Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
5892 judgments · newest first · showing 2201–2400
The petitioner, Bambam Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a complaint registered under Sections 498A and 323 of the IPC, alleging that his wife, Manita Devi, had falsely implicated him. He offered to pay a monthly maintenance of Rs.3,500 to the wife and their child, arguing that the …
The appellants, four individuals from East Champaran, appealed to the Patna High Court under Section 14-A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against the Special Judge's refusal to grant anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged assault, robbery and …
The appellant, Rinku Yadav, appealed under Section 14-A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against the lower court's refusal to grant anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged offences under the IPC and the SC/ST Act. The appellant claimed a clean …
The petitioner, Bambam Nishad, was implicated in a case involving alleged assault, firing of weapons, and offences under several sections of the Bihar Non-Compulsory Statutes (B.N.S.) and the Arms Act. He claimed the allegations were false, that no one was injured, and that the FIR lacked a clear …
The petitioners, Sunil Sah and Sudish Sah, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 80 of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act (B.N.S.) concerning the alleged dowry‑related killing of a woman. They argued that they are innocent, have clean records, and that the informant is …
The petitioner, Nirbhay Singh, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case alleging cheating in the NEET 2024 examination, with charges under IPC sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471, and Section 10 of the Bihar Conduct Examination Act, 1981. He contended that he was falsely implicated, …
The petitioner, Bipin Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case where he was accused of murder, attempt to murder, causing disappearance of evidence and criminal conspiracy under IPC sections 302, 324, 201 and 34. The FIR and charge‑sheet indicated that the investigation yielded no conclusive …
The appellants, Chunnu Lal and Ayush Kumar, were charged under several provisions of the Bihar Penal Code, 2023 and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 for allegedly assaulting an informant on the basis of his caste. They applied for anticipatory bail, …
The petitioner, Jitendra Kumar Mehta, was arrested in a complaint alleging offences under Sections 85 and 115(2) of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act. He applied for anticipatory bail, claiming he was falsely implicated by his estranged wife, the opposite party No.2, and offered to pay a monthly …
Petitioner Raj Kumari Devi applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 137(2), 96 and 3(5) of the B.N.S, alleging that she was falsely implicated in the alleged kidnapping of her 12‑year‑old daughter for a forced marriage. The informant claimed the daughter was abducted and …
Akhilesh Kumar was charged under several IPC sections and Sections 3(1)(r)(s) of the SC/ST Act for allegedly assaulting Shiv Kumar Ram on 2 September 2023, using caste slurs and causing head injuries. The appellant argued that the FIR was lodged after an unjustified ten‑day delay, that the charge …
The appellant, Dilip Kumar Yadav, was charged under several IPC offences and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly disturbing a school, filming girls and using caste slurs. He contended that the allegations were false, that the informant – the school …
The petitioner, Manish Kumar Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case registered under Sections 137(2), 96, 303(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The FIR alleged that he, along with others, entered the complainant's house, locked a room, stole Rs.1.50 lakh and ornaments, and …
Ankush Kumar (appellant) filed Criminal Appeal No.69 of 2026 arising from a 2025 Bodhgaya case. The appellant sought the court's permission to withdraw the appeal and be allowed to file a fresh appeal with all requisite documents. The learned counsel for the appellant requested this relief, and the …
The petitioner, Syed Wahid Warsi, a licensee of a cash service point (CSP), was implicated in a FIR alleging offences under Sections 316(2), 316(5), 318(4), 338, 336(3) and 61(2) of the B.N.S., 2023, based on a complaint that a customer’s money was misappropriated by an employee, Yogendra, who later …
Shivlal Yadav applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 118(1), 117(2), 109(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., alleging that he assaulted Rajeshwar Yadav causing a head injury. The petitioner claimed a clean antecedent and argued that the initial injury report described a …
The petitioner, Hema Kumari, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under several sections of the B.N.S. She asserted a clean record, her status as a woman, and alleged false implication by the informant, who claimed she participated in an assault and theft on 11-06-2025. The …
The petitioners, a group of ten individuals from Rampur village, were accused of assaulting an informant and his family over a land dispute, with allegations of using rods, lathis, swords and snatching jewellery. They sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections …
The petitioner, Kamrul Jama, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case involving multiple offences under the Indian Penal Code, arising from a land dispute. The informant alleged that the petitioner assaulted him with a rod, causing a fractured leg, and that his presence encouraged …
The petitioner, Baikunth Raut, filed an anticipatory bail application under Sections 281 and 106 of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act. He argued that Section 106(2) has not been notified and that Section 106(1) is bailable, making the district court's rejection of his anticipatory bail improper. …
The petitioners filed an anticipatory bail application in the Patna High Court in connection with a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 74, 118(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The counsel for the petitioners sought to withdraw the application for petitioner No.2, Md. Kayum, who had already …
The petitioners – Rima Kumari, Sanjay Singh and Shesha Devi – filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court in a criminal miscellaneous case arising from a 2012 FIR. They later sought the Court’s permission to withdraw that application, stating that a compromise had been reached …
Petitioner Rajeev Kumar filed an anticipatory bail application under the Criminal Procedure Code. During the proceedings, the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the application, stating that the parties had reached a compromise and he would surrender to obtain regular bail. The court …
The petitioners, Sanjay Kumar Singh and Rahul Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after the State of Bihar filed a case (PS Case No‑117/2025) alleging offences under several sections of the B.N.S. arising from a land‑dispute‑related altercation on 11‑07‑2025. The informant claimed the petitioners …
The petitioners, five residents of Ben Sagar village, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with FIR No.511 of 2025 alleging offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 74, 109, 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. They claimed to have clean antecedents and argued that the …
The petitioners, Radha Devi and Sadan Sharma, were implicated in an FIR alleging offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 352, 74, 3(5) and 109(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, stemming from a neighbour dispute and an alleged assault on 30‑7‑2025. They contended they have clean antecedents, are not …
Petitioner Prabhu Sah sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS No.136/2025) involving offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 190, 191(2), 351(2), 74, 352 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The informant alleged a violent assault on her and her family by a group of …
The petitioners, relatives of a man named Rajnish, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging offences under several sections of the B.N.S., 2023, the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act and the POCSO Act. The informant alleged that Rajnish forcefully married her as a minor, subjected …
The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in an FIR alleging participation in a violent assault on 20 June 2025, with offences listed under various sections of the BNS and later Section 109. He argued that he has a clean record, the informant is an agnate with …
The petitioners, Shravan Sahani, Bahuri Devi and Nirmala Devi, filed an anticipatory bail application in a case registered under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Arms Act, alleging false implication in a land dispute. Shravan Sahani withdrew his application, which the court …
Sachin Kumar petitioned for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case alleging multiple offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, including assault with a sword and causing injuries. He asserted a clean antecedent and claimed the informant’s allegations were false, contending that any …
The petitioner, Kumar Navneet, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a FIR alleging offences under Sections 201, 304B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code relating to a dowry demand and the alleged murder of his daughter-in-law. He contended that the dowry money received was not a dowry, …
The petitioner, Gopal Malakar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in an FIR alleging multiple offences under the Indian Penal Code, including assault, robbery, and criminal intimidation, arising from a land dispute on 20 October 2023. He asserted a clean criminal record and claimed the …
The petitioner, Md. Nadim Ahmad, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 69 of the B.N.S., alleging that the informant fabricated a rape complaint after a consensual relationship that began through Facebook. The informant claimed the petitioner promised marriage, forced her …
The petitioner, Md. Naushad, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 382 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged road robbery. He claimed the FIR was initially against unknown persons and that his name was later added based on a confessional statement of an accused in police …
The petitioners Sonu Kumar, Binit Kumar and Aditya Kumar sought anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged robbery, assault and firearm injury under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. During the pendency of the application, petitioner Lalu Yadav died, and …
The petitioners, a group of villagers, were implicated in a FIR alleging multiple assaults and related offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, arising from a land‑related dispute. They contended that the allegations were false, that the injuries were minor, and that the …
The petitioners, Ritesh Anand and Shankar Kumar, were implicated in the death of the informant’s elder son, who allegedly received an electric shock when a wire used to power the informant’s pumpkin field was said to have been tampered with by the petitioners. The informant claimed the petitioners …
Petitioner Pramod Yadav filed Criminal Miscellaneous No.66931 of 2025 arising out of PS Case No.468 of 2023, alleging wrongdoing by the State of Bihar and an Assistant Electrical Engineer. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, while the respondents were represented by an Additional Public …
The appellant, Ghanshyam Prasad Singh, filed a criminal appeal (SJ No.4415 of 2025) challenging the judgment of the Mahila Police Station, Kaimur. The court identified procedural defects in the appeal as pointed out by the office. Counsel for the appellant submitted that these defects would be …
Umesh Kumar appealed to the Patna High Court under Section 14‑A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, challenging the exclusive Special Judge’s refusal to grant anticipatory bail in a case registered under several IPC provisions and Sections 3(1)(r)(s) …
Vishal Singh filed an anticipatory bail application in connection with PS case No.364 of 2025, alleging that he might be arrested. He later approached the Court seeking permission to withdraw that application. The learned counsel for the petitioner argued that there was no longer any necessity for …
The appellant, Pankaj Singh, was charged under several IPC provisions and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly abducting an informant, attempting a bank robbery, and assaulting him. The trial court refused his prayer for anticipatory bail, prompting …
The petitioners, a group of twelve members of the Sahni family, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126, 109, 303(2) and 351(2) of the Bihar Negotiable (B.N.S.). They alleged that the informant fabricated the charges arising from a …
The petitioner, Dharmendra Kumar, was accused of operating an illegal sawmill in violation of Sections 41 and 42 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 and Sections 5, 10, 13 and 14 of the Bihar Saw Mills (Regulation) Act, 1990. He applied for anticipatory bail, claiming he was falsely implicated, that the …
The petitioners, Dinanath Sah, his wife Pramila Devi and daughter‑in‑law Kajal Kumari, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 80, 238, 61(2) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023 relating to alleged dowry demands, torture and the death of Rita Kumari. They contended …
The appellant, Samsul Rahman, filed a criminal appeal seeking anticipatory bail. During the hearing, the appellant's counsel requested permission to withdraw the appeal, stating that the appellant had already been arrested in the case. The Special Public Prosecutor for the State opposed the …
The petitioners, Pappu Sharma, Kaushal Kumar and Pramila Devi, filed an anticipatory bail application in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 352, 109 and 3(5) of the Bihar Negotiable Sale Act, alleging false implication stemming from a family property dispute. The counsel for …
The petitioner, Ravindra Chauhan, feared arrest in a case registered under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 103(1), 61(2), 352 and 351(3) of the BNS, 2023, alleging involvement in the assault and death of the informant's husband. He argued that he is not named in the FIR and that his alleged connection …
The petition sought anticipatory bail for two respondents, Amarjeet Singh and his daughter Suman Kumari, in a case involving multiple offences under the B.N.S. Amarjeet's anticipatory bail application was withdrawn after his arrest, and the petition was dismissed with respect to him. Suman, a …
The petitioner Vicky Kumar filed an anticipatory bail application in the Patna High Court. During the hearing, he requested permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail and instead surrender to the authorities to seek regular bail. The court granted the request, allowing the withdrawal and directing …
The petitioner, Nitish Kumar Sharma, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 69 and 303(2) of the Bihar Narcotic and Special (BNS) Act, 2023. He claimed to have a clean record and alleged that the complaint was false, based on a promise of marriage …
The petitioner, Bahadur Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a criminal case registered in 2005 under IPC sections 341, 323, 307, 386 and 34. He alleged that the incident involved an alleged abduction attempt, assault with a pistol, and theft of a bag containing motor parts and cash. …
The appellants, four accused persons, surrendered to the police during the pendency of their criminal appeal (CR. App. (SJ) No.416 of 2026) before the Patna High Court. They applied to the Court for permission to withdraw the appeal after surrender. The learned counsel for the appellants sought and …
The petitioners, Dharmendra Kumar and Vikash Kumar, were implicated in an FIR under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 75 litres of liquor from a public place in Hajaratpur. They contended that they have a clean antecedent, were not arrested at the spot, and …
The appellants, Shahnaz Khatoon and Mojib Alam, mother‑in‑law and father‑in‑law, were charged under Sections 85, 352 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act and Section 3(i)(r)(s) of the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of …
The petitioner, Dinesh Mandal, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where liquor was allegedly recovered from several locations not owned by him. He argued that the recovery was based solely on a confessional …
The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal miscellaneous case arising from a police report in Madhepura. After hearing the parties, the petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and to surrender, intending to apply …
The petitioner, Pramod Singh, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 180 litres of liquor from a bamboo orchard adjacent to his house. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, and …
The petitioner, Lal Babu Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 10 litres of liquor found in his joint family house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the house being …
Lal Babu Manjhi applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of five litres of liquor from his palani. He contended that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the palani is a public area accessible to villagers, and …
The petitioner, Surendra Shaw, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 34 and 36 of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 560 litres of liquor from a vehicle. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the car, and was implicated …
The petitioners, Umesh Saday and Mukesh Kumar Saday, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with a case alleging offences under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the recovery of 26 litres of liquor …
The petitioner, Dinesh Dhangar, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case involving the alleged recovery of 34.5 litres of liquor from his scooty, with charges under Sections 274, 275 and 317(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act. The petitioner claimed a clean …
Lakshman Chaudhary sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 alleging that 7 litres of liquor and 75 litres of fermented jawa‑mahua were recovered from his house and destroyed. The petitioner argued that …
The petitioner, Sanjiv Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 54.75 litres of liquor from a bamboo orchard adjacent to his house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious …
The petitioners, Subodh Singh and his son Santosh Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 9 litres of liquor found in their joint family house. They argued they have clean antecedents, that no liquor was recovered from …
The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 40 litres of liquor. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, the alleged recovery occurred on premises not belonging to him, and …
The petitioner applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, where 45 litres of liquor, a loaded pistol and live cartridges were recovered from a seized motorcycle owned by the petitioner. …
Prince Jayswal was charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 85 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and was not the owner of the seized vehicle, and that the case was based …
The petitioner, Rajnish Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, for the alleged recovery of 80 litres of liquor from his Alto car. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was …
The petitioner, Sandeep Kumar Ram, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 83.6 litres of liquor from three motorcycles. He was not caught in possession, did not own the motorcycles, and the allegation rests on a confessional statement made by …
Reena Devi sought anticipatory bail after learning that she might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 6.5 litres of liquor recovered from the courtyard of her joint‑family house. She argued that the liquor was not in her …
The petitioners, Tunnu Sahni and Golu Sahni, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 560 litres of liquor from two boats. They argued they were not caught in possession, the FIR did not name the informant, and …
The petitioner, Ramesh Agrawal, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 1,123.2 litres of liquor from a pick‑up. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, had …
Manibhushan Pandey sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 54.72 litres of liquor from a bamboo orchard not belonging to him. The petitioner argued that no liquor was found in his possession and that the informant, a chowkidar, …
The petitioner, Sakaldeep Kumar, was implicated in a case involving the seizure of 40 litres of liquor from an auto, alleged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He claimed he was not present at the spot of seizure, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and was merely …
The petitioner, Hiralal Mahto, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged possession of liquor. He argued that he has a clean antecedent and that the liquor was recovered from …
The petitioner, Dinesh Prasad, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a), 32 and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 15.12 litres of liquor recovered from his joint‑family house. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, that …
Anirudh Mukhiya sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 27.88 litres of liquor from a garden not in his possession. He argued that the allegation was based on a false …
Manoj Ray, the owner of a Bolero vehicle and a truck, was implicated in a case (PS Case No. 285 of 2025) for alleged possession of 171.21 litres of liquor and 1,813 cartons of Bajaj Almonds Drops hair oil. He claimed a clean antecedent, argued that the seized items were not in his conscious …
The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that liquor was recovered from a straw heap on his field and from a house belonging to another accused. He argued he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the …
Munni Devi and Dukhani Mandal applied for anticipatory bail after learning that they might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, alleging recovery of 31 litres of liquor from sacks not in their possession. They argued they have clean antecedents, …
Lohiya Devi, wife of Nami Manda, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 21.5 litres of liquor from a sack near her house. The petitioner argued that the liquor was not in …
The petitioner, Dilip Sahni, applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered against him under Sections 30(a), 32(3) and 34 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for alleged recovery of liquor from a room in front of a cowshed. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent, was not …
The petitioner, Vikash Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 147 litres of liquor from three jute bags. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, the liquor was not found in his possession, and the alleged location did not …
Sarvan Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 3.420 litres of liquor recovered from his joint‑family house. The petitioner argued that the liquor was not seized from his conscious possession, the house is …
The petitioner, Jangali Mahto, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 124.56 litres of liquor from an abandoned house. He contended that he was not arrested …
The petitioner, Pankaj Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 45 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that he was falsely implicated after a political dispute. The prosecution alleged that liquor was recovered from a house and …
Manohar Choudhary applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 28.200 litres of liquor from his joint family house. The petitioner argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not …
The petitioner, Santosh Kumar Manjhi, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly recovering 486 litres of liquor from a public area near a godown. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was falsely …
The petitioner, Anil Urao, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case alleging possession of 95 litres of liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He argued that the liquor was recovered from a joint family house, that he had no conscious …
Vakil Sahani, a petitioner with a clean antecedent, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 15 litres of liquor from Vasudeo Ram. He argued that he had no direct possession and was implicated solely on a confessional statement made by …
Indal Sahani sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 272, 273 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances and Smuggling Act and Sections 30(a), 32 and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging that liquor and Mahua jaggery solution were recovered from a public place and …
The petitioner, Sunil Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 100 litres of liquor. He argued that no liquor was found in his possession, the alleged site …
The petitioner, Munni Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing nine litres of liquor at his joint family house. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, that the liquor was not found in his conscious …
The petitioner, Kunti Devi, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 10 litres of liquor from her house and 8 litres from a nearby location. She contended that she had no conscious possession, the property was …
The petitioner, Devnandan Sharma, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for allegedly possessing five litres of liquor recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in …
The petitioner, Raja Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 150 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the seized vehicle, and the case was …
Manish Paswan sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly concealing 15.15 litres of liquor under husk at a location not belonging to him. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested on the spot, and that the …
Mukesh Kumar was implicated in a case under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly recovering 110 litres of liquor from a riverbank. He applied for anticipatory bail, asserting a clean …
The petitioner, Nageshwar Mahto, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with an FIR alleging violation of Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 40 litres of liquor from a bush near his house. The petitioner claimed a clean …
The petitioner, Kundan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 170.490 litres of liquor. He argued that the liquor was seized from a public area, not from his possession, and that the complainant (a watchman) …
The petitioner, Sunil Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 200 litres of liquor from a hut adjacent to his house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the location did not belong to him, …
Prem Kumar Choudhary and Vikram Choudhary sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, alleging they were involved in the recovery of 400 litres of liquor from a boat. The petitioners argued they have no …
Ramji Sahni applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 64,500 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He contended that he was not arrested at the spot, had no conscious …
Parmeshwar Yadav, owner of a vehicle from which 88.800 litres of liquor were seized, was charged under Sections 30(a) and 50(b) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and that the liquor was carried by his son without his knowledge. He …
Santosh Ray sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act alleging recovery of 270 litres of liquor from a mustard field owned by Munna Singh. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was found in …
Manoj Kumar Yadav was implicated in a case under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly transporting 228 litres of liquor in his vehicle. He argued that he was not arrested at the scene, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and was …
The petitioner, Dharmendra Chaurasia, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging that liquor was recovered from a roadside sack and from a third party's premises without his conscious possession. He highlighted his prior …
The petitioners, Raman Sharma, Shambhu Sharma and Dhiraj Mehta, feared arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 270 litres of illicit liquor were recovered from a Tata Safari. They contended that they were not arrested …
The petitioner, Mithilesh Kumar, feared arrest in a case alleging recovery of 60 litres of liquor from a motorcycle, charged under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He claimed he had no conscious possession of the liquor, was …
The petitioner, Dilip Sah, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 5.760 litres of liquor recovered from a mustard field that does not belong to him. He asserted that he has a clean criminal record, was not caught in possession, and the alleged …
The petitioner, Bhim Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 1,296 litres of liquor from his pickup vehicle. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, that the liquor was seized from the vehicle and not from …
Santosh Mahto sought anticipatory bail after a police case was registered under Section 281 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018, alleging that 504 litres of liquor were recovered from his Tata vehicle. He contended that he had a clean …
The petitioner, Babul Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 45 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not in possession of the seized vehicle, was not the owner, and the case was based solely …
Petitioner Sanoj Rai was arrested while his anticipatory bail application was pending. He approached the High Court seeking permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The court heard arguments from both sides and granted the petitioner's request. Consequently, the anticipatory bail …
Petitioner Sanjay Kumar applied for anticipatory bail in a liquor‑related case (Bairiya PS Case No. 239 of 2021). The State opposed, pointing out discrepancies between the FIR and the prosecution’s version in the impugned order. The petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory …
The petitioner, Vidayanand Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, alleging recovery of 54 litres of liquor from a pick‑up vehicle. He argued that he was not in actual possession of the liquor, was not the owner of …
Ganesh Marandi was apprehended in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 50 litres of liquor recovered from his house, which is a joint family property. The petitioner argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, that the concept of deemed …
The petitioner, Sujeet Chaudhary, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018 for allegedly possessing 15 litres of liquor recovered from his joint‑family house. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested on the spot, and that the liquor …
The petitioner, Santosh Singh, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 20 litres of liquor from his tea shop. He asserted a clean antecedent and claimed that the …
The petitioner, Ranjeet Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 52.5 litres of liquor from his cow‑shed. He argued that no liquor was seized from his immediate possession, the cow‑shed is a public …
The petitioner, Guddu Mahto, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 26.280 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his house. He argued that the liquor was not found in …
The petitioner, Ranjit Sahani, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for alleged recovery of 24 litres of liquor from a cattle shed owned by a third party. He argued he had no possession of the liquor, no antecedent record, …
The petitioner, Noor Alam, filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal miscellaneous case arising from a police case in Araria. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The Hon’ble Justice Satyavrat Verma granted the …
Ram Saday filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. During the hearing, he sought permission to withdraw the application and instead surrender to face regular bail proceedings. The Court, after hearing counsel, granted permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail. The …
The petitioner, Robin Singhla, the owner of a vehicle from which 3,051 litres of liquor were seized, feared arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 32(ii) and 41(i)(ii) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and that his driver, who …
The petitioners, Upendra Sharma and three others, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a FIR alleging offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 354(B), 386 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. They claimed the FIR was false, filed ten days after the …
The petitioner, Akhilesh Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code (341, 323, 386, 387, 307, 435, 427, 34) and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He contended that despite having six prior cases, he was acquitted in all, and alleged …
The petitioners, Mishrilal Sah and his three sons, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 384 of the Indian Penal Code. They alleged that the complaint was false and stemmed from a matrimonial dispute involving the informant, his wife Sanju Devi, and a prior 498A …
The petitioner, Krishna Kumar, was accused of multiple offences under the Indian Penal Code, including assault and grievous hurt, following an alleged attack on a youth named Ajay. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated, asserting that Ajay had harassed his daughter and that the informant …
Gayatri Devi and Shankar Mistri applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case registered under Sections 103(1), 238, 80(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023, relating to the alleged burning and subsequent death of a woman named Khushi. The petitioners claim they have clean antecedents …
The appellants, including Sandesh Mahto and others, filed a criminal appeal (SJ) No.4352 of 2025 before the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar and Rinku Devi. During the hearing on 19-03-2026, the appellant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the appeal and obtain liberty to file a …
The petitioners, Hari Mohan Singh and his son Niraj Kumar, were implicated in a FIR alleging assault and attempted murder under several sections of the B.N.S, 2023. They claimed the allegations were false, stemming from a property dispute, and that the informant was a cousin who fabricated the …
The three petitioners, brothers from Ramdaschak village, feared arrest in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109 read with Section 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023. They asserted that they have clean antecedents (except one minor prior case) and were falsely …
The petitioner, Bipin Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 109, 352, 351(2), 303(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. He argued that he has a clean antecedent and that the FIR contains only a vague, omnibus allegation of assault without specific …
The petitioner, Mithilesh Kumar, was implicated in a case alleging attempted rape and other offences under the B.N.S.S. and the POCSO Act, based on an FIR lodged 25 days after the alleged incident. He contended that the informant’s allegations were false, he has a clean record, and the delay in …
Ajay Kumar Jha was arrested in connection with offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. He had earlier applied for regular bail, which was withdrawn, and after the charge‑sheet was filed on 14‑Oct‑2025 he renewed his bail prayer. The petitioner had been in …
Petitioner Sanjay Kumar filed a restoration application seeking to revive Criminal Miscellaneous No.47093 of 2023. The petitioner argued that the case should be reinstated to its original file. The State of Bihar opposed the application. The Court examined the pleadings filed in the restoration …
The petitioner, Md. Izhar, filed an anticipatory bail application in 2026 concerning a criminal case originally registered in 2015. The court examined whether anticipatory bail could be granted when the investigation under Section 82 of the Criminal Procedure Code had already been initiated in 2017, …
The petitioners, Apsarul and Bagar Miyan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 272 and 273 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of liquor recovered from a bamboo orchard and a motorcycle. They argued they have …
The petitioner, Abhijeet Raj, was named in an FIR for murder under Sections 302 and 34 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He contended that he was not an eyewitness, that the FIR confused his identity with another person named Abhijeet Kumar, and that CCTV footage was of poor quality and did …
Kajal Kumari filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court in a criminal miscellaneous case. During the proceedings, she sought the court’s permission to withdraw the second anticipatory bail application. The court, after hearing counsel for both sides, granted the request to …
The petitioner, Vikash Yadav, filed an anticipatory bail application in the High Court of Patna. The bail order stipulated a specific period within which the petitioner had to surrender to the court. The petitioner failed to surrender within that period and did not file a modification application …
The petitioner, Bharti Gerai, was granted provisional anticipatory bail on 22 January 2026 with a requirement to surrender within six weeks. She filed a modification application on 26 February 2026, before the surrender deadline, seeking correction of errors in her description (gender, relationship, …
The petitioners, Pravin Kumar and Munai Lal, applied for anticipatory bail in a criminal miscellaneous case. The bail order required them to surrender to the court within a specified period. They failed to surrender within that time and did not file a modification application before the deadline …
The petitioners, Rohit Kumar Singh and Anjan Singh, filed a restoration application (Criminal Miscellaneous No. 18056 of 2026) seeking to have Criminal Miscellaneous No. 85453 of 2025 restored to its original file. The State of Bihar opposed the application. The court examined the pleadings and …
Balindra Kunwar filed a contempt application against the State of Bihar and several education officials. The petitioner sought the court's permission to withdraw the contempt proceedings. The learned counsel for the petitioner requested that the application be withdrawn, and the court considered …
Amar Jyoti filed a criminal miscellaneous application before the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar and its officials. The petitioner, through counsel, later sought the court's permission to withdraw the application. The court heard arguments from both sides and considered whether such …
Sunita Devi and Prithvi Mahto, maternal grandparents of a youth named Bhanu, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 137(2), 140(3), 87 and 3(5) of the BNS. They contended that the FIR, lodged on 21‑07‑2025, was filed more than ten days after the alleged incident …
The petitioner, Raushan Kumar, feared arrest in a case registered under IPC Sections 457 and 380 concerning alleged theft and rioting. He claimed he was falsely implicated based on the informant's suspicion and a confessional statement of a co-accused, which he argued has no evidentiary value. The …
The petitioner, Sandeep Sharma, applied for regular bail in a criminal case registered under IPC Sections 366A, 376, 34 and Section 4 of the POCSO Act, alleging that he has a clean antecedent and was not named in the FIR. The victim’s statement under Section 164 of the CrPC implicated the …
Arshad Ali applied for anticipatory bail in a criminal case. While the application was pending, he surrendered to the authorities. His counsel then sought the court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The court examined the request and, finding no impediment, granted …
The petitioner, Abhijit Singh, was charged under Sections 80(2) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, for the alleged death of his wife, who committed suicide within seven years of marriage. He applied for bail, claiming a clean antecedent and asserting that he had called emergency …
The petitioner, Md. Babul, applied for bail in a criminal case under Sections 80 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023. He claimed to have a clean record and alleged false implication by the informant. The trial had progressed beyond the framing of charges, with four prosecution …
The petitioners, Guddu Paswan and Lalu Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 191(2), 190, 126(2), 121(1)(2), 132 and 109 of the B.N.S., arising from an alleged attack on police during a raid on illegal sand mining. They claimed they were falsely implicated by an …
Shambhu Rai, the petitioner, was charged with multiple offences under the Indian Penal Code, including murder (Section 302) and various assault and robbery provisions. He applied for bail, claiming a clean antecedent and alleging false implication by the informant. The informant alleged that Rai and …
The petitioner, Rinkesh Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail in a case alleging offences under several sections of the B.N.S., including assault with a deadly weapon. He claimed a clean antecedent and asserted that the informant’s allegations were false, noting that the injuries described were …
The petitioner, Dhiraj Kumar Chaudhary, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition seeking a modification of an earlier order. During the hearing on 18-03-2026, the petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the modification application. The court, exercising its discretion, granted the …
The petitioner, Hira Chaudhary, was arrested in connection with the death of his wife, alleged to be a dowry death under Sections 304B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. He applied for bail, asserting a clean antecedent, that the informant who lodged the FIR was not an eye‑witness, and that the death …
The petitioner, Sikandar Bhilai Mahto, sought regular bail in a case registered under Sections 419, 420, 379 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code relating to alleged fraudulent withdrawals from an ATM. He claimed to have a clean antecedent, argued that he was falsely implicated by an informant, and …
The appellants, Sanjay Kumar Sah and Bishu Sah, were granted regular bail by a Special Judge under the SC/ST Act in a case arising from a 2019 police report. The bail order dated 18-03-2026 contained a clerical error in paragraph 7, incorrectly stating that the bail would be released only if the …
Lal Babu Yadav and Nanku Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 329(3), 109, 352 and 351(2)(3)(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly assaulting an informant and others during a land‑related dispute. The petitioners argued that …
The petitioner, Pintu Thakur, was named in an FIR alleging multiple offences under the IPC, the Sound Pollution Act and the Loud Speaker Act, stemming from a disturbance during a religious ceremony where loud music was played and police were allegedly assaulted. The petitioner claimed a clean record …
The petitioner, Sunil Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a FIR alleging fraud and other offences under Sections 316(2), 336(3), 338, 318(4) and 3(5) of the Bihar Negotiable Sale Act, 2023, relating to a disputed land sale. He claimed to have a clean record and asserted that …
Petitioner Sanjeev Kumar was arrested while his anticipatory bail application was pending before the Patna High Court. His counsel sought the court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application after the arrest. The court considered the request and granted permission to withdraw. …
The petitioner, Randhir Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 61(2), 352, 351(2) and 96 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for alleged kidnapping of a minor girl. He contended that the allegation was false, stating that he and the girl were in a consensual …
The petitioner, Mukesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under several IPC sections for alleged assault and robbery. He contended that the FIR was based on a non‑eyewitness informant and that he was falsely implicated, asserting no relation to the alleged victim …
The petitioner, Navnit Jha, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Sections 108 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita alleging that he, along with his father, tortured his mother, leading to her suicide. He contended that the allegations were false, that he had a clean record, and …
The petitioner, Ram Udit Yadav, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court after being implicated in a criminal case (PS Case No. 39 of 2025). While the application was pending, the petitioner was arrested by the police. The petitioner’s counsel then sought the Court’s …
The petitioner, Abhishek Kharwar, applied for anticipatory bail in a case alleging violation of Section 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 44 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent, was not …
The petitioner, Bipin Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 20 litres of liquor from a garbage site near his house and 30 litres from another individual, Sanjay. He asserted that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, maintained a …
The petitioners, Indrajeet Kumar Yadav and Kameshwar Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 45 litres of liquor. They argued that the liquor was found in a joint family house, they had no …
Petitioner Sanny Rauat applied for anticipatory bail. While the application was pending, he was arrested. He then sought the court's permission to withdraw his anticipatory bail application. The court, after hearing counsel, granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the anticipatory bail …
Petitioner Pramila Devi, a woman with a clean antecedent, feared arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act and several IPC provisions relating to rioting, assault and unlawful assembly. The FIR alleged that 4.4 litres of liquor were recovered from a person named Rahul …
The petitioner, Musaraf Ali, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 13.68 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the vehicle, and his name does not appear in the FIR, asserting a …
Anshu Kumar and Banshu Kumar filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. After hearing, they sought permission to withdraw that application and instead surrender to the trial court to seek regular bail. The Court allowed the withdrawal, dismissed the anticipatory bail …
Mirdula Devi, a resident of Vaishali district, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where 5 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a motorcycle she owned. She argued that she has a clean …
The petitioner, Subodh Kumar Verma, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a), 32(3) and 37 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 400 ml of liquor in a car he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in …
Petitioner Awdhesh Bhuiyan applied for anticipatory bail. While the application was pending, he was arrested. He then sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The Court granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.
The petitioner, Laxman Mandal, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where liquor was allegedly recovered from his house and a co‑resident's house. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, that the …
The petitioner, Sunil Rai, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that no arrest had been made and no liquor was recovered from his possession. He contended that the recovery of 28 litres of liquor was from a place not belonging to him and …
Ajay Kumar Rai sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2023, where 2.520 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a spot adjacent to his house. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the recovery …
The petitioner, Raja Singh, applied for anticipatory bail in a criminal case (PS Case No. 416 of 2025). While the application was pending, he was arrested by the police. The petitioner then sought the court's permission to withdraw his anticipatory bail application. The learned counsel argued that …
Babloo Paswan sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 272 and 273 of the IPC and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging that the liquor seizure was from a premises unrelated to him and that he was implicated on the basis of secret information without …
The petitioner, Chanda Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 20 litres of liquor recovered from her joint family house. She argued she has a clean antecedent, was not in actual possession, and was …
The petitioners, six residents of Bijalpur village, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 410 litres of liquor and 20,000 litres of Mahua solution. They contended that they have clean antecedents, were not …
The petitioner, Sanoj Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 90 litres of liquor were concealed near a community hall. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, and the …
The petitioner, Sohan Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a), 30(d) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for alleged recovery of 50 litres of liquor and 2,000 litres of fermented Jawa Mahua solution. He contended that he was not …
Ravindra Kumar Singh, the owner of a vehicle from which 179.98 litres of liquor were recovered, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. He argued that he was not present at the spot of seizure, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and was unaware that his driver misused …
Badri Rai sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 37 of the Bihar Excise Act, where liquor was allegedly recovered from other individuals. He argued he had no possession, a clean antecedent, and that the case relied on a confessional statement made in police …
Ramawatar Manjhi sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered against him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 (as amended in 2022) for allegedly possessing 50 litres of liquor recovered from his joint‑family house. He argued that he had no conscious possession, …
The petitioners, Pradeep Kumar and Laxmi Sahni, applied for anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 100 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. The petitioners argued that they were not arrested at the spot, that the liquor was not in …
The petitioner, Sandeep Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, involving alleged recovery of 110 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that the seizure was not from his …
The petitioner, Birendra Thakur, owner of a vehicle from which 360 litres of liquor was seized, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act and Sections 272, 273 and 34 of the IPC. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not present at the spot of …
Munna Kumar and Amarjeet Rai applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC Sections 272, 273/34 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging recovery of liquor from a motorcycle and a Santro. They contended that they were not arrested on the spot, …
The petitioner, Laxman Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that no liquor was recovered from his possession and that he is not the owner of the seized …
The petitioner, Narendra Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act, 2018 and Sections 41(1) and 41(2) of the Bihar Excise Act, 2016, alleging that the liquor seizure was made from a tractor not in his possession and that his name was …
The petitioner, Kundan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 100 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was found in his conscious …
