Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Gautam Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL REJECTED

Holding

The Court permitted the withdrawal of the regular bail application, dismissing it as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Gautam Kumar Yadav, filed a regular bail application in a criminal miscellaneous case arising from PS case No‑7 of 2016. After hearing, the petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the bail application, seeking liberty to re‑file after the charge is framed. The Court considered whether such withdrawal is permissible. It granted the request, allowing the petitioner to withdraw the current bail application and to seek bail later. Consequently, the bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether a regular bail application may be withdrawn with liberty to re‑apply after framing of charge

Subjects

  • bail
  • withdrawal
  • regular bail
  • criminal procedure
  • High Court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66672 of 2025
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-7 Year-2016 Thana- SHAMBHUGANJ District- Banka
                 ======================================================
                 Gautam Kumar Yadav Son of Jaishankar Prasad Yadav @ Jayshankar Prasad
                 R/o Village - Belsira, Police Station - Fullidumar, District - Banka.
                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
           1.     The State of Bihar
           2.     The Manager, Bihar State Corporation, Banka. Opp. Parties Bihar
                                                                      ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Ajay Mukherjee, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Parmeshwar Mehta, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   25-02-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned

                   A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of

                   the BSFC.

                                2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioner, after some arguments, seeks permission to withdraw

                   the regular bail application with liberty to the petitioner to

                   renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge.

                                3. Permission is accorded.

                                4. Accordingly, the regular bail application is

                   dismissed as withdrawn.


                                                                       (Satyavrat Verma, J)

Kundan/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.