Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
5892 judgments · newest first · showing 2401–2600
Brajesh Rai sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 17.28 litres of liquor from a public place. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the location did not belong to him, and the …
Guddu Kumar, accused under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 8,769.6 litres of liquor from a truck, applied for anticipatory bail, claiming he was not arrested at the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and was not the owner of the vehicle. He …
The petitioner, Dheeraj Sahani, feared arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging recovery of 40 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He contended that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was …
The petitioner, Sakal Deep Sahni, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of eight litres of liquor and the seizure of his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in …
The petitioner, Arvind Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of liquor from vehicles without his possession. He argued that the alleged evidence was a confessional statement made in …
The petitioner, Ramesh Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where liquor was allegedly recovered from two vehicles. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was not the owner of the …
The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 16 litres of liquor recovered from his joint family house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, that the house is a …
The petitioner, Sashikant Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after apprehending arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 75 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle. He contended that he was not the owner of the vehicle, that the liquor …
Jokhan Yadav sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 1,049.640 litres of liquor from a truck. He contended that he was not in possession of the liquor, was not the owner of the seized vehicle, and that his name was …
The petitioner, Baban Singh, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 1,049.640 litres of liquor from his truck. He argued that he was not present at the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and …
The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 50 litres of liquor from a motorcycle, with a scooty also seized. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and does not own the seized …
Mannu Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with alleged offences under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, where recovery of 30 litres of liquor each from two locations was alleged. The petitioner, who has three prior cases under the Excise …
The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 94.5 litres of liquor from his vehicle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that …
Suraj Kumar, the owner of a motorcycle, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 4.125 litres of liquor from his vehicle. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, was not arrested at the spot, and was unaware that a person …
Arfa Devi, the petitioner, feared arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 14.25 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. She contended that she had no conscious possession of …
The petitioners, six residents of Slaempur village, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 concerning the alleged recovery of 250 litres of liquor from a sack near the Kumhari River. They contended that the …
The petitioner, Mohammad Majid, was implicated in a case alleging that 408.960 litres of liquor were recovered from his Creta car, leading to charges under Sections 281 and 324(4) of the B.N.S and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he was not present at the …
Kishan Sahni was implicated in an FIR under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 100 litres of liquor and 500 litres of raw material from a hut that does not belong to him. He contended that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was not found in his …
Amarnath Kumar filed an anticipatory bail application but was arrested while the application was pending. He subsequently sought the court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Anil Kumar, requested that the application be withdrawn, and the …
The petitioner, Jai Prakash Yadav, was implicated in a case for allegedly transporting 648 litres of liquor in his Bolero vehicle, violating Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was unaware of his driver’s …
The petitioner, Raj Kishor Singh, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 10 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and was unaware that another person, …
Ram Kumar Singh sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 159.48 litres of liquor from a banana orchard adjacent to his house. The allegation was based solely on a confessional statement made by Ganesh while in police custody, which …
Gajendra Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. after a case was registered against him for alleged contravention of Section 30(a) of the Excise Act involving the recovery of 7.5 litres of liquor from his car. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in …
Subodh Mahato, the owner of a Honda car, was implicated in a case (PS Case No.893/2018) for the alleged recovery of 280 litres of spirit-like substance from his vehicle. He was not arrested at the spot and the substance was not found in his conscious possession; the prosecution’s case rests on his …
The petitioner, Ashish Singh Bhadouria, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging possession of 750 litres of liquor recovered from a Hyundai car registered in his father's name. He contended he had a clean antecedent and was unaware that his brother had misused the vehicle. The …
Petitioner Pramod Sahni sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He alleged that the liquor seizure of 75.600 litres from two motorcycles and a nearby …
Guddu Kumar Mahto sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 15 litres of liquor near his kiosk. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, the liquor was not in his …
The petitioner, Bipin Kumar, was implicated in a case (PS Paharpur Case No 684 of 2025) for allegedly possessing 23.04 litres of liquor, an offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He contended that the liquor was recovered from a joint‑family …
The petitioner, Vikash Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 842.4 litres of liquor from a pickup vehicle. He asserted a clean criminal record, denied ownership of the vehicle, and …
The petitioner, Baby Devi, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 156 litres of beer and 51.75 litres of liquor from two cars and a motorcycle. She contended that she was not present at the spot of seizure, …
The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under the Excise Act alleging offences under Sections 30(a), 32, 41, 56(b) and 62, involving the alleged recovery of 88.56 litres of liquor from his shop. He argued …
The petitioner, Dharmendra Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 42.225 litres of liquor recovered from his joint family house. He argued that he had no conscious possession, the liquor was …
The petitioner, Ravi Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for allegedly possessing 15 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was …
The petitioner, Munazir Alam, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 0.750 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure, and was …
The petitioner, Md. Sahid Alam, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 500 ml of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he has a clean …
The petitioner, Sugrim Prasad, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 20.9 litres of liquor from his shop and godown. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, …
Manju Devi, the wife of Ashish Paswan, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act and Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act. She contended that the alleged liquor and fermented mahua were recovered from a …
Ankush Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with offences under Sections 30(a), 32(3), 41(1) and 41(2) of the Excise Act, alleging that liquor was recovered from a driver’s vehicle and a cowshed owned by him. He contended that he was not …
Laxman Dhari applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 15 litres of liquor from his joint family house. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his …
Arjun Paswan applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act alleging recovery of 6.8 litres of liquor. The petitioner argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and the …
The petitioners, Raju and Jitendra Manjhi, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 110 litres of liquor from a premises adjacent to petitioner 1’s house. They …
The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 80 litres of liquor from his scooty. He argued that he was not in possession of the vehicle …
The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of liquor concealed in a straw heap and his premises. He argued that the liquor was hidden by hostile parties, that he had no conscious …
The petitioner, Dharmendra Yadav, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 85.5 litres of liquor from a truck. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, had no conscious possession, was not the truck’s owner, and the case …
The petitioner, Amarjeet Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 281 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 3,293.40 litres of liquor from a truck. He contended that he was not caught in possession, …
The petitioner, Saheb Sah, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 274 and 275 of the BNS read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 21 litres of liquor in a Bolero vehicle. He contended that he was not in possession of the liquor, was not the …
The petitioner, Bittu Kumar Sah, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering nine litres of liquor from a public bush. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, the liquor was not found in his possession, and the FIR did not name him, …
Petitioner Pintu Kumar filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal miscellaneous case. While the application was pending, he was arrested. The petitioner then sought permission from the court to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The court, after hearing counsel, granted permission …
The petitioner, Uday Mandal, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 57 litres of liquor from a location not belonging to him. He contended that he was not caught in possession, that the complaint was filed by a hostile …
The petitioner, Subhash Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 69.120 litres of liquor. He contended that he was not caught in possession, the alleged recovery occurred on public land, and the case against him relied on …
Satendra Kumar was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 33.810 litres of liquor from three motorcycles, although the liquor was not seized from his immediate possession and he denied ownership of the vehicles. The prosecution’s case relied …
The petitioner, Aahid Alam, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case alleging offences under Section 317(5) of the B.N.S. and Sections 30(a), 32(2) and 41 of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 216 litres of liquor from three motorcycles. He argued that he has a clean …
The petitioner, Hema Devi, owner of a motorcycle from which 50 litres of liquor was seized, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. She argued she had a clean antecedent, was not present at the spot of seizure, and was unaware of her friend's alleged …
The petitioner, Kanhaiya Jaishwal, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 666 litres of liquor from a Mahindra Scorpio, although he was not caught in possession and the vehicle was not owned by him. He argued that the charge was based …
Santosh Sahni sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 30(c) and 36 of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that the alleged seizure of 40 litres of spirit and 40 empty bottles was made from a location not belonging to him and that he had no possession or relationship with …
The petitioner, Sunil Sah, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 25 litres of liquor from a location not belonging to him. He claimed he was implicated by a watchman with whom he has an inimical relationship and that no …
The petitioner, Anshu Kumar, filed an anticipatory bail application under CrPC in connection with a case pending before the Special Judge, Excise Court No. 1, East Champaran. While the application was pending, the petitioner was arrested in the same matter. The petitioner’s counsel then sought …
Sunil, the owner of a vehicle, was implicated in the recovery of 352.5 litres of liquor from his car under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. He asserted that he had a clean criminal record and that the liquor was seized from the vehicle without his knowledge, …
The petitioner, Raju Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 16.8 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, was not the owner of the …
The petitioner, Mantu Mahato, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where police alleged recovery of liquor from a hut owned by a third party and a roadside location. He argued he had no possession of the liquor, was not arrested at the scene, …
Ram Kumar Singh applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 74.4 litres of liquor from a bush adjacent to his house. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested, …
Petitioner Tuntun Kumar and Bhara/Pankaj Kumar filed an anticipatory bail application in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. The petitioners sought to withdraw the anticipatory bail application for petitioner no. 2, who had already been arrested, and requested anticipatory bail for …
The petitioner, Chandeshwar Mahto, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 25 litres of liquor from his joint family house. He argued that the liquor was not found in his conscious possession, the house is jointly owned, and …
Sudin Kumar Ram sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 7.875 litres of liquor from a mango orchard not owned by him. He argued that he was not caught in possession …
Birendra Yadav applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of nine litres of liquor. The petitioner argued that the liquor was recovered from a public place, not from …
The petitioner, Ritik Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged seizure of 538.920 litres of liquor from a Scorpio vehicle. He contended that he was not in possession of the liquor, was not …
Avinash Kumar Sharma and his father Pawan Kumar Sharma sought anticipatory bail after a complaint was lodged against them under Sections 409 and 420 of the IPC alleging misappropriation of money from SBI customers. The complainant, Ritik Kumar, claimed the petitioners collected deposits and issued …
The appellant, Shashi Singh, was charged under several IPC offences (307, 379, 341, 323, 504, 143) and sections 3(1)(r)(s) and 2(v) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act in connection with an alleged assault and robbery at the complainant's residence. He applied for anticipatory bail, which …
Usha Devi, a supervisor in the CDPO office, was accused by her superior of abusing her on a phone call and attempting to assault her on 27 May 2025. The FIR, filed on 4 June 2025, alleged offences under the Bihar Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) …
The appellant, Saurabh Kumar, was charged with offences under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, the Arms Act and the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting an informant with a knife, causing injury to the eye, and robbing him …
The appellant, Mantu Tiwari, was charged under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and several IPC offences for allegedly receiving a bribe of Rs. 22,000 in connection with a land mutation dispute. He sought anticipatory bail, arguing his clean antecedents, that a co‑accused government servant …
The appellant, Naresh Kumar Gope, was charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 for allegedly taking a government‑installed solar light from the complainant’s house, abusing her and assaulting her son. He sought anticipatory bail under Section …
The appellants, Ranjan Kumar and Pankaj Kumar, were charged under multiple provisions of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act in connection with a dispute over a vehicle purchase where the informant alleged caste-based abuse. The informants claimed that after a …
Abdul Mannan and Abdul Hannan appealed against the Special Judge's order rejecting their anticipatory bail in a case filed under several sections of the B.N.S. and the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The informant alleged that the appellants had taken a loan …
Shankar Mandal and his wife Anita Devi applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 118(1), 351, 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. The dispute arose from a land disagreement between the petitioners and the informant, who are brothers, leading …
Md. Asgar Ali applied for anticipatory bail in a case involving the alleged seizure of 1,198 litres of codeine syrup, alleged under IPC sections 272-276 and NDPS Act section 21(b). He argued that he was not named in the FIR, that the seized consignment was intended for a rival medical shop, and that …
The petitioners, Pintu Kumar Ray and his father Singasan Ray, filed anticipatory bail applications in connection with FIR No. 583 of 2025 alleging assault and robbery. The first petitioner withdrew his application, while the second sought bail, claiming a clean antecedent and that the FIR only …
Manish Kumar applied for anticipatory bail but was arrested while the application was pending. He then sought permission to withdraw his anticipatory bail application. The court heard arguments from both sides and granted the petitioner's request to withdraw. Consequently, the anticipatory bail …
The petitioners, Rekha Ray and Anjali Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) of the Indian Penal Code. They alleged that the FIR was based on a civil dispute over a land sale agreement, where the informant claimed they delayed execution of …
The petitioner, Abhay Kumar, son of Late Shiv Lal Prasad, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 25(1‑b)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act and Section 37(2) of the Bihar Excise Act. The FIR named an accused who fled as Abhay Kumar Gond, leading the petitioner to …
The petitioners, four residents of Alpa village, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS Konch Case No. 272 of 2025) involving offences under multiple sections of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act, the Arms Act and the Criminal Procedure Code. They alleged that the FIR, filed three …
The petitioner, Sunil Patel, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 32(ii) and 41(i) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 1,230 litres of raw spirit from a truck. He contended that he was not in possession of the seized vehicle, was not its …
Ankesh Kumar sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 350 ml of liquor recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, that he …
The appellants, Nilam Devi, Amit Kumar, Sumit Kumar and Parmanand Singh, appealed against the trial court's refusal to grant anticipatory bail under Section 14‑A(2) of the SC/ST Act. The informant, Brajesh Paswan, alleged that the appellants assaulted him, used caste slurs, attempted to strangle …
The petitioner, Afroj Ansari, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, alleging recovery of 180 ml of liquor and seizure of a motorcycle from another individual, Alok Kumar. He contended that he was not arrested on …
The petitioner, Mantu Singh (also known as Narendra Kr. Patel), applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 and Sections 25(1‑b)A and 26 of the Arms Act. He is alleged to have been involved …
Sunil Singh filed an anticipatory bail application under the Criminal Procedure Code before the Patna High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the application. The court considered the request and, finding no objection, granted permission to withdraw. …
Santosh Kumar filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court in a criminal miscellaneous case. The petitioner was represented by Mr. Dinesh Prasad Verma, while the State was represented by Mr. Navin Kumar Pandey. During the hearing, the petitioner sought permission to withdraw …
The petitioner, Vinod Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where 2039.04 litres of liquor were recovered from a truck and his motorcycle was seized. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, was not …
The petitioner, Raman Kamat, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 540 litres of liquor from a pick‑up vehicle. He contended that he had a clean criminal record, was not in possession of the vehicle at the time of seizure, …
The petitioner, Bhikhari Sahni, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 600.75 litres of liquor from three motorcycles. He argued that he was not in actual possession of the liquor and was implicated only because he owned one of the seized vehicles, …
The petitioners, Durgesh Yadav and Sikandar Yadav, filed anticipatory bail applications in a case registered under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the B.N.S.S and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. Durgesh Yadav withdrew his application, which the court allowed. …
Muktinath Giri, the owner of a Tata Magic vehicle, was implicated in a case alleging the recovery of 145.755 litres of liquor from his vehicle under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. He was not arrested at the spot and did not have the liquor in his conscious possession; …
The petitioner, Niwash Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 15 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He contended that he was not in possession of the liquor, was not arrested on the spot, and …
The petitioner, Raja @ Raj Kumar Singh, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. While the application was pending, he was arrested by the police. The petitioner then approached the court seeking permission to withdraw his anticipatory bail petition. The learned counsel …
The petitioner, Manohar Mahto, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 25.5 litres of liquor from premises adjacent to his house. The petitioner argued that the …
The petitioner, Udaychand Ray, was arrested while his anticipatory bail application was pending before the Patna High Court. He sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application on the ground that he had already been taken into custody. The learned counsel for the petitioner filed a …
The petitioner, Tapeshwar Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 10 litres of liquor, which was actually recovered from a bag carried by another individual, Sarju. The petitioner argued that he had no …
Anil Kumar Singh, the owner of a vehicle from which 300 litres of liquor were recovered, was charged under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. He contended that he had a clean criminal record, was not in possession of the liquor, and that the driver …
The petitioner, Ajay Kumar Singh, was implicated in an excise case for alleged recovery of 90 litres of liquor from a truck, although he was not arrested at the spot and the liquor was not found in his conscious possession. He contended that he merely owned the vehicle used by another individual, …
The petitioners, Abhishek Kumar and Krishna Murari, were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for alleged recovery of 954.720 litres of liquor from a secret basement belonging to Rakesh Kumar. They argued that they were not arrested at …
The petitioners, Raghuveer Sahni, Ravindra Rai and Mahesh Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 concerning the alleged recovery of 130 litres of liquor. They argued that they were not caught in possession, …
The petitioner, Bisu Bauri, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 1,035 litres of liquor from a truck he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not in …
The petitioners, Pawan Verma and his son Rinkesh Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case alleging possession of illicit liquor under Sections 30(a)(c)(d), 32, 33 and 41 of the Excise Act. They argued that they have clean …
The petitioner, Rooplal Mahto, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 197 litres of liquor. The petitioner argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, …
Rahul Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, where 107.250 litres of liquor were recovered from his vehicle. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was unaware of any misuse …
The petitioner, Rajnish Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where 16.44 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a rented room of a third party, Anshu. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the …
The petitioner, Fekan Paswan, was implicated in a case alleging recovery of 72 litres of liquor from his residence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He contended that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was located in a joint family house and not …
The petitioner, Bhola Yadav, filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal case arising from PS Jogbani, Araria. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and to surrender, intending to apply for regular bail. The Hon'ble …
The petitioner, Pawan Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 717.12 litres of liquor from a boat on the Gandak river. He contended that the liquor was seized from a public boat, not from his possession, …
The petitioner, Suraj Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where 120 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a thatched house not owned by him. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found …
The petitioner, Rajesh Sahani, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 21 litres of liquor. He argued that he was not arrested at the scene, the liquor was …
Manoj Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after learning that a case had been registered against him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 600 litres of liquor from a forest. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his …
The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of eight litres of liquor from his joint family house. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, the liquor …
The petitioner applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 270.525 litres of liquor. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, the liquor was not found in his conscious …
The petitioners, Rajeev Kumar (Raju Yadav) and Dharmendra Kumar, were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 35 litres of liquor from the river Punpun. They argued that no liquor was found in their possession and the allegation rested solely on a …
The petitioner, Kishori Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 40 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that his friend misused the …
The petitioner, Deepak Sah, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, after 20 litres of liquor and 30 kilograms of jaggery were seized from an auto‑rickshaw and a motorcycle. He asserted that he neither owned the vehicles nor had the …
The petitioners, Kirani Rai and his son Jitendra Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Non‑Transportable Substances Act read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that the liquor was recovered from a kiln they did not own and that …
The petitioner, Bhola Yadav, had filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal case. He later sought permission to withdraw that application and instead surrender to the trial court to seek regular bail. The Patna High Court, after hearing counsel, granted permission to withdraw the …
The petitioner, Rakesh Chaudhary, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 98 litres of liquor were recovered from his shop. He contended that he was not in possession of the liquor, was not the owner of the shop, and that …
The petitioner, Chhotu Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 28.5 litres of liquor. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was …
Amar Kumar Yadav sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 274, 275(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of liquor recovered from two individuals and a motorcycle. He argued that he had …
The petitioner, Amarnath Ram, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 6.8 litres of liquor from his joint family house. He argued that the liquor was not found in his personal possession, …
The petitioners, Maina Devi and Radhika Devi, were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of liquor recovered from their residence, which is part of a joint family property. They contended that the liquor was not in their conscious possession, that …
The petitioner, Kanhaiya Patel, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 37 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 32.5 litres of liquor from a paddy field. He contended that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the field did not …
The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that liquor was recovered from other individuals and not from him. He argued that he was not caught in possession and that the case against …
The petitioners, Rohit Yadav and Manav Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of illicit liquor. They argued that they were not arrested at the spot, the …
The petitioner, Sita Devi, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(A) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 18 litres of liquor from her residence. She argued that she has a clean antecedent, is a …
The petitioner, Shyam Sundar Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where liquor was allegedly recovered from other accused and not from his possession. The petitioner argued that the recovery was based solely on a confessional statement …
The petitioner, Krishan Kumar Ray, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 4.5 litres of liquor from his house and Rs.112.98 worth from a pickup vehicle. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the …
The petitioner, Ramrati Devi, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 20 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to her house. She contended that the liquor was not in her possession, that the complaint was filed on the instigation of a …
The petitioners, Viveka Kumar and Ranjeet Choudhary, filed anticipatory bail applications in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of liquor. The counsel for petitioner no.1 sought to withdraw his anticipatory bail application after …
The petitioner, Jitendra Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2016 for alleged recovery of 77.76 litres of liquor from a vehicle he owned. He argued that the liquor was not found in his personal …
The petitioner, Laxman Saw, owner of a vehicle, was implicated in a case (PS 213/2025) for alleged recovery of 1,341 litres of liquor from a truck, alleged offences under Sections 30(a), 36 and 41(2) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he was not present at the spot of seizure, had no …
The petitioner, Om Shiv Kumar, filed an anticipatory bail application in the High Court of Patna. While the application was pending, he was arrested by the police. The petitioner then sought the Court's permission to withdraw his anticipatory bail application. The learned counsel for the petitioner …
The petitioner, Bholu Thakur, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of three litres of liquor from a bag not in his possession. He argued that the recovery was linked to another individual, Lalit, whose …
The petitioner, Dilip Rajbanshi, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly concealing 49 litres of liquor near his house. He argued that the liquor was recovered from a location not belonging to him and that the informant, a chowkidar with whom …
The petitioners, Haruni Rai and his son Raj Kumar, were implicated in a case under Sections 30(a), 38 and 40(i) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 9 litres of liquor at Haruni’s house and 130 litres at the house of Manoj Rai. They argued that they have clean …
Petitioner Kundan Kumar applied for anticipatory bail but was arrested while the application was pending. The petitioner, through counsel, sought the court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The court examined the request and, noting the arrest, granted permission to …
The petitioner, Ramesh Kumar Sahani, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 100 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He claimed a clean criminal record, but the impugned order recorded an antecedent case, …
Arman Khan applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 30(a), 32(3) and 37 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 0.7 litres of liquor from a car he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not present at the spot of …
The petitioner, Sanoj Yadav, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 770 litres of liquor from seven motorcycles. He argued that he was not arrested at the scene, had no possession of the seized …
The petitioner, Mithilesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 32(i)(ii) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 180.360 litres of liquor in a Scorpio vehicle. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not caught in possession, and the …
The petitioner, Vijay Sah, was implicated in a case under IPC Sections 274 and 275 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 39.455 litres of liquor seized from his motorcycle. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and had no conscious …
The petitioner, Gita Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 119 litres of liquor. She argued that she has a clean antecedent, is a woman, and that the liquor was recovered from a location not …
Santosh Sahni applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging recovery of liquor from a location behind Md. Sallaudin's house and from a sack in his cowshed. He asserted he had no conscious possession, a clean criminal record, and that the …
The petitioner, Shivmandal Mahto, applied for anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of six litres of liquor from his house, which is a joint family property. He argued that the liquor was not found in his conscious possession, that the …
The petitioner, Alok Ray, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, relating to the recovery of 26.1 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued …
Paras Nath Singh, the petitioner, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 200 ml of liquor recovered from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, had no conscious possession, was not the vehicle's owner, and …
The petitioner, Sudeep Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 34.925 litres of liquor and 120 kg of Mahua flower from two vehicles, one of which he owned. He argued that he was not present at the …
The petitioners, Ranjeet Yadav and Masudan Kumar, were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering five litres of liquor near the Andhera river. They argued that they were not arrested on the spot, no liquor was found in their possession, and the alleged …
The petitioner, Bablu Shrivastava, sought anticipatory bail after learning of a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 15 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not apprehended on the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, he is not …
Gautam Kumar was accused under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 3.375 litres of liquor recovered from his shop premises, which he claims was actually located in a joint family house and not in his conscious possession. He applied for …
Mukesh Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022, where 54.75 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a public bamboo orchard not in his possession. He argued that the complaint was based on a hostile chowkidar’s …
Shivam Kumar applied for anticipatory bail in a criminal case. While the application was pending, he was arrested. The petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The Court granted the request, holding that the petitioner could withdraw the application after …
The petitioner, Anil Sahni, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where 521.25 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from the house of Deepak Kumar, not from the petitioner. He contended that the complaint was based on a …
The petitioner, Yugal Ray, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 72 litres of liquor from a vehicle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and had no conscious possession of the liquor, …
The petitioner, Babbu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning of a pending case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 521.25 litres of liquor from a third party's house. He argued that he was not arrested at the scene, had no possession of the liquor, …
The petitioner, Gajendra Sahani, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 145 litres of liquor from a public riverbank location where nothing was found in his possession. He argued that the FIR …
The petitioner, Nitesh Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 0.750 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in actual possession of the …
Vishnu Yadav sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 64.5 litres of liquor from a public bush near the Sone river. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the location did not belong to him, and that …
Sita Devi applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 414 of the IPC and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging that 6.48 litres of liquor were recovered from her motorcycle. She argued that she was not in possession of the liquor, that she merely owned the vehicle, and that …
The petitioner, Mukesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 100 litres of liquor from a public area. He contended that the liquor was not in his possession, the …
The petitioner, Golu Dhangar, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 3.75 litres of liquor. He argued that the liquor was seized from a public place, not from his possession, and that his name was not mentioned in the FIR, …
The petitioner, Harinarayan Ram, was implicated in a case alleging recovery of 55 litres of liquor from the bank of the Tilave river, invoking Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Non‑Objection Statute (BNS) and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he had no prior criminal record, …
The petitioner, Pappu Mandal, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 33.9 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was unaware of any misuse of his vehicle by a third party, and that …
The petitioner, Dinesh Chandra Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging that 8.450 litres of liquor were recovered from his motorcycle. He contended that he was not arrested at the spot, had …
Mukesh Sahani appealed against the trial court's refusal to grant anticipatory bail under Section 14‑A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. He was charged under IPC sections 420, 406, 504 and 506 and SC/ST Act sections 3(i), (r) and (s) for allegedly not …
The petitioner, Manoj Kumar Singh, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with an excise case alleging recovery of 320 litres of spirit from a field adjacent to his house. He asserted a clean criminal record and argued that the alleged …
The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of liquor and jaggery solution. He argued that he was not arrested at the scene, had no possession of the …
The petitioner, Sameer Rai, was implicated in offences under Sections 30(a)(c) and 36 of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 3,890.97 litres of liquor from a secret basement belonging to another person. He was not arrested at the time of the raid and no liquor was found in his possession. …
Kewal Yadav filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. After hearing, the petitioner, through counsel Binod Kumar Sinha, requested permission to withdraw the application. The Court granted the request and ordered that the anticipatory bail application be dismissed as …
Petitioner Shambhu Kumar (Petitioner 1) and Yogendra Prasad (Petitioner 2) applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 105 of the B.N.S. alleging that the son of an informant was electrocuted by an electric wire around the petitioners' orchard. The petitioners argued that they …
The appellants, Santosh Yadav, Mohan Yadav and Amla Devi, appealed to the Patna High Court under Section 14‑A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against the refusal of anticipatory bail by the Special Judge. The FIR alleged that the informant, Sanju Devi, was abused and threatened by the …
The petitioner, Arun Kumar Bhagat, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging the recovery of 276.48 litres of liquor from a Bolero pickup. He contended that he was not caught in possession, was not the vehicle’s owner, and was implicated solely on a confessional …
The petitioner, Lal Das Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 150 litres of liquor near Mahavir temple. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the site was public, and he was implicated due to a …
The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 50 litres of liquor from a public area near a Mazar. He was not arrested at the scene and no liquor was found in his possession; the allegation stemmed from a hostile watchman …
The petitioner, Shambhu Mahto, had filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal case. While the application was pending, the petitioner died. The petitioner’s counsel then sought the court’s permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application on account of the petitioner’s death. The …
The petitioner, Chunchun Kumar, was implicated in a case under the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 582.84 litres of liquor from a seized pickup and motorcycle. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the seized vehicles, and was implicated only through a …
Vikash Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous petition against the State of Bihar. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner when the matter was taken up. The petition had earlier been dismissed for non‑prosecution on 18‑12‑2025, but was restored to the original file on 12‑2‑2026. Upon …
The petitioner, Rubin Kumar Manjhi, the registered owner of a vehicle from which 100 grams of cannabis was seized, was implicated in an NDPS case after two individuals were arrested at the scene. He contended that he had no knowledge of the drug possession and that the only link to the offence was …
The petitioner, Bittu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 15 litres of liquor from a public area. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, the liquor was not found in his possession, and the complaint …
Petitioner Keshav Kumar faced an anticipatory bail application in a criminal miscellaneous case (No.87065 of 2025). He approached the Patna High Court seeking permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The Court, after hearing counsel, granted the request, allowing the withdrawal. …
The petitioner, Devee Lal Yadav, filed a petition for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 22 litres of liquor. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, and the alleged recovery …
The petitioner, Vikash Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and the Arms Act. He alleged that the FIR was based on a false complaint by an informant who was a relative and that the alleged seizure of a …
The petitioner, Brajesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (P.S. No.138/2025) involving multiple offences under the B.N.S., 2023, arising from a dispute over road construction on land claimed to be privately owned by the informant. He argued that the road was part of a …
The petitioner, Dhamendra Kumar Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a theft case (Sections 379 and 411 IPC) involving the sale of tyres, batteries and diesel from a Hyva he was driving. He claimed a clean record and argued that the informant falsely implicated him, noting that …
The petitioner, Nitish Kumar Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with FIR No. 253/2024 alleging extortion, assault, and illegal possession of arms. He asserted that he has a clean record, is a student, and was falsely implicated by the informant. The State opposed the …
The petitioner, Mustafa Hussain, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 80 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita concerning the alleged dowry‑related death of his sister. He contended that the FIR was based on the testimony of an informant who is the brother of …
Ram Niwash Kumar, the petitioner, feared arrest in a case under Sections 274 and 275 of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly being the owner of a motorcycle from which 126 litres of liquor were recovered. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, …
Petitioners Lalbabu Mukhiya and Sanjay Mukhiya applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 274 and 275 of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. They contended that the alleged seizure of 325 litres of liquor and 4,000 litres of …
The petitioner, Pankaj Kumar, was implicated under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 319.875 litres of liquor recovered from his house, which he claims is joint family property and that he had no conscious possession. He argued that the 2018 amendment to the Excise Act …
Munsi Paswan sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 14 litres of liquor from two locations. He argued that he was not caught in possession, the alleged recovery occurred on property not his, and the complaint was filed by a hostile …
The petitioner, Bhim Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a) and 44 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 63 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in …
Bedami Devi, the owner of a motorcycle from which 50 litres of liquor was seized, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. She argued that she had no prior criminal record, was not present at the spot of seizure, and was unaware that her friend misused her vehicle. …
The petitioner, Deepak Kumar Gupta, had filed an anticipatory bail application under the Criminal Procedure Code. Subsequently, he approached the Court seeking permission to withdraw that application. The learned counsel for the petitioner requested the withdrawal, and the Court examined whether …
Meena Devi, a 70‑year‑old woman, and Pappu Yadav applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 65 litres of liquor from a hut that did not belong to them. The petitioners contended that they were not …
The petitioner, Anil Mandal, was implicated in a case alleging possession of 270.420 litres of liquor recovered from his joint family house, invoking Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. He applied for …
Petitioner Sahendra Yadav sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 41(1) and 41(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, alleging that the liquor was recovered from a location adjacent to his house and not from his possession. He has two prior excise cases and …
