Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
5892 judgments · newest first · showing 3001–3200
Santosh Kumar Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a FIR alleging forced sexual intercourse, assault and other offences under Sections 64, 74, 351(2), 115(2) and 3(5) of the BNSS. The informant, Sahana Khatoon, claimed the petitioner abducted her, assaulted her and forced a …
The petitioner, Sonu Singh, was charged under IPC sections 326, 307, 120B and Arms Act section 27 for allegedly causing firearm injury. He has eight prior criminal cases, but his name does not appear in the FIR; it was mentioned only in the confessional statement of co‑accused Bhajju Thakur, who had …
The petitioner, Dilip Sahani, applied for regular bail in a case registered under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) and the Arms Act. The charges include offences under Sections 10, 11, 13, 18B and 20 of the UAPA and Sections 25(1‑b)(a) and 26 of the Arms Act. The petitioner had …
The petitioner, Govinda Ram, was arrested in connection with a murder case (Sugauli PS Case No.530/2023) alleging offences under Sections 302, 201, 120(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. He claimed a clean antecedent, a long‑standing marriage, and that the informant (the victim's mother) had …
Petitioner Prabhat Sharma applied for bail in a case arising from a land‑dispute assault where he and his son were allegedly attacked, resulting in injuries. The FIR charges him under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, including offences relating to assault and grievous hurt. The …
The petitioner, Gulshan Kumar, was arrested in connection with a dowry death case (Sections 304B and 34 IPC read with Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act) concerning the death of his wife within seven years of marriage. He applied for bail, asserting a clean antecedent, claiming the …
The petitioners, three brothers from Terasiya, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS No.152 of 2025) involving alleged extortion, assault and stabbing under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023. They argued they have clean records and were falsely implicated by …
The petitioner, Bhola Kumar (also known as Aman Kumar), was arrested on charges of kidnapping a minor girl, the daughter of the informant, under Sections 365, 366(A) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 8 of the POCSO Act. He has been in custody since 22 October 2025 and claims that the …
The petitioner, Nandu Sahani, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 265 litres of liquor and a motorcycle. He argued that he was not in possession of the seized items, was not the owner of the vehicle, …
The petitioner, Devendra Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of large quantities of liquor. He argued that the liquor was located in a joint family house, that he had no conscious possession, and that the 2018 …
The petitioner, Rupesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 414 of the IPC and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 745.5 litres of liquor from two cars and four motorcycles. He argued that he had a clean antecedent and that the …
Petitioners Sonu Kumar and Nagendra Ram were arrested while their anticipatory bail application was pending. They approached the High Court seeking permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The court examined the request and, finding no legal impediment, granted permission to …
The petitioner, Ritesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 20 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession and that he was unaware his friend, …
The petitioner, Kanhaiya Chaudhary, filed a second anticipatory bail application in a criminal miscellaneous case arising from PS Malsalami, Patna. The petitioner’s counsel sought the court’s permission to withdraw this application. The learned judge considered the request and granted permission for …
Shivam Kumar sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections 30(a), 36 and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 270.72 litres of illicit liquor from a car. The petitioner argued that he had …
The petitioner, Amit Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, alleging that liquor was recovered from a vehicle not owned by him and that he was implicated solely on secret information. He disclosed three prior …
The petitioner, Momindra Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where 50 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a garden behind a primary school, a location he did not control and from which nothing was seized from his …
The petitioner, Ram Briksha Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 12 litres of liquor from a public bush. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and the alleged …
The petitioner, Dharemandra Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 36 litres of liquor recovered from a scooty he owned. He argued that he was not in possession at the time, that the vehicle was misused by …
Petitioner Pintu Kumar, who has four prior criminal cases (three under the Excise Act), sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 400 litres of liquor from a Tata Sumo vehicle. He contended that he …
The petitioners, Suman Kamati and Raj Kumari Devi, were implicated in a case alleging recovery of 27 litres of liquor from a motorcycle, invoking Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. They sought anticipatory bail, arguing …
The petitioners Sobha Sah, Ramratan Kumar and Bhola Sah sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act alleging recovery of 105 litres of liquor from an orchard. They contended that they were not in conscious …
The petitioner, Rohit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after a seizure of 34.5 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned, alleging he had no knowledge of the contravention and a clean criminal record. The State opposed the bail, arguing the seizure implicated him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar …
The petitioner, Komal Yadav, filed an anticipatory bail application in the High Court of Patna in connection with a criminal case arising from an excise matter. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and instead surrender to the …
The petitioner, Krishna Sah, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 alleging that 25 litres of liquor were recovered from his joint‑family house. He contended that he was not arrested at the scene, no liquor was …
Munna Kewat was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 40 litres of liquor recovered from his house, which is a joint family property. The petitioner argued that the liquor was not found in his conscious possession and that the case was based on …
The petitioner, Guddu Yadav, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 288 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He contended that he was not apprehended on the spot, had no possession of the liquor, and was not the owner of the motorcycles, …
Vikky Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where liquor was allegedly recovered from premises adjacent to his house and from a location behind another individual's house. The petitioner argued that no liquor was found in his possession …
The petitioner, Surya Chaudhary, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 0.18 litre of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession …
Petitioner Punam Sharma applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018-22 for alleged possession of 0.555 litre of liquor in a motorcycle she owned. She argued that she had a clean antecedent, …
The petitioner, Dhiraj Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 30.375 litres of liquor recovered from his joint family house. He argued that he had no direct possession, the liquor was not found on his …
Petitioner Kavita Devi, a widow residing in a joint family house, faced arrest in a case alleging possession of 40 litres of liquor at her home and 16 litres at another house, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. She contended that she had no conscious …
Arjun Kumar Chaudhary applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of liquor. He asserted a clean antecedent and argued that the liquor was recovered from a location not belonging to him and that he was not …
Savita Devi, owner of a vehicle from which 92.73 litres of liquor was seized, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. She argued she had no knowledge of the liquor, the driver acted without her consent, and she has a clean criminal record. The State …
The petitioner, Gaurav Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for the alleged recovery of 0.9 litres of liquor from a car he owned. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware …
Josna Kumari, the owner of a motorcycle from which 10.875 litres of liquor was seized, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act. She argued that she had no knowledge of the liquor being in the vehicle, had a clean criminal record, and that …
Vikash Kumar sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly recovering 105 litres of liquor from a public bush. He argued that he had no possession of the liquor, the location was not his property, …
The petitioner, Lalbabu Rai, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of liquor recovered from his house and that of another person. He argued that the liquor was not found in his conscious possession, the house …
Petitioner Rajan Ram sought anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 86.4 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, was not the owner of the vehicle, and …
The petitioner, Mauni Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for alleged possession of liquor recovered from a location adjacent to her house. She argued that the liquor was not in her conscious possession, the …
Vijay Sah was arrested in connection with a case registered under multiple sections of the B.N.S. in Aurai, Muzaffarpur. He had earlier applied for regular bail, which was rejected, and after the charge sheet was filed, he renewed his bail application. The State opposed bail on the ground that the …
Ravi Kumar, a first‑time offender, was arrested on 3 March 2025 in connection with a violent incident in which the informant’s son and husband were assaulted, the latter later dying from injuries. He faces multiple offences under the Indian Penal Code, including assault, causing grievous hurt, and …
The petitioner, Jagarnath Mukhiya, was arrested on 2 May 2025 in connection with an alleged dowry‑related death of his wife, who was said to have died on 1 May 2025. The informant alleged that after a 13‑year marriage and the birth of three children, the petitioner and others demanded a motorcycle, …
The petitioner, Sahim Mohammad, was arrested in connection with offences under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018 and the NDPS Act. He filed a regular bail application, which was his second attempt after an earlier bail denial on 26‑04‑2024. The High Court, after hearing counsel for both …
The petitioner, Md. Bilal, was arrested in connection with a case registered under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, including extortion, robbery, and assault. The informant alleged that Bilal forcibly seized Rs.1,30,000 and demanded a larger sum, while the petitioner claimed the informant …
The petitioner, Puttu Singh, was arrested in connection with offences under Sections 302, 120B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He has been in judicial custody since 21 January 2020 and this was his fourth application for regular bail. The petitioner’s counsel argued …
The petitioner, Manoj Kumar, sought bail in a criminal case registered under Sections 80, 238 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, alleging that he is a person of clean antecedent and has been in custody since 30 July 2025. The informant alleged that the petitioner and others killed …
The petitioner, Surya Prakash, was arrested in connection with a murder case (PS Harnaut Case No. 10 of 2020) involving offences under Sections 302, 120B, 34 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He was not named in the FIR, but his name appeared in the confessional statement of co‑accused …
The petitioner, Junaid Khan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving alleged recovery of 4,311.72 litres of liquor from a truck, with charges under IPC sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018 sections 30(a), 32(1)(ii), 36 and 41. He …
The petitioner, Lakhindra Rai, was arrested on 19‑11‑2024 in connection with the recovery of 52 kg of ganja from a vehicle and charged under Section 317(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 8 and 20(b)(ii)(c) of the NDPS Act. He applied for bail, claiming a clean antecedent, that he was …
The petitioner, Nil Mani Singh, sought bail in a case registered under Sections 316(2), 318(4) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, alleging that he was falsely implicated in a fraud involving Nirmal Vishwas Nidhi Ltd. Bank. The informant claimed that the accused, who were directors and agents …
The petitioner, Saroj Sahni, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 80 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, alleging that he was falsely implicated in the death of his wife, who the informant claimed was killed over a dowry demand. The petitioner asserted a …
The petitioner, Santosh Mandal, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 274, 275 of the Bihar Negotiable Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 375 ml of liquor recovered from a room in front of his house. He argued …
The petitioner, Rajesh Kumar, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 307, 34, 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. This was his third attempt to obtain bail, having previously filed a bail petition (Cr. Misc No. 88602 of 2024) which was rejected on …
The petitioner, Sanjay Dubey, was charged under Sections 103(1), 3(5) and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He had earlier applied for regular bail (Cr. Misc No. 34084 of 2025) which was rejected on 6-8-2025. He filed a second bail application (Cr. Misc No. 80709 …
Prince Kumar Pandey was charged under Sections 30(a), 32(i)(iii) and 41(i)(ii) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 72.280 litres of liquor from a vehicle he owned. He argued that he was not present at the spot of seizure, had no conscious possession of the liquor and was unaware that …
The petitioner, Rajesh Prasad, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 76.075 litres of liquor recovered from his house. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was located in a joint‑family property and that he had no conscious …
The petitioner, Anil Bind, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where police alleged recovery of 17 litres of liquor from his house and 300 litres of semi‑manufactured liquor from a nearby location. He argued he has a clean antecedent, that …
The petitioner, Rana Pratap Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 14.58 litres of liquor from a bush near his house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the recovery site did …
The petitioner, Kanhai Sahani, applied for regular bail in a case where police recovered 1.538 kg of charas and 200 litres of spirit from his premises, alleging offences under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act and the NDPS Act. The petitioner claimed a clean antecedent and had been in custody …
The petitioner, Dayanand Kumar Gupta, filed an anticipatory bail application in connection with PS case No. 66 of 2025. He later approached the court seeking permission to withdraw that application. The primary issue before the court was whether the petitioner could be allowed to withdraw his …
The petitioner, Ravi Kumar, had filed an anticipatory bail application under the Criminal Procedure Code. While the application was pending, he was arrested. He then sought the court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The court, after hearing counsel for both sides, granted …
The petitioner, Gaurav Kumar Yadav, filed a restoration application for Criminal Appeal (SJ) No. 730 of 2025, which had been previously dismissed or stayed. The State of Bihar and a co-accused were the opposite parties. Counsel for both sides appeared before the Hon'ble Justice Satyavrat Verma. The …
Vivek Kumar filed a petition seeking restoration of Criminal Miscellaneous No. 91979 of 2025, which had been previously closed. The petitioner, represented by Mr. Shahrukh Shiddiqui, argued that the grounds for restoration were valid. The State of Bihar, represented by Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey, opposed …
Awadhesh Sah, the petitioner, had been granted anticipatory bail with a condition to surrender to the court within a specified time. He failed to surrender within that period and subsequently filed an application seeking modification of the bail order to extend the surrender deadline. The court …
The petitioner, Ambuj Kumar, filed a restoration application seeking to have Criminal Miscellaneous No. 2275 of 2026 reinstated to its original file. The court examined the grounds raised in the application. Finding no impediment, Justice Satyavrat Verma ordered that the case be restored. The order …
The petitioners, Banti Devi and others, had been granted anticipatory bail by the High Court of Patna with a condition to surrender to the police within a specified time. They failed to surrender before the expiry of that period and subsequently filed a modification application seeking an extension …
The petitioner, Bhola Kumar, filed a restoration application before the Patna High Court seeking to have his earlier bail restored. He later approached the Court requesting permission to withdraw that application. The learned counsel for the petitioner argued that the withdrawal should be allowed. …
The petitioners, Anup Singh and Haripal Singh, filed a restoration application concerning criminal miscellaneous case No.59738 of 2025 arising from a police report in Rasulpur, Saran. They sought to have the case reinstated to its original file. The State of Bihar opposed the application. The …
Shobhnath Kumar, the petitioner, feared arrest in a case registered under Sections 191(2), 126(2), 115(2), 132, 351(2) and 352 of the Bihar Negotiable Sale Act, 2023. He had earlier filed an anticipatory bail application which was withdrawn, and was advised he could approach the court again. He …
The petitioner, America Yadav, had been granted anticipatory bail on 5 February 2026 with the condition that his father, Shaligram Yadav, act as one of the bailors. It was later pointed out that the father had died on 8 April 2019, and the order mistakenly omitted the term 'late' before his name. …
The petitioners, Suryakant Kumar and Chandan Kumar, were charged under Sections 30(a), 32(3), 41, 62 and 56(b) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 544.32 litres of liquor from a house rented by them. The prosecution alleged that the liquor was found in an asbestos‑room of Raman Kumar’s …
The petitioner, Sumit Kumar, was arrested in connection with alleged kidnapping, theft (IPC s.363) and rape (IPC s.376) as well as offences under the POCSO Act (ss.4,6). The victim, a minor, submitted a letter claiming she was in love with the petitioner, had eloped, and that her statements to the …
Amit Yadav was charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code (147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 302, 506) and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He applied for regular bail, marking his fifth attempt to obtain it. The petitioner’s counsel argued for release, but the court noted that the matter had already …
The petitioner, Digvijay Singh, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 304B, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code relating to the death of his wife. He pleaded that he has a clean record, was falsely implicated, and that the medical evidence indicated death due to cardiac …
The petitioner, Ritesh @ Vinit Kumar, challenged the factual description in Para‑4 of the trial court's order dated 25‑02‑2026, which incorrectly stated that he entered his house and shot his husband. The petitioner argued that the FIR records indicate the incident occurred in the informant's field, …
Rabindra Kumar Sharma was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 80 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita concerning the death of his wife, who allegedly committed suicide. He contended that he was falsely implicated, asserting that he and his wife had eloped, married, and had a child, …
The petitioner, Sumit Kumar, was charged under Sections 304B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for the death of his wife, which occurred within seven years of marriage. He applied for bail, claiming he was falsely implicated, that the death was not a dowry death, and that the victim had strangulated …
The petitioner, Md. Matin Alam, sought bail in a case registered under Sections 103(1), 238 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023, relating to the alleged murder of Md. Taufique, the son of the informant. The FIR alleges that Taufique fled with the petitioner's sister, was later recaptured, and his body was …
The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 103(1) and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleging that he was not named in the FIR and that his name only appeared in a confessional statement of co‑accused Deepak @ Bhogi. He …
The petitioner, Bhola Bhokta, was charged in Lutua Police Station Case No.02 of 2018, pending before the Additional Sessions Judge-IV, Sherghati, Gaya. He filed a second application for regular bail (Criminal Miscellaneous No.59205 of 2025) after an earlier bail plea was rejected on 11-12-2024. The …
The petitioner, Raunak Kumar, was arrested in connection with alleged extortion and unlawful possession of arms under IPC Sections 385, 387 and Arms Act Section 27. He claimed the allegations were false, arguing that the ransom demand was made by an unknown person and that the mobile number used …
Santosh Sahani, the petitioner, had filed a regular bail application in a criminal case. While that application was pending, he was granted default bail by the court. The petitioner then sought the court's permission to withdraw his regular bail application. The learned counsel for the petitioner …
The petitioner, Kaisar Miya, was arrested on 06‑03‑2025 for alleged kidnapping of the minor daughter of an informant under Sections 137 and 96 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023. He contended that the alleged kidnapping was a consensual elopement and that the victim’s statement recorded …
The petitioner, Ramakant Mal, was arrested on 29 May 2025 in connection with an assault on Bhagmani Devi that allegedly caused her death on 28 May 2025. He faces charges under several sections of the BNS, including offences of assault, homicide, and related offences. The petitioner argued that he …
The petitioner, Ranjeet Chaudhary, applied for regular bail in a criminal case under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. This was his second bail application after a prior petition was rejected on 18 January 2025. The trial in the matter has already commenced, with three witnesses examined …
The petitioners, Gorakh Yadav and co‑accused, were charged under Sections 341, 307 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly firing a weapon that injured a person in the Masaurhi case (PS No. 670 of 2021). The petitioners applied for regular bail, marking their …
The petitioner, Amit Kumar Yadav, was charged under IPC Sections 307 (attempt to murder) and 34 (common intention) and Section 27 of the Arms Act for alleged firing at an injured person. He has ten prior criminal cases and his earlier bail application was rejected. The petitioner argued that a …
The petitioner, Abhay Panjiyara, was arrested in connection with a 2016 case involving alleged shootings that resulted in one death and injuries to another. He faces charges under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 302 and 307, the Arms Act (Sec. 27) and the Explosive Substances Act (Secs. 3 and 4). The …
The petitioner, Nandlal Chaudhary, was arrested in connection with offences under Sections 103(1), 238 and 3(5) of the Bihar Negotiable Substances Act, 2023, following the alleged murder of his sister‑in‑law. The informant, brother of the deceased’s husband, claimed that the petitioner and his wife …
The petitioner, Gautam Kumar Yadav, filed a regular bail application in a criminal miscellaneous case arising from PS case No‑7 of 2016. After hearing, the petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the bail application, seeking liberty to re‑file after the charge is framed. The Court …
The petitioner, Keshav Rai, was charged in Vaishali Police Station Case No. 509 of 2023 for allegedly causing firearm injury to a victim. He filed a regular bail application, which was his fourth attempt before the High Court. The court examined the specific allegations of a serious offence …
The petitioner, Golu Kumar, was charged under Sections 307 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly firing a weapon that injured Pankaj Kumar. He has nine prior criminal cases and has been in custody since 12 March 2025. The petitioner sought regular bail, arguing …
The petitioner, Rahul Yadav, was arrested in connection with the death of his wife, who died within seven years of marriage. The informant, the victim's mother, alleged dowry demands, torture, and that the death was caused by throttling, invoking the presumption against the husband under Sections 80 …
The petitioner, Om Prakash Yadav, was arrested in connection with a FIR alleging offences under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Arms Act, including murder and assault. He had previously filed two anticipatory bail applications which were withdrawn, and was in custody since April …
The petitioner, Rajeshwar Paswan, applied for bail in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471, 341, 323, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, relating to a fraud scheme for government jobs. He claimed a clean antecedent, senior citizen status, and that he was falsely …
The petitioner, Sunil Kumar, was arrested on 8 March 2025 in connection with a robbery (Section 392 IPC) based on an FIR against unknown persons and a confessional statement of an apprehended accused, which the court held lacked evidentiary value. The petitioner, who has three prior cases, sought …
The petitioners, a group of relatives from Laukahi village in Madhubani, filed a criminal appeal (SJ) No. 3627 of 2025 against the State of Bihar and an individual named Ram Briksh Das. The appeal had previously been dismissed or withdrawn, prompting the petitioners to file a restoration …
Baidhnath Prasad appealed against his conviction in a criminal case from East Champaran. During the hearing, the appellant's senior counsel requested permission to withdraw the appeal and sought liberty for the appellant to apply for bail after the charge was framed. The court considered the request …
The petitioner, Prakash Yadav, applied for bail in a criminal case registered under Sections 127(1), 115(2), 109, 76, 352, 351 and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023, alleging assault on Pappi Devi with a blunt object causing a simple head injury. The petitioner had one prior case but the police had already …
The petitioners, Chandan Kumar and others, were charged under Sections 103(1) and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act for the alleged killing of Mukesh Chhotan. They sought regular bail, claiming they were not named in the FIR and that their names emerged only from a …
The petitioner, Ranjit Kumar, was arrested in connection with a FIR alleging multiple offences under sections 126(2), 127(2), 115(2), 118(1), 74, 109, 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bihar Negotiable Substances Act, 2023. He contended that he was falsely implicated, that the FIR was vague, and …
Petitioner Pravin Kumar Singh filed an anticipatory bail application in the Patna High Court. While the application was pending, he was arrested. He then sought permission from the court to withdraw his anticipatory bail application. The court, after hearing counsel for both sides, granted …
Saulesh Kumar Singh filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. While the application was pending, the petitioner was arrested by the police. The petitioner’s counsel then sought the court’s permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The court granted …
Lalita Devi filed an anticipatory bail application in the Patna High Court. While the application was pending, she surrendered to the authorities. Her counsel then sought the court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The court granted the request, holding that a petitioner …
Shankar Sah and Vijay Sah filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the application, the police arrested both petitioners. Their counsel then applied for permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The Court, after hearing the parties, …
Petitioner Puja Kumari filed an anticipatory bail application in the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the application, she surrendered to the authorities and sought to withdraw the bail application. The petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw, and the State’s counsel was heard. …
Madan Rai applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case alleging offences under Sections 30(a) and 37(c) of the Excise Act, involving the alleged recovery of 30 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. The petitioner argued that he had a clean …
The petitioner, Pahlad Chaudhary, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022, alleging that 180 litres of liquor were recovered from a public place and not from his possession. He has five prior cases under the Excise Act and claims he was implicated …
Tulasi Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 16.92 litres of liquor from a scooty he owned. He argued that he was not arrested at the scene, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and had a clean criminal …
The petitioner, Sudhir Singh, was arrested in connection with offences under Sections 406, 420 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. He applied for regular bail, contending that the lower court's order mistakenly recorded his date of custody as 30‑04‑2025 instead of the correct date of 13‑05‑2025, and …
The petitioner, Mahendra Mukhiya, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that he was not in possession of the seized liquor and was not the owner of the vehicle involved. The petitioner argued that …
The petitioner, Md. Akbar Alam, filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal miscellaneous case arising from an excise matter. He later sought permission to withdraw that application and instead surrender to the trial court to seek regular bail. The learned counsel for the petitioner …
The petitioner, Ranjeet Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 8(c), 21 and 22(a) of the NDPS Act concerning the alleged recovery of 25.75 litres of liquor and drug injections from a hut associated with five accused persons. The petitioner argued that he …
The petitioner, Dayanand Prasad, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 15 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at …
The petitioner, Mantu Mahato, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 10 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, is not the owner of the …
Karun Kumar was implicated in a case under Section 414 IPC and Sections 30(a) and 45 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for allegedly possessing 0.375 litre of liquor found with Dilip Kumar, who was also in possession of a motorcycle owned by Karun Kumar. The petitioner argued that he had …
Petitioner Pintu Kumar Singh had filed an anticipatory bail application in the High Court of Patna. While the application was pending, he was arrested. He then sought the court's permission to withdraw his anticipatory bail application. The court, after hearing counsel, granted the permission to …
The petitioner, Jyoti Devi, sought anticipatory bail after learning that she might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, for allegedly possessing 5 litres of liquor recovered from a plastic bag. She argued that she had no prior criminal record, was …
Guddu Kamat sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where liquor was allegedly recovered from two vehicles. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the vehicles, and his implication …
The petitioner, Abhimanyu Kumar, was arrested while his anticipatory bail application was pending before the Patna High Court. He sought permission to withdraw that application after his arrest. The court entertained the petitioner's request and granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the …
The petitioner, Shambhu Saw, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 55 litres of liquor recovered from his house, which is a joint family property. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the scene, and that the 2018 …
The petitioner, Narayan Mishra, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for allegedly possessing 8.280 litres of liquor recovered from a scooty he owned. He argued that he was not present at the spot, the liquor was not in his conscious possession, …
The petitioner, Kundan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning of a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 180 litres of liquor from a public area near the Gandak river. He argued that the liquor was not found in his possession, the location did not …
The petitioner, Brijmohan Manjhi, filed an anticipatory bail application which was pending when he was arrested. He subsequently sought the court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The petitioner’s counsel argued that withdrawal was appropriate given the arrest. The court, …
The petitioner, Nandu Paswan, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 20 litres of liquor recovered from a house that is part of a joint family property. The prosecution’s case relied mainly on a confessional statement made by the petitioner’s …
The petitioner, Karamu Paswan, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 25 litres of liquor from a government drainage. The petitioner argued that he was not …
Vikash Kumar, the owner of a vehicle from which 60 litres of liquor were seized, sought anticipatory bail, claiming he had no knowledge of the driver’s alleged misuse of the vehicle and possessed a clean criminal record. The State opposed the bail, arguing the offence under Section 30(a) of the …
Petitioner Pintu Ravidas was arrested while his anticipatory bail application was pending before the Patna High Court. His counsel sought the Court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application in view of the arrest. The Court considered whether a petitioner may withdraw an anticipatory …
Arjun Choudhary filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. While the application was pending, he was arrested by the police. The petitioner, through counsel, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The Court, after hearing both sides, …
The petitioners, Dhiraj Kumar and Indal Sahni, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 120 litres of liquor and 3000 litres of raw Jawa Mahua solution near the Gandak river. They argued they have clean …
Chandan Kumar applied for anticipatory bail in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 3,602.16 litres of liquor from a truck. He claimed he was not arrested at the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and was not the owner of the seized vehicle, …
The petitioner, Sunil Kamat, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, relating to the alleged recovery of 135 litres of liquor from a Scorpio vehicle. He argued …
The petitioners, Dilip Chauhan and Ganauri Chauhan, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 75 litres of liquor. They argued that the liquor was seized from a location not belonging to them …
The petitioner, Pappu Kumar Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, for alleged possession of liquor recovered from his joint family house and another's house. He argued he had a clean antecedent, the liquor was not in his …
The petitioner, Sanjeet Mahto, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 47.76 litres of liquor from a location not belonging to him. He contended that he was not arrested at …
The petitioner, Binod Choudhary, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 20 litres of liquor from a bicycle. He was not caught in possession and the prosecution’s case relied on a confessional statement made by Shiv Kumar while in police custody, …
The petitioner, Rohit Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 169.5 litres of liquor along with arms and cartridges. He has three prior cases and a separate FIR (Case No. 716 of 2025) concerning the arms, for which he …
Rakesh Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in a case registered under Section 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging that he was not arrested on the spot, had no possession of the seized liquor, and was implicated …
The petitioners, Dharmendra Sahni and Brijesh Sahni, were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 157.64 litres of liquor from a public bush. They argued that they were not arrested at the spot, had no conscious possession, and were implicated by …
The petitioner, Vikash Yadav, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that he was implicated solely on the basis of a confessional statement made by Uttam Sarkar while in police custody. The petitioner argued that no liquor was recovered …
The petitioner, Niraj Tiwari, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 8 and 20(B)(ii)(B) of the NDPS Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for alleged possession of 5.4 litres of liquor and 1 kilogram of ganja. He claimed …
The petitioner, Sunarpati Devi, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 160.7 litres of liquor from her house and 22.4 litres from another house. She argued that she was not caught in the act, no liquor was found in her conscious possession, and the …
The petitioner, Jitendra Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 26.25 litres of liquor and a motorcycle from Shankar Kumar's house. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, that the vehicle was merely owned by him, …
The petitioner, Abhishek Kushwaha, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 35 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, the liquor was not found in his …
The petitioner, Renu Devi, filed an anticipatory bail application in the High Court of Patna. While the application was pending, she was arrested by the police. She then approached the court seeking permission to withdraw her anticipatory bail application. The learned counsel for the petitioner …
Manish Kumar was implicated in a case alleging recovery of 33.125 litres of liquor from his house, charging him under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was stored in a joint‑family property and not in his personal possession, …
The petitioner, Ranjit Shah, applied for anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 alleging recovery of 17.28 litres of liquor from a bush and garbage. He contended that he was not arrested at the scene, no liquor was found …
The petitioner, Ramnigah Paswan, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 198 litres of liquor from a public area near the Bagmati river. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, the liquor was not in his …
Horil Mukhiya and Gauri Mukhiya sought relief from arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging the recovery of 45 litres of liquor from a public riverbank. They argued they had no possession of the liquor, the alleged informant was not named in the FIR, and they possessed a …
The petitioner, Ramesh Pasi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of liquor from public areas with no direct possession. He argued that the alleged recovery occurred at locations not owned …
Mukesh Kumar, the owner of a motorcycle from which 52.185 litres of liquor was seized, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was unaware of his friend’s misuse of the vehicle, and …
The petitioner, Rajo Ram, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 9.75 litres of liquor from a public area near a water tank. He was not arrested at the scene and no liquor was found in his possession. The petitioner sought anticipatory bail, …
Ranju Devi was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 54 litres of liquor from her residence, which is a joint family property. She contended that she had no conscious possession of the liquor, had a clean antecedent, and that the prosecution’s …
The petitioner, Rohit Kumar Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS Barhat Case No. 158 of 2025) involving multiple offences under the Bihar Negotiable S... Act, 2023. The FIR alleged that a dispute over a DJ set led to a group assault, during which the petitioner’s relatives …
Barun Singh, a 65‑year‑old senior citizen with a clean record, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 45 of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly obstructing a police raid on Chhotu Singh's house. The petitioner claimed the allegation was false and motivated by an …
The petitioner, Nita Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 390 litres of liquor and 1,000 litres of Jawa solution from a hut adjacent to her residence. She asserted that she had no conscious possession …
The petitioner, Sambhu Kumar Mukhiya, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 8 litres of liquor on a motorcycle. He argued that he has a clean …
The petitioner, Vijay Paswan, feared arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Excise Act relating to the alleged recovery of 10 litres of liquor and 1,200 litres of fermented Jawa Mahua from a public canal area. He argued that nothing was seized from his conscious possession, the …
The petitioner, Raju Chauhan, applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, relating to the alleged recovery of 25 litres of liquor and a motorcycle from a brick kiln owned by …
The petitioner, Vijendra Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 75 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued he has a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was implicated merely as the …
Arjun Paswan sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 30(c) and 30(d) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 95 litres of liquor from five locations. He argued that the liquor was not found in his possession, the recovery was from premises not belonging to …
The petitioner, Sania Priyadarsi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 15 litres of liquor from a scooty she owned. She argued she had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware …
Kuldev Yadav filed an anticipatory bail application which was pending when he was arrested. He subsequently sought the court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The petitioner’s counsel argued for withdrawal, and the State’s counsel was heard. The court granted permission to …
The petitioner, Narayan Kumar Mallick, was arrested in connection with a case alleging offences under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 476 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code relating to a disputed sale deed and alleged misappropriation of Rs.5 lakh. The informant claims the petitioner must return the …
The petitioner, Subin Kumar, was arrested in connection with a dowry‑death case involving his wife’s death, alleged to have occurred within a year of marriage. He faces charges under IPC Sections 341, 323, 498A, 307, 34, 304B, 302 and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, as well as allegations of …
The petitioner, Sunil Kumar Rai, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 137(2), 140(3) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, alleging that he and other accused lured the informant's daughter, failed to return her, and subsequently executed a sale deed in the name of the …
Vishal Kumar was arrested in connection with an alleged honour killing in which the son of an informant and the daughter of the deceased were found dead. The petitioner sought regular bail under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023, claiming a clean antecedent and arguing that his …
Om Prakash @ Upendra was charged under Sections 395, 412 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code for alleged dacoity, robbery and criminal conspiracy. He applied for bail before the Patna High Court, marking his third attempt to obtain relief. The court noted that the investigation had produced …
The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar, was involved in a criminal case (PS. Case No.108 of 2020) and filed a regular bail application before the Patna High Court. After hearing, the petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the bail application. The court considered whether it could permit the …
The Patna High Court considered bail applications filed by six petitioners in separate criminal miscellaneous cases arising from a gold‑showroom loot alleged under Sections 310(2) and 111(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, and, in one case, also under Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 35 of the …
The petitioner, Bhullu Rai, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 103, 61(2) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, alleging that she was falsely implicated in the death of a child. The informant, the child's mother, claimed that the petitioner had pressured her to …
The petitioner, Pankaj Jha, applied for regular bail in a case involving multiple serious offences under the Bihar Penal Code, including assault, arson, and homicide. The FIR alleges that he, along with several co‑accused, attacked members of the informant's family, set fire to the informant's …
Bittu Manjhi was arrested in connection with kidnapping of a minor girl and alleged rape, facing charges under Sections 363, 366(A), 506 and 120(B) of the IPC. The petitioner contended that he has a clean record, was falsely implicated, and that the victim’s medical report did not corroborate the …
The petitioner, Md. Saheb, was charged under Sections 137(2) and 96 of the Bihar Negotiable Substances Act, 2023, for allegedly kidnapping the minor daughter of an informant. The petitioner claimed the act was a consensual elopement and that the victim, now 19, had initially denied the charges under …
The petitioner, Shatrudhan Prasad, was arrested on charges of kidnapping and sexual offences under IPC sections 366A, 34, 376 and POCSO Act sections 4 and 6, alleged to have abducted the minor daughter of an informant. He has been in custody since 19‑01‑2025 and the charges have been framed. The …
The petitioner, Bablu Yadav, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 147, 304(B) and 316 of the Indian Penal Code, alleging that he was falsely implicated in the death of his wife. The prosecution argued that the death occurred within seven years of marriage, invoking a …
Petitioner Parwej Alam applied for bail in a criminal miscellaneous case concerning alleged violations of Sections 20(b)II(c), 23, 25 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. No counsel appeared for the petitioner, while the State was represented by Advocate on Record …
Dipesh Kumar was arrested in connection with a murder (IPC Sec. 302/34) and several offences under the Arms Act. He had been in custody since 04‑06‑2025 and sought regular bail, arguing that his implication arose only from a co‑accused's confession, which he claimed lacked evidentiary value, and …
The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, was acquitted in the trial of a criminal case. Following the acquittal, he filed a regular bail application. The petitioner sought the court's permission to withdraw this bail application, arguing that it was no longer necessary. The learned counsel for the State …
Petitioner Puja Devi sought regular bail in a case registered under Sections 115(2), 118, 103 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., alleging that she was falsely implicated in an assault that resulted in the death of the informant's wife. The FIR, filed by the petitioner’s father‑in‑law, alleged that the …
The Patna High Court considered five separate bail applications filed by individuals accused of looting a gold showroom, with charges under Sections 310(2) and 111(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and various provisions of the Arms Act. In each case the State argued that the accused …
The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 304B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code concerning the death of his wife within seven years of marriage. The State argued that the presumption under Section 304B places the husband and his family on the opposite …
The petitioners, Pramod Kumar and Vikash Kumar, were charged in a case arising from an alleged assault on the son of an informant on 7 March 2025, involving lathi, iron rod and stones. The informant, not an eye‑witness, based the FIR on a friend’s account that the deceased, an army personnel, had …
The petitioner, Hira Kumar, applied for bail in a criminal case (PS Case No. 458 of 2021) involving offences under Sections 395, 412 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code, relating to dacoity, robbery and criminal conspiracy. This was his second attempt to obtain bail after the trial had already …
The Patna High Court considered bail applications filed by five petitioners—Abhishek Kumar, Nitin Kumar, Gaurav Kumar, Gautam Kumar, and another Gautam Kumar—who were charged under Sections 310(2) and 111(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and, in one case, under Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and …
The petitioners, Pramod Kumar, Vikash Kumar and others, were charged in Tekari police case No.121 of 2025 for offences under several sections of the B.N.S., alleged to have assaulted the son of an informant on a motorcycle. The informant’s son was reportedly injured by lathi, iron rod and stones, …
The Patna High Court considered bail applications filed by six petitioners in separate criminal miscellaneous cases arising from a gold‑showroom loot alleged under Sections 310(2) and 111(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, and, in one case, also under Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 35 of the …
The petitioner, Santu Kumar (also known as Amrit Raj), filed a regular bail application in the Patna High Court. Earlier bail applications by Pramod Kumar and Vikash Kumar were rejected, with the court allowing them to renew their prayers after the charge was framed. The petitioner’s counsel argued …
The petitioner, Md. Massi, was arrested on 20-07-2024 in connection with an NDPS case involving the alleged recovery of 800 ml of prohibited cough syrup and 20 strips of Nitrazepam tablets from a sweet shop. He sought bail, claiming false implication and asserting that he would not abscond and would …
The petitioner, Vishwanath Rai, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case alleging violation of Sections 30(a) and 37 of the Excise Act for possession of 5 litres of liquor. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, the liquor was …
Dukhan Bind, a resident of Begumpur Baghautpur, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 80 litres of liquor from a jointly owned family house. The petitioner, asserting a clean criminal record and arguing that the liquor was …
Petitioners Ram Sikil Yadav, Ravindra Yadav and Sanjit Yadav sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act for alleged assault on a woman and her husband. They contended that the FIR was filed nine days after the alleged …
Manjit Kumar (also known as Bottle Yadav) sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, alleging that 32.925 litres of liquor were recovered from his house, which is a joint family property. The petitioner argued that …
The petitioners, Manoj Kumar Sah and Suman Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 10 litres of liquor from a bamboo orchard. They argued that they were not arrested on the spot, the liquor was not in …
The petitioner, Phuldeo Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a), 32 and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where liquor was allegedly recovered from premises adjacent to his house but not from his possession. He argued …
The petitioner, Anguri Bind, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 40 litres of liquor from a public area near the Panchayat Bhawan. The petitioner argued that he was not caught in possession, the liquor was …
The petitioner, Pappu Kumar Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where 42.720 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a bamboo orchard not belonging to him. He argued that no liquor was found in …
The petitioner, Rameshwar Dhangad, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 27 litres of liquor from a washroom adjacent to his house. He claimed the liquor was not in his conscious possession and that a watchman, with whom he had an inimical …
The petitioner, Surendra Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where police alleged recovery of 16 litres of liquor from a mango orchard and 4.4 litres from a location behind his house. He contended that no liquor was found in his …
