawat, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 14.70 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in …
Bhola Rajvanshi applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Excise Act, alleging that 24 litres of liquor were recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in …
The petitioner, Chandan Pasvan, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with alleged offences under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Excise Act for the recovery of 30 litres of liquor. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, the alleged liquor …
Guddu Chaudhary applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he may be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 50 litres of liquor from a paddy field that does not belong to him. He argued that the complaint was …
The appellant, Nirbhay Tiwari, appealed under Section 14‑A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against the trial court's refusal to grant anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged assault and caste‑based harassment. The FIR alleged that the appellant and another person assaulted the …
The appellants were charged under several sections of the Bihar Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 for allegedly assaulting an informant on 5 August 2024. They contended that the FIR was false, that there was no specific allegation of abuse …
The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail in a complaint case (No.1110 of 2023) alleging offences under IPC sections 498A, 323, 406, 504, 506 and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 4. He claimed he was falsely implicated by his wife, Aarti Kumari, and that the marital relationship …
The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a criminal case registered under Sections 498A and 406 of the IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, alleging false implication by his wife, Switi Kumari. He claimed he was a labourer working in Bengaluru and offered to pay a monthly …
The appellants, Krish Singh and others, were charged under several IPC sections and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting the informant's son at a bus stand. They applied for anticipatory bail, which was denied by the 1st Additional …
The appellants, Krishn Kumar, Sarswati Devi and Ranjit Kumar, were implicated in a case under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for the death of a pregnant woman, Manisha Kumari, and her still‑born child, alleged to have occurred at an illegal nursing home …
The appellants, a group of individuals including two women, were charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and several sections of the Indian Penal Code for alleged assault on the informant's family. They applied for anticipatory bail, which was …
The appellant, Vishal Kumar, appealed to the Patna High Court under Section 14‑A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against the refusal of anticipatory bail by the Additional District and Sessions Judge. The informant alleged that on 1 July 2023 the …
The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 37 litres of liquor from a vehicle. He argued that he was not arrested at the scene, …
The appellants, Bindeshwari Yadav and Deepak Yadav, filed a criminal appeal (SJ) No.620 of 2026 arising from a SC/ST complaint case. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellants surrendered before the trial court. They subsequently sought the court's permission to withdraw their memorandum of …
The appellants, Amit Kumar and Ajit Kumar, were charged in a criminal case (PS Case No.207/2025) and filed an appeal (Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.395 of 2026). During the pendency of the appeal, the appellants surrendered and sought the court’s permission to withdraw the appeal. The learned counsel for …
Ashwani Kumar filed an anticipatory bail petition before the Patna High Court in a criminal miscellaneous case. After the first application, a second anticipatory bail application was filed. The petitioner later sought the court's permission to withdraw this second application. The learned counsel …
The petitioner, Tarkeshwar Prasad, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Sections 316(5), 318(4) and 61(2) of the Bihar Food and Civil Supplies Act, 2023, alleging misappropriation of Rs.1,74,19,438.31. The FIR arose because the petitioner, as proprietor of Ominor Agro Industries …
The petitioner, Md. Perwez, was implicated in a 2019 recruitment fraud case involving alleged cheating in a police and fire service driver exam, with charges under IPC sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471. He claimed a clean record, ignorance of the case until 2025, and argued that arrest would …
The petitioners, Anjali Kumari and her husband Jitendra Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 85, 123, 80, 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bihar Negotiable (B.N.S.) relating to alleged dowry harassment and the death of a woman. They contended that they have clean …
The petitioners, three brothers, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a FIR alleging they assaulted the brother of an informant with knives, leading to his death. They claimed the informant was not an eye-witness and that the case was false, citing a prior case filed by the same …
Manish Mishra applied for anticipatory bail in a case alleging offences under Sections 109 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act, where an informant claimed he was shot by unknown youths and that Mishra had orchestrated the attack. Mishra’s counsel argued that the FIR is based solely …
The petitioner, Pankaj Kumar Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case alleging offences under several sections of the BNS. He claimed a clean antecedent and argued that the informant’s allegations of a knife attack were contradicted by the medical report, which described the …
Shankar Chaudhary applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1) and 352 of the BNS, 2023. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent and that the alleged assault on the informant’s son with a knife caused only simple injuries to both …
The petitioner, Akash Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in connection with a robbery‑and‑shooting incident at his jewellery shop on 21‑10‑2025. The FIR, registered as PS Case No. 833 of 2025, charges offences under Sections 309(5) and 109 of the Bharatiya Nyaya …
Amarnath Kumar filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal miscellaneous case. While the application was pending, he received a notice under Section 35(3) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances (BNSS) Act, removing any fear of imminent arrest. He therefore moved the court to withdraw the …
The petitioner, Shashikant Singh, a former Chairman of Darveshpura PACS, was implicated in an FIR concerning alleged misappropriation of rice from a Bihar State Food Corporation godown, invoking Sections 409 and 34 of the IPC. Although his name was not originally mentioned in the FIR, the …
The petitioners, seven residents of Chatra village, applied for anticipatory bail after an incident on 10 June 2025 near Fauji Line Hotel where a mob clash and police action occurred. They were alleged to have participated in obstructing police under Sections 191(2), 223 and 132 of the B.N.S., but …
The petitioner, Sunil Kumar Mishra, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 109 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleging that he was falsely implicated in an assault on an informant. The informant claimed two unknown youths fired at him, and the FIR …
The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 351.78 litres of liquor from his Nissan vehicle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in conscious possession of …
The petitioners, five residents of Radhiya Rai Tola, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged alleging their involvement in a violent altercation over the demolition of a boundary wall on 18 July 2025. The informant claimed that the accused, including the petitioners, assaulted several …
Girja Devi and Ram Bharat Ray applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged possession of large quantities of liquor and a seized vehicle. The petitioners argued that they had no conscious …
The petitioner, Buddhi Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where 2 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from his joint family house. He contended that the liquor was not in his conscious …
Akhilesh Kumar Yadav applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 16.5 litres of liquor from a joint family house. The petitioner argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the scene, and that no liquor was found in …
The petitioner, Abhishek Kumar, sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 2,340 litres of liquor from a pick‑up. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, …
The petitioner, Pramod Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 47(A) and 47(F) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 140 litres of liquor and 460 kg of fermented jawa mahua. He contended that the alleged contraband was seized from a public …
The petitioner, Vikash Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 126 litres of liquor from two motorcycles, one of which he owned. He argued that he was not present at the spot, had no conscious possession …
Ramrati Devi, a woman with a clean antecedent, feared arrest in a case alleging that 14.5 litres of liquor were recovered from her joint family house under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. She argued that the liquor was not in her conscious possession, the house being joint family property, …
The petitioner, Bipin Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 21,400 litres of liquor from a washroom in a joint family house. He argued that no liquor was found in his conscious possession, the …
Rakesh Kumar Mahaseth sought relief fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 45 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He contended that he has a clean antecedent, was …
The petitioner, Aman Kumar Singh, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case alleging violation of Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 43,500 litres of liquor from his Maruti Suzuki vehicle. He argued that …
The petitioner, Usha Devi, was implicated in a case alleging recovery of eight litres of liquor from her residence, alleged to be a violation of Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. She contended that she had no conscious possession of the liquor, that …
The petitioner, Rahul Singh, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Sections 30(a), 30(c), 36 and 56(c) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of liquor and raw materials from a bamboo orchard. The petitioner asserted …
The petitioner, Raju Ram, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in an excise case for alleged recovery of 9 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he was not present at the spot of seizure, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and was unaware that his friend …
Petitioner Rajan Kumar was implicated in a case alleging recovery of 159 litres of liquor from a motorcycle, charged under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018. He applied for anticipatory bail, contending that he was not arrested at the spot, did not own the …
The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning of a pending case (PS Case No. 477/2024) alleging his involvement in the recovery of 90 litres of liquor from a public area near a cremation ground, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He argued that he …
Petitioners Veer Singh and Chandan Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 174.24 litres of liquor from two vehicles. They argued they have clean antecedents, were not in possession of the liquor, …
Anish Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly transporting 119.160 litres of liquor in his Innova car. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and had no …
The petitioner, Sanjay Rishidev, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where 8 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from his joint family house. He argued that no liquor was found in his immediate …
Sudhir Kumar Yadav was implicated in a case involving the seizure of 144 litres of liquor from a motorcycle, alleged under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. The petitioner argued that he was not present at the spot, had no conscious …
Mantu Kumar Rai applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 800 litres of spirit from a pick‑up vehicle. The petitioner argued that he was not in actual possession of the vehicle, that the seizure was based …
Satya Narayan Mukhiya sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 518.4 litres of liquor from his house, which is a joint family property. He argued that he was not arrested, no liquor was found in his …
The petitioner, Bijendar Prasad, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022 for the alleged recovery of 100 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, that the liquor was not found in his conscious possession, and …
The petitioner, Dhiraj Sahani, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging that the prosecution’s case rests on a confessional statement of a co‑accused and that no liquor was recovered from his possession. He has …
Babita Devi applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act alleging recovery of 35 litres of liquor from her residence. She argued that she has a clean antecedent, is a woman, and that the liquor was …
Shipahi Kumar petitioned the Patna High Court for anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for alleged recovery of 270 litres of liquor from a vehicle that he does not own. He argued that the only …
The petitioner, Amit Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 200 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent, was not in …
The petitioner, Soni Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 40 litres of liquor from a public area near the Dhoba river. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, and …
The petitioner, Bikram Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 29.875 litres of liquor recovered from his joint family house. He argued he had no conscious possession, the liquor was in a joint family …
The petitioner, Prem Kumar Manjhi, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 10 litres of liquor from a premises adjacent to his house. He contended that the FIR …
Vivek Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, where he was alleged to have recovered 8.640 litres of liquor from a bag thrown by an accused who fled on a motorcycle. The petitioner argued …
The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering liquor from a bamboo orchard, though the liquor was not found in his possession and the site does not belong to him. He asserted a clean criminal record and argued that the …
The petitioner, Kallu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2016, where 115 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from sacks near Diyara, not from his possession. He argued that the case was based solely …
The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, was implicated in an excise case for the alleged recovery of 34.5 litres of liquor from a vehicle he owned. He claimed he had no knowledge of the liquor being in the vehicle, had a clean criminal record, and that the actual offender, Lakshman, was apprehended at the …
The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act involving the alleged recovery of 1,170 litres of liquor from his pick‑up vehicle. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, …
The petitioner, Sarju Sharma, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 17 litres of liquor from a location not belonging to him. He argued that no liquor was found in his possession, the recovery was …
Ramakant Sharma was implicated in an excise case for the alleged recovery of 36 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned, though the liquor was not found in his conscious possession and he was not arrested at the spot. He pleaded that he had a clean antecedent and was unaware that a friend …
The petitioner, Balraj Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 324 litres of liquor from a bush. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, the liquor was not in his possession, and the complaint …
The petitioner, Sunny Kumar, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022 for the alleged recovery of 59.5 litres of liquor and seizure of a motorcycle from a cowshed on his premises. He contended that the liquor was planted, that the cowshed was …
The petitioner, Botu Paswan, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that liquor was recovered from his joint family house without his …
The petitioner, Pramod Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 300 litres of liquor from six motorcycles, one of which he owned. He argued that he had no knowledge of his friend Ravi's misuse of the vehicle and that no …
The petitioner, Abhimanyu Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 15.840 litres of liquor recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and was …
The petitioner, Saiyad Kamruddin, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 75.24 litres of liquor from his Bolero vehicle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent and that the liquor was not found in his conscious possession, asserting that …
The petitioners, Durgavati Devi and Ankit Kumar Yadav, were charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 28.8 litres of liquor recovered from a scooty. They argued they have clean antecedents, were not apprehended at the scene, and that ownership of the vehicle does …
The petitioner, Anil Pandit, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 20 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, had …
Krishna Kumar was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 10.8 litres of liquor recovered from a joint family house, part of a total seizure of 83.91 litres. He contended that he had no conscious possession, the property was jointly …
The petitioner, Indal Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he was not caught in possession of the alleged liquor, was not the owner of the …
Petitioners Pramod Kumar and Amresh Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a), 30(c) and 30(d) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 60 litres of liquor and 1500 kg of jawa mahua. They contended that they were not arrested on the spot, no …
Amit Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 300 litres of liquor from a public bush. He argued that nothing was seized from his possession, the site was public, and the complaint was filed by a hostile chowkidar who had not …
Shyam Kumar, a resident of Ward No. 16, Saur Bazar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 135 litres of liquor and 300 litres of java‑mahua, which were reportedly …
The petitioner, Krishna Paswan, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered as Pakridayal P.S. Case No. 153 of 2025 under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging recovery of 123.75 litres of liquor from a vehicle. He argued that he was not caught in possession, the vehicle …
Ram Kumar Mahto sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018 for allegedly recovering 80 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He asserted a clean criminal record, lack of ownership of the vehicle, and claimed that a …
The petitioner, Niraj Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 3.42 litres of liquor recovered from a straw room near his poultry farm. He argued he has a clean antecedent, the liquor was not in his …
The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly recovering 5.5 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his shop. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the alleged recovery site did not belong to him, …
The petitioner, Ranjeet Kumar, owner of Sahu Chicken Center, was implicated in a case alleging recovery of 59.059 litres of liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He claimed a clean antecedent and argued that the liquor was concealed by an employee …
The petitioner, Krishna Chaudhary, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for alleged recovery of liquor and Mahua, though no material was seized from his possession and the alleged site was public. He argued that the police relied on a chowkidar’s …
The petitioner, Chandan Kumar Choudhary, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, alleging recovery of liquor from a third‑party's house and from a motorcycle he owned. He contended that he had no possession of …
The petitioner, Banti Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in offences under Sections 30(a), 41 and 56 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, involving alleged recovery of large quantities of liquor from a government building and a vehicle. He argued that he was …
Manoj Kumar, the owner of a Tata Mini truck, was implicated in the seizure of 826.3 litres of liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure, and that his …
Kishore Pandey was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for the alleged recovery of 40 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that he had a clean antecedent, that the liquor was not in his …
The petitioner, Sanjog Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, alleging recovery of 718.320 litres of liquor from a straw house he claims does not belong to him. He argued that no arrest was made at the spot, no liquor …
The petitioner, Ankit Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 52.5 litres of liquor from a public area. He was not arrested at the scene and no liquor was found in his possession. The petitioner claimed that a chowkidar, with whom he had a …
Petitioner Kajal Kumari was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 15 litres of liquor from two motorcycles she owned. She argued that she had no conscious possession of the liquor, had a clean antecedent, and was unaware that a friend misused …
The petitioners, Nirsi Devi and Suraj Sahni, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering five litres of liquor from a public place near the Collectorate in Patna. They argued that they have clean antecedents, were …
The petitioner, Dinesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 132.17 litres of liquor. He argued that the liquor was recovered from a joint‑family house, not from his conscious possession, and that …
The petitioner, Niraj Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 218.8 liters of codeine from a Baleno car he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, the drug was not found in his …
Devkant Ray was implicated in an excise case for the alleged recovery of 275.26 litres of liquor from a godown and two vehicles, although no liquor was found in his immediate possession and he was not arrested at the spot. He contended that he was unaware of the misuse of his vehicle by a co‑accused …
The appellants, Pramod Kumar Shrivastava and his son Prakash Kumar Shrivastava, were charged under several IPC sections and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for alleged fraud involving a Rs.1,00,000 payment to send the informant's brother to Malaysia, which …
The appellants, three residents of Dharipur, were charged under Sections 341, 323, 504, 506 and 34 of the IPC and Section 3(1)(2)(va) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting and abusing an informant on caste grounds. They filed an appeal …
The appellants, six members of the Yadav family, were charged under several sections of the Bihar Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting an informant and his labourer and for extorting money. They contended that the FIR was …
The appellant, Chandan Yadav, was charged under several provisions of the Bihar Negotiable Substances (BNS) Act, 2023 and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, including sections relating to assault and caste-based abuse. He applied for anticipatory bail, …
The appellants appealed under Section 14‑A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against a trial court order refusing anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged extortion, assault, and caste‑based abuse. The appeal was withdrawn for appellants Dhiraj Pandit and Chandan Kumar, and those …
The appellants, five members of the Rai family, were charged under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act and the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for alleged theft and assault on a land dispute. Their anticipatory bail application was rejected by …
The petitioner, Dhananjay Kumar, had earlier filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal case. He later decided to surrender to the authorities and seek regular bail, requesting permission to withdraw his anticipatory bail application. The High Court considered whether such a withdrawal …
The petitioner, Mahesh Dev, was implicated in a criminal complaint alleging misappropriation of funds, fraud, and other offences arising from a dispute with his brother over a private limited company and a mortgaged flat. The complaint, filed under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, …
Gautam Kumar filed an anticipatory bail application in the Patna High Court. He later sought permission to withdraw that application and to surrender to the authorities, intending to apply for regular bail. The Court, after hearing counsel, granted permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail. …
The petitioner, Thakan Jadav, was implicated in a land‑dispute incident where the informant alleged that he assaulted the informant's son with an iron rod and that another accused, Laltu Yadav, injured the son with a tractor. The petitioner contended that the injury to the son’s head was …
The petitioners, three brothers from Gaya, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case alleging kidnapping for marriage, criminal intimidation and related offences under IPC sections 366(A), 504, 506 and 34. The informant claimed his 16‑year‑old daughter was lured and eloped with …
The petitioners, four members of the Rajak family, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under several sections of the BNS relating to assault and other offences. They claimed that the informant had falsely implicated them, that the FIR lacked specific allegations against some …
The petitioners, Azad Kumar and Santosh Choudhary, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging extortion, assault, robbery and possession of arms. The FIR described a group of twelve accused, including the petitioners, intercepting the informant’s brother, demanding money, assaulting …
The petitioner, a 19‑year‑old with no prior record, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 110, 351(2) and 352 of the B.N.S., alleging he assaulted an informant over a dispute concerning a bag. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated and that the …
The petitioner, Aditya Chauhan, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act for alleged recovery of 250 litres of liquor from his scooter and his house. He contended that he had a clean …
Istekhar Mansoor, a resident of Bhagalpur, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a FIR alleging that he, along with 15 other named accused and about 200 unknown persons, assaulted his sons and a villager, leading to serious injuries and death. The petitioner argued that he has a …
Shyam Mahto sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged alleging his involvement in the death of Putul, the son of an informant, under Sections 108 and 3(5) of the BNS. The informant claimed that Manisha, who had an alleged illicit relationship with the petitioner, and her mother had called her …
The petitioner, Pradeep Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 89.25 litres of liquor from a boring room on his premises. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the room was …
The petitioners, Lalan Prasad and his wife Renu Devi, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 85, 69, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., alleging that they were falsely implicated by the informant, who claimed her son’s suicide and subsequent family disputes. …
Petitioner Rahul Raj sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case (PS Case No.429/2025) alleging offences under Sections 305, 331(4) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, based largely on the informant’s suspicion that Rahul had transferred money from the informant’s …
The petitioner, Aman Kumar Mahto, was implicated in a FIR alleging assault, kidnapping and firing on the informant’s son, invoking offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 191(2), 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner, a 22‑year‑old with a clean …
The petitioner, Isha Alam, filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal case. The petitioner later sought the Court's permission to withdraw that anticipatory bail application and instead surrender to the trial court to seek regular bail. The learned counsel for the petitioner requested this …
The petitioner, Sachin Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 8(c), 21(c) and 29 of the NDPS Act, alleging that he was falsely implicated based on a confessional statement of co‑accused made in police custody. The prosecution argued that call detail records showed …
The petitioners, Sanoj Kumar Singh, Raj Kumar Singh, and Randhir Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bihar Negotiable Statutes (BNS) relating to assault, grievous hurt, and other offences arising from a land dispute. They claimed …
The petitioners, Vibha Singh and her son Golu Singh, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a murder case under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., based on an informant's allegation that they hanged the informant's sister. They argued they have clean antecedents, were falsely …
The petitioners, three residents of Bhurkudva village, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a FIR alleging offences under multiple sections of the B.N.S., including assault and rioting, stemming from a land dispute. They argued they have clean antecedents, that the informant’s …
The petitioner, Lalan Ram, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022, alleging that 28.020 litres of liquor were recovered from his joint family house and that he had no conscious possession. He argued that the 2018 amendment …
The petitioners, Goldan and Banti Choudhary, who are serving in the Indian Army and are relatives of a man named Abhishek, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 324(5), 326(f), 326(g) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023. …
The petitioner, Vijay Sahani, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case involving the alleged recovery of 1,746 litres of liquor from a truck he owned, under Sections 30(a), 32(ii), 36 and 41(i) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, …
The petitioner, Avdhesh Ray, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with alleged offences under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Excise Act involving the recovery of 1080 litres of liquor from a vehicle he owned. He argued that he had a clean …
Petitioner Rahul Kumar Singh sought anticipatory bail after the police indicated he would be arrested in a case alleging recovery of 5,265 litres of liquor from a truck, an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He contended that he was not arrested on …
The petitioner, Binod Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 18 litres of liquor from his joint family house. He contended that he was not arrested at the scene, no liquor was found …
