Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
5892 judgments · newest first · showing 2001–2200
The petitioner, Ram Kumar Roy, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case involving multiple offences under the B.N.S., arising from a land dispute where he was alleged to have assaulted the informant with a rod. The petitioner argued he has a clean record, the injuries were minor, …
Krishna Singh petitioned for anticipatory bail after an FIR (Risiap PS Case No. 116 of 2025) alleged that, while intoxicated, he assaulted his brother-in-law with a rod, causing a grievous injury to the head. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated due to a personal dispute and argued that …
The petitioners, including Rohan Kumar and others, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 137(2), 96 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., alleging that they were falsely implicated in the alleged kidnapping and abuse of a 17‑year‑old girl. The informant claimed the petitioners enticed …
Ajay Kumar Yadav and Vijay Kumar Yadav applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 109 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023. They asserted that they have clean antecedents and that the informant, a co‑villager with …
The petitioners, comprising members of the Singh family, filed an anticipatory bail application in a case registered under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable (B.N.S.) Act. Petitioners 1 and 2 (Budhraj Singh and Guddu Kumar) were arrested during the pendency of the application and sought to …
Sarita Devi, the owner of a Bolero pickup, was implicated in the seizure of 1,710 litres of liquor from her vehicle and feared arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. She argued that she had no knowledge of the driver’s alleged misuse of the vehicle and that no liquor was found in her …
The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3) and 61(2) of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act, 2023, based on allegations by an informant that a relative, Indu Bhushan, misappropriated funds and credited part …
Shivpujan Kumar and Munna Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, including offences of false evidence, abetment, and assault. The informant alleged that the petitioners, along with others, threatened him with a …
Santosh and Rahul, brothers residing in Katihar, were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 50 litres of liquor from a public area. Fearing arrest, they filed an anticipatory bail application, seeking rectification of pleadings. The petitioners …
The petitioner, Arvind Kumar Sah, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly supplying spurious liquor that caused the informant's husband to lose an eye and the informant's father‑in‑law to die. The petitioner contended that he was …
Ravi Yadav sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018 alleging that liquor was recovered from two other individuals and not from his conscious possession. The petitioner argued that he has a clean antecedent …
Ganauri Saw filed an anticipatory bail application in the Patna High Court under Criminal Miscellaneous No.11441 of 2026. The petitioner later approached the court seeking permission to withdraw that application. The learned counsel for the State raised no objection to the withdrawal. The court, …
The petitioners, Kailash Sahni, Laxman Sahni and Ram Nandan Rai, feared arrest in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 302/34, 120B, 467, 468, 201 of the IPC and Sections 18 and 22 of the Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act. They contended that the police investigation had …
Ankit Kumar Jha, a 19‑year‑old with no prior record, was named in an FIR for alleged participation in a violent assault involving sword and knife, during which Rs.5,000 was allegedly stolen. He contended that the informant, the son of Sanoj Jha, fabricated the charges due to a personal dispute and …
The petitioners Ujjwal Kumar and Gautam Kumar filed anticipatory bail applications in a criminal case arising from PS case No. 215 of 2025 concerning alleged offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The petitioners withdrew the application for Ujjwal Kumar, and the court …
Manjay Lal Yadav sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 alleging recovery of large quantities of liquor from premises adjacent to his house and from two motorcycles. The petitioner argued …
The Patna High Court entertained the petition of Bindu Devi (Lalmuni Devi), who feared arrest in a case registered under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022 for alleged possession of liquor and jaggery solution. She contended that she has a clean criminal record, the alleged liquor was …
The petitioner, Alok Kumar, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court in a criminal miscellaneous case. The petitioner later sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The learned counsel for the State opposed the withdrawal. The Court, after hearing …
The petitioners, Md. Shamim Ahmad and Md. Jawed Alam, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a criminal complaint (Sections 420, 406, 120B IPC) arising from a disputed real‑estate transaction. They alleged that the complainant had paid Rs.54 lakh for nine flats, which remained uncompleted, and …
The appellant, Rajnish Singh, was charged under several IPC sections and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly causing a road accident involving his vehicle and threatening the victim's family. He contended that he was falsely implicated, did not …
The appellants, accused under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and several IPC and Arms Act provisions for a land‑related violent incident, appealed a trial court order that refused them anticipatory bail. One appellant died during the pendency, and the court permitted withdrawal of his …
Halendra Yadav filed an anticipatory bail application in the Patna High Court. While the application was pending, he was arrested by the police. The petitioner, through counsel, sought the court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The court examined the request and found no …
The appellants were charged under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and several IPC provisions for allegedly forcibly ploughing a landowner’s field, assaulting his son with a knife, injuring another person with a club, and threatening family members with a gun. They filed an appeal under …
Vivek Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he may be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 165.150 litres of liquor from a rented room belonging to Shivnath Sah. The petitioner asserted that he has a …
The Patna High Court considered the petition of Ashwani Kumar (Uttam Kumar) seeking anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 69, 89, 126(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita based on allegations by an informant of a long‑term relationship, false promise of …
Petitioner Pintu Kumar was arrested while his anticipatory bail application was pending before the Patna High Court. The petitioner, through counsel, sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application after his arrest. The court considered the request and, finding no impediment, granted …
Manoj Mandal and his wife Gunjan Devi sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 109(1), 352, 303(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The alleged offence arose from a family dispute over a goat, during which the petitioner allegedly assaulted his brother with …
The petitioners, Priti Kumari and Kumar Gaurav, applied for anticipatory bail in a complaint (Case No. 4574 of 2022) alleging offences under Section 420 of the IPC and Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complaint alleged that the petitioners received advance payments of Rs. 20 lakh …
The petitioner, Ajay Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the BNS, 2023, alleging he was falsely implicated in an altercation involving his neighbour and the informant's son. He asserted he was not present at the incident, has a clean record, …
The petitioners, four Yadav brothers, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 110, 352 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The FIR alleged that they threw garbage, leading to a dispute during which the informant’s husband was allegedly …
Geeta Kumari sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120(B) alleging she obtained a teaching appointment through a forged marksheet. She contended that the FIR was filed without a prior show‑cause notice and that she was falsely …
Petitioners Pankaj Singh and Rajesh Kumar applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under several sections of the BNS, 2023 relating to alleged assault during a road‑construction dispute. They contended that they were falsely implicated by the informant, who alleged that the …
The petitioner, Sanni Singh, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bihar Negotiable Statutes (BNS) 2023, including offences of assault and robbery. He alleged that the informant’s complaint was false, arising from a wage dispute, and denied …
Kumari Prathna, a teacher since 2006, was implicated in a case alleging forgery of a mark‑sheet and offences under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120(B). She applied for anticipatory bail, asserting a clean antecedent, that she is a woman, and that the informant falsely implicated her without …
Petitioners Neelam Devi and Raja Sah sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 147, 149, 353, 431, 504 and 114. They argued they have clean antecedents, were not named in the FIR and were only identified later during investigation, and that the allegations of …
The petitioner, Dilshad Alam, was named in an FIR for offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 137(2), 96, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita relating to the alleged abduction and assault of his sister. He contended that the informant falsely implicated him and that the investigating …
The petitioner, Dharam Roy, feared arrest in a case registered under several sections of the Bihar Non‑Specific (BNS) Act, 2023, alleging that he assaulted an informant with a pistol during a land dispute involving his father‑in‑law. He contended that he has a clean record and that the allegations …
The petitioners, Jhunjhun Bin @ Rakesh Mukhiya and Motilal Bin @ Motilal Mukhiya, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. During the hearing on 26-03-2026, the petitioners' counsel sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and instead surrender to …
The petitioner, Md. Babar Ali, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with alleged offences under Sections 30(a), 32(2) and 41(1) of the Excise Act involving the alleged recovery of 520 litres of spirit. The petitioner argued that he was not …
Hajara Khatun, the wife of Md. Gafar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 72 litres of liquor from an e‑rickshaw she owned. She contended that she had a clean antecedent, was unaware of her husband’s …
Vikash Bhagat applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 3.24 litres of liquor. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, the liquor was recovered from a place not …
The petitioner, Maharaja Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 100 litres of liquor. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, the liquor was not in his immediate possession, and the alleged …
Vijay Chauhan sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged alleging that 10 litres of liquor were recovered from his house and 10 litres from a neighbour's house, invoking Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the property is a …
Dharmendra Choudhary was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018 for allegedly recovering 100 litres of liquor from a bush. He contended that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and that the allegation stemmed from a hostile …
The petitioner, Akshay Kumar Das, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with alleged offences under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, relating to the alleged recovery of 225 litres of liquor …
The petitioners applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act alleging recovery of liquor from a field. They argued that they were not arrested on the spot, that the alleged liquor was not in their …
Amod Kumar Sharma, the owner of a Maruti Baleno, was implicated in a case alleging the recovery of 79.98 litres of liquor from his vehicle, violating Sections 30(a), 32(i)(iii) and 41(i)(ii) of the Bihar Excise Act. He was not arrested at the spot and no liquor was found in his immediate possession; …
Petitioners Ranjay Singh and Sunny Kumar applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for alleged recovery of 12 litres of liquor from a truck. They argued they have clean antecedents, are not owners of the truck, and that …
The petitioner, Sumit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of eight litres of liquor from the house of Devi Lal. He argued that he had no possession of the liquor, the alleged recovery occurred at a place …
The petitioner, Pushpa Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where 40 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a motorcycle and a house. She argued that she had no prior criminal record, was a …
Manoj Sinha, the petitioner, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered against him for alleged offences under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, involving the recovery of 99 litres of liquor from a car …
The petitioner, Mannu @ Abhimanyu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 18 litres of liquor from his joint‑family house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the house is a joint …
Satya Mahato applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with offences under Sections 30(a) and 37 of the Excise Act, alleging that the alleged recovery of 18 litres of liquor was from a location not belonging to him and that he was implicated by a …
Rita Devi sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 30 litres of liquor from a Bajaj CNG auto. She contended that she was not arrested on the spot, had no possession of the liquor, was not the owner of the vehicle, and that …
Shashi Ranjan was implicated in a case alleging the recovery of 1,350 litres of liquor from seven motorcycles, charging him under Sections 274, 275 and 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he was not caught in …
The petitioners, Shatranj Manjhi and Surendra Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 12 litres of liquor from a public place. They argued they have no conscious possession of the liquor, the alleged informant is …
The petitioner, Nand Kishore Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC in connection with alleged offences under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, involving the recovery of liquor and semi‑manufactured mahua. He …
The petitioner, Sajila Devi, sought anticipatory bail after a police case was registered under IPC Sections 274 and 275 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 66.6 litres of liquor recovered from a scooty she owned. She argued that she had no prior …
The petitioner, Shankar Paswan, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act where 20 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he was not present at the spot of seizure, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and …
The petitioner, Bhagirath Mukhiya, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for the alleged recovery of 270 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no conscious …
The petitioner, Amit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of liquor from a riverbank and his cattle shed. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was not found in his conscious possession, …
The petitioner, Ranjeet Kumar Mahto, was implicated in an excise case (PS No. 974 of 2025) for the alleged recovery of 225 litres of liquor from a pickup vehicle he owned. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor being in the vehicle and that he was not in possession at the time of seizure, …
The petitioner, Ramesh Sah, applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging that 5.79 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle registered in his wife's name. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not present at the spot …
The petitioner, Rakesh Mahto, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where 200 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a toto vehicle and a motorcycle. He argued that he was not present at the seizure, did not own the …
The petitioners, three residents of Dhumnagar in West Champaran, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 18 litres of liquor from a joint‑family house. They contended that they had clean antecedents, no …
The petitioners, three women from Piparahiya village, were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 40 litres of liquor from a bush near the Kataha river. They contended that they have clean antecedents, were not arrested at the spot, and were falsely …
The petitioner, Subhankar Prasad Singh, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 82.8 litres of liquor from a Wagon R car he owned, although the liquor was not found in his immediate possession and he was not arrested at the spot. He argued …
The petitioner, Saurabh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 50.400 litres of liquor from an asbestos house on Gair Majarua land. He contended that he was not arrested on the spot, …
The petitioner, Sonu Kumar Sah, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where liquor was allegedly recovered from his orchard and a car. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was …
The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 255.120 litres of liquor recovered from his WagonR vehicle. He argued that he was not in actual possession of the …
The petitioner, Md. Mustakim, was implicated in a case under IPC sections 272 and 273 and the Bihar Excise Act sections 30(a) and 47 for alleged recovery of liquor from a motorcycle he owned, while another motorcycle was seized. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, was not …
The petitioner, Hari Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 24 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that the liquor was seized from his friend who was apprehended at the spot …
The petitioner, Md Asgar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 168.75 litres of liquor were recovered from a Swift car he owned. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor, that the driver who was in control of the vehicle fled the scene, …
The petitioner, Ankit Kumar, was implicated in a case under the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 277.125 litres of liquor from a Tata Safari vehicle. He contended that he was not arrested at the spot, had no possession of the liquor, and was not the owner of the vehicle, asserting that the …
The petitioner, Rafiq Miyan, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 9 litres of liquor recovered from a scooty. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not the owner of the scooty, and that the only evidence against him was a …
The petitioner, Gautam Kumar Sahani, was implicated in a case involving alleged possession of 353.58 litres of liquor seized from two motorcycles and a car, and charged under IPC sections 272, 273, 290 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. He argued that he had no …
The petitioner, Jelar Nut, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 48 litres of liquor from a bush adjacent to his house. He contended that he has a clean antecedent, was not caught in possession, and that the allegation stemmed from a hostile …
The petitioner, Md. Mubarak, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 378 litres of liquor from his Bolero vehicle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, …
The petitioner, Shamsad Alam, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 18 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued he had a clean antecedent, was not the owner of the vehicle, and the case was based solely on a …
The petitioner, Rampukar Rai, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 80 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He claimed he was not arrested on the spot, had no …
The petitioner, Rajan Kumar Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Excise Act, 2018, alleging recovery of 567 litres of liquor from a vehicle not in his conscious possession. He argued that …
The petitioner, Taher Alam, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Excise Act, alleging that only 500 ml of liquor was recovered from his motorcycle and that he had no prior criminal record. He …
The petitioner, Pappu Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 30(c), 32(iii) and 36 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, alleging recovery of liquor from several houses including his own. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was …
Petitioner Pratima Kumari, owner of a motorcycle from which 200 litres of liquor was seized, sought anticipatory bail, claiming she had no knowledge of the liquor being transported and possesses a clean criminal record. The State opposed the bail, arguing the seizure implicated her under Section …
The petitioner, Raushan Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 5.25 litres of liquor from a public banana orchard. He asserted a clean criminal record and …
The petitioners, Amir Shahni and Shyambabu Shahni, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 317.100 litres of liquor from a vehicle. They argued that they were not arrested on the spot, had no conscious possession of the …
The petitioner, Ravi Shankar Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of one litre of liquor from the jacket of an accused, with his motorcycle also seized. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of …
Petitioner Rajesh Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with alleged offences under Section 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, involving the recovery of 141 litres of liquor from his …
The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for the alleged recovery of 2,891.52 litres of liquor from a truck, although he claimed he was not in possession of the liquor and was merely the owner of the vehicle. He asserted a …
The petitioner, Dhakelu Bhuiya, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 34.3 litres of liquor from a poultry farm not owned by him. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, he had no relationship with the farm …
The petitioner, Sumiti Devi, sought anticipatory bail after a vehicle registered in her name was seized with 29 litres of liquor, alleged to be a violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. She contended that she had no knowledge of the driver’s misuse of the vehicle and possessed a clean …
The petitioner, Saroj Paswan, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly having 5 litres of liquor recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean criminal record, was not in possession of the …
The petitioner, Ajeet Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for alleged possession of 3 litres of liquor recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, the liquor …
Petitioner Pramod Yadav applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 6.8 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he was not in possession at the time, was unaware of his …
The petitioner, Bharat Paswan, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged possession of six litres of liquor. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, the liquor was found in a …
The petitioner, Sarvan Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case involving alleged recovery of 792 litres of liquor from six motorcycles, charged under Sections 274, 275, 317(5) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the …
Shriram Kumar sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where liquor was allegedly recovered from a third‑party named Santosh and from a motorcycle. The petitioner argued that no liquor was found in his …
The petitioners, Ramashankar Sahani, Rambha Devi, and Sajan Sahani, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 35 litres of liquor concealed near their house. They argued that the liquor was not in their conscious possession, the alleged recovery …
The petitioner, Amarnath Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 75 litres of liquor from a Toto vehicle and a motorcycle. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of …
The petitioner, Mithun Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018, alleging recovery of 162 litres of liquor from a vehicle he did not own. He argued that the police had implicated him …
The petitioner, Rabindra Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging recovery of 80 litres of liquor from his joint family house. He contended that no liquor …
Shiv Kumar Sahni sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that the alleged liquor seizure occurred at a public place, no liquor was found in his possession, and the …
Athanni Chaudhary sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 75 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the vehicle, and was implicated solely on …
Amirika Devi, a woman with a clean antecedent, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case alleging she possessed 54 litres of liquor and a motorcycle under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amended) Act, 2018 & 2022. She argued that the liquor was located …
The petitioner, Pradip Kumar Yadav, filed an anticipatory bail application in the High Court of Patna. He was subsequently arrested in connection with the case. The petitioner, through counsel, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application after his arrest. The Court …
The petitioner, Avinash Kumar Srivastav, was implicated in an excise case (PS No.1298 of 2025) for the alleged recovery of 54.54 litres of liquor from his Nissan car. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in actual possession of the liquor, and was unaware that his vehicle was misused …
The petitioner, Laddu Nut, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, alleging that 7 litres of liquor and 200 litres of Mahua were seized from a hut adjacent to his house. He contended that he was not arrested at …
The petitioner, Sulekha Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 82(1), 85, 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. She claimed to have a clean antecedent and alleged that the informant, her mother‑in‑law, falsely implicated her after a dowry …
The petitioner, Md. Munna, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Sections 274, 275 and 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly recovering 629.485 litres of liquor from four motorcycles. …
The petitioner, Upendra Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. after a seizure of 20 litres of liquor from his motorcycle, alleging he was unaware of his friend's misuse of the vehicle and had no conscious possession of the contraband. He claimed a clean antecedent and …
Lakshmi Paswan was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a), 30(c), 30(d) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly recovering 199.5 litres of liquor and 80 litres of spirit from a public place. The petitioner, claiming a clean antecedent, argued that the …
The appellant, Alok Kumar Yadav, filed Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.1367 of 2024 before the Patna High Court, arising from PS Case No.454 of 2023 in Buxar. The appeal challenged the judgment of the lower court in a criminal matter, though the specific substantive issues were not detailed in the order. …
Vikash Yadav applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 2.25 litres of liquor from the house of Rahul Kumar. The petitioner asserted that he has a clean antecedent, …
The petitioner, Vikash Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 126 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He …
The petitioner, Ghuran Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of liquor and motorcycles. He argued that he was not in possession of the seized items, the orchard did not belong to him, and the case was based …
Manjit Paswan, the owner of a motorcycle from which 28 litres of liquor was seized, applied for anticipatory bail, claiming a clean criminal record and that he was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure. The State opposed the bail, arguing the seizure implicated him under Section …
Brajesh Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where 25 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a site adjacent to a poultry farm not owned by him. He claimed the allegation arose from an inimical …
The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 7.200 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued he had a clean antecedent, was not the owner of the vehicle, and the seizure was based on secret …
Raju Mukhiya applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of large quantities of liquor. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was found in his …
The petitioner, Vikki Patel, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he was likely to be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly recovering 19.80 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, …
The petitioner, Nandu Mukhia, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 168 litres of liquor from a bag belonging to another individual, Ram Balak Mukhiya. The petitioner argued that he had no …
The petitioner, Jwala Prasad Singh, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 152.625 litres of liquor recovered from a car he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not in actual possession of …
The petitioner, Vikram Mukhiya, was implicated in a case under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 70 litres of liquor from a public area near a temple. He argued that he had no clean possession, was not …
The petitioner, Kumar Shubham, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 32(3) and 37 of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 0.75 litres of liquor recovered from his Maruti Suzuki vehicle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in actual possession …
The petitioner, Ramesh Sahni, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 45 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He …
The petitioner, Mohit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 55.210 litres of liquor recovered from his joint family house. He argued that the liquor was not seized from his personal possession, the house being a joint …
The petitioner, Dipu Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 180 litres of liquor from a hut he claims does not belong to him. He argued that the complaint was based on the testimony of a hostile chowkidar and that no …
The petitioner, Sanjay Nut, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 30 litres of spirit. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, the alleged contraband …
The petitioner, Nandkishor Sah, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where police recovered 72 litres of liquor from a public canal area and 900 ml from the house of Deep Narayan. The petitioner argued that he had no possession of the liquor, …
The petitioner, Tuntun Nut, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 30 litres of liquor from a public orchard. He argued that the liquor was not found in his possession, the site did not belong to him, and the complainant (the …
The petitioners, Chhote Yadav and Kakku Yadav, filed an anticipatory bail application in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act. During the pendency, Kakku Yadav was arrested, and his counsel sought to withdraw his part of the application, which the Court permitted, dismissing the petition …
Guddu Kumar and Siddu Kumar, brothers from Rupganj village, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging they were involved in the recovery of 60 litres of liquor near a water tank. The petitioners argued they were not caught in the …
The petitioner, Mannan Lal Mahto, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where 15 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he was not present at the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and …
Dilip Yadav applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 1,130.4 litres of liquor from a hut adjacent to his house. He contended that he was not arrested, no liquor was found in his …
Petitioner Baiju Yadav sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 11.640 litres of liquor from his joint family house. He argued he has a clean antecedent, the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and …
Guddu Chaudhary sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 20 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was not the owner of the vehicle, claiming the …
Krishna Yadav was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 50 litres of liquor from two motorcycles, one of which he owned. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, had a clean antecedent, and was unaware that another person misused …
The petitioner, Rakesh Dubey, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 11.250 litres of liquor from his joint family house. He argued that the liquor was not found in his conscious possession, the house is jointly owned, and …
The petitioner, Aditya Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 69.8 litres of liquor from two motorcycles, though he claimed no ownership of the vehicles and no possession of the liquor at the time of arrest. He sought anticipatory bail, …
The petitioner, Jibachh Chaupal, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 765 litres of liquor from an orchard not owned by him. He asserted a clean criminal record and claimed he was implicated …
The petitioner, Maneger Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of two litres of liquor from a sack concealed near his house. The petitioner asserted a clean …
The Patna High Court considered a petition for anticipatory bail filed by Birju Mukhiya, who feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 22 litres of liquor from the house of Madhusudan Ram. The petitioner asserted that he had no possession of the …
The petitioner, Nathu Kumar Yadav, owner of a six-wheeler, was implicated in a case (PS Case No. 272 of 2025) for the alleged recovery of 1,745.28 litres of liquor seized from his vehicle under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he had no knowledge of the liquor being in the …
The petitioner, Pukar Mukhiya, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Sections 30(a) and 37(2) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of six litres of liquor. He argued that he was not arrested at the scene, had no direct …
The petitioners, Sudhir Kumar Jaiswal and Chandan Kumar Jaiswal, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, alleging that the liquor was recovered from a bag not in their possession and that the complaint was motivated by an …
The petitioner, Ankit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 272 and 273 and several provisions of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was recovered from his possession, and the only basis for his …
The petitioner, Kunal Sungh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022, where 72 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a vehicle and his joint‑family house. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, …
Mithilesh Mandal sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 86.85 litres of liquor from an auto he owned. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was unaware of the vehicle's misuse by another …
Uttam Kumar, the owner of a motorcycle, was implicated in a case (PS Case No. 489/2025) for allegedly transporting 32 litres of liquor, an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022. He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that he had a clean record, was …
Manoj Pandey, owner of a vehicle from which 1249.56 litres of liquor was seized, sought anticipatory bail under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that Dinkar had misused his vehicle. The State opposed the …
The petitioners – Surendra Ram, Amarjit Kumar and Sushila Devi – applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 160 litres of liquor from a bush adjacent to their house. They contended that no …
The petitioner, Anil Nut, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 90 litres of liquor. He argued that he was not apprehended at the spot, that the liquor was recovered from his mother, and that the case was mechanically filed …
Dasai Paswan and Lawkush Paswan sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 44.2 litres of liquor from their joint family house. They argued that the liquor was not in their conscious …
Mushan Devi, a woman resident of Saidsarai, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 15 litres of liquor from a public bush. She claimed the allegation was false, made by a chowkidar who had a personal dispute with her husband, and that no liquor …
The petitioner, Rohit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 5.625 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his house. He asserted a clean criminal record and that no liquor was found in his possession, …
The petitioner, Rakesh Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 10 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his house. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, the alleged liquor was not found in his possession, …
The petitioner, Sharukh Alam, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, for the alleged recovery of 40.320 litres of liquor and the seizure of three motorcycles, one of which he owned. He contended that he had no prior criminal record, …
Prince Pratap Singh sought anticipatory bail after learning that he may be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, alleging recovery of 567 litres of liquor from a vehicle he did not own. He argued that he was not caught in possession, that the …
The petitioner, Budru Kamat, sought anticipatory bail after a police case alleged that 108 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not present at the spot of seizure, and was unaware that his friend misused the vehicle. The …
Bablu Ray sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 274, 275 and 111 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. The petitioner has five prior criminal cases, four of which relate to excise offences, and the …
Petitioners Shushila Devi and Chhotu Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of liquor from premises adjacent to their houses. They argued that no liquor was found in their possession, the recovery was from …
The appellants, Akhilesh Yadav and his wife, appealed under Section 14‑A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against the refusal of anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged assault, caste abuse, and theft under several IPC sections and provisions of the SC/ST Act. They argued that …
The petitioner, Praveen Kumar Sinha, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a complaint alleging offences under Sections 406 and 420 IPC for allegedly opening a fake Axis Bank account in the complainant's name and diverting an income‑tax refund of Rs.45.5 lakh to his housing‑loan …
The appellants, five brothers, filed a criminal appeal (SJ) against the State of Bihar and Rina Devi, challenging an order dated 06.05.2024. The Special Public Prosecutor highlighted that the prosecution narrative in the impugned order did not correspond with the allegations in the FIR. The …
The petitioner, Durgesh Shivam @ Samar Thakur, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with an extortion case (PS Case No.831/2023) involving offences under Sections 341, 342, 386, 387, 452, 307, 34 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He contended that he is not named in the FIR, was …
Petitioner Raj Kumar, husband, was implicated in a complaint alleging offences under IPC sections 498A, 406, 323, 506 and 120B, as well as Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He contended that the allegations were false and stemmed from a deteriorated marital relationship, and sought …
Guddu Kumar appealed against an order dated 25.07.2024 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge under the POA Act in case No.315 of 2024. The parties informed the court that the matter had been referred to mediation on 13.11.2025 and that mediation was successful, with the second …
The petitioner, Dara Manjhi, was implicated in a case under Sections 8, 15, 18(c) and 25 of the NDPS Act for alleged cultivation of opium on 8.14 acres of forest land. He argued that he has a clean record, the informant’s identity was not disclosed in the FIR, and that forest officials, who …
The appellant, Pawan Kumar, was charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and certain provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with an alleged kidnapping of a minor girl. He contended that he has a clean record, the allegations were …
Sudhir Pandey applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a complaint under Section 498A of the IPC and Section 4 of the Domestic Violence Act, alleging that he was falsely implicated by the informant over a matrimonial dispute involving a demand for an Alto car. The petitioner argued that the …
The appellants, Jitan Sah and Laddu Sah, appealed against the Special Court's order dated 23‑11‑2023 that denied them anticipatory bail in a case involving offences under several IPC sections and the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. They contended that they have …
The petitioners, Jahira Khatoon and Md. Mokim, were charged under Sections 80 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. for the alleged murder of the informant's daughter, who had been married to Jishan. The petitioners contended they were falsely implicated, had no prior criminal record (except one case for the …
The appellant, Sugan Kumar, was charged under several IPC sections, the Arms Act and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for alleged assault and firing incidents. He appealed to the Patna High Court under Section 14‑A(2) of the SC/ST Act against the trial court's refusal to grant anticipatory …
The petitioner, Raushan Mishra, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with a criminal case (PS Case No.235/2025) alleging offences under Sections 338, 336(3), 340(2), 316(2), 318(4) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. He claimed to have a clean antecedent and argued that he was falsely implicated by …
The appellant, Kunal Kumar, filed a criminal appeal before the Patna High Court challenging his conviction. During the hearing, the appellant’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the appeal and to surrender, requesting that the appellant be allowed to apply for regular bail. The Court considered …
The petitioner, Shubhashish Kumar Bhardwaj, filed an anticipatory bail application in connection with Kasba Police Station Case No. 226 of 2025. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application, stating that the petitioner had already been …
The petitioners, comprising Md. Nasim and three women relatives, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act (B.N.S.) alleging assault, robbery and other offences. They contended they have clean antecedents, were falsely …
The petitioners, five individuals from Puraina village, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 329(3), 118(1), 109, 117(2), 352 and 3(5) of the Bihar Negotiable (BNS) Act. They argued they have clean records and were falsely implicated by the informant, …
The petitioners, five members of the same family, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code for alleged assaults involving an axe, a khanti, and other violent acts. They contended that they have clean antecedents and that the FIR …
The petitioner, Badal Chauhan, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a FIR alleging his involvement in the murder of his daughter-in-law and dowry-related offences under IPC sections 302, 304B and 201. He contended that he has a clean record, was not present at the crime scene as evidenced by …
The Patna High Court considered the petition of Lalita Karn, who sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged against her under Sections 448, 341, 323, 354, 379, 427, 504, 506 and 34 of the Bihar Penal Code alleging robbery, assault and related offences. She argued that she has a clean record, …
The Patna High Court heard a petition for anticipatory bail filed by Sameer Kumar (petitioner no.1) in a case involving alleged assault, harassment, and other offences under Sections 333, 117(2), 78(ii), 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The petitioners also sought to withdraw the anticipatory bail …
The petitioner, Md. Haroon, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 64(1), 318(4) and 61 of the B.N.S., Sections 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act, alleging sexual intercourse with a 15‑year‑old girl under a false promise of marriage, procurement …
The petitioners, a group of Paswan family members, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under IPC sections 341, 323, 504, 506, 307 and 34, alleging that they were involved in an assault stemming from a land dispute with the informant. The informant claimed that a tractor parked near …
Petitioner Chandan Singh applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under several sections of the BNS, 2023 relating to organized crime and robbery. He contended that the informant who implicated him dealt in looted jewellery, that the mobile phone used for calls did not …
Virendra Mahto applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 74, 103(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. He contended that he has a clean record and that the informant’s allegations are false, noting that the FIR improperly includes …
The petitioners, Sachin and Anju, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 406, 420, 467, 468 and 120(B) relating to alleged misappropriation of Rs 60‑70 lakhs by a manager named Manindra. The informant, who is Manindra's brother‑in‑law and wife, alleged that …
The petitioners, four Yadavs from Satanpatti, were accused of multiple offences under the IPC, including assault and attempt to murder, arising from an incident where Birendra Yadav allegedly assaulted two individuals. They applied for anticipatory bail after the district court rejected their …
Vikash Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after a police case was registered for the alleged recovery of 53 kg of ganja from a Tata Sumo vehicle, with the vehicle and narcotics allegedly belonging to him. The prosecution’s case is based primarily on a confessional statement made by an apprehended …
The petitioner, Vishal Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving alleged snatching of a purse and subsequent cyber‑fraud, charged under Sections 356, 379, 420 of the IPC and Section 66(c) of the IT Act. He claimed the FIR named unknown persons and that his name only …
The petitioner, Sagar Sahani, applied for anticipatory bail in a criminal miscellaneous case alleging offences under Sections 126(2), 127(2), 115(2), 109 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The incident involved the victim, the son of an informant, who went to the petitioner’s house on a motorbike, consumed …
Ranvir Singh Yadav applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under multiple sections of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleging that he was not present at the alleged crime scene where an extortion attempt led to the shooting and death of the informant's son. The petitioner …
Tiger Patel applied for anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged in 2017 alleging that he and his brother fired at a person, causing firearm injury, under Sections 307 and 34 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner argued that the FIR was initially against unknown persons and that …
Petitioner Dilkhush Kumar sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 137(2), 96, 140(3) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023, alleged to involve the kidnapping of his daughter on 14‑04‑2025. The petitioner argued that he has a clean record, the FIR was lodged 16 days after the …
The petitioner, Golu Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 310(2) of the BNS, 2023 concerning a robbery of Rs. 4,50,000. The FIR named unknown persons, but CCTV footage identified a co‑accused, Chandan, who, while in custody, disclosed the petitioner’s …
Petitioners Priyanka Kumari and Sujay Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109, 352, 351(2) and 351(3) of the BNS, 2023. They contended that they have clean antecedents and were falsely implicated by an informant amid a rivalry …
Satendra Singh sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 137(2) and 140(3) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, based on an informant's allegation that his husband was abducted with his involvement. The petitioner argued that the allegations were purely …
Petitioner Jhagaru Ram was arrested while his anticipatory bail application was pending before the High Court. He subsequently sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The court considered whether a petitioner may withdraw such an application after arrest. The judge granted …
The petitioner, Md. Naushad Alam, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a violent incident where an ambulance was set on fire following the death of a person in a hospital. He claimed the prosecution’s case was based on video footage that also captured him visiting the hospital for a …
Petitioner Ramesh Kumar was arrested while his anticipatory bail application was pending before the High Court. The petitioner, through counsel, sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application after his arrest. The court considered whether a pending anticipatory bail application …
