Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Amar JyotiversusThe State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Home namely Sri K. Senthil Kumar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court granted permission to the petitioner to withdraw the application.

Summary

Amar Jyoti filed a criminal miscellaneous application before the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar and its officials. The petitioner, through counsel, later sought the court's permission to withdraw the application. The court heard arguments from both sides and considered whether such withdrawal could be permitted. It found no impediment to allowing the petitioner to withdraw. Accordingly, the court granted permission for the withdrawal of the application.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the pending criminal miscellaneous application

Subjects

  • withdrawal of application
  • criminal miscellaneous proceedings
  • procedural law
  • high court order

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1726 of 2024
                                                     In
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3536 of 2024
                  ======================================================
                  Amar Jyoti son of Sharwaan Kumar @ Sharwan Raut, Resident of Village-
                  Panchgawan, P.S.-Nemdarganj, District-Nawada.
                                                                           ... ... Petitioner
                                                   Versus
            1.     The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Home namely Sri K.
                   Senthil Kumar x
            2.    Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna namely Sri Rajvinder Singh Bhatti.
            3.    The Superintendent of Police, Nawada namely Kartikey K. Sharma.
            4.     Investigating Officer Nemdarganj Police Station Nawada namely Nilesh
                   Kumar Singh.
                                                                     ... ... Opposite Parties
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Priya Ranjan, Advocate
                  For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Government Pleader 4
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

4    18-03-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                    AC to GP-4 for the Respondent-State.

                                 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner after some

                    argument seeks permission to withdraw the present application.

                                 3. Permission is accorded.



                                               (Satyavrat Verma, J)
Gaurav Sinha/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.