Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Brijmohan Manjhi @ Vrijmohan PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court permitted the withdrawal of the anticipatory bail application and dismissed it as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Brijmohan Manjhi, filed an anticipatory bail application which was pending when he was arrested. He subsequently sought the court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The petitioner’s counsel argued that withdrawal was appropriate given the arrest. The court, after hearing both sides, granted permission to withdraw the application. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner may withdraw his anticipatory bail application after being arrested

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal of bail application
  • criminal procedure
  • bail

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12019 of 2026
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-16 Year-2026 Thana- NAYAGAON District- Saran
                  ======================================================
                  Brijmohan Manjhi @ Vrijmohan Paswan S/o Baleshwar Manjhi R/o Dumari
                  Bujurg Ward No 6, P.S- Nayagaon, District- Saran

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Subhash Kumar, Advocate
                  For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Sucheta Yadav, APP
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    24-02-2026                        1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                    learned APP for the State.

                                      2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits

                    that petitioner during pendency of the anticipatory bail

                    application was arrested, thus, seeks permission to withdraw the

                    same.

                                    3. Permission is accorded.

                                   4. Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail

                    application is dismissed as withdrawn.



                                                          (Satyavrat Verma, J)
Rishabh/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.