Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Pintu Prasd @ Pintu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court held that an anticipatory bail application can be withdrawn on the petitioner's request and therefore dismissed it as withdrawn.

Summary

Petitioner Pintu Kumar was arrested while his anticipatory bail application was pending before the Patna High Court. The petitioner, through counsel, sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application after his arrest. The court considered the request and, finding no impediment, granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn. The order effectively disposes of the petition without granting bail.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner may withdraw his anticipatory bail application after being arrested

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal of bail application
  • criminal procedure
  • arrest
  • bail jurisdiction

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6864 of 2026
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-603 Year-2019 Thana- MUFFASIL District- West Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Pintu Prasd @ Pintu Kumar Son of Chokat Prasad Resident of Village-
                 Hardiya Purbari Tola, P.S.- Bettiah Muffasil, District- West Champaran
                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                     Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                          ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Sunil Kumar Pandey, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Nawal Kishore Prasad, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   26-03-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission

                   to withdraw the anticipatory bail application as the petitioner

                   was arrested during pendency of the same.

                                3. Permission is accorded.

                                4. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is

                   dismissed as withdrawn.


                                                                       (Satyavrat Verma, J)

Kundan/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.