Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
5892 judgments · newest first · showing 2601–2800
The petitioner, Rahul Yadav, was implicated in a case alleging the recovery of 414.720 litres of liquor from a Tata Magic vehicle under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, was not the owner of the vehicle, …
The petitioner, Chhotu Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, where 770 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from motorcycles. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was found in his …
Ramanand Yadav, owner of a pickup vehicle, was implicated in the seizure of 1,465.560 litres of liquor from three vehicles in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He was not arrested at the spot and no liquor was found in his immediate possession; the prosecution’s case rests on his …
The petitioner, Bijen Yadav, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 8 litres of liquor recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in actual possession at the time of seizure, and that the vehicle was misused …
The petitioner, Luchi Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where 300 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a location adjacent to his house. He argued that the recovery was not from his …
The petitioner, Sinku @ Tinku Yadav, was implicated in a criminal case (PS Case No.133 of 2025) and filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code. During the hearing on 13-03-2026, the petitioner, through counsel Mr. Dr. Raushan, requested permission to …
The appellants, seven residents of Mudera village, were charged in a 2019 case under several IPC sections and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. They applied for anticipatory bail, which was denied by the Special Judge SC/ST, Patna, on 16‑12‑2023. On appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of the SC/ST …
The petitioners sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, involving the alleged recovery of 228.4 litres of liquor and 930 empty bottles from a bush not belonging to them. They argued that they were not in possession of the …
The petitioner, Sanni Kumar, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. He later sought the court's permission to withdraw that application. The learned counsel for the petitioner requested the withdrawal, and the court granted permission. Consequently, the anticipatory bail …
The petitioners, three brothers from Godigawa village, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 272, 273 and 34 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 20 litres of liquor recovered from a bamboo orchard that does not …
The petitioners, Rakesh and Rajesh Sapera, were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 70 litres of liquor near Ganeshi Bigha bridge. They contended that the liquor was not found in their possession, the location was a public area, and the …
The petitioner, Guddu Chauhan, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 36 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, nothing was seized from his possession, and he is not the owner …
The petitioner, Ravi Kumar, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 37 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of liquor from two motorcycles he owned. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession and that he was unaware of its misuse …
Naresh Kumar Sardar sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 318(4) and 303(2) of the Bihar Non‑Excise Statutes (BNS) read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 63 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. The petitioner argued that he was not …
Anil Singh and Naresh Singh applied for anticipatory bail after learning that they might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 30 litres of liquor from a public place. They argued that they have clean antecedents, were not in possession of the …
The petitioner, Satyendra Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where 2.88 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a cattle shed adjacent to his house. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the recovery site did …
The petitioner, Md. Sarafaraj, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 18 litres of liquor recovered from his house, which is a joint family property. He argued that he was not apprehended on the spot, the liquor was not in his conscious …
The petitioner, Chandan Singh Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 14.6 litres of liquor were recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he was not in …
The petitioner, Sujit Kumar Paswan, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 10 litres of liquor from his auto. He argued that he has a clean criminal record, was not caught with the liquor, and …
The petitioner, Shambhu Sahni, sought anticipatory bail after learning of a pending case (PS Case No. 446/2025) alleging that 70 litres of liquor were recovered from two motorcycles, invoking Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act. He argued that he had no …
The petitioners, Ram Balak Sahani and Chuman Sahani, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, alleging that the liquor was not found in their conscious possession and that the case was based solely on a custodial …
The petitioner, Deepak Tiwary, applied for anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Sections 303(2) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023 and Section 37 of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly stealing a mobile phone from a girl’s pocket. The allegation stemmed from a statement made by an apprehended …
The petitioner, Sadhu Choudhary, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a), 3(C), 32(iii) and 34 of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 60 litres of liquor and 400 litres of jawa mahua at his newly constructed house, which is a joint family property. He was not arrested at the scene …
The petitioner, Lalbabu Mahto, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 8,769.6 litres of liquor from a truck. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, the liquor was not found in his possession, and he was not the owner …
The petitioner, Ramesh Ram, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for alleged recovery of 11.72 litres of liquor from a bush adjacent to his …
Lalita Devi was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 4.875 litres of liquor recovered from her house, which is a joint family property. She contended that she was not arrested, had no conscious possession, and that the amendment to the Excise Act …
The petitioner, Jaiprakash Singh, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly recovering 100 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor or the vehicle and that the case was based solely on a …
The petitioner, Jitendra Jha, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 459 litres of liquor from his pickup vehicle. He argued that he had no knowledge of the driver’s alleged misuse of the vehicle and that nothing was found in his …
The petitioner, Ravi Ranjan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. He contended that he was not caught in possession of liquor, was not the owner of the seized vehicles, and was implicated solely on secret …
Vinod Sahani sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 50 litres of liquor from a public bamboo orchard. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the orchard does not belong …
The petitioner, Gautam Kumar Paswan, applied for anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Sections 30(a), 34 and 36 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for allegedly possessing 40 litres of liquor in a house under construction. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, …
The petitioner, Dilip Kumar Patel, was implicated in a 2015 case involving alleged recovery of 3,800 litres of spirit from a truck, with charges under Sections 420, 414, 272, 273, 120B of the IPC and Section 47(A) of the Bihar Excise Act. He claimed to have a clean antecedent, asserted that the …
The petitioner, Sanjay Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2016, for alleged recovery of 10 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not the owner of the seized …
The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, faced arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 50 litres of liquor on a scooty. He contended that the liquor was not recovered from his immediate possession, he was not the owner of the vehicle, and the case was based solely on a …
The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 34 and 37 of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 40 litres of liquor concealed under a straw beside a public road. He contended that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, …
The petitioner, Md. Nurul, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition (No.14689 of 2026) arising from PS case No.242 of 2019, Thana Paroo, Muzaffarpur. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, while the State was represented by Advocate Mr. Damodar Prasad Tiwary. The Hon'ble Justice Satyavrat …
The petitioner, Kumbha Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 22 litres of liquor from a public bush. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, the recovery site did not belong to him, …
The petitioner, Shivam Kumar, had been granted anticipatory bail in Bachhwara P.S. Case No.31 of 2026. However, the order dated 13.03.2026 mistakenly recorded the case number as 314 in paragraph 5. The petitioner sought correction of this clerical error, arguing that the intended reference was to …
Santosh Kumar was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 30.200 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that the vehicle was misused by …
The petitioner, Binod Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act concerning alleged possession of 56.280 litres of liquor recovered from a joint‑family house. He argued that no liquor was found in his conscious possession, the …
The petitioner, Saroj Kushwaha, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 86.88 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and …
The petitioner, Md. Mahatab, was implicated in an excise case (PS Case No. 388 of 2025) and filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. The petitioner later approached the court seeking permission to withdraw his anticipatory bail application. The learned counsel for the …
The petitioner, Pintu Kumar, feared arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a), 30(c), 34 and 36 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 75 litres of liquor and 6,400 litres of illicit Mahua from a chamber behind Subhash Rai’s house. He asserted that no …
The petitioner, Lal Bahadur Chouhan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 40 litres of liquor recovered near a canal. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the recovery site did not belong to him, and …
The petitioner, Vivek Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 60 litres of liquor from a riverbank. He contended that he had no prior criminal record, that the liquor was not …
The petitioner, Manish Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging that the liquor was recovered from a public place and not from his possession. He submitted a supplementary affidavit showing six prior cases, three …
The petitioner sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of ten litres of liquor from a bush adjacent to his house. He argued he had a clean antecedent, that the liquor was not found in his possession, and that the informant’s …
The petitioner, Baban Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022, alleging that the alleged recovery of liquor was from a location not belonging to him and that he was implicated based on secret information without …
The petitioner, Ajay Bari, applied for anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act alleging recovery of 8.5 litres of liquor from a bush. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and was falsely implicated by a chowkidar …
Petitioner Prabhu Kumar feared arrest in a case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 557.5 litres of liquor from a tractor. He argued that he had no direct possession, was not the owner of the vehicle, and that the informant’s name was omitted from the FIR, casting …
The petitioner, Dilip Patel, applied for anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, alleging possession of liquor recovered from locations not belonging to him. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent and that the complaint was …
Harendra Sahni sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 22,800 litres of liquor near Piparahi bridge. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the alleged recovery site was public, and the case …
The petitioner, Abodh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 72.6 litres of liquor from an e‑rickshaw he owned. He argued that he was not present at the spot of seizure, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and …
The petitioners, Dhauli Devi and Chhotu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 200 litres of liquor. They argued that they were not arrested on the spot, no liquor was found in their possession, and the …
The petitioners, Sakal Mahato and Ramroop Mahato, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. They argued that they were not arrested at the scene, no liquor was recovered from their possession, and the alleged recovery was from a …
The petitioner, Baby Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 200 litres of liquor from a public riverbank. He argued that no liquor was seized from his possession, the alleged recovery site did not belong to him, and the FIR …
The petitioner, Momindra Sahani, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 145 litres of liquor from a river bank. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the location did not belong to him, and the …
The petitioner sought anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging that liquor was recovered from a motorcycle and that he had no conscious possession or ownership of the vehicle. He argued that the only evidence was a confessional statement made …
The petitioner, Bittu Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of liquor from premises not owned by him. He argued that no liquor was found in his possession and that he was implicated solely on secret information. The …
The petitioner, Md. Firoz, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 459 litres of liquor from two vehicles, one of which he owned. He was not arrested at the spot and the liquor was not found in his possession; only his driver …
Saroj Devi, the owner of a motorcycle, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 32 litres of liquor from the vehicle. She contended that she had no knowledge of the liquor, that the vehicle was misused by her brother, and that she possessed a …
The petitioner, Rina Devi, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing nine litres of liquor at her joint‑family house. She argued that she has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was …
The petitioners, Arvind Sah and Dharmendra Sah, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in connection with PS case No. 328 of 2025, which alleges offences under Sections 30(a) and 45 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the recovery of 22.080 litres of liquor from a godown …
The petitioner, Kusum Lal, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 50 litres of liquor from a bag near a public temple. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the location was public, and the …
The petitioner, Sumit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(iii) of the Bihar Excise Act, where liquor was allegedly recovered from another accused and a motorcycle. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, was not the vehicle owner, …
Dipak Kumar, the owner of a Scorpio, was implicated in a case (PS Case No. 448 of 2025) for the alleged recovery of 972 litres of liquor, an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested …
The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 822 litres of liquor from his pickup vehicle. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no liquor in his conscious possession, and …
Lalan Kumar, the owner of an e‑rickshaw, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 123.675 litres of liquor were recovered from his vehicle and 14 litres from another person. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the …
The petitioner, Suraj Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 10 litres of liquor recovered from a scooty he owned. He argued that he was not in possession of the …
Petitioner Keshav Yadav sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 25.875 litres of liquor from an orchard not belonging to him. He argued that the recovery was not from his possession, that the chaukidar who …
The petitioner, Kripanand Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 270 litres of liquor from his auto. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that …
The petitioners, three residents of Begusarai, sought anticipatory bail after a police case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022 alleging recovery of 44.460 litres of liquor and seizure of a motorcycle. They argued they had clean antecedents, were not …
The petitioner, Ajeet Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 521.25 litres of liquor from the house of Deepak Sahni. He argued that no liquor was found in his possession, the alleged recovery occurred at a …
The petitioner, Balmiki Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022, where 100 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, did not own the vehicle, and the …
The petitioner, Nanhak Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), (b) and (c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 280 litres of liquor near the Ganga river. He argued that the liquor was seized from a location not under his …
The petitioners, Dineshwar Paswan and his son Sonu Paswan, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022, where 40 litres of liquor was allegedly recovered from a motorcycle and their house. They argued they have clean antecedents, were not the owners of …
The petitioner, Fekan Sah, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 1,130.4 litres of liquor from a hut belonging to Basudev Yadav. He contended that he was not caught in possession, that the recovery occurred on premises not owned by him, and …
Petitioners Rajendra Jaiswal and Guddu Jaiswal were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 175.09 litres of liquor from their joint family house. They applied for anticipatory bail, contending that the liquor was not in their conscious …
The petitioner, Gopal Yadav, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a), (c), (d), 33 and 36 of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 64.5 litres of liquor and 89 empty bottles from a bush near the Sone river. He asserted that he has a clean criminal record, that the alleged liquor was …
The appellants, Bijay Kumar, Mritunjay Yadav and Moti Devi, appealed to the Patna High Court against the refusal of anticipatory bail by the Exclusive Special Court under Section 14(A)(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. They contended that they have clean antecedents, that the informant …
The petitioner, Motin Ansari, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case filed under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita relating to assault and other offences. He alleged that the case was false and stemmed from an ongoing land dispute, with the informant having previously filed …
The petitioner, Lali Yadav, was implicated in a case (Paliganj PS Case No.81 of 2011) alleging his involvement in the death of his wife, with charges under Sections 304B, 201 and 34 of the IPC. The investigating police concluded that the death was accidental, caused by drowning, and submitted a …
The appellants, including Mithilesh Kumar, appealed under Section 14-A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against the trial court's refusal to grant anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged abduction, forced inter‑caste marriage, and caste‑based assault under several IPC and SC/ST …
The appellants, thirteen Yadavs, were charged under several IPC sections and the SC/ST Act for alleged caste-based assault and robbery against an informant and his son. They filed an appeal under Section 14‑A(2) of the SC/ST Act seeking anticipatory bail after a trial court refused it. The …
The petitioners, including Golu Sai and others, feared arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bihar Narcotic and Smuggling (BNSS) Act, 2023 and Section 8 of the POCSO Act, based on an informant’s allegations of kidnapping, theft and alleged sexual offences. They contended that …
Savita Devi sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 80 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, relating to the alleged dowry‑related torture and death of her sister‑in‑law. The informant, whose sister discovered the dead body, alleged that the …
Manish Kumar, a student with a clean record, feared arrest in a case registered under Sections 108, 351(3) and 61(2) of the B.N.S., 2023, alleging his involvement in the alleged suicide of his son. The petitioner claimed the allegations were false, stating that the informant’s son was mentally …
The petitioners, Hasan Rai, Mainuddin Rai and Kaimul Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under several sections of the B.N.S. for alleged assault on an informant and his family on 28 September 2025. They contended they have clean records, were falsely implicated, and …
The petitioner, Minhaj Alam, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case registered under Sections 406, 420 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code concerning a land transaction. The informant alleged that he paid Rs. 15.20 lakh to the petitioner and another accused, of which Rs. 11.20 …
Vipin Sahani applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a road‑robbery case (Case No.203/2024) under Section 309(4) of the B.N.S., 2023. The FIR was lodged against unknown persons, but his name appeared in a confessional statement of another accused, which the petitioner argued lacks …
The petitioner, Birendra Singh, filed an anticipatory bail application in the High Court of Patna. While the application was pending, he was arrested by the police. The petitioner then approached the court seeking permission to withdraw his anticipatory bail application. The learned counsel for the …
The petitioner, Jagarnath Mahto, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 13 litres of liquor recovered from a bamboo orchard behind his house. He was not arrested at the spot and no liquor was found in his immediate possession. The petitioner …
The petitioners, three residents of Majhariya village, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly recovering 129.96 litres of liquor from a millet field. They argued they have clean antecedents, that the …
Ashok Kumar, the petitioner, feared arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 30 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure, and was unaware …
The petitioner, Rajeev Ranjan Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for alleged recovery of 23.25 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He contended that he had no prior criminal record, was not in possession of the liquor at the …
The petitioner, Ujjawal Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 39 litres of liquor from a bush near Rajendra Sah's house. He argued that no liquor was seized from his possession, the recovery site did …
The petitioner, Sarita Rani, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for the alleged recovery of 135 litres of liquor from a vehicle she owned. She argued that she had no prior criminal record, was not present at the …
The petitioner, Madhuri Kumari, applied for anticipatory bail after a FIR alleged that 175.8 litres of liquor were recovered from a four‑wheel vehicle she owned, implicating her under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. She argued that she had no prior …
Petitioner Kundan Kumar was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly transporting 60 litres of liquor in his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and had no conscious possession of …
The petitioner, Sanjeet Sah, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 4.80 litres of liquor recovered from his house. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, the liquor was not …
The petitioner, Munna Mushar, sought anticipatory bail after learning of a pending case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, alleging recovery of 30 litres of liquor from a field not belonging to him. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, that the …
The petitioner, Bechan Paswan, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 90 litres of liquor from an e‑rickshaw he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not in possession of the liquor at the …
The petitioner, Suresh Das, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for alleged recovery of 62 litres of liquor from a public pit. He argued he had no prior criminal record, the liquor was not in his conscious …
The petitioner, Pravesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 30 litres of liquor from a public place near Katra Baradari. He argued that he was not apprehended at the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, and …
The petitioner, Sikindar S ahani, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 250 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his house and 15 litres from a motorcycle. He has five prior criminal cases, four of which are also under the Excise Act, …
The petitioner, Lalu Kumar Soni, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, alleging recovery of 23,400 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He contended that he was not arrested on the spot, did not …
The petitioner, Pappu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 111 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, relating to the alleged recovery of 103 litres of liquor from a seized motorcycle. He argued that he was …
The petitioner, Dinesh Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging recovery of 110 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He contended that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was found in his conscious …
Petitioner Rajdev Mehta was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly transporting 33.3 litres of liquor in a motorcycle he owned, though the liquor was not found in his immediate possession. He argued that he had a clean …
The petitioner, Muntun Baitha, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 9.93 litres of liquor recovered from a hut near his residence. He asserted a clean criminal record and argued that the liquor was not in his conscious …
The petitioner, Sanjay Yadav, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging that only 1 litre of liquor was recovered from his motorcycle and that he had no conscious possession of the contraband. He argued that he had a clean antecedent and …
Vishwakarma Dom and Kamla Devi applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging that no liquor was found in their possession and the alleged recovery was from a location unrelated to them. They asserted clean antecedents and …
Mausam Anand, the owner of a pickup vehicle, was implicated in the recovery of 392.4 litres of liquor from his vehicle under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He claimed he had no knowledge of the liquor being transported, that his friend Indradeo misused the vehicle, …
Manoj Kumar (Manoj Paswan) sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging that the alleged liquor recovery was from a third person, Manoranjan, and not from his possession. He argued that the confessional statement of …
The petitioner, Sudarshan Ram, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 23.42 litres of liquor from locations not belonging to him. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the scene, and that the …
The petitioner, Surendra Sao, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 560 litres of spirit from a vehicle he did not own. He argued that he was implicated solely on secret information without a proper investigation and …
The petitioner, Binod Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Sections 317(5) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He argued that the liquor and vehicles seized were not in his conscious …
The petitioner, Bhim Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 317(5) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, alleging recovery of liquor from his house and vehicles. He argued that no liquor was …
The petitioners, Dinesh Pasi and Gorakh Pasi, filed anticipatory bail applications in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018-22. Dinesh Pasi's application was withdrawn by his counsel and dismissed. Gorakh Pasi, who has a prior case under the Excise Act, …
The petitioner, Vijay Rajbhar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 140 litres of liquor from a location behind his house. He contended that the liquor was not found in his possession and that the complaint was filed by a watchman …
Mana Nut, a resident of Dewpura, Saran, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of ten litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his house. He was not arrested at the spot and the liquor was not found in his possession. The petitioner, …
The petitioner, Rohit Kumar, was implicated in an excise case (PS Case No. 1581 of 2025) for alleged recovery of 40 litres of liquor from a scooty he owned. He contended that he had no knowledge of the liquor, was not in possession, and had a clean criminal antecedent. The State opposed his prayer …
The petitioner, Govinda Mandal, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a), 41 and 47 of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 50.865 litres of liquor from a Toto vehicle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of arrest, and …
The petitioner, Rajnish Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging that he was implicated without being caught in possession of 25 litres of liquor and that the FIR was based on undisclosed information. He asserted a clean criminal …
Awadesh Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after learning that a case had been registered against him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He contended that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was recovered from his possession, and the case was based …
The petitioner, Surendra Mukhiya, sought anticipatory bail after fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of six litres of liquor from a bamboo orchard. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, that the alleged liquor was not found in …
Ghanshayam Kumar, the owner of a Bolero vehicle, was implicated in a case alleging the recovery of 862.92 litres of liquor from his vehicle under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in actual possession of the liquor, …
Mukesh Rai was implicated in a case (PS‑513/2025) for allegedly transporting 30 litres of liquor in a motorcycle, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that the liquor was recovered from the vehicle, not from his conscious possession, and that he was unaware of any misuse by a …
The petitioner, Sarkar Hansda, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. While the application was pending, he was arrested by the police. The petitioner’s counsel then sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The Court considered whether …
The petitioner, Ravindra Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 174.765 litres of liquor concealed near a canal, which he claimed was not in his possession and was located on public land. He argued that the informant, a …
The petitioner, Ramanand Uraon, feared arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 37(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 20 litres of liquor from his joint‑family house. He argued that no liquor was found in his conscious possession, that the house is a joint property, …
The petitioner, Amit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging that no liquor was recovered from his possession and the case was based solely on a confessional statement of another person. He argued that the 2018 …
The petitioner, Ramjinis Mahto, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of liquor recovered from his house and a motorcycle. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the house was joint …
The petitioner, Md. Kaish Ansari, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(i) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for allegedly possessing 300 ml of liquor found in a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, that the …
The petitioner, Fulchand Sahani, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 50 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he had no conscious possession, …
The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, was implicated in a case involving the alleged recovery of 258.145 litres of liquor from a vehicle and charged under several IPC sections (341, 323, 353, 427, 504, 506, 34) and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. He contended that he …
The petitioner, Sudarshan Ram, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 23.42 litres of liquor from locations not belonging to him. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the scene, and that the …
The petitioner, Dheeraj Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a), 56(b) and 62 of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 28.5 litres of liquor from a house he does not own. He argued that he was not caught in possession, that the …
The petitioner, Rohit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 56(2)(ii) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing three litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle. He argued he had no prior criminal record, was not the owner of the vehicle, and the …
The petitioner, Tabrez Ansari, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018 for allegedly transporting 820 litres of liquor in his vehicle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not present at the spot of seizure, …
The petitioner, Dinesh Mahto, was implicated in a case alleging recovery of 15 litres of liquor from his motorcycle, under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He argued that he was not present at the spot of seizure, …
The petitioner, Raju Kumar Thakur, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly recovering 30 litres of liquor from a Toto, though he was not arrested at the spot and the liquor was not found in his conscious possession. He …
The petitioner, Lala Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered against him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for alleged recovery of 23.75 litres of liquor. He argued that the liquor was seized from a location not belonging to him, that …
The petitioner, Dharmshila Devi, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Sections 30(a), 41(1) and 41(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 5 litres of liquor at her joint family house. She argued that she has a clean antecedent, is a woman, and that …
Petitioner Pramila Devi applied for anticipatory bail after learning that she might be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a) and 37 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022, for alleged possession of 10 litres of liquor recovered from her joint‑family house. She argued that she has a clean …
The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 45 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that a friend …
The petitioner, Sanjay Rai, applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 150 litres of liquor. He argued that the liquor was seized from a public area, not from his possession, and …
Mahesh Chaudhary filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal case arising from PS Tisiouta, Vaishali. While the application was pending, the petitioner was arrested. The petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The Court, after hearing both …
Manju Devi applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered against her under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for allegedly possessing 10 litres of liquor and 60 litres of Jawa Mahua. She argued that she has a clean antecedent, is a woman, and …
The petitioner, Deepak Kewat, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 10 litres of liquor from a public drain. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the location was public, and the complaint was …
Shiv Kumar, the owner of a vehicle from which 1320 litres of liquor was recovered, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not present at the spot of seizure, and was unaware of his driver’s …
The petitioners, Nanhak Manjhi and Dharmendra Manjhi, were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 40 litres of liquor from a roadside in Mirjapur. They contended that they have no prior criminal record, were not caught in possession, and were …
Manohar Kumar, the owner of a motorcycle from which 120 litres of liquor were seized, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He argued that he had a …
The petitioner, Sunil Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 21 litres of liquor concealed near the Balan river, which was not in his possession. He argued he has a clean antecedent …
Rita Devi, a woman from Sitamarhi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 315 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to her house and 19.5 litres from a motorcycle. She contended that she was not in possession of the …
The petitioner, Alok Ranjan, sought anticipatory bail after a police case was registered under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for the alleged recovery of 400 litres of spirit from a vehicle he owned. He argued that he was not present at the spot of seizure, …
The petitioner, Vinay Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 36 litres of liquor near the Falgu river. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the alleged recovery occurred on …
The petitioner, Amar Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 5.94 litres of liquor near a middle school. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, and the accusation was …
The petitioner, Aganidev Mahto, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 36 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession and that the police relied on …
The petitioner, Dharmendra Sonkar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 62 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 14.25 litres of liquor recovered from the house of Nagina Kumar, a joint family property. He argued that he had no direct …
Ritik Chaudhary applied for anticipatory bail after the police alleged that 3 litres of liquor were recovered from his motorcycle in violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in conscious possession of the liquor, and was …
The petitioner, Dayanand Poddar, sought anticipatory bail after a police case was registered under Sections 223 and 173 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Sections 37 and 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 1.44 litres of liquor were recovered from …
The petitioner, Nikesh Ram, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 20 litres of liquor concealed under straw at a public location. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his …
The petitioner, Munna Sahni, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 50 litres of liquor were recovered from a bamboo orchard that did not belong to him. He argued that he had no conscious possession …
The petitioner, Anil Sahani, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 50 litres of liquor were recovered from a bamboo orchard not belonging to him and that no liquor was found in his …
The petitioner, Bimla Devi, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act alleging recovery of 47 litres of liquor from a bamboo orchard adjacent to her house. She argued that the liquor was not found in her possession, the …
Suraj Kumar applied for anticipatory bail but was arrested while the application was pending. He then sought the court's permission to withdraw his anticipatory bail application. The petitioner’s counsel requested that the application be withdrawn, and the court granted permission to do so. …
The petitioner, Sanjay Choudhary, applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 6.75 litres of liquor from his house, which is a joint family property. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, that the …
The petitioner, Upee Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 37 and 45 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, alleging that 7 litres of liquor were recovered from another person, Ashok Chaudhary, and not from his own possession. He argued that he has a …
Shiv Kumar Paswan and Raja Paswan were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of liquor in their joint family house. They applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that the liquor was not in their conscious possession, the house is joint family property, …
Mantosh Kumar and Mukesh Kumar, nephews of the informant, were implicated in a land‑dispute related case (Bairiya PS Case No.531/2025) alleging assault, grievous injuries and other offences. They filed an anticipatory bail application, claiming false implication and that the FIR lacks specific …
Munna Chaudhary applied for anticipatory bail after the police registered a case (PS‑298/2025) alleging he possessed 15 litres of liquor in violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He argued that the liquor was recovered from a joint‑family house, not …
The petitioner, Jitendra Kumar, sought protection from arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging the recovery of 48 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that a friend …
The petitioner, Fagu Manjhi, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for alleged recovery of 60 litres of liquor from a bamboo orchard not belonging to him. He claimed the accusation was based on a hostile chowkidar’s testimony and that no …
The petitioner, Surendra Sav, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 760 litres of spirit from a Bolero. He has five prior cases under the Excise Act and contended that he was not arrested on the spot, no spirit was …
Vikash Yadav and Sanjay Yadav were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 40.5 litres of liquor from an abandoned house belonging to the second petitioner. The petitioners contended that they have clean antecedents, were not caught in possession …
Petitioners Rahul Kumar and Moti Tamoli were arrested while their anticipatory bail application was pending before the Patna High Court. They subsequently moved the court seeking permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The court considered the request and, noting that the …
The appellant, Sonu Kumar, was charged under several sections of the Bihar Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for alleged assault, intimidation and caste-based abuse following a dispute with the informant, who claimed a false marital relationship. …
The appellants Bhola Shah, Manna Shah and Mahbub Shah were charged under several IPC sections and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly abusing and assaulting the informant's son on caste grounds. They contended that they have clean antecedents and that the FIR’s allegations of …
The appellant, a 19‑year‑old named Anil Kumar, was accused of kidnapping a minor girl and allegedly stealing cash and ornaments, with the informant alleging the act was to force a marriage. The victim later gave a statement under Section 164 CrPC that she had gone voluntarily to the appellant’s …
The appellants appealed under Section 14‑A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against the trial court’s refusal to grant anticipatory bail in a case involving offences under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 307, 324 and 379 and SC/ST Act sections …
The appellants Ratan Kumar, Pawan Kumar and Samedhari Ray filed Criminal Appeal No. 3943 of 2025 before the Patna High Court challenging a conviction by the Nadi Police Station Court. During the pendency of the appeal the appellants were arrested, and they subsequently moved the Court seeking …
The petitioner, Madan Kumar, was implicated in a case of alleged robbery and assault under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act. He contended that the informant falsely implicated him, citing his clean antecedent, the timing discrepancy between the FIR and the alleged incident, and …
The petitioners, Rahul Kumar and his father Arvind Prasad, sought anticipatory bail in two related criminal miscellaneous applications concerning offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 308(4) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. They alleged that the FIR was false, claiming they were political …
The petitioners, Rahul Kumar and his father Arvind Prasad, sought anticipatory bail in two related criminal miscellaneous applications concerning offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 308(4) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. They alleged that the FIR was false, claiming they were political …
The petitioner, Aasik Raza, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case registered under Sections 137(2), 140(3) and 3(5) of the B.N.S.S and Section 8 of the POCSO Act, alleging his involvement in the kidnapping of a minor. The informant claimed the minor was abducted …
Mukesh Kumar Mandal filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. While the application was pending, he surrendered before the lower court. The petitioner then sought the court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The court, after hearing counsel, granted …
The petitioner, Urmila Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a 2016 case registered under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504 and 34 of the IPC. She contended she has a clean antecedent, is a woman, and was falsely implicated by the informant, who alleged an assault on 21‑01‑2016 and …
The petitioner, Rajendra Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Statutes (2023) for alleged assault and robbery. He contended that he has a clean record, the informant is not an eye‑witness, the injuries were minor, and …
Petitioner No.1, Yadolal Rai, a 68‑year‑old senior citizen with a clean record, applied for anticipatory bail in a case alleging his involvement in the looting of Rs.95,000 and assault on the informant. The FIR charges him under Sections 126(2), 322, 118(1), 109(1), 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of …
The petitioners, Ravi Kumar and Mukesh Kumar, were implicated in a case (PS Parbatta Case No. 261 of 2025) alleging multiple offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, including assault and rioting. The informant, who is an agnate of the petitioners, claimed that the petitioners assaulted him and …
The petitioners, Sulekha Khatoon and Johara Khatoon, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a murder case (Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S.) based on the death of a young man whose body was found hanging from a tree. They argued that the FIR was founded solely on suspicion, there …
The petitioners, four brothers named Raut, were granted anticipatory bail by the Patna High Court with a condition to surrender within a specified period. They failed to surrender before the deadline and subsequently filed an application seeking modification of the surrender condition. The State, …
The petitioner, Firoz Alam, was arrested in connection with a violent incident in Gaunaha, West Champaran, where several persons were stabbed and a child died. The informant, the mother of the deceased, alleged that multiple accused, including the petitioner, participated in the assault, but the …
The petitioner, Dinesh Sahani, filed a restoration application seeking to have Criminal Miscellaneous No.86494 of 2025 reinstated to its original file. The State of Bihar opposed the application. The High Court examined the grounds presented in the restoration petition. Finding the grounds …
The petitioner, Sahid Rehman @ Samu, was implicated in a case arising from a Durga immersion procession where stones were allegedly thrown, leading to charges under numerous sections of the Indian Penal Code and Section 9 of the Bihar Control of Use and Play of Loudspeaker Act. He contended that he …
The petitioner, Chhotu Ansari, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the B.N.S. The FIR alleges that, on orders of the S.D.O., the petitioner was part of a group that created a ruckus and assaulted police in Bela village. The petitioner …
Mukesh Kumar Mahto, the owner of a pickup vehicle, was implicated in the recovery of 1,977 litres of liquor and charged under IPC sections 272, 273, 34 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He had been in custody since 11 January 2026 and argued that he had no prior criminal …
The petitioner, Rajiv Prasad Verma, filed a modification application in Criminal Miscellaneous No.15221 of 2026 arising from PS case No.284 of 2025. During the hearing, the petitioner sought the court's permission to withdraw the said application. The learned counsel for the petitioner requested …
The petitioner, Raj Kumar Singh, applied for bail in a criminal case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 11,250 litres of liquor. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the scene, no liquor was found in his …
