Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Pradip Kumar Yadav @ Pradip Kumar @ Pradip YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The Court permitted the withdrawal of the anticipatory bail application and dismissed it as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Pradip Kumar Yadav, filed an anticipatory bail application in the High Court of Patna. He was subsequently arrested in connection with the case. The petitioner, through counsel, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application after his arrest. The Court considered the request and, noting the petitioner's desire to withdraw, granted permission to do so. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether a petitioner may withdraw an anticipatory bail application after being arrested

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • arrest
  • criminal procedure
  • High Court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15128 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-161 Year-2023 Thana- JAYNAGAR District- Madhubani
                 ======================================================
                 Pradip Kumar Yadav @ Pradip Kumar @ Pradip Yadav S/o Rajendra Yadav
                 R/o Vill- Kamlabri, P.S- Jaynagar, Distt-Madhubani
                                                                           ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                     Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                    ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Ms. Kumari Pallavi, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Kanhiya Kishor, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   25-03-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission

                   to withdraw the anticipatory bail application as the petitioner

                   was arrested in this case.

                                3. Permission is accorded.

                                4. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is

                   dismissed as withdrawn.


                                                                       (Satyavrat Verma, J)

Kundan/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.