Created by Fuzzy Cloud

SATYAVRAT VERMA

5764 judgments · newest first · showing 1601–1800

Rajesh ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rajesh Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where 18 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from his joint family house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious …

Vijay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vijay Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for the alleged recovery of one litre of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent and that the liquor was not in …

Bharni DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bharni Devi, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for the alleged recovery of 5.4 litres of liquor from a motorcycle she owned. She was not arrested at the spot and the liquor was not found in her conscious possession; …

Naresh Kumar @ Naresh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Naresh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that he was involved in the recovery of 40.5 litres of illicit liquor concealed in bushes. He argued that the liquor was …

Santosh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Santosh Yadav, owner of a pickup vehicle, was implicated in the recovery of 66.240 litres of liquor under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. He was not arrested at the spot and no liquor was found in his possession; the allegation rests on his ownership of the …

Pramod PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Pramod Paswan feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where 144 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a boat. He has five prior criminal cases, four of which relate to the Excise Act, and claims he was not caught in …

Bittu Kumar Yadav @ Bittu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bittu Kumar Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly recovering 172.8 litres of liquor from a truck. He argued he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, was not the truck’s …

Chimaladari Samyuktha @ Ch. SamyukthaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chimaladari Samyuktha, sought anticipatory bail after a seizure of 10.5 litres of liquor from an ambulance vehicle allegedly owned by her. She argued that she had no prior criminal record, was not present at the spot of seizure, and had no conscious possession of the liquor; the …

Ram Awadhesh SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ram Awadhesh Singh applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 20 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. The petitioner argued he had a clean antecedent and was not in possession of the liquor, asserting that ownership of …

Vishanu Kumar @ Mamu @ MamaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Vishanu Kumar and Ashish Mahto, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 128 litres of liquor from a joint family house. They contended that they were not arrested on the spot, no liquor was …

Rajendra SahversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Petitioner Rajendra Sah filed an anticipatory bail application in the High Court of Patna. During the pendency of the application, he was arrested. The petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The Court, after hearing counsel for both sides, granted …

Rajiv Saday @ Rajiv SadaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rajiv Saday, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing one litre of liquor recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He asserted that he had a clean antecedent, was not in actual possession of the liquor, and was unaware that …

Fekan Kumar @ Fekan Kumar MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Fekan Kumar Mahto, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly storing 50.250 litres of liquor on the roof of his jointly owned house. He was not arrested at the scene and argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, that the …

Sanjiv Ray @ Sanjiv Ranjan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanjiv Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 2,697.69 litres of liquor from a truck. He has a criminal antecedent of twenty‑four cases, fourteen of which are under the Excise Act, and was implicated …

Pawan Chaudhary @ Pawan Kumar ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of liquor and mahua from public places. The petitioner argued that he was not in possession of the seized …

Jitu Kumar Yadav @ Jitu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jitu Kumar Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018, where 80 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from his dalan. He argued that the dalan is a public area, he was not caught in possession, and …

Himansu Kumar Chaturvedi @ Bablu BabaversusThe State Of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Himansu Kumar Chaturvedi, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. He later approached the court seeking permission to withdraw that application. The learned counsel for the State opposed the withdrawal. The court, exercising its discretion, granted the …

Gore Jamadar @ Mithlesh JamadarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Gore Jamadar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a murder case arising from a wedding procession accident that led to the death of Pawan Kumar. The FIR, filed under several sections of the B.N.S. and the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) …

Bajanti DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, three women, were implicated in a FIR alleging they murdered a woman by strangulation, based on an informant's claim. The FIR charged them under Sections 108, 3(5) and 238 of the B.N.S., 2023. The post‑mortem report and the investigating officer’s statement indicated that the victim …

Nitesh RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nitesh Rai, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 50 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the …

Sumer PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Sumer Prasad, was implicated in a criminal case (PS Case No. 613 of 2025) and filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. After hearing, the petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The Court, exercising its …

Santosh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Santosh Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 2,355.48 litres of liquor from a truck he owned. The petitioner argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and the liquor was …

Golu Pandey @ Vikesh Kumar Pandey @ Galu PandeyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Golu Pandey, was accused of multiple offences under the B.N.S., 2023 arising from an altercation over irrigation of agricultural land on 23 July 2025, during which he allegedly fired a pistol (which misfired) and assaulted the informant with the butt of the pistol, causing a head …

Mira DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mira Devi, the owner of a motorcycle from which 60 litres of liquor was seized, applied for anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. She argued that she had no conscious possession of the liquor, was not …

Chandan YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Chandan Yadav, the owner of a transport vehicle, was implicated in the seizure of 500 litres of codeine cough syrup allegedly being transported in his auto, leading to charges under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Excise Act. He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that he had a clean antecedent, was …

Shankar Kumar @ Shankar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Shankar Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered against him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 204.71 litres of liquor from his motorcycle and a cowshed. He argued that the liquor was not in his …

Meri DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Meri Devi, the owner of an e‑rickshaw, was implicated in an excise case for alleged possession of 20 litres of liquor from a motorcycle, 20 litres from a scooty and 120 litres from her e‑rickshaw. She contended that she was not arrested at the scene, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and …

Santosh SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Santosh Sahni, was implicated in a case (PS Case No.162/2025) for allegedly possessing 15 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor, was not in possession at the time of seizure, and had a clean criminal record. The State …

Rajnish @ Nisha Ray @ Rajnish Kumar @ NishaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rajnish Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where liquor was allegedly recovered from a vehicle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of …

Surendra Prasad SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Surendra Prasad Singh applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case alleging recovery of 6,831 litres of liquor from a truck, alleged offences under Sections 30(a), 32(i)(ii), 36 and 41(i)(ii) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. The petitioner argued that he …

Niraj Sah @ Niraj Kumar SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Niraj Sah, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 500 ml of liquor recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He contended that he had a clean criminal record, was not in actual possession of the liquor at the time of seizure, and was …

Arif KhanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Arif Khan sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 alleging recovery of 630 litres of liquor from a vehicle he did not own. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was found in his conscious possession, and the …

Daulat DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Daulat Devi, owner of a pickup vehicle, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act after 212.4 litres of liquor were recovered from her vehicle. She was not present at the scene and the driver fled, leading her to claim she had no knowledge of the offence. …

Shriman NarayanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Shriman Narayan, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case (Criminal Miscellaneous No.18960 of 2026) alleging offences under Sections 316(2), 318(4) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 relating to a land sale dispute. The informant claimed that the petitioner facilitated an …

Shamsher SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shamsher Singh, the owner of a pickup vehicle, was implicated in an excise case for the alleged recovery of 184.4 litres of liquor from his vehicle. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor being in the vehicle and that he was not in possession at the time of seizure, asserting a clean …

Vishal Kumar Verma @ Vishal Kumar @ Vishal VermaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vishal Kumar Verma, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act read with Section 317(5) of the BNS, 2023, alleging recovery of 239.4 litres of liquor from three motorcycles. He contended that he was not caught in possession, was not …

Vikram @ Bhutti @ Vikram KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vikram Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 21 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was seized from his possession, and he was not the vehicle's owner, claiming the …

Rupak Sahni @ Rupak SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Rupak Sahni and Suraj Sahni, were named in an FIR alleging multiple offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita arising from a land dispute involving the removal of pillars. They contend they have clean antecedents and were falsely implicated by the informant, asserting that both …

Raja Ram @ Raja Kumar RamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Raja Ram sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the BNS, 2023. He alleged that the informant, a neighbour with whom he had a passage dispute, falsely implicated him, claiming no specific allegation or motive and that the alleged injury was …

Shivnath sahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shivnath Sahani applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, alleging recovery of 35 litres of liquor and 3000 kg of semi‑prepared liquor from a public riverbank. He asserted a clean criminal record and argued that the …

Mukurdhan NutversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Mukurdhan and Soni Devi, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 102 litres of liquor and 100 litres of semi‑fermented liquor from a public pond. They contended that no conscious possession was established, the …

Govinda NutversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, four individuals from Musepur Nut Toli, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of large quantities of liquor and semi‑fermented liquor. They argued that they were not caught in possession, the seized liquor …

Sintu YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sintu Yadav, was implicated in an excise case (Case No. 366 of 2025) for the alleged recovery of 10 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that another individual, Vishal, misused …

Pintu Kumar @ Maigar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pintu Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 82 litres of liquor from a bush adjacent to his house. He has nine prior criminal cases, six of which are under the Excise Act, and argues that the liquor …

Ravi Sah @ Ravi Ranjan Kumar GuptaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ravi Sah, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where liquor was allegedly recovered from his joint family house. He argued that no liquor was found in his conscious possession, the house being a joint family property, and that …

Bipin Ram @ Vipin RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bipin Ram, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 33 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that his friend misused the …

GUDDU KUMAR @ GUDDU MANJHIversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Guddu Kumar petitioned for anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 20 litres of liquor from his joint family house. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested on the spot, the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and the …

Awdesh MandalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Awdesh Mandal and Muntun Mandal filed an anticipatory bail application in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 57.75 litres of liquor from a potato field not belonging to the petitioner. The petitioners sought to withdraw …

Pintu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pintu Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 54 litres of liquor from a car and 7.5 litres from a motorcycle. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure, and was …

Shiv Kumar @ Shiva YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Shiv Kumar (Shiva Yadav), sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 19.125 litres of liquor from a semi‑constructed house that is part of a joint family property. He contended that he was not arrested on …

Rocky Raj @ Rocky KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Rocky Raj was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly recovering 45 litres of liquor from the cowshed of Anup Yadav. He was not arrested at the scene and no liquor was found in his possession; the allegation rests on …

Rishi Dev KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioners Rishi Dev Kumar and Sanjay Kumar applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under several sections of the B.N.S., alleging assault with rods that caused injuries to several persons. They contend they have clean antecedents and were falsely implicated, highlighting a 33‑day delay …

Shubhani HassanversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Shubhani Hassan, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and to surrender, seeking regular bail instead. The Court granted the request, allowing …

Niraj Kumar Rai @ Neeraj Kumar RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Niraj Kumar Rai applied for anticipatory bail in a case (Sonepur P.S. Case No. 943 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The informant alleged that Rai had previously stabbed him in a separate case (Case No. 937 of 2025) and later …

Randhir RaiversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Petitioner Randhir Rai filed an anticipatory bail application. While the application was pending, he was arrested. He then approached the court seeking permission to withdraw his anticipatory bail application. The court, after hearing counsel, granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the …

Md. SubhanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, six residents of Lakshminiya village, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bihar Non‑Statutory (BNS) Act, 2023. They contended that they have clean antecedents and were falsely implicated by the informant, with no …

Ram Narayan PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ram Narayan Paswan, a 70‑year‑old senior citizen with a clean record, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in an FIR alleging multiple offences under the BNS, 2023. The petitioner argued that he was falsely implicated merely because he is the father of two alleged assailants and that …

Jira DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Jira Devi and Manju Devi, petitioners, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 96 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act. The FIR alleged that a man named Manish had enticed the petitioners' minor daughter and taken her away with …

Raushan YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Raushan Yadav and Diwakar Yadav (alias Saurav Kumar), applied for anticipatory bail in a criminal case registered under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, including offences of rioting, assault, and attempt to murder. They alleged that the informant’s claim of a land‑related …

Sunita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Sunita Devi and Motijharo Devi, both women with clean antecedents, filed a petition fearing arrest in a case registered under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. They contended that the informant had falsely implicated them to pressure their husbands, and that the FIR did not …

Prabhunath RayversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Prabhunath Ray and Brijkishor Ray, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a FIR alleging multiple offences under the Bihar Negotiable Sale Act, 2023, stemming from a land dispute. They argued they have clean antecedents and that the allegations, especially against …

Roshan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Roshan Kumar and Sabita Devi, sought anticipatory bail in a criminal case (PS Case No. 444 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023. Roshan Kumar withdrew his application, which the court dismissed as withdrawn. Sabita …

Rahul Kumar Ray @ Rahul RayversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar Ray, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 303(2), 62 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 25(1‑Ba), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, based on an informant’s claim that he aided in a theft of a buffalo. The petitioner argued …

Aman Kumar Mishra @ Ravinder MishraversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Aman Kumar Mishra, a Havildar in the Assam Rifles, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Sale Act and the Dowry Prohibition Act, alleging that he was falsely implicated by his wife in a dowry demand and assault case. He asserted that the …

Manju DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The Patna High Court heard an application for anticipatory bail filed by Manju Devi (petitioner No.1) after the co‑applicant Bangali Bhagat withdrew his application. Manju Devi, a woman with a clean record, alleged that she was falsely implicated in a violent incident where the informant’s mother …

Dhanjay Kumar @ Dhananjay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dhanjay Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the BNS, 2023, alleging serious offences. The informant’s complaint described a violent incident involving several accused, with the petitioner only alleged to have assisted in …

Amit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Amit Kumar and Kaushal Sharma, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 74, 118(1), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bihar Non‑Compete Statute, 2023. They alleged that the informant, a neighbour with whom they have a passage dispute, …

Indo Devi @ Indu DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners – Indo Devi, Bhola Mahto and Abren Kumar – sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a complaint filed by Lalita Devi under IPC sections 323, 342, 498A, 494 and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The complaint alleged that the husband’s family demanded a dowry of Rs.1 lakh, and …

Seraj KhanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Seraj Khan, sought anticipatory bail after a non‑bailable warrant was issued in a 2021 case alleging he participated in a robbery under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. The FIR named unknown accused, but the petitioner’s name appeared in a confessional statement made by Ajay Ram …

Loknath KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Loknath Kumar, a resident of Paraiya, Gaya, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS No. 357/2025) involving offences under Sections 126, 115(2), 109, 74, 303(2) and 3(5) of the Bihar Negotiable Sale Act, 2023. The informant alleged that Kumar and several co‑accused created a ruckus at …

Ravi Sharma @ Ravi KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ravi Sharma, was arrested in a case under Section 498A of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He sought anticipatory bail, contending that the allegations were false and offering to settle outstanding maintenance of Rs.1,17,000 owed to his wife, who had earlier …

Atul PriyadarshiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Atul Priyadarshi, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 318(4) of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act for alleged forgery of a bank guarantee. He claimed he had a clean record and that the forged guarantee was produced …

Amit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Amit Kumar filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. He later sought permission to withdraw that application and to surrender to the authorities to obtain regular bail. The learned counsel for the petitioner argued for withdrawal, and the court granted the request. The …

Aarti DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The appellants, five residents of Kushar Purwari village, appealed to the Patna High Court under Section 14‑A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act seeking anticipatory bail after a trial court had taken cognizance of offences alleged in a land‑dispute case, despite a police final report …

Md. Hamza @ Abu HamzaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The Patna High Court heard an appeal under Section 14‑A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 against the trial court’s refusal to grant anticipatory bail to four accused charged with offences under the IPC and the SC/ST Act. The appellants argued that …

Raju Kumar Singh @ Raju KumarversusThe State of Bihar

D.F.D. (PRE-EMPTORY)

The appellants, Raju Kumar Singh and Nitish Kumar, filed a criminal appeal before the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar and Deepak Kumar. The learned Coordinate Bench had earlier directed that notices be filed within two weeks, failing which the application would be dismissed. The …

Ranjeet Kumar @ Ranjeet Kumar SahversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Ranjeet Kumar, appealed under Section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 against the Special Judge's order rejecting his bail application in a case involving multiple offences including assault, robbery and offences under the …

Rajesh Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rajesh Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail in a case alleging offences under Sections 30(a), 30(g), 32, 62 and 56(b) of the Excise Act for possession of codeine syrup seized from the godown of his employer, Vinay Roadlines. The syrup had been lawfully purchased by a licensed …

Sukhdev Yadav @ Bhaglu YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Sukhdev Yadav, appealed against the order of the Exclusive Special Judge that denied his anticipatory bail in a case involving offences under several sections of the B.N.S. and the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. He claimed to have a clean record …

Pankaj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pankaj Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under the Excise Act alleging recovery of 608 litres of liquor from his vehicle. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was unaware of the vehicle's …

Nage Kamat @ Nagesh KamatversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nage Kamat, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the B.N.S. and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 1,224 litres of liquor from his house. He asserted a clean antecedent, claimed the liquor was not in his conscious …

Dinkar ChoudharyversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Dinkar Choudhary, filed a regular bail application in a criminal case (PS Case No. 305 of 2024) before the Patna High Court. After the trial concluded with the petitioner’s acquittal, his counsel sought the court’s permission to withdraw the pending bail application. The court …

Lakho DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Lakho Devi and Santosh Thakur, applied for anticipatory bail in a case alleging offences under Sections 316(5), 318(4), 338 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., where they were accused of withdrawing money from the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojna by misusing beneficiaries' account numbers. The …

Rinku DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Rinku Devi, Kundan Nut and Suraj Nut, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 210 litres of liquor from a pond adjacent to their house. They argued that the liquor was not in their conscious …

Indradeo YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Indradeo Yadav, applied for regular bail in a case involving offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 120B of the Indian Penal Code, Section 27 of the Arms Act and Sections 16, 18, 20 of the UAPA. The FIR does not name him, and his alleged involvement is based only on a …

Arbind Sahni @ Arbind Kumar @ Arvind SahniversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Arbind Sahni, was arrested in connection with an alleged recovery of 305.28 litres of liquor from a public area near a garbage disposal building, under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act. He had a prior case under the same Act and had been in custody since 27 January 2026. The …

Shiv Dutt SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shiv Dutt Sharma filed a petition under Criminal Miscellaneous No.23366 of 2026 seeking restoration of an earlier case, Criminal Miscellaneous No.63920 of 2025, which had been closed. The petitioner argued that the grounds for restoration were satisfied. The court examined the restoration …

Raja KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raja Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging that 164.160 litres of liquor were recovered from a Tata Magic vehicle. He contended that he was not in possession of the liquor, was not the owner of the vehicle, and was …

Umesh Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Umesh Kumar Singh obtained anticipatory bail in a criminal case but had concealed material antecedent facts. The State of Bihar filed an application seeking modification of that bail order. The High Court, referencing its consistent stance, held that an anticipatory bail order should not be altered …

Ravi Shankar SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Ravi Shankar Sahani, filed a restoration application in a criminal miscellaneous proceeding arising from a 2010 case. During the hearing on 3 April 2026, the petitioner’s counsel expressed difficulty in continuing the application and sought permission to withdraw it. The court, after …

Mundrika PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Mundrika Prasad, the petitioner, filed a modification application in a criminal miscellaneous proceeding before the Patna High Court. The State of Bihar opposed the application. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the modification application. The court, after …

Sudhir ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Sudhir Chaudhary filed a restoration application seeking to have Criminal Miscellaneous No. 6953 of 2026 restored to its original file. The petitioner was represented by Mr. Sudhir Kumar Raj and the State by Mr. Md. Matloob Rab. The court examined the grounds presented in the restoration …

Ashok YadawversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Ashok Yadaw, was granted provisional anticipatory bail on 3 February 2026 with a directive to deposit Rs 5,000 with the Patna High Court Lawyers’ Association within two weeks and to surrender before the trial court within six weeks. He deposited the amount a day after the deadline …

Rahul BhartiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Rahul Bharti filed a restoration application seeking to have Criminal Miscellaneous No. 6025 of 2026 reinstated to its original file. The petitioner was represented by Ms. Ankita Kumari, while the State of Bihar was represented by Mr. Harendra Prasad. The court examined the grounds …

Raushan Kumar SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Raushan Kumar Sah, who had been granted anticipatory bail, filed an application seeking modification of the order to extend the period within which he must surrender to the court. The State opposed the application. The learned judge examined whether the surrender period could be …

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Rahul Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous petition before the Patna High Court arising from a police case in East Champaran. He subsequently filed a second application seeking modification of the proceedings. The petitioner later approached the court requesting permission to withdraw this second …

Ankit Kumar MandalversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Ankit Kumar Mandal filed a criminal miscellaneous petition before the Patna High Court seeking a modification of the proceedings. The petitioner later moved the court for permission to withdraw the modification application. The court, after hearing counsel, exercised its inherent jurisdiction to …

Chhotu Kumar Rai @ Sanjiv Kumar RaiversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioners filed a modification application in Criminal Miscellaneous No.21758 of 2026 arising out of PS. Case No.-70 Year-2021. They later approached the court seeking permission to withdraw that application. The learned counsel for the petitioners requested the court’s leave to withdraw, and …

Guddu Chaudhary @ Guddu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Guddu Chaudhary, the petitioner, had been granted anticipatory bail with a stipulated period for surrender to the court. He filed a modification application seeking an extension of the surrender period after the original deadline had passed and without having moved the court before the expiry. The …

Manju DeviversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Manju Devi, the petitioner, filed a modification application in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 23310 of 2026 arising from PS case No. 1227 of 2025. During the hearing, she sought the court's permission to withdraw that application. The learned counsel for the petitioner requested the withdrawal and the …

Raj Kumar MahtoversusThe Station of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Raj Kumar Mahto filed a restoration application seeking to have Criminal Miscellaneous No. 13920 of 2026 restored to its original file. The State opposed the application. The court examined the grounds presented in the restoration petition. Finding the grounds satisfactory, the court …

Sajal Kumar Sinha @ MausamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sajal Kumar Sinha, had earlier filed an anticipatory bail application (Cr. Misc No. 2649 of 2026) which was taken up out of turn. He later sought to withdraw the anticipatory bail application on the ground that the underlying criminal case had been compromised and he had not been …

Hardev Ram @ Hardev Kumar RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Hardev Ram filed a restoration application concerning Criminal Miscellaneous No. 58081 of 2025. The petitioner sought to have the case restored to its original file. The State of Bihar and the petitioner's wife were opposite parties. Counsel for both sides were heard before Justice Satyavrat Verma. …

Munna Quraishi @ Munna MiyaversusThe State Of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, ten individuals from the Quraishi family, were charged under several IPC sections and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act in connection with an alleged caste‑based assault on Sugandhi Devi. They appealed the Special Judge’s refusal to grant …

Kulanand ChaudhariversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Kulanand Chaudhari, filed a contempt petition alleging willful disobedience of a court order by the State of Bihar officials. After filing, the petitioner complied with the order that was the subject of the alleged contempt. Consequently, the petitioner moved the court seeking …

MD. TAHIR HUSSAIN @ TAHIR HUSSAINversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, MD Tahir Hussain, filed an anticipatory bail application in the High Court of Patna. A second anticipatory bail application was subsequently filed. Counsel for the petitioner sought the court's permission to withdraw this second application. The court granted permission to withdraw. …

Shankar PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, seven residents of Laxman Tola, were charged under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and several IPC offences for allegedly assaulting and robbing an informant on 22 November 2023. They sought anticipatory bail, which was denied by the Special Judge, prompting an appeal under …

Hira Kumar Sah @ Hira SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Hira Kumar Sah petitioned for anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 64(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita alleging false promise of marriage and related offences. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 BNSS did not allege a physical relationship, …

Rahul Yadav @ Rahul Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Rahul Yadav, was arrested in connection with a dowry‑related murder case where his wife was allegedly killed after demanding Rs.4 lakh and a car. He applied for regular bail under Sections 80(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., claiming a clean antecedent and that the FIR is based on mere …

Chhotu Kumar @ Kunal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Chhotu Kumar, brother‑in‑law of a deceased woman, was arrested in July 2025 in a dowry‑death case filed under Sections 85, 80, 238 and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023. He applied for bail, claiming a clean record, false implication, and that his confession was obtained in violation of Section …

Sunarman YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sunarman Yadav, was charged under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 354 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code in a case registered in 2021. He had earlier been granted regular bail in April 2023, subject to a condition that the trial court could cancel the bail if he attempted to …

Kishor Yadav @ Krishna Yadav @ Kishore YadavversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Kishor Yadav, was arrested in connection with a case registered at Bhagalpur and filed a regular bail application before the Patna High Court. After hearing, the petitioner’s senior counsel sought the court’s permission to withdraw the bail application so that a fresh application …

Munna Yadav @ Munna Kumar SaoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners Munna Yadav, Sintu Goswami and Jairam Kumar filed a criminal appeal (SJ) No. 1919 of 2025 against the State of Bihar and Dipak Kumar, which had been dismissed for non‑prosecution because the required notices were not filed within the time prescribed by the order dated 17‑10‑2025. The …

Akhilesh kumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Akhilesh Kumar, was arrested in connection with a violent land‑dispute incident and charged under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 303(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. He claimed to have a clean antecedent and argued that the allegations of assault were exaggerated. The petitioner sought …

Pratap Yadav @ Pratap KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Pratap Yadav and Pintu Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 305(e) and 317(4) of the B.N.S. concerning alleged illegal sand mining from the Nati river, where 15,114 cft of sand was seized and villagers reportedly named them. The petitioners argued …

Tarun ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Tarun Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case registered under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act for alleged black‑marketing of rice, wheat and kerosene meant for PDS beneficiaries. The complainant, Nardi Devi, alleged that the petitioner failed to …

Radheshyam Kumar @ Radheyshayam SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Radheshyam Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a bike‑theft case (Barun P.S. Case No.202/2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 317(4), 317(5), 336(3), 340(2) and 318(4) of the B.N.S., 2023. He contended that he has a clean record and was falsely implicated …

Amrit Vai Patel @ Amrit Bhai PatelversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Amrit Vai Patel, Janardhan Prasad Mahto and Shankar Saw, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code relating to assault, rioting, and other offences. They claimed they were falsely implicated in an incident that arose after a …

Shivam Kumar @ Shivam YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Shivam Kumar (Shivam Yadav) applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case registered under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments (B.N.S.) Act, 2023, alleging assault and theft. He contended that he has a clean record, the FIR was filed three days after the alleged …

Bhagya Narayan Thakur @ Bhagnarayan ThakurversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Bhagya Narayan Thakur sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023. The informant alleged that the petitioner and others assaulted her, attempted to outrage her modesty, and stole jewellery. The petitioner …

Dangar Paswan @ Dagar PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, four residents of Pundar village, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bihar Negotiable Substances Act, 2023. They contended that they have clean records and that the FIR primarily implicates Ramu, who is not a …

Md Sarfuddin @ Bachchan @ Md SafiuddinversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, four residents of Nadiya Gachh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 132, 76, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. They alleged that the informant falsely implicated them due to a dispute concerning a Madarsa, …

Bablu ChauhanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Bablu Chauhan applied for anticipatory bail after a police case (PS No.168/2025) was registered against him under Section 61(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Sections 25(1‑B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The police recovered three country‑made pistols and 16 live cartridges from the …

Shailesh Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Shailesh Kumar Singh applied for anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged alleging that he, in collusion with others, sold ancestral land using forged power of attorney, threatened victims, and operated as a land‑mafia. The informant claimed the petitioner had a history of twenty‑one criminal cases …

Ranjan DubeyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ranjan Dubey, feared arrest in a case registered under Section 87 of the B.N.S., 2023, alleging that he and his father had enticed a minor and stolen jewellery worth Rs.40,000. He contended that the charge sheet against him was filed without proper investigation, especially after the …

Shashibhushan SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioners, Shashibhushan Sharma and his wife Jhunna, applied for anticipatory bail in a 2013 case (PS Case No.111) involving alleged murder, concealment of evidence, and criminal conspiracy under IPC Sections 302, 201, 120B and 34. They argued they have clean antecedents, that the deceased was …

Mohammad Ehsan @ Md Ehsan @ AzamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Mohammad Ehsan, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case registered under Sections 25(1‑B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The FIR alleged that during a Durga immersion ceremony, three accused arrived on a scooter, one brandishing a gun, and that Ehsan …

Md. MahtabversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Md. Mahtab and Md. Imtiyaz, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 64 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for alleged rape offences. The petitioners argued that the earlier order mistakenly named Md. Mustafa instead of Md. Mahtab, and therefore requested …

Chandi YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, a father and son, feared arrest in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, based on an informant's allegation that they fired weapons to create fear, though no injury occurred. The petitioners …

Mantu Yadav @ Mantu Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Mantu Yadav, sought anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 447, 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code, stemming from a violent incident on 11 November 2019 in which the informant's minor son was killed. The FIR alleges that the petitioner …

Tashrif @ Farhat Khan @ Tashif RuzuversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Tashrif, had filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal miscellaneous case. While the application was pending, he was arrested. He then sought the court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The court, after hearing counsel for both sides, granted …

Chhotu Kumar @ Chhotu Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Chhotu Kumar Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a theft case (PS Case No.210/2025) involving alleged theft and sale of a stolen motorcycle. The allegations against him stem from a confessional statement made by his brother Nitish while in police custody, which the …

Md. Ekbal @ BanarversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Md. Ekbal, was implicated in a criminal case (PS case No.217/2025) arising from Simri in Buxar district. He filed an anticipatory bail application under the Criminal Procedure Code. During the hearing, he sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and to …

Noor AlamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Noor Alam sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita relating to alleged extortion, assault and other offences arising from a land dispute. The informant alleged that a group, including the petitioner, had …

Jyoti KumariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Jyoti Kumari and Ajanasiya Devi, women residents of Bhagwanpur, Begusarai, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act. They asserted they have clean antecedents, are young women, and were …

Manoj Kumar RamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manoj Kumar, a resident of Kasdeora, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case alleging assault on his brother (the informant) and his niece Sunita, stemming from a property dispute between the brothers. The informant, who is also the petitioner’s brother, alleged that the …

Priti KumariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Priti Kumari, a woman with a clean record, feared arrest in a case registered under Sections 366(A) and 34 of the IPC, alleging she was falsely implicated by an informant who is the maternal aunt of Sachin, accused of eloping with the informant's minor daughter. The petitioner sought anticipatory …

Kumar ShanuversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Kumar Shanu filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal miscellaneous case. While the application was pending, he was arrested. He then sought the court's permission to withdraw his anticipatory bail petition. The court, after hearing counsel, granted the request to withdraw. Consequently, …

Bheem Sharma @ Bhim Kumar SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bheem Sharma, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023. He asserted that he has a clean record and is falsely implicated by an informant who alleged a dispute involving crackers, stabbing, and …

Kundan Kumar @ Kundan PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Kundan Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Sections 115, 118(1), 126(2), 109 and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023 alleging his participation in a series of assaults and an extortion attempt. He contended that the informant who lodged the FIR had a pending case against …

Dinesh RayversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dinesh Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023, arising from a land dispute with the informant. He alleged that the FIR was false, being a retaliatory measure after he filed a case …

Birendra Ray @ Virendra RayversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Birendra Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the B.N.S., 2023, alleging that the informant falsely implicated him for allegedly assaulting the informant while cutting a banana tree. The petitioner claimed a clean antecedent, …

Ramesh RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ramesh Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving multiple offences under the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act, including robbery, extortion, assault and weapon discharge. The informant alleged that Rai and others looted his shop, assaulted his …

Siyaram RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, six individuals involved in a land‑related dispute, were charged under several sections of the B.N.S. for assaulting various persons, resulting in injuries of varying severity. They applied for anticipatory bail, claiming clean antecedents and, for petitioner No.6, that no specific …

Makeshwar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Makeshwar Yadav, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged robbery. He claimed he was falsely implicated, asserting that the informant, Amit Kumar, later became an accused after a tablet was recovered from his house, …

Baijnath YadavversusThe State of Bihar And others

ALLOWED

The appellants Baijnath Yadav, Sarita Devi and Navjeevan Anand appealed against the trial court's refusal to grant anticipatory bail under Section 14‑A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The informant alleged that the appellants, after a petroleum retail licence was cancelled, assaulted …

JAI RAM SHARMA @ JAYRA SHARMAversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

DISPOSED

The case involves eight members of the Sharma family accused under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and several sections of the Bihar Nagarik Suraksha Act, 2023 for alleged assault and molestation of an informant and her relatives on 24 May 2025. The …

Pramod KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Pramod Kumar applied for anticipatory bail in a case (PS Case No.298 of 2023) involving offences under Sections 341, 323, 379, 498(A), 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He claimed he was falsely implicated by his wife, Pallavi Kumari, over a …

Surendra YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Surendra Yadav, was charged under several provisions of the Bihar Penal Code, 2023 and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 for allegedly assaulting an informant and using caste slurs. The informant claimed that nine accused, including the …

Umesh RamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Umesh Ram, Dinesh Ram and Avinash Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging offences under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the IPC. The informant claimed that on 6 March 2021 a group of eleven accused, including the petitioners, assaulted …

Radhika DeviversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, five individuals including three women, were charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Sale (BNSS) for alleged kidnapping and caste-based abuse of a minor girl. The informant claimed the …

Amit Kumar @ Amit GiriversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The Patna High Court heard two criminal appeals (SJ No.4051/2025 and SJ No.4753/2025) filed by Amit, Ajit and Ankit Giri and by Santosh Giri respectively, seeking anticipatory bail under Section 14‑A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act after a Special Judge …

Sanjay PandeyversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, three brothers named Sanjay, Sarvesh and Rakesh Pandey, were charged under several sections of the Bihar Nagarik Suraksha Act and the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly abusing and assaulting an informant on a field. The informant claimed …

Santosh GiriversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants – Amit, Ajit and Ankit Giri – were charged under several provisions of the Indian Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting the informant, his daughter and mother‑in‑law on 14 May 2025, allegedly motivated by prior …

Bablu Nut @ Bablu NatversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bablu Nut, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 30 litres of spirit near a railway crossing. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no contraband was found in his possession, and …

Vikash @ Vikash Kumar @ Vikash Kumar RayversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Vikash Kumar, was arrested while his anticipatory bail application was pending before the High Court. He approached the Court seeking permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application after his arrest. The learned counsel for the petitioner argued that the arrest rendered the …

Somaru RajwarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Somaru Rajwar, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 2.3 litres of liquor from a bush behind his house. He contended that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the location did not belong …

LALAN SINGHversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The appellant, Lalan Singh, was convicted in a criminal case (PS Case No.237/2023) and filed an appeal before the Patna High Court. While the appeal was pending, the appellant sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the appeal and to surrender to the trial court, requesting that he be allowed to …

Dewanti DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dewanti Devi, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 9 litres of liquor in a seized motorcycle. She argued that she had a clean antecedent, was a woman, and was …

Ramesh SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ramesh Sahani, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 165 litres of liquor from a hut he does not own. He contended he has a clean criminal record and that the complaint was …

Dayanand YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, five Yadavs from Jamui district, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act, 2023. They contended that the FIR does not specifically allege any assault or abuse by them and that they have been …

Sanjeet Paswan @ Sanjeet KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanjeet Paswan, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 30(c), 30(d) and 41 of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of liquor and spirits. He argued that the alleged contraband was seized from a public place not in his possession and that the …

Md. Joal @ Johab @ JabedversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Petitioner Md. Joal applied for anticipatory bail under the Criminal Procedure Code. While the application was pending, he was arrested by the police. He then moved the High Court seeking permission to withdraw his anticipatory bail application. The Court, after hearing counsel, granted the …

Ram Kumar SahniversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Ram Kumar Sahni and Shanti Devi filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. While the application was pending, they were arrested by the police. The petitioners then moved the court seeking permission to withdraw their anticipatory bail application. The learned counsel for …

Sunil Yadav @ Surendra YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sunil Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He claimed that the charge sheet failed to clearly record his four prior …

Sunil Kumar Ray @ Sunil SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sunil Kumar Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 406, 420 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. He alleged that the informant, who claimed the petitioner promised a back‑door government job through his son, the District Magistrate, had paid Rs. …

Anil RajvanshiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Anil Rajvanshi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS Case No. 753 of 2024) that alleged offences under several sections of the BNS, 2023. He asserted that he has a clean record and that the informant’s allegations of assault on the informant’s family members are …

Chandan Kumar @ Chandan Kumar Bharti @ Chandan YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving alleged possession of 11 litres of country-made liquor, a country-made pistol, and cartridges recovered from a cowshed belonging to another person. The prosecution alleged violations of Sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26 …

Guddi DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Guddi Devi applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. after a case was registered against her for alleged contravention of Section 30(a) of the Excise Act involving the recovery of 40 litres of liquor from an e‑rickshaw. The petitioner argued that she has a clean antecedent, is a …

Rinku DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Rinku Devi and Lalan Yadav, were implicated in a FIR alleging offences under Sections 103(1), 61(2), 127(2), 351(2) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023, stemming from a family dispute that led to the death of the informant's son. They applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that the …

Puran Prasad Sah @ Puran SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Puran Prasad Sah, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving numerous offences under the Bihar Negotiable Special (BNS) Act, 2023 and the Arms Act. He alleged that the FIR was based on an informant’s claim that a mob, led by others identified in CCTV footage, …

Dheeraj SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dheeraj Singh, feared arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly transporting 144 litres of liquor on two motorcycles. He contended that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the vehicles, and was implicated solely on the …

Anurag Kumar @ Vishal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Anurag Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He alleged that the informant falsely implicated him in an incident on 07.01.2026 where he was allegedly present …

Akhatar ShahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Akhatar Shah, Mumtaz Shah and Shahid Shah, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case involving multiple offences under the B.N.S. The FIR alleged that a dispute over water logging led the petitioners to assault the informant's husband and family. The petitioners …

Lalbabu Sah @ Lallu SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Four brothers applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 191(1), 190, 109, 352, 351(2) and 118(1) of the Bihar Penal Code. The petitioners argued that they have clean antecedents and that the informant has falsely implicated them, noting that the FIR does not specifically …

Babar AliversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Babar Ali, the owner of a pickup vehicle, was implicated in the seizure of 1,305 litres of liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he had no knowledge of the driver’s alleged misuse of the vehicle and possessed a clean criminal record. The State opposed his request for …

Anil MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Anil Mukhiya applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 22 litres of liquor from the courtyard of Madhusudan Ram. The petitioner argued that he was not in possession …

Bittu KuamrversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bittu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case registered under Sections 137(2) and 87 of the BNS, 2023, for allegedly kidnapping a girl with intent to marry. He argued that he has a clean record, the allegations are false, and the victim, who is an adult and …

Baban SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Baban Sah, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged possession of liquor. He argued that the liquor was recovered from a joint family house, that he was not …

Md. SaddamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Md. Saddam, sought anticipatory bail after being named in FIR No.254/2025 for offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita including assault, robbery and attempt to murder. He alleged that the informant had falsely implicated him, claiming the allegations were exaggerated and that the …

Akhilesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Akhilesh Kumar, the owner of a truck, was implicated in a case (PS Bidupur Case No. 360 of 2021) for alleged possession of 69.12 litres of liquor in a truck and 82.965 litres in a Nano car, offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act read with Section 414 of the …

Khursid AlamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Khursid Alam and Alamgir Mia, applied for anticipatory bail in a case alleging recovery of 738 litres of liquor from a pick‑up vehicle, invoking Sections 272 and 273 of the IPC and Sections 30(a), 41 and 47 of the Excise Act. They argued that they have no prior criminal record, were …

Ismail Gaddi @ Ismail GadiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Ismail Gaddi, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case registered under Sections 137(2), 140(3) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023, alleging kidnapping and sexual assault of a minor. The petitioner claimed the allegations were false, asserting that the victim, a 16‑year‑old, …

Sandeep MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sandeep Mukhiya, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 72 litres of liquor from a river bank. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no …

MANOJ KUMAR YADAV @ MONAJ KUMAR YADAVversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Manoj Kumar Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 8, 20(b)(ii), 22(b) and 23(b) of the NDPS Act for alleged possession of two kilograms of ganja. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner was identified by his Aadhar card and mobile phone that …

Munilal SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Munilal Sah, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 270 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He contended that he was not in possession of the liquor, that the vehicles were owned by him but were misused by a friend who fled …

Badal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Badal Kumar, the owner of a vehicle from which 169.74 litres of liquor were seized, feared arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he had a clean criminal record, was not caught with the liquor, and was unaware that his driver misused the vehicle, who subsequently fled the …

Jokhan SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jokhan Singh, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 30 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. The petitioner argued that he was not in possession …

Upendra Yadav @ Upendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Upendra Yadav and Vinay Yadav applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 329(3), 329(4), 109, 115(2), 117(2), 303(2), 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. for alleged assault on a woman and her husband. The petitioners asserted they have clean antecedents and that the FIR stems from a …

Jagpal @ Jagpal MalikversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jagpal Malik, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 140.25 litres of liquor from a truck he owned. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was unaware of the misuse of his …

Afroj Miyan @ Afroj AnsariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Afroj Miyan, was implicated in an FIR alleging that 132.6 litres of liquor were recovered from a straw concealment at Vishunpura village, contravening Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the scene, and had no …

Nurul HaqueversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nurul Haque, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 38.5 litres of liquor recovered from a scooty he owned. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in actual possession of the liquor, and that his friend, who fled …

Dinesh PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dinesh Paswan, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 24.9 litres of liquor recovered from a cowshed. He asserted that he has a clean criminal record, that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and that the cowshed is a …

Anil Yadav @ Anil RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Anil Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after the police alleged his involvement in an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, involving the recovery of 273.15 litres of liquor from two vehicles. He contended that he was not the owner of the vehicles, …

Devendra PaswanversusThe state of bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Devendra Paswan, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 36 litres of liquor. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was found …

Dhoni Ram @ Dhoni KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dhoni Ram, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 10 litres of liquor recovered from his joint family house. He argued that the liquor was not found in his conscious possession, the house is jointly …