Created by Fuzzy Cloud

SATYAVRAT VERMA

5892 judgments · newest first · showing 1801–2000

Santosh GiriversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants – Amit, Ajit and Ankit Giri – were charged under several provisions of the Indian Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting the informant, his daughter and mother‑in‑law on 14 May 2025, allegedly motivated by prior …

Bablu Nut @ Bablu NatversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bablu Nut, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 30 litres of spirit near a railway crossing. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no contraband was found in his possession, and …

Vikash @ Vikash Kumar @ Vikash Kumar RayversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Vikash Kumar, was arrested while his anticipatory bail application was pending before the High Court. He approached the Court seeking permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application after his arrest. The learned counsel for the petitioner argued that the arrest rendered the …

Somaru RajwarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Somaru Rajwar, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 2.3 litres of liquor from a bush behind his house. He contended that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the location did not belong …

LALAN SINGHversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The appellant, Lalan Singh, was convicted in a criminal case (PS Case No.237/2023) and filed an appeal before the Patna High Court. While the appeal was pending, the appellant sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the appeal and to surrender to the trial court, requesting that he be allowed to …

Dewanti DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dewanti Devi, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 9 litres of liquor in a seized motorcycle. She argued that she had a clean antecedent, was a woman, and was …

Ramesh SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ramesh Sahani, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 165 litres of liquor from a hut he does not own. He contended he has a clean criminal record and that the complaint was …

Dayanand YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, five Yadavs from Jamui district, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act, 2023. They contended that the FIR does not specifically allege any assault or abuse by them and that they have been …

Sanjeet Paswan @ Sanjeet KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanjeet Paswan, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 30(c), 30(d) and 41 of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of liquor and spirits. He argued that the alleged contraband was seized from a public place not in his possession and that the …

Md. Joal @ Johab @ JabedversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Petitioner Md. Joal applied for anticipatory bail under the Criminal Procedure Code. While the application was pending, he was arrested by the police. He then moved the High Court seeking permission to withdraw his anticipatory bail application. The Court, after hearing counsel, granted the …

Ram Kumar SahniversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Ram Kumar Sahni and Shanti Devi filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. While the application was pending, they were arrested by the police. The petitioners then moved the court seeking permission to withdraw their anticipatory bail application. The learned counsel for …

Sunil Yadav @ Surendra YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sunil Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He claimed that the charge sheet failed to clearly record his four prior …

Sunil Kumar Ray @ Sunil SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sunil Kumar Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 406, 420 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. He alleged that the informant, who claimed the petitioner promised a back‑door government job through his son, the District Magistrate, had paid Rs. …

Anil RajvanshiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Anil Rajvanshi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS Case No. 753 of 2024) that alleged offences under several sections of the BNS, 2023. He asserted that he has a clean record and that the informant’s allegations of assault on the informant’s family members are …

Chandan Kumar @ Chandan Kumar Bharti @ Chandan YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving alleged possession of 11 litres of country-made liquor, a country-made pistol, and cartridges recovered from a cowshed belonging to another person. The prosecution alleged violations of Sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26 …

Guddi DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Guddi Devi applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. after a case was registered against her for alleged contravention of Section 30(a) of the Excise Act involving the recovery of 40 litres of liquor from an e‑rickshaw. The petitioner argued that she has a clean antecedent, is a …

Rinku DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Rinku Devi and Lalan Yadav, were implicated in a FIR alleging offences under Sections 103(1), 61(2), 127(2), 351(2) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023, stemming from a family dispute that led to the death of the informant's son. They applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that the …

Puran Prasad Sah @ Puran SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Puran Prasad Sah, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving numerous offences under the Bihar Negotiable Special (BNS) Act, 2023 and the Arms Act. He alleged that the FIR was based on an informant’s claim that a mob, led by others identified in CCTV footage, …

Dheeraj SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dheeraj Singh, feared arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly transporting 144 litres of liquor on two motorcycles. He contended that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the vehicles, and was implicated solely on the …

Anurag Kumar @ Vishal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Anurag Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He alleged that the informant falsely implicated him in an incident on 07.01.2026 where he was allegedly present …

Akhatar ShahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Akhatar Shah, Mumtaz Shah and Shahid Shah, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case involving multiple offences under the B.N.S. The FIR alleged that a dispute over water logging led the petitioners to assault the informant's husband and family. The petitioners …

Lalbabu Sah @ Lallu SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Four brothers applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 191(1), 190, 109, 352, 351(2) and 118(1) of the Bihar Penal Code. The petitioners argued that they have clean antecedents and that the informant has falsely implicated them, noting that the FIR does not specifically …

Babar AliversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Babar Ali, the owner of a pickup vehicle, was implicated in the seizure of 1,305 litres of liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he had no knowledge of the driver’s alleged misuse of the vehicle and possessed a clean criminal record. The State opposed his request for …

Anil MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Anil Mukhiya applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 22 litres of liquor from the courtyard of Madhusudan Ram. The petitioner argued that he was not in possession …

Bittu KuamrversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bittu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case registered under Sections 137(2) and 87 of the BNS, 2023, for allegedly kidnapping a girl with intent to marry. He argued that he has a clean record, the allegations are false, and the victim, who is an adult and …

Baban SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Baban Sah, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged possession of liquor. He argued that the liquor was recovered from a joint family house, that he was not …

Md. SaddamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Md. Saddam, sought anticipatory bail after being named in FIR No.254/2025 for offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita including assault, robbery and attempt to murder. He alleged that the informant had falsely implicated him, claiming the allegations were exaggerated and that the …

Akhilesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Akhilesh Kumar, the owner of a truck, was implicated in a case (PS Bidupur Case No. 360 of 2021) for alleged possession of 69.12 litres of liquor in a truck and 82.965 litres in a Nano car, offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act read with Section 414 of the …

Khursid AlamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Khursid Alam and Alamgir Mia, applied for anticipatory bail in a case alleging recovery of 738 litres of liquor from a pick‑up vehicle, invoking Sections 272 and 273 of the IPC and Sections 30(a), 41 and 47 of the Excise Act. They argued that they have no prior criminal record, were …

Ismail Gaddi @ Ismail GadiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Ismail Gaddi, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case registered under Sections 137(2), 140(3) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023, alleging kidnapping and sexual assault of a minor. The petitioner claimed the allegations were false, asserting that the victim, a 16‑year‑old, …

Sandeep MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sandeep Mukhiya, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 72 litres of liquor from a river bank. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no …

MANOJ KUMAR YADAV @ MONAJ KUMAR YADAVversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Manoj Kumar Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 8, 20(b)(ii), 22(b) and 23(b) of the NDPS Act for alleged possession of two kilograms of ganja. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner was identified by his Aadhar card and mobile phone that …

Munilal SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Munilal Sah, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 270 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He contended that he was not in possession of the liquor, that the vehicles were owned by him but were misused by a friend who fled …

Badal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Badal Kumar, the owner of a vehicle from which 169.74 litres of liquor were seized, feared arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he had a clean criminal record, was not caught with the liquor, and was unaware that his driver misused the vehicle, who subsequently fled the …

Jokhan SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jokhan Singh, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 30 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. The petitioner argued that he was not in possession …

Upendra Yadav @ Upendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Upendra Yadav and Vinay Yadav applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 329(3), 329(4), 109, 115(2), 117(2), 303(2), 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. for alleged assault on a woman and her husband. The petitioners asserted they have clean antecedents and that the FIR stems from a …

Jagpal @ Jagpal MalikversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jagpal Malik, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 140.25 litres of liquor from a truck he owned. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was unaware of the misuse of his …

Afroj Miyan @ Afroj AnsariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Afroj Miyan, was implicated in an FIR alleging that 132.6 litres of liquor were recovered from a straw concealment at Vishunpura village, contravening Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the scene, and had no …

Nurul HaqueversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nurul Haque, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 38.5 litres of liquor recovered from a scooty he owned. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in actual possession of the liquor, and that his friend, who fled …

Dinesh PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dinesh Paswan, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 24.9 litres of liquor recovered from a cowshed. He asserted that he has a clean criminal record, that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and that the cowshed is a …

Anil Yadav @ Anil RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Anil Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after the police alleged his involvement in an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, involving the recovery of 273.15 litres of liquor from two vehicles. He contended that he was not the owner of the vehicles, …

Devendra PaswanversusThe state of bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Devendra Paswan, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 36 litres of liquor. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was found …

Dhoni Ram @ Dhoni KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dhoni Ram, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 10 litres of liquor recovered from his joint family house. He argued that the liquor was not found in his conscious possession, the house is jointly …

Bipin KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bipin Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for alleged recovery of 450 litres of liquor from three motorcycles. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, was not the owner of …

Pramod Chaudhary @ Pramod Kumar Yadav @ Pramod YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pramod Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 99 litres of liquor were recovered from two motorcycles. He contended that he was not arrested on the spot, had no …

BINOD MUKHIYAversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Binod Mukhiya, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 200 litres of liquor and 100 litres of semi‑prepared liquor from a public riverbank. He claimed the liquor was not in his possession and the recovery site did …

Lala Chaudhary @ Lalan ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Lala Chaudhary applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of liquor and semi‑fermented mahua from premises adjacent to his house but not from his possession. The …

Bithal Saw @ Indrajeet KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bithal Saw (Indrajeet Kumar), sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 47(a) and (f) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 35 litres of liquor and 690 litres of Jawa Mahua from his residence, which is a joint family property. He argued he has a clean …

Vishal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vishal Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 61(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, relating to the alleged recovery of 9.75 litres …

Mithilesh Kumar @ Mithilesh ChoupalversusThe state of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mithilesh Kumar, the petitioner, feared arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 36 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not …

Onkar NarayanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Onkar Narayan, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered against him under Sections 274, 275 and 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 25.8 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle he owned. …

Vicki Kumar Singh @ Krishna Murti SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioners Vicki Kumar Singh and Himanshu Singh applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in a case registered under Sections 30(a), 38 and 41(i) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 3010.14 litres of liquor and a vehicle. They argued they have no prior criminal record, …

Neeraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Neeraj Kumar and Sanjay Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 31.4 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. They argued that the liquor was not recovered from their conscious possession and that the second …

Rohit Sharma @ Rohit Kr. SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Rohit Sharma filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the application, he surrendered to the authorities. He then sought permission to withdraw his anticipatory bail plea. The Court, after hearing counsel, allowed the withdrawal. Consequently, the …

Upendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Upendra Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 20 litres of liquor from a vehicle he owned. He argued that he had a clean criminal record, was not in …

Lakshmi BabuversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Lakshmi Babu, the owner of a motorcycle from which 13.875 litres of liquor was recovered, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor and was unaware that his vehicle would …

Karan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Karan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where liquor was allegedly recovered from his house and that of another person. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was …

Badal Kumar @ Ajay RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Badal Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of liquor from his house and another residence. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the house is …

Prince KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Prince Kumar, owner of a Scorpio vehicle, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 500.625 liters of liquor from his vehicle. He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that he was not present at the spot, had no conscious possession of the …

Indal Kumar Yadav @ Indal yadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Indal Kumar Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he may be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly recovering 4.5 litres of liquor near Majhari Crossing. The petitioner argued that the liquor was not in his …

Laxman Kumar @ Laxman Manjhi @ Duldul ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Laxman Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act alleging recovery of 56.07 litres of liquor. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, that the recovery took place at a location not belonging to …

Jan Mohammad MianversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jan Mohammad Mian, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 145 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware of his friend's alleged …

Vinod KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vinod Kumar, the owner of a Maruti Suzuki, was implicated in a case alleging the recovery of 338.35 litres of liquor from his vehicle and offences under Sections 414 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. The petitioner argued …

Sudhir Kumar BhartiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sudhir Kumar Bharti, sought anticipatory bail after the police alleged his involvement in an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, claiming he had recovered 21.5 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He contended that he was neither in possession of the liquor nor the …

Chhotu Kumar Singh @ Amarjeet Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chhotu Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of ten litres of liquor from an orchard belonging to Arun Singh. He asserted that he has a clean …

Mahesh MishraversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mahesh Mishra, the owner of a motorcycle from which 171 litres of liquor were seized, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Sections 274 and 275 of the BNS, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor being carried, that the vehicle …

Sanjay MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanjay Mahto, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 103.68 litres of liquor from an auto he owned. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, had a clean …

Mukesh Kumar ChoudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mukesh Kumar Choudhary was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 750 ml of liquor recovered from his co‑accused, Manish, and for being the registered owner of a seized motorcycle. The petitioner, claiming a clean antecedent and no conscious …

Kailu Kumar @ Bittu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Kailu Kumar applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Excise Act. He argued that he was not in possession of the seized motorcycle and that the case against him relied solely on a confessional statement of Gaurav Kumar made in police custody, …

ParwativersusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Parwati, the owner of a Scorpio from which 402.24 litres of liquor was seized, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. She argued that she was not present at the seizure, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and was unaware of her driver’s alleged misuse of …

Tunni DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Tunni Devi, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 16 litres of liquor from a sack near Chandni crossing. She asserted she had no possession of the liquor, the location did not belong to her, and she was implicated by a …

Ram Awatar SaoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Ram Awatar Sao and Rahul Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 1.08 litres of liquor. They contended that they were not caught in possession, the alleged recovery was based on a co-accused's confession …

Raja KuraishiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Raja Kuraishi, a resident of Ward No. 26 in Sitamarhi, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 69.600 litres of liquor from a field that does not belong to him. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at …

Krishan Kumar Mandal @ Krishna Kumar MandalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The Patna High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Krishan Kumar Mandal, who was alleged to be involved in the recovery of 30 litres of liquor from two motorcycles under Sections 30(a) and 32(2) of the Excise Act. The petitioner argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not …

Mithilesh Sardar @ Mithlesh SardarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mithilesh Sardar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 15 litres of liquor from his courtyard. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, …

Anil ShahiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Anil Shahi, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 343.44 litres of liquor from a vehicle he owned. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor being in the vehicle and that the actual offender, a friend, fled the scene, …

Lakshman Paswan @ Laxuman PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Lakshman Paswan, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging he concealed 5 litres of liquor in an orchard. He argued that the alleged contraband was not in his possession, the orchard did …

Sachin Kumar @ Sachin SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sachin Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 73.2 litres of liquor from a straw house linked to him. He argued that the liquor was not seized from his immediate possession, the straw …

Anil Chaudhary @ Anil KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Anil Chaudhary was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 160 litres of liquor from a location not owned by him. He sought anticipatory bail, arguing he has a clean antecedent, the alleged recovery was not from his possession, and the case relied on …

Manjesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Manjesh Yadav filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court in a criminal miscellaneous case. He later approached the Court seeking permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail and to surrender, requesting that he be allowed to apply for regular bail. The learned counsel for the …

Pappu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pappu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after police alleged that 432 litres of liquor were recovered from a poultry farm adjacent to his property and 45 litres from his house, along with the seizure of a motorcycle, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that the …

Sonu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 10 litres of liquor from his motorcycle and 60 litres from a gallon at Jafrabad. He contended that the liquor was not found in his conscious possession, that he was merely the …

Suraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, four individuals from Nawada district, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 46.5 litres of liquor. They argued they have clean antecedents, the liquor was recovered from a location not …

Prithvi KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Prithvi Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that liquor and two motorcycles were seized but none were found in his possession and he is not the owner. He contended that the case against him relied on a …

Shahil Kumar @ Shahil PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shahil Kumar (Shahil Paswan) applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly recovering 13,500 litres of liquor from a scooty. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested on the spot, the liquor was not in …

Mritunjay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Mritunjay Kumar filed an anticipatory bail application in the Patna High Court. While the application was pending, he was arrested. He then sought the court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The court, after hearing counsel for both sides, granted the request to withdraw. …

Rahul MandalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The appellants, members of the Mandal family, were charged under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and several IPC provisions for alleged caste‑based assault and abuse of an informant and her family on 10‑Nov‑2024. The trial court had refused anticipatory bail under Section 14‑A(2) of the …

Pushpa DeviversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, Pushpa Devi and Anurag Kumar, were charged under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting an informant who claimed she was subjected to caste-based abuse after an …

Raj Narayan SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The appellants, three brothers, were charged under several IPC offences and sections of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act in connection with a land‑sale dispute that allegedly involved caste‑based abuse. They sought anticipatory bail after the Special Judge refused it. The appellants …

Suresh dasversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, a group of brothers and relatives, were charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act for alleged assault, robbery and other offences on 15 August 2024. They applied for …

Rajnikant KumarversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The appellant, Rajnikant Kumar, filed a criminal appeal against his conviction. During the hearing, he sought permission to withdraw the appeal and to surrender, requesting that the trial court consider his regular bail application without prejudice. The High Court, after hearing counsel, granted …

Amit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The appellant, Amit Kumar, was charged under IPC sections 420, 120B and 406 and under Sections 3(1)(r)(s) and 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly cheating a woman and her sister‑in‑law. He applied for anticipatory bail under Section …

Nilam Kushwaha @ Kumari Nilam SinhaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Nilam Kushwaha and Arvind Bhagat, parents of a man named Gautam, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 89 and 64 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023. They alleged that the case was false, stemming from a personal dispute between Gautam …

Vijay Kumar @ Vijay RaiversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The appellants, Ajay Kumar Rai and Anup Kumar Rai (along with co‑appellant Vijay Kumar), were convicted in a criminal case (PS Case No.252/2019) and filed criminal appeals (SJ No.498/2025 and SJ No.433/2025) before the Patna High Court. They sought the Court’s permission to withdraw their appeals …

Kamdev Yadav @ Kamdev KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Kamdev Yadav sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case registered under Sections 379 and 411 of the IPC for the theft of diesel pump sets. The prosecution’s case is based on an informant’s allegation and a confession by co‑accused Dhananjay Kumar, which …

Aman Kumar @ Aman PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Aman Kumar appealed against the State of Bihar and Rita Devi. The appellant claimed that the matter had been compromised with the informant and requested permission to withdraw the appeal, surrender, and obtain regular bail. The court considered the request and, after hearing counsel, granted …

Mohan RavidasversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mohan Ravidas, the petitioner, feared arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 56(b) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 10 litres of liquor in a motorcycle he owned. He argued that the case diary had not been produced despite a court order and that he had a clean …

Kashinath MishraversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Kashinath Mishra, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a criminal case (PS No. 314/2025) involving multiple offences under the Bihar Negotiable Sale Act, 2023. He alleged that the informant, a cousin, falsely implicated him over a land dispute where the informant claimed the …

Sanauddin @ SoneyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioners Sanauddin and Sitare were charged under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments (B.N.S) Act and Section 27 of the Arms Act for alleged assault and firing of weapons. They applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest. The petitioners argued that the allegations were false and …

Sanjay SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioners Sanjay Sah and Parmila Devi sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under several IPC sections for alleged assault with an axe, robbery and other offences arising from a land dispute with the informant, who is an agnate. They asserted clean antecedents and contended that the FIR …

Dharmraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Dharmraj Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a FIR alleging that he was part of a group that intercepted and fired at an informant, resulting in a firearm injury and the alleged snatching of a locket. The petitioner contended that he did not fire any weapon and …

Vinod Kumar Gupta @ Binod KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Vinod Kumar Gupta, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case alleging fraud involving a shortfall of Rs. 1,36,400 at a bank branch. He argued that the informant, a bank customer service assistant, falsely implicated him and that the bank’s routine practice of …

Shivajee KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Shivajee Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a cyber‑forgery case involving alleged preparation of fake birth certificates and Aadhaar cards. The FIR charges him under Sections 340(2), 338, 336(3), 318(4) and 61(1) of the Bihar Negotiable Sale Act, 202 and Sections 66(c) …

Sanoj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Petitioner Sanoj Kumar filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal miscellaneous case. During the pendency of the application, he was arrested. The petitioner then sought the court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The court, after hearing counsel for both sides, …

Sonu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a FIR alleging offences under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Substances Act, including alleged inappropriate conduct with a woman. He argued that he has a clean record and that the informant, who had previously …

Bhola Sharma @ Chandan Kumar @ Bhol SharmversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioners, four residents of Lakhipur village, applied for anticipatory bail in a criminal case (PS Case No. 29 of 2020) involving offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 504, 354, 307 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The State opposed the bail, pointing out that a Section 82 Cr.P.C. …

Pintu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Pintu Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a kidnapping case under Sections 137(2), 140(3) and 96 of the B.N.S. The informant alleged that Kumar kidnapped her minor daughter on 23 October 2025, but the victim later gave a statement under Section 183 CrPC …

Baskinath Rai @ Basukinath RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Baskinath Rai, a PDS dealer, was implicated in an FIR alleging discrepancies between digital and physical stock of wheat and rice, and failure to hand over certain quantities to a new dealer. The FIR was registered under Sections 316(5) and 318(4) of the BNS, 2023 read with Section 7 of the …

Rohit Kumar SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rohit Kumar Sharma, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 316(2), 316(5), 318(4) and 3(5) of the Banking and Financial Services Act, 2023, relating to a cash shortage of Rs. 1,36,400 at a bank branch. He alleged that the informant, an Assistant …

Praduman GiriversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Praduman Giri sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where 214.68 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a car and a motorcycle. He contended that he was not present at the seizure, did not own the vehicles, …

Dheeraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dheeraj Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 151.2 litres of liquor from a location not owned by him. He argued that no liquor was found in his possession and that the investigation relied …

Lakhindra Bind @ Lakhendra BindversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Lakhindra Bind, was arrested while an anticipatory bail application was pending before the Patna High Court. The petitioner, through counsel, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application after his arrest. The Court considered whether a withdrawal could …

Govind Kumar @ Goutam KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Govind Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 135.75 litres of liquor recovered from a car. He argued he had no conscious possession, was not the vehicle owner, …

Suresh ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Suresh Manjhi and Dipu Manjhi, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 30 litres of liquor. During the pendency of the application, Dipu …

Panchanand Yadav @ Phulwa @ Panchanand Prasad YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Panchanand Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 1.620 litres of liquor from his house and 37.2 litres from a sack. He argued that the house is joint family …

Arun HembramversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Arun Hembram and Sukhlal Hembram, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged possession of liquor. They argued they have clean antecedents, the liquor was recovered from a …

Jitendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jitendra Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 180 litres of liquor from his Maruti Dzire. He was not arrested at the scene and the liquor was not found in his immediate possession; the allegation rests on his …

Mohan SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Mohan Sahani feared arrest in a case under IPC sections 272, 273, 34 and Bihar Excise Act section 30(a) concerning the recovery of liquor from his motorcycle and a shop. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, he had no relation with the shop owner, and he was …

Dhanvir Yadav @ Dharamveer YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dhanvir Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail in a case alleging offences under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, relating to the alleged recovery of 108 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not …

Madan YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Madan Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case alleging violation of Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 86.4 litres of liquor from a pick‑up vehicle he owned. He argued that he …

Rajesh Kumar Bhagat @ Rajesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Rajesh Kumar Bhagat sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where 5.4 litres of liquor and four motorcycles were seized. He contended that he was not arrested on the spot, had no possession of the seized items, and was …

Gorelal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Gorelal Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning of a pending case (PS Case No. 649 of 2025) alleging his involvement in the recovery of 1,650 litres of liquor from multiple vehicles, offenses under Section 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Sections 30(a) and 41 …

Tunnu Bhar @ Tunu BharversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Tunnu Bhar, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered against him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 41 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession and that the …

Mithilesh Kumar ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Mithilesh Kumar Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 28 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that the liquor was not found in his possession and that he was …

Chandeshwar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Chandeshwar Yadav, filed an anticipatory bail application in the High Court of Patna. While the application was pending, he was arrested by the police. The petitioner’s counsel then sought the court’s permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The learned counsel for …

Md. Asgar AliversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Md Asgar Ali, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 24 litres of liquor from a scooter he owned. He was not arrested at the spot and the liquor was not found in his conscious possession; the …

Asha DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Asha Devi, the wife of Madho Saw, applied for anticipatory bail after the police seized 32 litres of liquor from a motorcycle she owned, alleging a violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. She argued that she was not present at the spot, had no conscious possession of the …

Pramod ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Pramod Chaudhary, a man with no prior criminal record, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act for allegedly possessing 28 litres of liquor recovered from a sack at a location not belonging to him. He argued that the liquor was not in …

Pooja DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Pooja Devi, owner of a vehicle from which 240.63 litres of liquor were seized, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482(2) of the BNSS, arguing she had no prior criminal record and was unaware of the misuse of her vehicle. The State opposed the bail, contending the seizure implicated …

Subodh Sah @ SubodhversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners Subodh Sah, Santosh Sah and Sanjeev Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 240.63 litres of liquor from two autos. They argued they have clean antecedents, were not caught with the liquor, …

Arun Kumar @ Arun Raut @ Arun Raut @ Arun KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Arun Kumar petitioned for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of liquor from a motorcycle and a location near his house. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, had no conscious possession …

Sudhir Pandit @ Sudhir Kumar PanditversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Sudhir Pandit and Sudhir Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 240.63 litres of liquor from two autos. They contended they had clean antecedents, were not caught with the liquor, were not owners of the …

Kallu GopeversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Petitioner Kallu Gope filed an anticipatory bail application under criminal procedure. He later sought to withdraw that application and surrender to the trial court to obtain regular bail. The High Court allowed the withdrawal, directing that the trial court consider his regular bail application on …

Mukesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mukesh Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly concealing 14.1 litres of liquor under straw. He argued he has a clean antecedent, was not caught in possession, and the alleged recovery occurred on premises not belonging to him, based on …

Amarjeet RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Amarjeet Ray, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of large quantities of liquor and a seized motorcycle. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, the liquor was recovered from premises …

MohitversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Mohit, owner of a vehicle, was implicated in a case (Excise P.S. Darbhanga Case No.328/2025) for the alleged recovery of 918 litres of liquor from his vehicle, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He contended that he was not arrested at the …

Kaushal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Kaushal Kumar, accused under Sections 30(a), 30(c) and 30(d) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 100 litres of liquor from a forest area, applied for anticipatory bail. He contended that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, and the case was based …

Tuntun ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Tuntun Chaudhary, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 3 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in …

Om Prakash SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Om Prakash Sahani, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 36 litres of liquor from a Toto vehicle. He contended that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the vehicle, and was implicated by a watchman with whom he …

Rahul Kumar @ Rahul RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 5 litres of liquor from a location behind his shop and another shop. He argued that he had no possession of the liquor, the alleged recovery site did not …

Akhilesh Yadav @ Aklesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Akhilesh Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that the alleged recovery of 50 litres of liquor occurred at a …

Rajesh ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rajesh Chaudhary, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where 10 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a location adjacent to his house but not from his possession. He argued that the police relied on secret …

Pradeep Yadav @ Pradeep KumarversusThe State of Bihar

D.F.D. FOR NON APPEARANCE

Petitioner Pradeep Yadav filed a criminal miscellaneous petition before the Patna High Court seeking relief against the State of Bihar. The petitioner failed to appear before the court despite repeated calls. The State was represented by Advocate Pradeep Narain Kumar, A.P.P. The court noted the …

Vishun Sahni @ Vushun SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vishun Sahni sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 31.8 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and was unaware that his son had misused …

Rajkumar Sah @ RajkumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Rajkumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of liquor from his shop and a motorcycle. He contended that he was not in possession of the seized liquor, was not the …

Lal Mohan SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Lal Mohan Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 50 litres of liquor from a box behind his house. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the location did not belong to …

Bhartendu PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bhartendu Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(A), 32, 36 and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 2,851.125 litres of liquor from a truck. He contended that he had no conscious …

Vikash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vikash Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 40 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, …

Bittu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bittu Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly recovering 10.350 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the FIR did not …

Upendra Sah @ Satyendra Sah @ Satyondra SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Upendra Sah, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act read with Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, alleging that 5 litres of liquor were recovered from a spot behind his cattle shed and not from his …

Kalawati DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Kalawati Devi, the owner of a motorcycle from which 6.375 litres of liquor was seized, sought anticipatory bail after fearing arrest under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act. She argued that she had no knowledge of the liquor being in her vehicle and that her son, who was apprehended …

Kamlesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Kamlesh Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 1.5 litres of liquor from a bush behind a petrol pump. The petitioner argued that he has a clean …

Pappu Sah @ Pappu Kumar SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pappu Sah, was implicated under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 40.86 litres of liquor recovered from his joint family house. He contended that he had no conscious possession, possessed a clean antecedent, and that the 2018 amendment to the Excise Act …

Shyambabu YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Shyambabu Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Excise Act read with Sections 112(2) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023, relating to alleged recovery of large quantities of liquor from premises not owned by him. He argued that the …

Ritesh NathversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ritesh Nath, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 20.4 litres of liquor in his Hyundai Santro. He argued that the liquor was recovered from the vehicle, not from his personal …

Dhiraj Kumar @ BillaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dhiraj Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with alleged offences under Section 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act. He has five prior criminal cases, one involving the alleged …

Jai Prakash Paswan @ J. PversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jai Prakash Paswan, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 10 litres of liquor from a bush behind his house. He was not arrested at the scene and the liquor was not found in his possession; the alleged location does not belong to …

Dinesh ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioners Dinesh Chaudhary and his wife Lalita Devi were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for allegedly possessing 15 litres of liquor recovered from their jointly owned house. They applied for anticipatory bail, contending that …

Md. Amanullah @ AmanullahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Md. Amanullah, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 255 litres of liquor from his pickup vehicle. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor being transported, had a clean criminal record, and was …

Kailash Yadav @ Kaila KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kailash Yadav, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 500 litres of liquor from three motorcycles. He asserted that he had no prior criminal record, was not in possession of the liquor, and was falsely implicated by a watchman …

Ravi KantversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ravi Kant, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case alleging violation of Section 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for the alleged recovery of 10,800 litres of liquor …

Jay Krishna KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Jay Krishna Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, where 63.6 litres of liquor were recovered from seven motorcycles, one of which he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, …

Subhash PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 95 litres of liquor from three motorcycles. The petitioner argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was unaware …

Teni Rai @ Teni Ray @ Teni KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Teni Rai, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 40 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not in …

Amritansh Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Amritansh Kumar Singh, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 501.12 litres of liquor from a Scorpio vehicle. He contended that he was not …

Rajeshwar Manjhi @ Rajeshwar HazraversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rajeshwar Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for allegedly recovering three litres of liquor from a public bridge. He asserted a clean criminal record, denied possession of the liquor, and …

Subash Prasad @ Subhash Prasad @ Subhash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Subash Prasad, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 80 litres of liquor from a public ghat. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the location did not belong to him, …

Ravikant Kumar @ Mantu Kumar @ MantuversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ravikant Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 220 litres of liquor from a sack thrown from a scooty. He asserted a clean criminal record, lack of possession of the liquor, and that the …

Sujeet Kumar @ AfsarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sujeet Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 45 litres of liquor from a vehicle he did not own. He argued that no liquor was found in his possession, the vehicle belonged to another, and the case relied on a confessional …

Chandrabir Kumar Yadav @ Chandrabir YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Chandrabir Kumar Yadav applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 756 litres of liquor from four motorcycles. The petitioner argued that he was not …

Sanjay SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanjay Sah, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for alleged recovery of 6.44 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his kiosk. He contended that the liquor was not in his possession, the place did …

Umesh Manjhi @ Umesh MajhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Umesh Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of liquor from a bamboo orchard not belonging to him. He argued he has a clean antecedent, no possession at the …

Ravi HembramversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ravi Hembram, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged alleging that 180 litres of liquor and 12 kg of Naushadar tablets were recovered from his house, invoking Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. He contended that he has a clean …

Ajay YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ajay Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 1.455 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, …

Rajan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Rajan Kumar sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged by Priyanka Kumari alleging that they were married in a temple and that she was later ousted from his home. The petitioner denies any marriage, contending that the complainant has taken contradictory positions in other …

Rakesh Singh @ Rakesh Prasad SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Rakesh Singh, was charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and several sections of the Bihar National Security Act for alleged assault and theft. He applied for anticipatory bail, which was denied by the Special Judge. On appeal, the …

RAVINDRA MALAH @ RAVINDRA KUMAR @ RABINDRA MALAHversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, three brothers from Durgapur, were charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and several IPC offences for an alleged caste‑based assault that occurred on 24‑12‑2019. The FIR was lodged on 25‑02‑2020 after a complaint was filed on …

Budhhan MandalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The appellants, four brothers from Khurdkol village, were charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting and abusing a woman, Malti Devi, during a land dispute. They applied for anticipatory bail under Section 14‑A(2) of the SC/ST Act, …

Arti Devi @ Arti KumariversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, Arti Devi and her brothers Uday and Vijai Sharma, were charged under several IPC sections and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting the informant and misappropriating furniture. They applied for anticipatory bail, which was …

Sunil Patel @ Bhaltu PatelversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sunil Patel, feared arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 70 litres of liquor. He contended that no liquor was found in his possession, the recovery occurred at a location not belonging to him, and he was implicated based on …

Shankar SawversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Shankar and Mithilesh applied for anticipatory bail in a case involving the murder of an informant's son, with offences under Sections 341, 323, 307, 302 and 324/34 IPC. The petitioners were not named in the FIR, but the informant later identified them in a re‑statement, alleging their involvement. …

Dhan Sunder RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The appellants, members of the Rai family, were charged under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and several IPC provisions for alleged caste‑based assault and abuse that allegedly occurred on 20‑06‑2012. A charge‑sheet was filed in 2013, cognizance was taken, and a non‑bailable warrant was …

Golu Goswami @ Saurav KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The appellants, Golu Goswami and Mithun Mandal, were charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 for offences including sections 105 and 3(5) as well as sections 3(1)(s) and 3(2)(V), following the death of the informant’s son. The informant alleged …

Suman MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioners Suman Mahto and Jetan Mahto applied for anticipatory bail in two separate criminal miscellaneous proceedings concerning alleged offences under the Excise Act, the Bihar Narcotic Substances (BNSS) Act and the Arms Act. They argued that they were not arrested at the scene, no liquor was …

Ambuj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ambuj Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 24.39 litres of liquor recovered from a scooty he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was …

SANTOSH SAHNIversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Santosh Sahni applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 11.9 litres of liquor from his joint family house. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, the liquor was not in his conscious possession, …

Satyam Kumar @ Satyam RamversusThe State Of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Satyam Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(i) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 27 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He contended that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the vehicle, and was implicated by a local chowkidar …

Rakesh MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Rakesh and Deepak Mukhiya, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case alleging violation of Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for possession of 15 litres of liquor. They argued that the liquor was found in a joint family …

Suman MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Suman Mahto and Jetan (Jitan) Mahto, applied for anticipatory bail in two separate criminal miscellaneous proceedings concerning alleged offences under the Excise Act and various provisions of the Bihar Narcotic Substances (B.N.S.) Act and the Arms Act. They argued that they were …

Hari Shankar Kumar ThakurversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Hari Shankar Kumar Thakur applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, relating to the recovery of 54 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued …

Anish SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Anish Singh, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 127(1), 115(2), 303(2), 109, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bihar National Security Act, 2023. He claims he was falsely implicated due to a Panchayat election dispute and argues that the …

Ravi KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ravi Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for the alleged recovery of 315 litres of liquor from two vehicles he owned. He was not arrested at the scene and claimed he was unaware that his driver had misused the …

Pintu Chaudhary @ Pintu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pintu Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 30 litres of liquor from a public area not in his possession. He argued that the informant, a chowkidar with whom he …

Raja KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Raja Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 37.98 litres of liquor from a bush and 24.48 litres from a house belonging to his mother, Indira Devi. The petitioner argued …

Juli DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Juli Devi, wife of Guddu Sahani, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under multiple sections of the B.N.S. alleging her involvement in an assault arising from a family dispute. She contended that she has a clean antecedent, is a woman, and that the FIR is vague and she has been …

Nitish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners—Nitish Kumar, Jivachh Sah, Uro Devi and Vinita Kumari—filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 127(2), 115(2), 109, 303(2) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023. The FIR alleged that on 10‑10‑2025 a group of accused, …

Pawan SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Petitioner Pawan Singh applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case involving alleged possession of 1807.56 litres of liquor, a country-made pistol, live cartridges, a motorcycle and a bicycle. He contended that he was not in conscious possession of the seized items, was not the …