Patna High Court

Rajiv Prasad Verma @ Rajeev Prasad VermaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided: 11 March 2026
Disposal: WITHDRAWN
Bench: SATYAVRAT VERMA

Holding

The court held that the petitioner may withdraw the modification application and ordered it dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Rajiv Prasad Verma, filed a modification application in Criminal Miscellaneous No.15221 of 2026 arising from PS case No.284 of 2025. During the hearing, the petitioner sought the court's permission to withdraw the said application. The learned counsel for the petitioner requested that the modification application be withdrawn, and the court granted this permission. Consequently, the court ordered that the modification application be dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the modification were considered, as the application was withdrawn with the court's approval.

Issues considered

Whether the petitioner is entitled to withdraw a pending modification application in a criminal miscellaneous proceeding

Subjects

Criminal Procedure
Modification Application
Withdrawal of Application
Dismissal

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15221 of 2026
                                               In
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4436 of 2026
                         Arising Out of PS. Case No.-284 Year-2025 Thana- SARAI District- Vaishali
                  ======================================================
                  Rajiv Prasad Verma @ Rajeev Prasad Verma Son of Late Ram Chandra
                  Prasad @ Ram Chandra Prasad Verma R/o Village - Maricha Ram, P.S.- Sarai,
                  Dist - Vaishali.

                                                                                      ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Aniket Singh
                  For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr.Abhay Kumar
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    11-03-2026               1.    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                    learned APP for the State.

                              2.    Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset,

                    seeks permission to withdraw the modification application.

                              3.    Permission is accorded.

                              4.    Accordingly,         the    modification        application       is

                    dismissed as withdrawn.



                                               (Satyavrat Verma, J)
Sumit/-

U         T

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.