Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
5892 judgments · newest first · showing 2801–3000
Vishal Kumar Rebal, the petitioner, had earlier been granted anticipatory bail by the High Court. The State of Bihar filed a modification application alleging that the bail was obtained by concealing the petitioner’s criminal antecedents. The petitioner was represented by Mr. Ram Niwas Ray, while …
Sharwan Kumar filed a petition seeking restoration of Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 75932 of 2025. The petitioner argued that the case should be reinstated to its original file. The State opposed the restoration. The court examined the grounds presented in the restoration application and found …
The petitioners, four individuals named Sanjay Kumar Verma, Praharsh Verma, Mritunjay Kumar Verma and Vivek Vibhuti Saurabh, filed a contempt application against the State of Bihar and several police officials. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners when the matter was listed on 25.02.2026 …
The petitioner, Shailendra Kumar Singh, filed a contempt application alleging that the Collector of Khagaria violated a status‑quo order dated 25‑03‑2025, which required the land in dispute to remain unchanged until the writ petition (CWJC No.2757 of 2025) was finally decided. The State argued that …
Ankush Kumar and Ganesh Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case alleging assault and looting during a dispute over house construction. The informant claimed the petitioners attacked him with rods, causing injuries, and that a co‑accused used a pistol, while also alleging …
The petitioner, Priyaranjan Kumar Thakur, was arrested in connection with the alleged dowry death of his wife and sought bail. The FIR alleges that the petitioner demanded additional dowry, tortured the victim for non‑payment, and had an extramarital affair, culminating in the victim's death, which …
The petitioner, Md. Tofik Alam, was arrested on 1 July 2025 in connection with a case registered under Gaura Police Station for offences under Sections 126(2), 118(1), 109, 103, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. He applied for bail, claiming a clean antecedent and arguing that the …
The petitioner, Suraj Rai, applied for bail in a criminal miscellaneous case arising from a 2020 murder allegation where he is alleged to be the main assailant. The petition is his fifth attempt to obtain bail. The court noted that the trial is at the stage where evidence has been closed. …
Yusuf Ali, the petitioner, was charged under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for the death of Md. Ayub Khan and applied for regular bail. He asserted that he merely held the victim’s hand while another accused, Tofik, stabbed the victim, and that the incident arose from a land …
Satendra Yadav was charged under Section 74 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 10 of the POCSO Act for allegedly kissing and inappropriately touching a minor who had gone to his shop to purchase a tablet. The complainant alleged that the incident occurred on 18-07-2025, and the …
Mukesh Kumar (also known as Mukesh Yadav), the petitioner, filed a bail application in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 88203 of 2025 arising from PS case No. 116 of 2023. During the hearing on 11 March 2026, the petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the bail application, requesting liberty …
The petitioner, Kundan Kumar, filed a bail application in the Patna High Court. During the hearing, he sought the court's permission to withdraw the bail application and to file a fresh bail petition after the charge was framed. The court granted permission to withdraw the application. Consequently, …
Raja Miyan, a resident of Bathwariya in West Champaran, feared arrest in a case registered under Sections 96, 351(2), 61(2) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023. He pleaded that he has a clean antecedent and sought anticipatory bail, relying on a prior order granting such relief to …
The petitioner, Sudhir Kumar, has been in custody since 4 January 2025 in connection with a FIR alleging two deaths, but the FIR does not specifically allege that he fired any weapon. He contended that co‑accused in the same case were granted regular bail, and that his prior criminal record alone …
The petitioner, Md. Imtiyaz, was charged under Sections 103(1), 85 and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023 read with Sections 3 and 4 of the DP Act for alleged dowry‑related torture and the death of his wife. He sought regular bail, asserting a clean antecedent, that the informant was not an eye‑witness and that …
The petitioner, Lalit Paswan, applied for bail in a criminal case registered under Sections 304B/34 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code, alleging that he was falsely implicated in his wife's death. He claimed a clean antecedent and argued that the informant, the victim's sister, was not an eyewitness …
Indu Mishra, mother of Suraj, was arrested in connection with the alleged poisoning and deaths of the informant's mother and sister, purportedly over a dowry dispute. She petitioned for bail, asserting a clean record, that the allegations were false, and that the victims likely consumed poison …
The petitioners, three individuals from East Champaran, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC in connection with a case alleging offences under Sections 30(a), 32 and 41(1) of the Excise Act involving the alleged recovery of 170 litres of liquor. They contended that they were …
The petitioner, Ramnath Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act alleging recovery of liquor from his residence, which is a joint family property. He argued he had no prior criminal record, the liquor was not in …
Amarnath Gupta sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 37.18 litres of liquor from a cremation ground, which the petitioner claimed was not in his possession and that the site was public. The petitioner, described as having a …
Mohan Sah, a resident of Mira Chowk, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 22.320 litres of liquor from a sack near the Asni river. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, the liquor was not …
The petitioner, Savita Kumari, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of three litres of liquor. The petitioner argued that she has a clean antecedent, is a woman, …
The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 23.265 litres of liquor from his house and 8.64 litres from another house. He argued that the liquor was stored in a joint family property, he had no conscious possession, and …
The petitioner, Aakash Kumar, feared arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022, alleging that 8 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle he was riding. He contended that he was not the owner of the vehicle, no liquor …
The petitioner, Anand Bihari Rai, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 431.520 litres of liquor from his tractor. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, …
Amit Kumar applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 12.99 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He contended that he was not in actual possession, the vehicles were his, and he was unaware of their misuse by another …
Sharda Nand Jha was implicated in a case (PS Case No.156/2021) for alleged possession of 68.4 litres of liquor in his Maruti car, invoking Sections 272, 273 and 34 of the IPC and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in actual possession of the …
The petitioner, Ramchandra Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of liquor and mahua at a public ghat. He argued that nothing was seized from his possession, the location was public, and the FIR did not name the …
The petitioner sought anticipatory bail after an FIR under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleged his involvement in the recovery of 47.5 litres of liquor. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, the liquor was not found in his possession, and the premises from which it was allegedly …
The petitioners, Laddu Kumar Mahto and his wife Guriya Kumari, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 26.655 litres of liquor concealed near their house. The petitioners argued that the liquor was not in their conscious …
The petitioner, Ashok Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 32(3), 41(1) and 41(2) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 7.8 litres of liquor recovered from another person, Vinay. The petitioner argued he had no direct possession, clean …
Subodh Sahani and his wife Lakshminiya Devi sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where police alleged recovery of 15 litres of liquor near their hut based solely on a confessional statement of a co-accused in custody. The …
Charnu Munda, owner of a pickup vehicle, was implicated in the recovery of 360 litres of liquor from his vehicle under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that he had no conscious possession of the liquor and that his son had …
The petitioners, three relatives, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 30 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. The petitioners argued that they were not …
The petitioners, three brothers from Ketuka Lachchi, applied for anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of large quantities of liquor from locations not belonging to them. They argued they have clean antecedents and were implicated …
The petitioner, Sushil Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, where 311.46 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a bush near his house. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the …
Shiv Prasad Gupta applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of liquor from his motorcycle and a car. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of …
Sabir Ansari sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of six litres of liquor from a public bush. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the location did not belong to him, and the complaint was filed by a hostile …
The petitioner, Md. Ibaran, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, for allegedly possessing 7.29 litres of liquor recovered from his scooter. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor being …
Geeta Devi and Ashok Manjhi were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 21 litres of liquor at their jointly‑owned house. They claimed to have a clean criminal record and argued that the liquor was not found in their conscious possession, nor could …
The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 10 litres of liquor from a motorcycle, asserting he was not caught in possession and was not the vehicle's owner. He claimed the case was initiated solely on the basis of a …
The petitioner, Md. Sonu Quraisi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of liquor from a third party and a bush, with no evidence of his conscious possession. He argued he has a clean antecedent and that the alleged …
Archana Gupta, the petitioner, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 600 litres of liquor from two vehicles. She argued that she has a clean antecedent, is a woman, and that the liquor was not …
The petitioner, Prabhu Ram, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 54 litres of liquor from the courtyard of his joint‑family house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious …
Amresh Kumar was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly recovering 35 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not the owner of the vehicle, and was falsely implicated by the …
Petitioners Chintu Kumar and his wife Khushboo Kumari sought anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018, alleging recovery of 5 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to their house. They argued that no liquor was found in their …
The petitioner, Anil Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, alleging that the alleged recovery of liquor was from a field not belonging to him and that he was implicated by an inimical chowkidar without proper investigation. …
The petitioner, Ajay Bhuian, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(c)(d) and 37 of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging recovery of liquor from his house and that of Raja Buniyan. He argued he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested on the spot, had no conscious possession …
The petitioner, Raja Kumar Mandal, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 after 159 litres of liquor were recovered from a Tata Magic vehicle he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not arrested at the spot, and …
The petitioner, Akhilesh Sahani, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, alleging that the alleged seizure of liquor and Mahua occurred at a public place not in his possession and that the informant (chowkidar) failed …
Petitioner Sanjay Yadav sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He argued that the alleged seizure of 36 litres of liquor occurred on land not owned …
The petitioner, Akhilesh Sahani, feared arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 50 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle, which he claims he did not own and was implicated through statements of seizure‑list witnesses. The petitioner …
Lal Babu Rai, the owner of a Swift car, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 after 297 litres of liquor were recovered from the vehicle. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor being in his car and that the liquor was not …
The petitioner, Md. Aslam, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for the alleged recovery of 180 ml of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, had a clean criminal …
Petitioner Radheyshyam Mandal applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for alleged recovery of 153 litres of liquor from a corn field not belonging to him. He asserted a clean criminal record …
The petitioner, Suraj Kumar Gupta, applied for anticipatory bail after learning of his impending arrest in a case involving alleged possession of two country-made pistols, a live cartridge, two motorcycles and a mobile phone, alleged under Sections 25(1‑B)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act and Section 37 of …
The petitioner, Seema Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 20 litres of liquor from a bush adjacent to her house. She argued she had no conscious possession, a clean antecedent, and …
Vinod Kumar Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered against him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 540 litres of liquor from a Scorpio. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested on the spot, did not possess …
Surendra Yadav was arrested while his anticipatory bail application was pending before the Patna High Court. His counsel requested permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application after the arrest. The court examined the request and, finding no impediment, granted permission to withdraw. …
The petitioner, Sunil Manjhi, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where liquor was allegedly recovered from his house and another house. He contended that he was not arrested on the spot, that the …
The petitioner, Dhrup Mahto, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a), 32 and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 30 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his house. He asserted that he had no possession of the liquor, that the recovered liquor was not on his …
The petitioner, Parmeshwar Mandal, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 420 IPC and several provisions of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 concerning the alleged recovery of 177.20 litres of liquor from a vehicle he did not own. He argued that the …
Petitioner Ranjeet Kumar Yadav sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2016. He argued that the allegations were based on a confessional statement made in police custody, which he claimed lacked evidentiary value, and …
Rambabu Kumar petitioned for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging that 81 litres of liquor were recovered from a litchi orchard behind a cowshed that does not belong to him and that he was not arrested at the spot. …
The petitioner, Ajay Yadav, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. During the hearing, his counsel requested permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and instead surrender to the trial court to seek regular bail. The Court granted the request, clarifying …
Shankar Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 792 litres of liquor from a vehicle. He argued that he had no conscious possession, was not the owner of the vehicle, and …
The petitioner, Pramendra Ram, applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 alleging recovery of 72 litres of liquor from a washroom in his house. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, the liquor was found …
Mukesh Mukhiya sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, where 50 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a motorcycle not owned by him. He claimed the police implicated him based on a chowkidar’s information …
The petitioner, Dharmdeo Mukhiya, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly recovering 200 litres of liquor from a public ghat. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, …
The petitioners, three residents of Pandeypur, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 50 litres of liquor. They contended that they were not caught in possession, the alleged liquor was …
Madan Yadav applied for anticipatory bail in a case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment up to date) Act, 2016, alleging offences under sections 30(a), 32, 33, 36 and 41(i). He claimed he was not in possession of the seized spirits, was not the owner of the vehicles involved, and was …
The petitioner, Rupesh Kumar Pandit, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly recovering 0.650 litre of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not in possession …
Petitioners Kiran Devi and Vicky Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 289.2 litres of liquor from their joint family house. They argued that the liquor was not in their conscious possession, the house is joint family …
The petitioner, Anuj Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering nine litres of liquor from a bush behind a hut belonging to another person. He argued that he was not apprehended at the scene, no liquor was found in his possession, and the …
The petitioner, Md. Sultan Ahmad, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 concerning alleged recovery of 514 litres of liquor from a truck. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was not the owner …
The petitioner, Sheikh Taslim, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for the alleged recovery of 3.705 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and had no …
The petitioner sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 272 and 273 of the IPC read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging recovery of 4,698 litres of liquor from two trucks. He contended that no liquor was found in his possession, he was not the owner of the …
Rita Devi, a woman with a clean antecedent, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 19.8 litres of liquor from her joint family house. She argued that she was not arrested, that the liquor was not in her conscious possession, and that the …
Vijay Kumar Sah sought anticipatory bail after learning that he may be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, involving alleged recovery of 78 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, the liquor was not found …
The petitioner, Subhash Kumar Paswan, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly recovering six litres of liquor from a motorcycle …
The petitioner, Sandeep Mukhiya, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 60.120 litres of liquor recovered from a public area in his village. He contended that he has a clean antecedent, was not in actual …
Ahmad Sajjad, the owner of a motorcycle, was implicated in a case where 30 litres of liquor were recovered from the vehicle, leading to charges under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act and Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner contended that he had no …
The petitioner, Sushil Kumar Kushwaha, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of three litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He was not caught in possession of the liquor and claimed he was unaware that another individual, Amresh, misused …
Mahendra Kumar Manjhi applied for anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Bihar Excise Act alleging that he concealed liquor in a straw house, a scooty and a bush. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, that the seized items were not in his …
Indal Paswan applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case alleging offences under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Excise Act, involving alleged recovery of liquor from locations not owned by him. The petitioner argued that he was not …
Krishna Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where 150 litres of liquor and a motorcycle were seized. He argued that he was not in possession of the seized items, was not the vehicle owner, and was implicated solely on …
Santosh Prasad applied for anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 alleging recovery of large quantities of liquor from premises near his house and from an e‑rickshaw and a scooty. The petitioner argued that …
Om Prakash Paswan and Ajay Paswan applied for anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 108 litres of liquor concealed under …
The petitioner, Vijay Chauhan, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing ten litres of liquor recovered from his house, which is a joint family property. He contended that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was not in his conscious …
Kamal Rai applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Sections 30(a)(c), 34 and 36 of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 75 litres of liquor and 6,400 litres of mahua pass. The petitioner argued that he was not …
The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly recovering 130 litres of liquor from a sack, although the liquor was not found in his immediate possession. The allegation rests on a confessional statement made by a …
The petitioner, Neeraj Mandal, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 40 litres of liquor from his house and 10 litres from a motorcycle. He contended that he was not in actual possession, the house was a joint family …
Mamta Devi, the owner of two motorcycles, was implicated in a case alleging the recovery of 141.75 litres of liquor and charged under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. She contended that she had no knowledge of the liquor …
Ramnath Ram was arrested in a case under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 55 litres of liquor recovered from a public sack. The petitioner pleaded that he has a clean antecedent, was not caught in …
The petitioners were granted anticipatory bail on 10 March 2026, but an error was noted in paragraph 3 where petitioner No. 2's criminal antecedent was recorded as four cases instead of five. The petitioners' counsel sought correction of this mistake, and the State did not contest the submission. …
The petitioner, Shri Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 19.6 litres of liquor from a plastic polythene. He argued that he was not caught in possession, the alleged recovery occurred on premises not …
The petitioner, Sushil Sah, was implicated in a case (Excise P.S. Case No. 302 of 2025) for the alleged recovery of 319.905 litres of liquor from a Bolero vehicle he owned. He was not caught in possession of the liquor and claimed ignorance of his driver’s alleged misuse of the vehicle. The …
Mithun Kumar was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 128 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that another person, Ratan, misused his …
Ashok Kumar filed an anticipatory bail application in the Patna High Court. While the application was pending, he was arrested. He then sought the court's permission to withdraw his anticipatory bail petition. The court, after hearing counsel, granted permission to withdraw the application. …
Mamta Singh was implicated in an excise case for the alleged recovery of 171.36 litres of liquor from a car she owned. She contended that she had no prior criminal antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that the vehicle would be used for illegal activity. The State opposed …
The petitioner, Ranglal Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged possession of 20 litres of liquor and 200 litres of semi‑prepared liquor recovered from a joint family house. He argued that he was not arrested …
Prem Prakash Kumar was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for allegedly transporting 500 ml of liquor in a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in actual possession of the liquor, and was …
Chandani Devi, the wife of Raj Kumar Mandal, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 27 litres of liquor from her auto. She argued that she was not arrested at the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and was …
The petitioner, Munna Mahto, applied for anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act alleging recovery of 55 litres of liquor from a location behind his house. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, the liquor was not …
The petitioner, Gajendra Yadav, filed an anticipatory bail application under the Criminal Procedure Code. While the application was pending, he was arrested by the police. The petitioner then sought the court's permission to withdraw his anticipatory bail application. The learned counsel for the …
The petitioner, Bishwanath Singh, had filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. While the application was pending, he was arrested by the police. The petitioner then sought the Court's permission to withdraw his anticipatory bail application, arguing that the purpose of the …
Mithilesh Singh applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 302/34, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 27, 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The FIR alleges that on 21 May 2024, after a political rally, the petitioner shot Guddu Kumar, causing …
Dharkan Paswan, the husband, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a complaint filed by his wife, Sundari Devi, alleging assault, dowry harassment under IPC sections 323, 441, 498A/34 and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 4. The petitioner argued that the notice was served to the …
Devesh Kumar Rai, a serving Sepoy in the Indian Army, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a FIR alleging offences under several IPC sections and the Dowry Prohibition Act. He contended that the allegations, including a claim of a second marriage and dowry demands, were false and …
The petitioners, Indeshwar Sahani and Chunchun Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 137(2), 87, 96 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 for allegedly kidnapping a minor girl. They argued that the victim’s statements recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. and …
The petitioner, Md Ajmal Ansari, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under IPC sections 341, 323, 379, 498A and 494/34. He argued that the notice served to the opposite party’s daughter was valid, that he was falsely implicated, and that he was financially supporting the …
Alok Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Sections 8, 20(b)(ii)(B), 23(b) and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act alleging his involvement in a charas trafficking network. The FIR was based on a co‑accused, Rakesh, who was arrested with 1 kg of …
The petitioners, members of the Gena family, were implicated in a FIR alleging assault, attempted strangulation, and theft of jewellery during a dispute over a government hand pump. They claim the allegations are false and stem from a personal quarrel, noting that some have prior criminal records …
The petitioners, five members of the Choudhary family, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Akbarpur PS Case No.351/2025) involving offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 118(2), 109, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. The FIR alleged that the petitioners participated …
The petitioners, three residents of Dafarpur village, were implicated in a kidnapping case under Sections 96 and 137(2) of the B.N.S. 2023 based on an informant’s FIR dated 17‑08‑2024. They contended that the FIR was filed three days after the alleged incident, that the victim voluntarily took …
Munna Kumar was arrested while his anticipatory bail application was pending before the Patna High Court. He sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application after his arrest. The court entertained the petition and, after hearing counsel, granted permission to withdraw the …
The petitioner, Sunil Kumar Ranjan, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a FIR alleging multiple offences under the Bihar Negotiable Statutes, 2023, including assault and robbery. He asserted a clean antecedent and claimed the informant falsely implicated him, contending that the …
Amit and Gautam Yadav were implicated in a case involving alleged assaults during a land dispute, with the FIR alleging multiple attacks on a woman and her husband. The petitioners filed anticipatory bail applications; the counsel for Amit Yadav sought to withdraw his application, which the court …
Vijay Kumar Ghosh applied for anticipatory bail in a case where 18 litres of liquor were recovered from his motorcycle, leading to charges under IPC sections 272, 273, 414/34 and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act. The petitioner argued that the vehicle belonged to him, that he had no knowledge of its …
Ramchandra Mehta applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case involving offences under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, including assault, extortion, and rioting. He contended that the allegations were false and stemmed from a land dispute, noting that a prior …
The petitioner, Harinandan Rajbanshi, had filed an anticipatory bail application in the High Court of Patna. While the application was pending, he was arrested by the police. The petitioner then sought the court's permission to withdraw his anticipatory bail application. The learned counsel for the …
The petitioner, Shashi Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Acts of 2018 and 2022, alleging that liquor was recovered from a riverbank and a house not belonging to him. He contended that he was not caught in …
The petitioner, Sandip Safi, feared arrest in a case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 3062.52 litres of liquor from two Scorpio vehicles, although the liquor was not found in his possession and he is not the owner of the vehicles. He contended that his implication …
Manoj Kumar sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018 for alleged recovery of liquor from a motorcycle and an auto. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not in actual possession of …
The petitioner, Ajay Sahni, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 46.24 litres of liquor from a bag that did not belong to him. He argued that he was not apprehended on the spot, no liquor was found in his conscious possession, and the case relied …
The petitioner, Raj Kaliya Devi, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged possession of liquor. She argued that she has a clean antecedent, is a woman, and that the liquor was …
The petitioner, Amit Paswan, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 810 litres of liquor from a boat on the Koshi river. He was not arrested at the scene and no liquor was found in his possession. The petitioner, who has three prior criminal …
Petitioner Raunak Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 33.84 litres of liquor from his scooty. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, that …
The petitioner, Ganga Paswan, owner of a vehicle, was implicated in a case (PS Case No. 167 of 2025) for the alleged recovery of 2,531.52 liters of liquor from a truck, alleged offences under Section 111 of the BNS read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He claimed he had no knowledge of …
The petitioner, Sunil Kumar Yadav, was implicated in a case alleging recovery of 180 litres of liquor from a vehicle, charged under Sections 30(a), 32(3) and 41(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He applied for anticipatory bail, contending that he was not arrested at the …
Chandan Paswan applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 108 litres of liquor from three vehicles. The petitioner argued that he had no clean possession, was not the owner of the vehicles, and was linked to …
Sunil Kumar applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 220 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle he did not own. He claimed the police, prompted by a local chawkidar, had …
The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018 after 1,093.875 litres of liquor were recovered from a truck and a motorcycle seized, which he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not present at …
Petitioners Satish Kumar and Nirala Kumar applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(A) of the Excise Act, alleging that no liquor was recovered from their possession and that the only evidence against them was a …
The petitioner, Chandan Kumar Singh, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 22.5 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor being in the vehicle and that the liquor was not found in his …
The petitioner, Mohit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 28.875 litres of liquor from a third party. He argued that he was not caught in possession and that the case was based solely on a confessional …
The petitioner, Sunil Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly recovering 120 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He contended that he was not arrested at the spot, had no …
Mithun Kumar Mishra, the owner of a motorcycle from which 25 litres of liquor were recovered, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the …
Mahesh Rai (Mahesh Kumar Yadav) applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 171 litres of liquor from a bush not in his possession. He has three prior cases under the Excise Act and …
The petitioner, Sunny Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 35 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He contended that he had no knowledge of the liquor being in the vehicle, that the vehicle was misused by a friend who fled …
Lallu Paswan filed an anticipatory bail application in the Patna High Court. While the application was pending, he was arrested. He then sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The court, after hearing counsel for both sides, granted the request to withdraw. Consequently, …
Satyanarayan Mukhiya sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where 148.7 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a mustard field not owned by him. The prosecution’s case relied on a confessional statement made by a …
The petitioner, Birbal Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 43.20 litres of liquor from a paddy field not owned by him. He argued that the recovery was made at the behest of a hostile chowkidar and that no liquor …
The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly recovering 148.7 litres of liquor from a mustard field that does not belong to him. He contended that the liquor was not found in his possession, the alleged recovery site …
The petitioner, Dhiraj Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging that liquor and a scooty were seized from another individual, Asharam Mandal, and that his implication rested solely on Asharam's confessional …
The petitioner, Puni Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 120 litres of liquor. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the …
Maharshi Kumar sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 4.5 litres of liquor recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in actual possession of the liquor, and was unaware that …
The petitioner, Dukhi Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 14.94 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. The petitioner claimed a clean antecedent and argued that the …
Petitioner Sarajul Nat was arrested while his anticipatory bail application was pending before the Patna High Court. He approached the Court seeking permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application after his arrest. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the withdrawal was desired due to …
The petitioners, Raushan Kumar and Dukhan Yadav, were implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 225 litres of liquor recovered from the Sone Diyara area. They contended that they have clean antecedents, were …
The petitioner, Dinesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act and Section 414 of the IPC for alleged recovery of 80 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, that he was merely …
Petitioner Sujeet Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 30(a), 38(1) and 41(1) of the Excise Act, where 4,462.905 litres of liquor were reportedly recovered from a truck. He argued that he was not in …
The petitioner, Vipin Mahtha, feared arrest in a case alleging illegal possession of 141.84 litres of liquor recovered from two motorcycles, charged under Sections 317(5), 274, 275, 3(5) of the Bihar Negotiable Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He argued that …
The petitioner, Rajendra Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail after learning of a pending case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of liquor from his house and adjoining residences. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, that the house is joint family …
The petitioner, Bharat Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 140 litres of liquor were recovered from an area not belonging to him and that no material was seized from his possession. He contended that the …
The petitioner, Anshu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 40 litres of liquor near the Banas River. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the location was public, and he had only one prior excise …
Five petitioners applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Excise Act, alleging that they were not arrested, no liquor was found in their possession, and the only evidence against them was a confessional statement of …
Guddu Kumar sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 95 litres of liquor from an auto. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, was not the owner of the vehicle, and the case …
The petitioner, Muneshwar Mahto, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 405 litres of liquor from his residence. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, that no liquor was found in his conscious possession, and that …
The petitioner, Shashi Kumar Choudhary, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 56.670 litres of liquor from a public bush. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, that the liquor was not in his possession, and that the …
The petitioner, Domi Dharikar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 36 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his house. He argued he had a clean antecedent and that the alleged recovery was not from his possession, relying …
Udal Kumar, the owner of a motorcycle from which 30 litres of liquor was seized, applied for anticipatory bail alleging he was not in possession of the liquor and was unaware of his friend's alleged misuse of the vehicle. He has four prior cases under the Bihar Excise Act. The State opposed the …
Mukesh Kumar Yadav sought relief fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 126 litres of liquor from a bush adjacent to his house. He argued that he had no prior criminal record and that the liquor was not found in his possession, …
The petitioner, Sadakat, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case registered under Sections 281 and 125(B) of the Bihar Non‑Statutory (BNS) Act read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 19.5 litres of liquor from a Wagon R vehicle. He …
Jayendra Singh was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for allegedly having 55 litres of liquor recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent and was unaware that a person named Vicky misused his vehicle, and …
The petitioner, Ajay Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Sections 30(a), 32, 33, 36 and 41(i) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 6,000 litres of spirit from four vehicles. He argued that he was not …
The petitioner, Sachin Sahani, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Sections 274 and 275 of the B.N.S. and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged possession of 50 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not in …
The petitioner, Akshay Mukhiya, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 81.545 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not in possession of the seized vehicle, was not the owner, and that the police …
Subhash Chaudhary applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 81.545 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He contended that he was not arrested at the spot, did …
The petitioner, Pappu Kumar Mandal, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018 for allegedly possessing 60 litres of liquor recovered from a cowshed adjacent to his house. He was not arrested at the scene and no liquor was found in his …
The petitioner, Guddoo Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for the alleged recovery of 15 litres of liquor from two motorcycles, one of which he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and had no …
Subodh Kumar was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 32.58 litres of liquor recovered from the house of his mother, Meena Devi. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the scene, no liquor was found in his conscious …
The petitioner, Dinesh Sah, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 3 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was not the owner of the …
Petitioner Rajkumar Mukhiya was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 37 of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing six litres of liquor recovered from his house, which is a joint family property. He contended that he had no conscious possession, the liquor was not seized from him …
The petitioner, Ruksana Khatoon, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 18 litres of liquor from an e‑rickshaw she owned. She contended that she was not present at the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and was unaware that her …
The petitioner, Sanjay Ram, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 7 litres of liquor and 500 litres of mahua. He argued that he was not arrested, no contraband …
The petitioner, Sikandra Sahni, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 8.4 litres of liquor near Satlakha bridge. He was not apprehended at the spot and no liquor was found in his possession; the complaint was lodged by a chowkidar with whom …
The petitioner, Ashok Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 2.340 litres of liquor in a worship room of a joint family house. He argued that the liquor was not found in his conscious possession, that the house …
The petitioners, two women and a man from Keshopur, applied for anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged alleging they, along with eight others, assaulted a field owner over a grazing goat, causing a fractured nasal bone. The FIR listed offences under Sections 127(1), 115(2), 109, 352, 351(2) and …
Loha Mahto applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018 and Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The FIR alleged that 35 litres of liquor were recovered from a kiosk owned by Ramji Mahto and a rifle was …
Shravan Mahto was charged under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly recovering 450 litres of liquor from a public place. He applied for bail, asserting a clean antecedent, that the liquor was not in …
The petitioner, Bhola Das, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged possession of 3062.5 litres of liquor recovered from two Scorpio vehicles and a market verandah. He contended that the liquor was not in his …
The petitioner, Dilip Chaudhary, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly concealing 55 litres of liquor near a public ghat. He argued that no liquor was recovered from his possession, the alleged recovery site was public, and the police …
Petitioner Pradeep Kumar feared arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 10 litres of liquor from a public spot near the Dhanauti river. He contended that the liquor was not in his possession, the location did not belong to him, and that he was …
The petitioner, Ravi Ranjan Singh, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 40 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that another individual, …
The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(d) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 40 litres of Jawa Mahua and 100 litres of raw Jawa. He argued that no contraband was seized from his possession, the alleged recovery occurred on public …
Ankesh Kumar and Angad Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging that 200 litres of Jawa Mahua were recovered from a poultry farm adjacent to their premises. They argued that nothing was seized from their …
The petitioner, Saroj Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 612 litres of liquor from a public place in front of his house. He argued he has a clean antecedent, the liquor was not …
Mannu Yadav sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, alleging that 90 litres of liquor were recovered from a location not belonging to him and that the only evidence against him was a confessional statement made by Sagar …
The petitioner, Chhote Manjhi, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 30 litres of liquor recovered from his house, which is a joint family property. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at …
The petitioner, Mathura Prasad, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 200 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he was not present at the spot of seizure, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and was …
The petitioner, Gulten Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 27 litres of liquor from a bicycle. He argued he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested on the spot, had no conscious …
The petitioner, Shivam Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for alleged recovery of 1,049.640 litres of liquor from a truck. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, …
Goli Devi sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged possession of liquor recovered from her house and a co‑resident's house. She argued that she had no conscious possession, the liquor was in …
The petitioners, five residents of Bahilwara Bhual, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 120 litres of liquor from a public bush. They argued they have clean antecedents, were not caught in possession, and …
The petitioner, Yash Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 60 litres of liquor from a public pond not in his possession. He has two prior cases under the Excise Act and claims the …
The petitioner, Sanjeev Kumar Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 read with several provisions of the Bihar Excise Act. He has 14 prior criminal cases, 12 of which are excise offences, and the …
Petitioner Sanju Devi sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 5.25 litres of liquor from a public place. She contended that the liquor was not in her possession, that the recovery occurred at a location she …
The petitioners, two young brothers aged 21 and 23, were implicated in a FIR for offences under Section 309(4) and later Section 317(2) of the Bihar Negotiable (BNS) Act, based on an informant’s claim that unknown assailants looted a tractor at gunpoint. They argued that the FIR named unknown …
The petitioner, Ramdhir Singh, was named in an FIR alleging assault, grievous hurt and attempted murder arising from a property dispute with his cousin, the informant. The FIR was lodged six days after the alleged incident and later amended to include Section 307 of the IPC, raising questions about …
